Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-nptnm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-13T15:11:36.788Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Late Stages of the Evolution of Close Binaries*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

C. De Loore
Affiliation:
Astrophysical Institute, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, België
W. Sutantyo
Affiliation:
Bosscha Observatory, Bandung, Indonesia

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Close binaries can evolve through various ways of interaction into compact objects (white dwarfs, neutron stars, black holes). Massive binary systems (mass of the primary M1 larger than 14 to 15 M0) are expected to leave, after the first stage of mass transfer a compact component orbiting a massive star. These systems evolve during subsequent stages into massive X-ray binaries. Systems with initial large periode evolve into Be X-ray binaries.

Low mass X-ray sources are probably descendants of lower mass stars, and various channels for their production are indicated. The evolution of massive close binaries is examined in detail and different X-ray stages are discussed. It is argued that a first X-ray stage is followed by a reverse extensive mass transfer, leading to systems like SS433, CirXl. During further evolution these systems would become Wolf-Rayet runaways. Due to spiral in these system would then further evolve into ultra short X-ray binaries like CygX-3.

Finally the explosion of the secondary will in most cases disrupt the system. In an exceptional case the system remains bound, leading to binary pulsars like PSR 1913 +16. In such systems the orbit will shrink due to gravitational radiation and finally the two neutron stars will coalesce. It is argued that the millisecond pulsar PSR 1937 + 214 could be formed in this way.

A complete scheme starting from two massive ZAMS stars, ending with a millisecond pulsar is presented.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1984

Footnotes

*

Paper presented at the Lembang-Bamberg IAU Colloquium No. 80 on ‘Double Stars: Physical Properties and Generic Relations', held at Bandung, Indonesia 3-7 June, 1983.

