Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-xq9c7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-26T22:12:10.520Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

II. Cases Before the Court

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 January 2008

Extract

1. Questions of Interpretation and Application of the 1971 Montreal Convention arising from the Aerial Incident at Lockerbie (Libyan Arab Jamahiriya v. United Kingdom).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Institute of International and Comparative Law 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. I.C.J. Rep. 1992, 3, 14. See Beveridge, F., “The Lockerbie Affair”, (1992) 41 I.C.L.Q. 907.Google Scholar

2. I.C.J. Rep. 1992, 231, 234.

3. See Beveridge, F., Case Note, (1999) 48 I.C.L.Q. 658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

4. I.C.J. Rep. 1998, 237, 240.

5. I.C.J. Rep. 1998, 749.

6. I.C.J. Press Communiqué No. 99/36.

7. I.C.J. Press Communiqué No. 2000/27.

8. I.C.J. Rep. 1992, 763.

9. I.C.J. Rep. 1993, 35.

10. I.C.J. Rep. 1996, 803.

11. See Evans, M. D., Case Note, (1997) 46 I.C.L.Q. 693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

12. I.C.J. Rep. 1996, 902.

13. I.C.J. Rep. 1998, 190.

14. I.C.J. Rep. 1998, 269.

15. I.C.J. Rep. 1998, 740.

16. I.C.J. Press Communiqué No. 2000/26.

17. I.C.J. Rep. 1993, 3.

18. I.C.J. Rep. 1993, 325.

19. See Gray, C., Case Note, (1994) 43 I.C.L.Q. 705.Google Scholar

20. I.C.J. Rep. 1993, 29.

21. I.C.J. Rep. 1993, 470.

22. I.C.J. Rep. 1995, 80.

23. I.C.J. Rep. 1996, 595. See Gray, C., Case Note, (1997) 46 I.C.L.Q. 688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

24. I.C.J. Rep. 1996, 797.

25. I.C.J. Rep. 1997, 243.

26. I.C.J. Rep. 1998, 3.

27. I.C.J. Rep. 1998, 743.

28. I.C.J. Rep. 1997, 7.

29. See Okowa, P. N., Case Note, (1998) 47 I.C.L.Q. 688.Google Scholar

30. I.C.J. Press Communiqué No. 98/28

31. I.C.J. Press Communiqué No. 98/31.

32. I.C.J. Rep. 1994, 105.

33. I.C.J. Rep. 1996, 13. See Merrills, J. G., Case Note, (1997) 46 I.C.L.Q. 676.Google Scholar

34. I.C.J. Rep. 1998, 275.

35. See Merrills, J. G., Case Note, (1999) 48 I.C.L.Q. 651.Google Scholar

36. I.C.J. Rep. 1998, 275.

37. I.C.J. Rep. 1998, 420.

38. I.C.J. Rep. 1999, 24.

39. I.C.J. Press Communiqué No. 2001/4.

40. I.C.J. Rep. 1999, 31. See Merrills, J. G., Case Note, (1999) 48 I.C.L.Q. 651 at 657–658.Google Scholar

41. I.C.J. Press Communiqué No. 99/44. See Merrills, J. G., Case Note, (2000) 49 I.C.L.Q. 720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

42. I.C.J. Rep. 1998, 429.

43. I.C.J. Press Communiqué No. 99/40.

44. I.C.J. Press Communiqué No. 2000/14.

45. I.C.J. Press Communiqué No. 2000/33.

46. I.C.J. Press Communiqué No. 2001/7.

47. I.C.J. Press Communiqué No. 99/49.

48. I.C.J. Press Communiqué No. 2000/28.

49. I.C.J. Rep. 1999, 9. See Addo, M. K., Case Note, (1999) 58 I.C.L.Q. 673.Google Scholar

50. I.C.J. Rep. 1999, 28.

51. I.C.J. Press Communiqué No. 2000/38.

52. I.C.J. Press Communiqué No. 99/39.

53. See Gray, C., Case Note, Case Note, (2000) 49 I.C.L.Q. 730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

54. I.C.J. Press Communiqué No. 99/33.

55. I.C.J. Press Communiqué No. 2000/25

56. I.C.J. Press Communiqué No. 2000/29.

57. I.C.J. Press Communiqué No. 2001/5.

58. I.C.J. Press Communiqué No. 99/45.

59. I.C.J. Press Communiqué No. 2000/24 and see D. Kritsiotis, above, p.662.

60. I.C.J. Press Communiqué No. 99/41.

61. I.C.J. Rep. 2000, 3.

62. I.C.J. Press Communiqué No. 2000/21

63. I.C.J. Rep. 2000, 6.

64. I.C.J. Press Communiqué No. 2000/32.

65. I.C.J. Press Communiqué No. 2000/40. See C. L. Wickremasinghe, above, p.670.

66. I.C.J. Press Communiqué No. 2000/41.

67. I.C.J. Press Communiqué No. 2001/8.

68. I.C.J. Press Communiqué No. 2001/11.

69. I.C.J. Press Communiqué No. 2001/12.

70. I.C.J. Press Communiqué No. 2001/1.

71. I.C.J. Press Communiqué No. 2001/2.

72. I.C.J. Press Communiqué No. 2001/9.