Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-01T20:08:08.117Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

FAR-Ultralviolet Spectrophotometry of two do White Dwarfs from Voyager

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

E. Poulin
Affiliation:
Département de Physique, Université de Montréal
F. Wesemael
Affiliation:
Département de Physique, Université de Montréal
J.B. Holberg
Affiliation:
Lunar and Planetary Laboratory, University of Arizona
G. Fontaine
Affiliation:
Département de Physique, Université de Montréal

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

While the observed number of hot, helium-rich degenerates is noticeably larger than that of their hydrogen-rich counterparts, the calibration of their effective temperatures has been comparatively much less trustworthy. The spectroscopic classification scheme introduced three years ago by Wesemael, Green, and Liebert (1985, hereafter WGL), and the crude temperature domains associated with each class remain, to this date, the only comprehensive effort at defining a temperature scale for DO stars. The current uncertainty in this is perhaps best epitomized by two objects, HD149499B and PG1034+001. The former belongs to a binary system which also contains a KO V primary, 2” away. The temperature determined for the degenerate secondary ranges from 85,000±15,000 K (Wray, Parsons, and Henize 1979) to 55,000±5000 K (Sion, Guinan, and Wesemael 1982, hereafter SGW). PG1034+001, on the other hand, is the prototype of the so-called hot DO spectroscopic class; WGL assign an uncertain temperature of 80,000±20,000 K to this object.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Springer-Verlag 1989

References

Green, R.F., Schmidt, M., and Liebert, J. 1986, Ap. J. Suppl., 61, 305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holden, F. 1977. Pub.A.S.P., 89, 588.Google Scholar
Ianna, P.A., Rhode, J.R., and Newell, E.B. 1982, Ap. J. (Letters), 259, L71.Google Scholar
Rossiter, r.A. 1955, Pub.Obs.Univ.Michigan, 11, 1.Google Scholar
Sion, E.M., Guinan, E.F., and Wesemael, F. 1982, Ap. J., 255, 232(SGW).Google Scholar
Wegner, G. 1978, M.N.R.A.S., 187, 17 Google Scholar
Wesmael, F. 1981, Ap. J. Suppl., 45, 177.Google Scholar
Wesemael, F., Green, R.F., and Liebert, J. 1985, Ap. J. Suppl. 58, 379(VGL).Google Scholar
Wray, J.D., Parsons, S.B., and Henize, K.G. 1979, Ap. J.(Lettars), 234, L187.Google Scholar