No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
DEMOCRATIC STATE, AUTOCRATIC METHOD: THE REFORM OF HUMAN RIGHTS LAW IN THE UNITED KINGDOM
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 December 2023
Abstract
On 22 June 2022 the Bill of Rights Bill to replace the Human Rights Act 1998 was introduced to the United Kingdom (UK) Parliament. Just over a year later, it was withdrawn. This was not a minor update, as claimed by the Conservative government, but a wholesale revision of a fundamental feature of UK constitutional arrangements. Given that the UK has no codified constitution, it is not out of the ordinary for constitutional change to proceed via ordinary Act of Parliament. But what was unusual was the informal methods used by the government in its attempt to push through its bill of rights. Searching for a word or phrase to capture what happened over this time in the UK is difficult, not only because of the absence of a conventional method for constitutional change. Most scholarship focuses on formal rather than informal processes for amendment. The purpose of this article is therefore to make a contribution towards filling this gap by introducing the phrase ‘autocratic method’ to describe a particular method of constitutional change as opposed to its substance. Using existing scholarship, and examples from other States, a preliminary definition and essential features of the autocratic method are set out. Further detail is gained through a study of the attempted replacement of the Human Rights Act. Whilst the Bill of Rights Bill is no longer going ahead, this episode in UK constitutional history contains important lessons not just for the UK but for any State embarking on a process of constitutional change.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of British Institute of International and Comparative Law
References
1 Other States include Israel and New Zealand.
2 See further, M Amos, ‘Problems with the Human Rights Act and How to Remedy Them: Is a Bill of Rights the Answer?’ (2009) 72 ModLRev 883.
3 Conservative Party, The Conservative and Unionist Party Manifesto 2019 (Conservative Party, 2019) 48 <https://www.conservatives.com/our-plan/conservative-party-manifesto-2019>.
4 UK Parliament, Bill of Rights Bill <https://bills.parliament.uk/bills/3227>.
5 See further, Joint Committee on Human Rights, ‘Legislative Scrutiny: Bill of Rights Bill, Ninth Report of Session 2022–23’ (25th January 2023) HC 611 HL Paper 132, 109.
6 See, eg, the suspension of various parts of the Human Rights Act 1998 (HRA) by the Illegal Migration Act 2023.
7 To support the government's immigration reforms, this possibility is once again the subject of serious debate. See further, Hymas, C, ‘Braverman Refuses to Rule Out Prospect of UK leaving ECHR’ The Daily Telegraph (London, 28 August 2023)Google Scholar <https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2023/08/28/suella-braverman-european-convention-human-rights-migrants/>.
8 At the time of writing (September 2023), the Conservative Party forms a majority government with a working majority in the House of Commons of 60. <https://members.parliament.uk/parties/commons>.
9 Roznai, Y, ‘Amendment Power, Constituent Power, and Popular Sovereignty’ in R Albert, X Contiades and A Fotiadou (eds), The Foundations and Traditions of Constitutional Amendment (Hart Publishing 2019) 46Google Scholar.
10 Macfarlane, E, ‘Judicial Amendment of the Constitution’ (2021) 19 ICON 1894, 1924Google Scholar.
11 Galligan, DJ, ‘The Paradox of Constitutionalism or the Potential of Constitutional Theory’ (2008) 28 OJLS 343, 354–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
12 See, eg, Albert, Contiades and Fotiadou (eds) (n 9).
13 R Albert, ‘The State of the Art in Constitutional Amendment’ in Albert, Contiades and Fotiadou (eds) (n 9) 19.
14 Tushnet, M, ‘Peasants with Pitchforks, and Toilers with Twitter: Constitutional Revolutions and the Constituent Power’ (2015) 13 ICON 639, 653Google Scholar.
15 M Tushnet and B Bugarič, Power to the People Constitutionalism in the Age of Populism (OUP 2021) 11.
16 Toler, L Updike, ‘Mapping the Constitutional Process’ (2014) 3 CJICL 1260Google Scholar.
17 ibid 1262.
