Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-rkxrd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T07:27:55.911Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2.3.1 Submicron Particles from the Sun

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

Curtis L. Hemenway*
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik*

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A review is given which suggests that cosmic dust theoretical and experimental studies are still beset with uncertainty and inaccuracy. A significant body of interrelated evidence exists which indicates that the solar system has two populations of dust particles, a submicron population generated and emitted by the sun and a larger size population spiraling inward toward the sun. The submicron component may provide the missing coupling mechanism between solar sunspot activity and meteorological activity in the earth’s atmosphere.

Type
2 In Situ Measurements of Interplanetary Dust
Copyright
Copyright © Springer-Verlag 1976

References

1. Fechtig, H. and Hemenway, C., “Near-Earth Fragmentation of Cosmic Dust”, IAU Colloquium 31, 1976, this-volume.Google Scholar
2. Hemenway, C., et alNear-Earth Cosmic Dust Results from S 149”, AIAA/AGU Conference on the Scientific Experiments of SKYLAB, Huntsville, Ala. 1974.Google Scholar
3. Halleren, D.. et alNoctilucent Cloud Sampling by a Multi-Experiment Payload”, Space Research XIII, p. 11051112, 1973.Google Scholar
4. Fullam, E., Private Communication.Google Scholar
5. Rauser, P. Fechtig, H., “Combined Dust Collection and Detection Experiment During a Noctilucent Cloud Display Above Kiruna, Sweden”, Space Research XII, p. 391402, 1972.Google Scholar
6. Morrison, G., et alElemental Abundances of Lunar Soil and Rocks”, Proceedings of the Apollo II Lunar Science Conference, Houston, 1970, V. 2, Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta Supp. 1, p. 13831392, 1970.Google Scholar
7. Hemenway, C., et alElectron Microscope Studies of Noctilucent Cloud Particles”, Tellus, V. 16, p. 96102, 1964.Google Scholar
8. Standeford, L., “The Dynamics of Charged Interplanetary Grains”, Thesis, University of Illinois, 1968.Google Scholar
9. Blackwell, D. and Ingham, M., “Observations of Zodiacal Light from a Very High Altitude Station. I The Average Zodiacal Light”, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, V. 122, p.113127, 1961.Google Scholar
10. Schneider, E., et alMicrocraters on Apollo 15 and 16 Samples and Corresponding Cosmic Dust Fluxes”, Proceedings of the Fourth Lunar Science Conference, Houston, 1973, V. 3, Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta Supp. 4, p. 32773290, 1973.Google Scholar
11. Powell, R., et alAnalysis of All Available Zodiacal-Light Observations”, The Zodiacal Light and the Interplanetary Medium, National Aeronautical and Space Administration, Washington, NASA SP-150, p. 225241, 1967.Google Scholar
12. Hicks, T., et alAn Investigation of the Motion of Zodiacal Light Particles I”, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, V. 166, p. 439448, 1974.Google Scholar
13. Greenberg, J., “Interstellar Grains”, Nebulae and Interstellar Matter, Stars and Stellar Systems, university of Chicago Press, V. 7, p. 221361, 1968.Google Scholar
14. Allen, C.. “Astroohvsical Quantities”, 2nd. ed., University of London, The Athlone Press, p. 170, 185, 1963.Google Scholar
15. Minnaert, M., “The Photosphere”, The Sun, The Solar System, University of Chicago Press, V. 1, p. 88185, 1953.Google Scholar
16. Pottasch, S., “Review of Astrophyslcal Conclusions from the UV Solar Spectra”, International Astronomical Union Symposium. 36th. Lunteren, 1969. Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 1970, p. 241249.Google Scholar
17. Pettit, E. and Nicholson, S., “Spectral Energy-Curve of Sun-Spots”, Astrophysical Journal, V. 71, p. 153162, 1930.Google Scholar
18. De Jager, C., “Structure and Dynamics of the Solar Atmosphere”, Handbuch der Physik, V. 52, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1959, p. 174.Google Scholar
19. Villmann, C., “Space-Time Regularities of Noctilucent Cloud Displays”, Physics of Mesopheric (Noctilucent) Clouds, Proceedings of the Conference on Mesopheric Clouds, Riga, 1968. Jerusalem: Israel Program for Scientific Translations, 1973, p. 8695.Google Scholar
20. Wickramasinghe, N., “Interstellar Grains”, London: Chapman and Hall, 1967.Google Scholar
21. Bowen, E., “Kidson’s Relation Between Sunspot Number and the Movement of High Pressure Systems in Australia”, Possible Relationships Between Solar Activity and Meteorological Phenomena, Proceedings of a Symposium held at NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, 1973. NASA Goddard SFC Preprint X-901-74-156, p. 5659 (To be published subsequently as a NASA Special Publication).Google Scholar
22. Roberts, W., “Relationships Between Solar Activity and Climate Change”, Possible Relationships Between Solar Activity and Meteorological Phenomena, Proceedings of a Symposium held at NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, 1973. NASA Goddard SFC Preprint X-901-74-156, p. 323 (To be published subsequently as a NASA Special Publication).Google Scholar
23. Douglass, A., “Tree Rings and Their Relation to Solar Variations and Chronology”, Annual Report of the Smithsonian Institution, p. 304, 1931.Google Scholar
24. Vasil’ev, O., “Frequency Spectrum of Noctilucent Cloud Displays and Their Connection with Solar Activity”, Physics of Mesopheric (Noctilucent) Clouds, Proceedings of the Conference on Mesopheric Clouds, Riga, 1968, Jerusalem: Israel Program for Scientific Translations, 1973, p. 100113.Google Scholar
25. Rosinski, J., Private Communication.Google Scholar
26. Waldmeier, M.M. 1939Über die Struktur der Sonnenflecken”, Astron. Mitt. Zürich, No. 138, 439.Google Scholar