Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m8s7h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T17:28:20.872Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Physical Processes on Circumplanetary Dust

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

Joseph A. Burns
Joseph A. Burns*
Affiliation:
Departments of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics and of Astronomy, Cornell UniversityIthaca NY 14853USA

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The life cycles of grains in circumplanetary space are governed by various physical processes that alter sizes and modify orbits. Lifetimes are quite short, perhaps 102-104 years for typical circumplanetary grains of 1 micron radius. Thus particles must be continually supplied to the circumplanetary complex, probably by the grinding down of larger parent bodies in collisions. Dust is eroded gradually through sublimation and through sputtering by the magnetospheric plasma but also is catastrophically destroyed through hypervelocity impacts with interplanetary micrometeoroids. Orbits evolve through momentum transfer (light drag, plasma or Coulomb drag, and atmospheric drag), and through resonant gravitational and electromagnetic forces. Plasma drag is generally the most effective evolution mechanism, with the possible exceptions of exospheric drag at Uranus and of electromagnetic schemes for some conditions. Since grains become charged (with typical electric potentials of a few volts), they undergo associated orbital perturbations: variable electromagnetic forces can cause the systematic drain of energy (orbital collapse) or, at specific (resonant) orbital locations can force large orbital inclinations/eccentricities. Solar radiation induces a periodic orbital eccentricity that can reach substantial values for 1 micron particles distant from the giant planets.

Type
Circumplanetary Dust: Collisional and Electrostatic Processes
Information
International Astronomical Union Colloquium , Volume 126: Origin and Evolution of Interplanetary Dust , 1991 , pp. 341 - 348
Copyright
Copyright © Kluwer 1991