18 Defined to include: acceptance contemporaneously and over time; frequency and extent of amendments; and longevity, ibid 1268.
19 ibid 1272. Two problem constitutions she points to are Morocco, where the public received propaganda from the King rather than information concerning constitutional choices; and Iraq where the information was less biased but failed to focus on significant constitutional issues, ibid 1274.
20 ibid 1281. See also Kuo, M, ‘Against Instantaneous Democracy’ (2019) 17 ICON 554Google Scholar.
21 Jacobsohn, GJ, ‘An Unconstitutional Constitution? A Comparative Perspective’ (2006) 4 ICON 460, 486Google Scholar.
22 Sadurski, W, ‘Constitutional Democracy in the Time of Elected Authoritarians’ (2020) 18 ICON 324, 326Google Scholar.
23 R Dixon and D Landau, ‘Transnational Constitutionalism and a Limited Doctrine of Unconstitutional Constitutional Amendment’ (2015) 13 ICON 606, 607. See also Landau, D and Dixon, R, ‘Constraining Constitutional Change’ (2015) 50 WakeForestLRev 859Google Scholar.
24 Dixon, R and Uhlmann, F, ‘The Swiss Constitution and a Weak-form Unconstitutional Amendment Doctrine?’ (2018) 16 ICON 54, 55–6Google Scholar.
25 ibid.
26 ibid 66.
27 On authoritarian constitutionalism, see generally, Ginsburg, T and Simpser, A (eds), Constitutions in Authoritarian Regimes (CUP 2014)Google Scholar.
28 NS Bui, ‘Constitutional Amendment in Laos’ (2019) 17 ICON 756, 779. See also V Paskalev, ‘Bulgarian Constitutionalism: Challenges, Reform, Resistance and … Frustration’ (2016) 22 EPL 203; and M Tushnet, ‘Authoritarian Constitutionalism’ (2015) 100 CornellLRev 391.
29 KL Scheppele, ‘Autocratic Legalism’ (2018) 85 UChiLRev 545.
30 N Bermeo, ‘On Democratic Backsliding’ (2016) 27 JDemocr 5.
31 Tushnet and Bugarič (n 15) 213.
32 Galligan (n 11) 354–5.
33 Tushnet and Bugarič (n 15) 11.
34 Updike Toler (n 16).
35 D Okubasu, ‘The Implication of Conflation of Normal and “Constitutional Politics” on Constitutional Change in Africa’ in Albert, Contiades and Fotiadou (eds) (n 9).
36 ibid 329.
37 ibid 332.
38 ibid 331.
39 D Kotze, ‘South Africa Votes in 2024: Could a Coalition Between Major Parties ANC and EFF Run the Country?’ (The Conversation, 24 April 2023) <https://theconversation.com/south-africa-votes-in-2024-could-a-coalition-between-major-parties-anc-and-eff-run-the-country-204141>.
40 R Berg, ‘Israel Judicial Reform Explained: What is the Crisis About?’ (BBC News, 11 September 2023) <https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-65086871>.
41 Tushnet and Bugarič (n 15) ch 2.
42 ibid 126.
43 ibid 128.
44 Szente, Z, ‘The Myth of Populist Constitutionalism in Hungary and Poland: Populist or Authoritarian Constitutionalism’ (2023) 21 ICON 127Google Scholar, 136–40.
45 Uitz, R, ‘Can You Tell When an Illiberal Democracy is in the Making? An Appeal to Comparative Constitutional Scholarship from Hungary’ (2015) 13 ICON 279, 295–6Google Scholar.
46 J Braver, ‘Revolutionary Reform in Venezuela’ in Albert, Contiades and Fotiadou (eds) (n 9).
47 See further, S Tierney, Constitutional Referendums (OUP 2014) 23–7; and M Qvortrup and L Trueblood, ‘The Case for Supermajority Requirements in Referendums’ (2023) 21 ICON 187–204.