References

Alpar, M. A., Cheng, A. R. Ruderman, M. A., and Shaham, J.: 1982, Nature 300, 728.Google Scholar
Arnett, W. D.: 1978, in Giacconi, R. and Ruffini, R. (eds.), Physics and Astrophysics of Neutron Stars and Black Holes, North-Holland Pubi. Co., Amsterdam, p. 356.Google Scholar
Arons, J.: 1983, Nature 301, 302.Google Scholar
Ashworth, M., Lyne, A. G. and Smith, F. G.: 1983, Nature 301, 313.Google Scholar
Backer, D. C., Kulkami, S. R., and Taylor, J. H.: 1983, Nature 301, 314.Google Scholar
Clark, J. P. A. and Eardly, D. M.: 1977, Astrophys. J. 125, 311.Google Scholar
Conti, P. S., Garmany, C., de Loore, C., and Vanbeveren, D.: 1983, Astrophys. J. (in press).Google Scholar
Cowley, A. P.: 1980, in Sandford, P. (ed.), Compact Galactic X-Ray Sources, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
De Cuyper, J. P.: 1981, in Sieber, W. and Wielebinsky, R. (eds.), ‘Pulsars', IAU Symp. 95, 399.Google Scholar
De Greve, J. P. and de Loore, C.: 1976, Astrophys. Space Sci. 43, 35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Greve, J. P. and de Loore, C.: 1977, Astrophys. Space. Sci. 50, 75.Google Scholar
De Greve, J. P., de Loore, C., and van Dessel, E. L.: 1978, Astrophys. Space. Sci. 53, 105.Google Scholar
de Loore, C., De Greve, J. P., and De Cuyper, J. P.: 1975, Astrophys. Space Sci. 36, 219.Google Scholar
Delgado, A. and Thomas, H. C.: 1980, Astron. Astrophys. 36, 142.Google Scholar
Firmani, C. and Bislacchi, F.: 1980, Proc. 5th IAU Reg. Meeting, Liège, Belgium.Google Scholar
Green, R. F., Richstone, P. O., and Schmidt, M.: 1978, Astrophys. J. 22A, 892.Google Scholar
Henrichs, H. F. and van den Heuvel, F. P. J.: 1983, Nature 303, 213.Google Scholar
Hovaisky, S. A. and Chevalier, C.: 1978, Astron. Astrophys. 70, L19.Google Scholar
Jedrzejec, E.: 1969, Thesis, M. S., Univ. of Warsaw.Google Scholar
Jones, C.: 1977, Astrophys. J. 214, 956.Google Scholar
Joss, P. C. and Rappaport, S.: 1979, Astron. Astrophys. 71, 217.Google Scholar
Lewin, W. H. G. and Clark, G. W.: 1980, Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 336, 451.Google Scholar
Lewin, W. H. G. and Joss, P. C.: 1981, Space Sci. Rev. 28, 3.Google Scholar
Maraschi, L., Trêves, A., and van den Heuvel, E. P. J.: 1977, Astrophys. J. 216, 819.Google Scholar
Massevich, A. G., Tutukov, A. V., and Yungelson, L. R.: 1981, in Sugimoto, D., Schramm, D., and Lamb, D. (eds.), ‘Fundamental Problems in the Theory of Stellar Evolution', IAU Symp. 93, 185.Google Scholar
Massevich, A. G., Tutukov, A. V., and Yungelson, A. R.: 1976, Astrophys. Space Sci. 40, 115.Google Scholar
Meyer, F. and Meyer-Hofmeister, E.: 1979, Astron. Astrophys. 78, 167.Google Scholar
Miller, J. S., Krzeminsky, W., and Priedhorsky, W.: 1976, IAU Circ, No. 2974.Google Scholar
Miyaji, S., Nomoto, K., Yokoi, K. and Sugimoto, D.: 1980, Pubi. Astron. Soc. Japan 32, 303.Google Scholar
Nelson, B. and Young, A.: 1970, Pub!. Astron. Soc. Pacific 82, 7699.Google Scholar
Nomoto, K.: 1980, Proc. Workshop ‘Type I Supernovae', Univ. of Texas.Google Scholar
Papaloizou, J. and Pringle, J. E.: 1978, Monthly Notices Roy. Astron. Soc. 184, 501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paczyński, B.: 1971, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 9, 183.Google Scholar
Paczyński, B.: 1976, in Eggleton, P., Mitton, S., and Whelan, J. (eds.), ‘Structure and Evolution of Close Binary Systems', IAU Symp. 73, 75.Google Scholar
Paczyński, B. and Sienkiewicz, R.: 1972, Acta Astron. 22, 73.Google Scholar
Paczyński, B. and Sienkiewicz, R.: 1981, Astrophys. J. 248, L27.Google Scholar
Peters, P. C.: 1964, Phys. Rev. B136, 1224.Google Scholar
Plavec, M., Ulrich, R. K., and Polidan, R. S.: 1973, Pub!. Astron. Soc. Pacific 85, 769.Google Scholar
Rappaport, S. A., Joss, P. C., and Webbink, R. F.: 1982, Astrophys. J. 254, 616.Google Scholar
Ritter, H.: 1975, Miti. Astron. Ges. 36, 93.Google Scholar
Ritter, H.: 1976, Monthly Notices Roy. Astron. Soc. 175, 279.Google Scholar
Savonije, G. J.: 1978, Astron. Astrophys. 62, 317.Google Scholar
Savonije, G. J.: 1979, Astron. Astrophys. 71, 352.Google Scholar
Shklovski, I. S.: 1981, Proc. 5th IAU Regional Meeting, Liège, Belgium.Google Scholar
Sugimoto, D. and Nomoto, K.: 1980, Space Sci. Rev. 25, 155.Google Scholar
Taam, R. F., Bodenheimer, P., and Ostriker, J. P.: 1978, Astrophys. J. 222, 269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tutukov, A. V.: 1981, in Sugimoto, D., Schramm, D., and Lamb, D. (eds.), ‘Fundamental Problems in the Theory of Stellar Evolution', IAU Symp. 93, 137 Google Scholar
Tutukov, A. V. and Yungelson, L. R.: 1979, Acta Astron. 29, 665.Google Scholar
van den Heuvel, E. P. J.: 1976, in Whelan, J. and Mitton, S. (eds.). ‘Structure and Evolution of Close Binary Systems', IAU Symp. 73, 35.Google Scholar
van den Heuvel, E. P. J.: 1980, in Giacconi, R. and Setti, G. (eds.). X-Ray Astronomy, D. Reidei Pubi. Co., Dordrecht, Holland, p. 115.Google Scholar
van den Heuvel, E. P. J.: 1981, in Sugimoto, D., Lamb, D., and Schramm, D. (eds.), ‘Fundamental Problems in the Theory of Stellar Evolution', IAU Symp. 93, 115.Google Scholar
van den Heuvel, E. P. J. and Heise, J.: 1972, Nat. Sci. 239, 67.Google Scholar
van den Heuvel, E. P. J. and de Loore, C.: 1973, Astron. Astrophys. 25, 387.Google Scholar
van den Heuvel, E. P. J., Ostriker, J. P., and Petterson, J. A.: 1980, Astron. Astrophys. 81, L7.Google Scholar
Vanderlinden, T.: 1982, Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Van Paradijs, J.: 1978, Nature 274, 650.Google Scholar
Van Paradijs, J.: 1980, IAU C'ire, No. 3487.Google Scholar
Verbunt, F. and Zwaan, C.: 1981, Astron. Astrophys. 100, L7.Google Scholar
Webbink, R. F.: 1975, Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Webbink, R. F.: 1977a, Astrophys. J. 211, 486.Google Scholar
Webbink, R. F.: 1977b, Astrophys. J. 211, 881.Google Scholar
Webbink, R. F.: 1979, in Bateson, F. M., Smak, J., and Urch, I. H. (eds.), ‘Changing Trends in Variable Stars Research', IAU Colloq. 49, 102.Google Scholar