References

Burns, J.A. (1979) An elementary derivation of the perturbation equations of celestial mechanics. Am. Jnl. Phys. 44, 944–949 (Erratum 45, 1230).Google Scholar
Burns, J.A., and Horanyi, M. (1990) Dynamics of the dust in Saturn’s E ring. Bull. Am. Astro. Soc. 22, 1042. Abstract in this volume.Google Scholar
Burns, J.A., and Schaffer, L. (1989) Orbital evolution of circumplanetary dust by resonant charge variations. Nature 337, 340–343.Google Scholar
Burns, J.A., Lamy, P. L. and Soter, S. (1979) Radiation forces on small particles in the solar system. Icarus 40, 1–48.Google Scholar
Burns, J.A., Showalter, M. R., Cuzzi, J.N. and Pollack, J. B. (1980) Physical processes in Jupiter’s ring: Clues to an origin by Jove! Icarus 44. 339–360.Google Scholar
Burns, J.A., Showalter, M. R. and Morfill, G. E. (1984) The ethereal rings of Jupiter and Saturn, in Greenberg, R. J. and Brahic, A. (eds.), Planetary Rings, Univ. Arizona Press, Tucson, pp. 200–272.Google Scholar
Burns, J.A., Schaffer, L., Greenberg, R.J. and Showalter, M. R. (1985) Lorentz resonances and the structure of Jupite’s ring. Nature 316, 115–119.Google Scholar
Burns, J. A., Kolvoord, R. A. and Hamilton, D. P. (1989) An assessment of potential hazards to the Cassini spacecraft from debris along satellite orbits. JPL PD 699-11, 13, Section 6.Google Scholar
Cheng, A.F., Haff, P. K., Johnson, R.E. and Lanzerotti, L. J. (1986) Interactions of planetary magnetospheres with icy satellite surfaces, in Bums, J. A. and Matthews, M. S. (eds.), Planetary Satellites, Univ. Arizona Press, Tucson, pp. 403–430.Google Scholar
Colwell, J., and Esposito, L. W. (1990) A numerical model of the Uranian dust ring. Icarus 86, 530–560.Google Scholar
Cuzzi, J.N., and Bums, J. A. (1988) Charged particle depletion surrounding Saturn’s F ring: Evidence for a moonlet belt? Icarus 74, 284–324.Google Scholar
Cuzzi, J.N., Cooper, J. F., Hood, L.L. and Showalter, M. R. (1989) Abundance and size distribution of ring material outside of the main rings of Saturn. JPLPD 699-11, 13, Sec. 5.Google Scholar
Esposito, L.W., Brahic, A., Burns, J.A. and Marouf, E. A. (1991) Particle properties and processes in Uranus’s rings, in Bergstralh, J. T., Miner, E. D. and Matthews, M. S. (eds.), Uranus, Univ. Arizona Press, Tucson, in press.Google Scholar
Goertz, C.K. (1989) Dusty plasmas in the solar system. Rev. Geophys. 27, 271–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grün, E., Morfili, G. E. and Mendis, D. A. (1984) Dust-magnetosphere interactions, in Greenberg, R. J. and Brahic, A. (eds.), Planetary Rings Univ. Arizona Press, Tucson, pp. 275–332.Google Scholar
Herbert, F. et al.(1987) The upper atmosphere of Uranus: EUV occultations observed by Voyager 2. Jnl. Geophys. Res. 92, 15093–15109.Google Scholar
Horanyi, M., and Bums, J. A. (1991) Orbital resonance due to planetary shadows. Jnl. Geophys. Res. in press. Abstract in this volume.Google Scholar
Horanyi, M., Burns, J. A., Tatrallyay, M., and Luhmarm, J. G. (1990) On the fate of dust lost from the Martian satellites. Geophys. Res. Ltrs. 17, 853–856.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, R. E., Barton, L. A., Boring, J. W., Jesser, W. A., Brown, W. L. and Lanzerotti, L. J. (1985) Charged particle modification of ices in the Satumian and Jovian systems, in Klinger, J., Benest, D., Dollfus, A. and Smoluchowslci, R. (eds.), Ices in the Solar System, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp.301–317.Google Scholar
Mendis, D.A., Hill, J. R., Ip, W.-H., Goertz, C. K. and Grün, E. (1984) Electrodynamic processes in the ring system of Saturn, in Gehrels, T. and Matthews, M. S. (eds.), Saturn, Univ. Arizona Press, Tucson, pp. 546–589.Google Scholar
Mignard, F. (1984) Effects of radiation forces on dust particles in planetary rings, in Greenberg, R. J. and Brahic, A. (eds.), Planetary Rings, Univ. Arizona Press, Tucson, 333–366.Google Scholar
Northrop, T.G., Mendis, D. A. and Schaffer, L. (1989) Gyrophase drift and the orbital evolution of dust at Jupiter’s gossamer ring. Icarus 79, 101–115.Google Scholar
Ockert, M.E., Cuzzi, J. N., Porco, C. C. and Johnson, T. V. (1987) Uranian ring photometry: Results from Voyager 2. Jnl. Geophys. Res. 92, 14969–14978.Google Scholar
Schaffer, L.E. (1989)The Dynamics of Dust in Planetary Magnetospheres. Ph. D.dissertation. Cornell Univ., Ithaca NY.Google Scholar
Schaffer, L., and Burns, J. A. (1987) The dynamics of weakly charged dust: Motion through Jupiter’s gravitational and magnetic fields. Jnl. Geophys. Res. 92, 2264–2280.Google Scholar
Showalter, M.R. (1991) This volume.Google Scholar
Showalter, M.R., Cuzzi, J. N. and Larson, S. M. (1991) Structure and particle properties of Saturn’s E ring. Icarus submitted.Google Scholar
Smith, B.A., and the Voyager imaging team (1989) Voyager 2 at Neptune: Imaging science results. Science 246, 1422–1449.Google Scholar
Soter, S.L. (1971) The dust belts of Mars. CRSR Rpt. 472, Cornell Univ.Google Scholar
Stevenson, D.J. (1983) Planetary magnetic fields. Rep. Prog. Phys. 46, 555–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whipple, E. C. (1981) Potentials of surfaces in space. Rep. Prog. Phys. 44, 1197–1250.Google Scholar