48 R Mushkat, ‘Israel's Judicial Reform: Where is the Analytical Context?’ (IACL-AIDC Blogs, 7 February 2023) <https://blog-iacl-aidc.org/2023-posts/2023/2/7/israels-judicial-reform-where-is-the-analytical-context>.
49 Berg (n 40).
50 ibid.
51 Y Knell, ‘Israel: Huge Rally Pushes Back at Judicial Reform Protests’ (BBC News, 28 April 2023) <https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-65413814>.
52 B McKernan, ‘Israel: Netanyahu Announces Delay to Judicial Overhaul Plan’ The Guardian (London, 27 March 2023) <https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/mar/27/israel-netanyahu-judiciary-plans-halt>.
53 B McKernan, ‘What is Israel's Judicial Overhaul About and What Happens Next?’ The Guardian (London, 12 September 2023) <https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/jul/24/what-is-israel-judicial-overhaul-vote-about-what-happens-next>.
54 Ministry of Justice, Human Rights Act Reform: A Modern Bill of Rights. A Consultation to Reform the Human Rights Act 1998 CP 588 (December 2021) 3 <https://consult.justice.gov.uk/human-rights/human-rights-act-reform/supporting_documents/humanrightsreformconsultation.pdf>.
55 Something that Albert would describe as ‘constitutional dismemberment’. See Albert, R, ‘Constitutional Amendment and Dismemberment’ (2018) 43 YaleJIntlL 1Google Scholar.
56 Bill of Rights Bill (n 4). See also cl 24 which provided that interim measures issued by the ECtHR do not determine the rights and obligations of a public authority.
57 Bill of Rights Bill ibid. In cl 40 the government was given the power to amend, by regulation, primary legislation previously subject to a sec 3 HRA interpretation.
58 Bill of Rights Bill ibid, cl 15.
59 ibid, cl 18.
60 ibid, cl 3(3)(a).
61 ibid, cl 3(3)(b), unless it is necessary to comply with cl 4 which grants enhanced protection to freedom of speech.
62 Bill of Rights Bill ibid, cl 5(2).
63 ibid, cl 6(2).
64 ibid, cls 8, 20.
65 ibid, cl 13. The rights of families to bring proceedings in UK courts where the victim is deceased were also removed.
66 I Cram, ‘Amending the Constitution’ (2016) 36 LS 75, 84.
67 It has been a feature of the policies of the UK Independence Party since its founding in 1993 although this party currently has no members of parliament in the House of Commons. The Labour government released a consultation paper on a bill of rights in 2009 but did not make the repeal and replacement of the HRA with a bill of rights a manifesto commitment for the 2010 general election.
68 David Cameron, speech at the Centre for Policy Studies, 26 June 2006 as reported in W Woodward, ‘Cameron Promises UK Bill of Rights to Replace Human Rights Act’ The Guardian (London, 26 June 2006) <https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2006/jun/26/uk.humanrights>.
69 Travis, A, ‘Cameron Pledges Bill to Restore British Freedoms’ The Guardian (London, 28 February 2009)Google Scholar <https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2009/feb/28/conservatives-human-rights>.
70 Conservative Party, Protecting Human Rights in the UK (Conservative Party 2014).
71 T Shipman, ‘Human Rights Law to be Axed; British Bill of Rights Revealed’ The Sunday Times (London, 8 November 2015).
72 Okubasu (n 35).
73 Including the Scotland Act 1998, Government of Wales Act 1998, Northern Ireland Act 1998 and the Human Rights Act 1998. See further, R Brazier, ‘New Labour, New Constitution?’ (1998) 49 NILQ 1.
74 D Shell, ‘Constitutional Reform—the Constitution Unit Reports’ [1997] PL 66.
75 S Kenny, ‘The Law Commissions: Constitutional Arrangements and the Rule of Law’ (2019) 39 OJLS 603, 623. This is in contrast to law commissions in South Africa, New Zealand and Australia. See further, E Albanesi, ‘Beyond the British model. Law Reform in New Zealand, Australia, Canada, South Africa and Israel’ (2018) 6 TPLeg 153.
