Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-cx56b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-28T20:22:28.519Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Precession Theory Using the Invariable Plane of the Solar System

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

W.M. Owen Jr.
W.M. Owen Jr.*
Affiliation:
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, University of Florida , California Institute of TechnologyGainesville, Florida Pasadena, California;

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Standard precession theory builds up the precession matrix P, which rotates coordinates from the mean equator and equinox of epoch to the mean equator and equinox of date, by a sequence of three elementary rotations by the accumulated Euler angles ϚA, θA and zA: P = R3(−zA)R2(θA)R3(−ϚA). This scheme works well provided both the epoch and the date are within a few centuries of J2000. For long-term applications, the alternative formulation using the accumulated luni-solar and planetary precession, P = R3(ᵡA)R1(−ѡA)R3(−ψA)R1(ɛ), is more stable.

Yet another formulation for P is possible, using the invariable plane of the Solar System as an intermediate plane: P = R3(−L) R1(−I) R3(−Δ) R1(I0) R3(L0). The angles I0 and L0 are the inclination and ascending node of the invariable plane at epoch; I and L are the same quantities at the date. Only the angle Δ is a function of both times. This scheme works for both short-term and long-term applications.

For the short term, polynomial coefficients for I, L, and Δ are derived from the currently-accepted coefficients of the angles ϚA, θA and zA. For the long term, these angles are expressed as sums of Chebyshev polynomials obtained from analysis of a million-year numerical integration.

If the intersection of the mean equator and the invariable plane were adopted as the origin of right ascensions, the theory would be simplified further: since L0 and L would no longer be required, P would again consist of the minimum three rotations.

Type
Part 2. Poster Papers
Information
International Astronomical Union Colloquium , Volume 127: Reference Systems , 1991 , pp. 323 - 326
Copyright
Copyright © United States Naval Observatory 1991

References

Burkhardt, G. (1982). Astron. Astrophys. 106, 133.Google Scholar
Eichhorn, H.K. (1977/78). Cel. Mech. 43, part 4, 237.Google Scholar
Jacobson, R.A., Lewis, G.D., Owen, W.M., Riedel, J.E., Roth, D.C., Synnott, S.P., and Taylor, A.H. (1990). “Ephemerides of the Major Neptunian Satellites Determined from Earth-Based Astrometric and Voyager Imaging Observations,” AIAA paper 90–2881, AAS/AIAA Astrodynamics Conf., Portland, Ore.Google Scholar
Laskar, J. (1990). Astron. Astrophys., in preparation; a revision of Astron. Astrophys. 198, 341 (1988).Google Scholar
Lieske, J.H., Lederle, T., Fricke, W., and Morando, B. (1977). Astron. Astrophys. 58, 1.Google Scholar
Kinoshita, H. (1977). Cel. Mech. 15, 277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owen, W.M. Jr. (1990). A Theory of the Earth’s Precession Relative to the Invariable Plane of the Solar System, Ph.D. dissertation, Univ. of Florida, Gainesville; in preparation.Google Scholar