High resolution implies that we obtain some information on spectral line shapes. In late-type stars, we need to measure velocities of a few km/sec to accomplish this. Increasing the spectral resolution and the signal to noise ratio allows us to progress step by step toward deeper physical understanding. The steps we take often lead to good debate and “stimulate” our lives. I am sometimes amused at the urgency we feel to press on to the next step. We rarely seem to pause and enjoy the completion of previous steps. Perhaps this is because we always see shortcomings in completed work. Quite typically one will “discover” the importance of some physical phenomenon (It makes little difference how many others already know about it.), and in his eyes everything done previously becomes wrong because this phenomenon was not included. We used to hear how Milne-Eddington or Schuster-Schwarzschild model atmospheres were inadequate -we had to use instead properly computed depth dependence. We used to hear how LTE models were no good - we had to use more detailed physics. Now we talk about line analyses being inadequate because it has not included velocity fields. The curious thing is that we believe that including our pet phenomenon gives the correct models. We ignore all those other phenomena as yet unseen! (Is this a mechanism for maintaining sanity?) I think it really amounts to a statement of what we are able to measure, compute, or understand.