76 Ministry of Justice (n 54) 59. See Bill of Rights Bill (n 4) cls 1, 2, 3.
77 Ministry of Justice ibid 80. See Bill of Rights Bill ibid, cls 1, 7.
78 Ministry of Justice ibid 23. See Bill of Rights Bill ibid, cl 3.
79 Ministry of Justice ibid 29.
80 ibid 60.
81 ibid 60. See Bill of Rights Bill (n 4) cls 1, 3, 7.
82 Ministry of Justice ibid 52.
83 ibid 5.
84 ibid 68. See Bill of Rights Bill (n 4) cls 1, 10.
85 Ministry of Justice ibid 3.
86 ibid 9.
87 ibid 17.
88 ibid 59. See Bill of Rights Bill (n 4) cl 3.
89 Ministry of Justice ibid 36.
90 ibid 36.
91 ibid 63.
92 ibid 45.
93 Director of Public Prosecutions v Ziegler [2021] UKSC 23.
94 Ministry of Justice (n 54) 39.
95 Rabone v Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust [2012] UKSC 2.
96 Ministry of Justice (n 54) 39.
97 R. (Carmichael) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2016] UKSC 58.
98 Ministry of Justice (n 54) 48.
99 P Patel, ‘2020 Speech at Conservative Party Conference (Political Speech Archive, 5 October 2020) <https://www.ukpol.co.uk/priti-patel-2020-speech-at-conservative-party-conference/>.
100 H Banks, ‘In Full: PM Boris Johson's Tory Conference Speech’ (City AM, 6 October 2020) <https://www.cityam.com/in-full-pm-boris-johnsons-tory-conference-speech-in-full/>.
101 A Gimson and P Goodman, ‘Interview: Braverman Says that What May Emerge from Russia “Is a Basis for Charges of Genocide”’ (Conservative Home, 20 May 2022) <https://www.conservativehome.com/highlights/2022/05/interview-braverman-says-that-what-may-emerge-from-russia-is-a-basis-for-charges-of-genocide.html>.
102 Ministry of Justice (n 54) 35–6, 40, 42, 43.
103 ibid 43–4.
104 ibid 47–51.
105 ibid 49.
106 ibid 82.
107 ibid 62.
108 Shell (n 74) 66.
109 Judicial Power Project, ‘About the Judicial Power Project’ <https://judicialpowerproject.org.uk/about/>.
110 Finnis, J and Murray, S, Immigration, Strasbourg, and Judicial Overreach (Policy Exchange 2021) 107Google Scholar.
111 Laws, S, How to Address the Breakdown of Trust Between Government and Courts (Policy Exchange 2021) 10Google Scholar.
112 Ekins, R and Gee, G, Reforming the Lord Chancellor's Role in Senior Judicial Appointments (Policy Exchange 2021) 10Google Scholar.
113 Ekins, R, Protecting the Constitution (Policy Exchange 2019)Google Scholar.
114 Policy Exchange, ‘About Policy Exchange’ <https://policyexchange.org.uk/about/>.
115 G Monbiot, ‘No 10 and the Secretly Funded Lobby Groups Intent on Undermining Democracy’ The Guardian (London, 1 September 2020) <https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/sep/01/no-10-lobby-groups-democracy-policy-exchange>.
116 G Monbiot, ‘Who Drives the So-called Thinktanks Crushing Democracy for Corporations?’ The Guardian (London, 13 September 2011).
117 Transparify, How Transparent are Think Tanks about Who Funds Them 2016? (Transparify, 29 June 2016) <https://www.transparify.org/publications-main>. See also B Quinn, ‘UK Thinktanks Urged to be Transparent about Funding as $1m US Donations Revealed’ The Guardian (London, 4 August 2023) <https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2023/aug/04/uk-thinktanks-urged-to-be-transparent-about-funding-as-1m-us-donations-revealed>.
