Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-rvbq7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T15:33:23.541Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Particulate Detection in the Near Earth Space Environment Aboard the Long Duration Exposure Facility Ldef: Cosmic or Terrestrial?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

J.A.M. McDonnell ,
K. Sullivan ,
T.J. Stevenson  and
D.H. Niblett
J.A.M. McDonnell
Affiliation:
Unit for Space Sciences, University of Kent at Canterbury, Canterbury, Kent, CT2 7NR, United Kingdom
K. Sullivan
Affiliation:
Unit for Space Sciences, University of Kent at Canterbury, Canterbury, Kent, CT2 7NR, United Kingdom
T.J. Stevenson
Affiliation:
Unit for Space Sciences, University of Kent at Canterbury, Canterbury, Kent, CT2 7NR, United Kingdom
D.H. Niblett
Affiliation:
Unit for Space Sciences, University of Kent at Canterbury, Canterbury, Kent, CT2 7NR, United Kingdom

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Examination of surfaces exposed for more than five and a half years, from detectors with unique attitude stabilisation relative to the orbital velocity vector, offers scope for examining definitively the sources of hypervelocity space particulates. Surfaces reveal discrete crater morphologies, crater size distributions and incident flux distributions. Discrete crater studies will later also reveal the chemistry of residues which can, especially via the capture cell principle, lead to elemental analysis of micron dimensioned particles.

First analyses of the flux data from the thin foil perforation experiments (MAP) involve a study of the statistics of the forward (ram) direction, the rear (trailing) direction and the space pointing direction. Modelling of the dynamics of geocentrically bound and unbound orbits yields evidence that the characteristics of the particles, and hence probably their source, change over the particle size range measured by the experiment. Smaller particles (< 1 μm diameter) have lower velocities which could include geocentrically bound particulates, whereas the larger particles (5-10 μm diameter) can be identified with “cosmic” particles of interplanetary or interstellar origin.

Type
Interplanetary Dust: Space and Earth Environment Studies
Information
International Astronomical Union Colloquium , Volume 126: Origin and Evolution of Interplanetary Dust , 1991 , pp. 2 - 10
Copyright
Copyright © Kluwer 1991

References

Humes, D. (1984). ‘Space debris impact experiment (S0001)’, in: LDEF Mission 1 Experiments, eds, Clark, L.G., Kinard, W.M., Carter, D.J.,Jones, J.L. NASA SP473, 136–137.Google Scholar
Kessler, D.J. (1990). Orbital debris predictions for LDEF’, NASA communication SN3-90-18.Google Scholar
Laurance, M.R., and Brownlee, D.E. (1986). ‘The flux of meteoroids and orbital space debris striking satellites in low Earth orbit’, Nature, 323, 136–138.Google Scholar
Mandeville, J.C. (1984). ‘Study of meteoroid impact craters on various materials’ (A0138)’, in: LDEF Mission 1 Experiments, eds, Clark, L.G., Kinard, W.M., Carter, D.J., Jones, J.L. NASA SP473, 124–126.Google Scholar
McDonnell, J.A.M. (1970). ‘Factors affecting the choice of foils for penetration experiments in space’, Space Res., X, 314–325.Google Scholar
McDonnell, J.A.M., Deshpande, S.P., Green, S.F., Newman, P.J., Paley, M.T., Ratcliff, P.R., Stevenson, T.J., and Sullivan, K. (1990). ‘First results of paniculate impacts and foil perforations on LDEF’, Adv. Space Res. (in press).Google Scholar
McDonnell, J.A.M., Sullivan, K., Stevenson, T.J., Niblett, D.H., and Green, S.F. (1991). ‘Dynamic Modelling Transformations for the Low Earth Satellite orbit 10 particulate environment’, Proc. IAU Coll. on ‘Origin and Evolution of Interplanetary Dust’, Kyoto, Japan.Google Scholar
Olsson-Steel, D., and McDonnell, J.A.M., (1990). ‘Face-dependent collision probabilities upon the Long Duration Exposure Facility for particles in geocentric orbits’, Planet. Space Sci. (in press).Google Scholar
Olsson-Steel, D. (1990). ‘Face dependent impact probabilities, velocities and angles by space debris upon LDEF’, Adv. Space Res. (in press).Google Scholar
O’Sullivan, D. (1984). ‘A high resolution study of ultra-heavy cosmic-ray nuclei (A0178)’, in: LDEF Mission 1 Experiments, eds, Clark, L.G., Kinard, W.M., Carter, D.J., Jones, J.L. NASA SP473, 101–104.Google Scholar
Pailer, N., and Grün, E. (1980). ‘The penetration limit of thin films’, Plan. Space. Sci., 28, 321–331.Google Scholar
See, T., Allbrooks, M., Atkinson, D., Simon, C, and Zolensky, M. (1990). ‘Meteoroid and debris impact features documented on the Long Duration Exposure Facility’, M-D SIG, Prelim. Report., NASA.Google Scholar
Singer, S.F., Stanley, J.E., Kassel, P.C., Kinard, W.H., Wortman, J.J., Weinberg, J.L., Mulholland, J.D., Eichhorn, G., Cooke, W.J., and Montague, N. (1990). ‘First spatio-temporal results from the LDEF Interplanetary Dust Experiment’, Adv. Space Res. (in press).Google Scholar
Zook, H.A. (1990). ‘Flux vs. direction of impacts on LDEF by meteoroids and orbital debris’, Proc. 20th Lun. Plan. Sci. Conf., (in press).Google Scholar