118 Conservative Party Manifesto 2019 (n 3).
119 ibid.
120 Ministry of Justice, ‘Guidance: Independent Human Rights Act Review’ (7 December 2020) <https://www.gov.uk/guidance/independent-human-rights-act-review>.
121 Ministry of Justice, Independent Human Rights Act Review: Terms of Reference <https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/953347/human-rights-review-tor.pdf>.
122 Contrast the creation in April 2021 of the Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court of the US comprised of a bipartisan group of experts on the Court and the Court reform debate.
123 IHRAR, Call for Evidence Responses <https://www.gov.uk/guidance/independent-human-rights-act-review>.
124 See, eg, submission of Finnis and Murray (n 110) which was not in answer to the review questions but a report on immigration published by Policy Exchange; submission of the Judicial Power Project which was also not in answer to the review questions; and the submission of the Society of Conservative Lawyers which did, in part, focus on the review questions.
125 UK Government, The Independent Human Rights Act Review CP 586 (December 2021) <https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/61b8531c8fa8f5037778c3ae/ihrar-final-report.pdf>.
126 Ministry of Justice (n 54) 3.
127 House of Commons, ‘Oral Evidence: Human Rights Act Reform’ (1 February 2022) HC 1087.
128 Ministry of Justice (n 54) 5.
129 ibid.
130 ibid.
131 ibid 6.
132 ibid.
133 Othman (Abu Qatada) v the United Kingdom App No 8139/09 (ECtHR, 17 January 2012).
134 Ministry of Justice (n 54) 29.
135 Rabone (n 95).
136 Ministry of Justice (n 54) 39.
137 ibid. 43.
138 Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis v DSD [2018] UKSC 11.
139 Ministry of Justice (n 54) 36.
140 ibid. 6.
141 ibid. 6.
142 After lobbying by numerous NGOs, an easy-read version was eventually produced. The evidence base is similarly poor but the simplification of the message makes for interesting reading: Ministry of Justice, ‘Human Rights Act Reform: a Modern Bill of Rights’ (Ministry of Justice, 2022) <https://consult.justice.gov.uk/human-rights/human-rights-act-reform/>.
143 Ministry of Justice (n 54) 35, 36, 40, 52.
144 ibid 83–5.
145 ibid 62.
146 Ministry of Justice, Draft Bill of Rights Impact Assessment (19 June 2022) <https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1084545/bill-of-rights-impact-assessment.pdf>.
147 ibid 3.
148 Ministry of Justice, Human Rights Act Reform: A Modern Bill of Rights. Consultation Response CP 704 (June 2022) <https://consult.justice.gov.uk/human-rights/human-rights-act-reform/results/modern-bill-rights-consultation-response.pdf>.
149 ibid 7.
150 ibid 12.
151 ibid 14.
152 ibid 15–16.
153 ibid 18.
154 ibid 19.
155 ibid 23.
156 ibid 31.
157 ibid 34.
158 ibid 20.
159 ibid 21. Its response to the overwhelming feedback that there should be no tampering with the proportionality test was similar, ibid 30.
160 Illegal Migration Act 2023 <https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2023/37/enacted>.
161 ibid, sec 1(5).
162 ibid, sec 5.
163 Shipman, T, ‘Sunak's Threat to Pull UK out of the ECHR’ The Sunday Times (London, 5 February 2023)Google Scholar.
164 Brazier, R, ‘The Machinery of British Constitutional Reform’ (1990) 41 NILQ 227, 243Google Scholar.
165 The Constitution Unit, Delivering Constitutional Reform (The Constitution Unit 1996).
166 Labour Party, A New Britain: Renewing our Democracy and Rebuilding our Economy. Report of the Commission on the UK's Future (Labour Party, 2022) <https://labour.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Commission-on-the-UKs-Future.pdf>.