Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-lrf7s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-27T21:30:12.952Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Relation of Algols and W Serpentis Stars

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

R. E. Wilson
R. E. Wilson*
Affiliation:
Department of Astronomy and Space Astronomy Laboratory, 211 SSRB,University of Florida, Gainesville,FL 32611

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Evidence on the issues of whether the W Serpentis stars are a coherent class, and how they may interface with the Algol systems, is reviewed, with emphasis on the idea that they are semi-detached systems in the latter part of the rapid phase of mass transfer, with optically and geometrically thick disks of transferred gas around the (now) more massive star. We are interested in what will be seen when the gas clears away, and mainly examine the idea that it will be an Algol-type system. More particularly, consideration is given to centrifugally limited accretion as a mechanism to build up a substantial disk, and the presumed evolutionary sequence is from a W Ser to a rapidly rotating Algol to a normal Algol system. Systems such as V367 Cyg and RW Tau fit into this scheme only with difficulty. Because it is extremely difficult to measure the rotation of some W Ser (mass) primaries, it is natural to look at the rotation statistics of Algols to test this idea. The badly behaved light curves and spectroscopy of some Algols (eg. U Cep, RZ Set) may be attributable to the double contact condition, and the ramifications of this possibility are discussed. If so, the rotation statistics of Algols should show two spikes, corresponding to the two special conditions into which a system should be driven by tidal braking and centrifugally limited spin-up. Present rotation statistics do show these spikes. Algols should flip between these states fairly quickly, depending on the mass transfer rate. Thus, to the extent that the meager statistics can be accepted as meaningful, the new (fourth) morphological type of close binary (double contact) has attained demonstrable reality. The rotation statistics are presented in terms of a particular rotation parameter, R, which is zero for synchronism and unity for the centrifugal limit. Future work should develop rotation statistics to see if the rotational lobe-filling (R=l) spike persists. It should also look into whether W Ser primaries are on the hydrogen burning main sequence, or in general what they are. We also need more light curves of W Ser type systems, high resolution line profiles for the (mass) primaries (with particular attention to the W Ser-Algol transition cases), and spectroscopy of low inclination W Serpentis systems, such as KX And.

Type
Research Article
Information
International Astronomical Union Colloquium , Volume 107: Algols , 1989 , pp. 191 - 203
Copyright
Copyright © Kluwer 1989

References

Dobias, J.J. and Plavec, M.J. 1985, Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacific 97, 138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giuricin, G., Mardirossian, F., and Mezzetti, M. 1983, Ap. J. Suppl. 52, 35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaitchuck, R.H., Honeycutt, R.K., and Schlegel, E.M. 1985, Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacific 97, 1178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kippenhahn, R. 1969, Astron. and Ap. 3, 83.Google Scholar
Koch, R.H., Olson, E.C., and Yoss, K.M. 1965, Ap. J. 141, 955 (KOY).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levato, H. 1974, Astron. and Ap. 35, 259 (L).Google Scholar
Olson, E.C. 1984, Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacific 96, 376 (O).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Packet, W. 1981, Astron. and Ap. 102, 17.Google Scholar
Paczynski, B. 1967, Acta Astron. 17, 355.Google Scholar
Paczynski, B. 1971, Ann. Rev. Astron. Ap. 9, 171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plavec, M.J. 1968, Advances in Astron. Ap. 6, 201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plavec, M.J. 1970, in “Stellar Rotation”, ed. Slettebak, A. (Reidel Publ., Dordrecht), p. 133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plavec, M.J. 1980, in “Close Binary Stars: Observations and Interpretation”, ed. Plavec, M.J., Popper, D.M., and Ulrich, R.K. (Reidel, Dordrecht Publ.), p. 251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plavec, M.J. 1986, in “Instrumentation and Research Programmes for Small Telescopes”, p. 173.Google Scholar
Rafert, J.B. and Markworth, N.L. 1983, Bull. Am. Astron. Soc. 15, 926 (RM).Google Scholar
Rucinski, S. 1979, Acta Astron. 9, 339 (R).Google Scholar
Van Hamme, W. and Wilson, R.E. 1986, Astron. J. 92, 1168 (VW1).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Hamme, W. and Wilson, R.E. 1989 (to be published) (VW2).Google Scholar
Wilson, R.E. 1974, Ap. J. 189, 319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, R.E. 1979, Ap. J. 234, 1054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, R.E. 1981, Ap. J. 251, 246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, R.E. 1982, in “Binary and Multiple Stars as Tracers of Stellar Evolution”, ed. Kopal, Z. and Rahe, J. (Reidel Publ.), p. 261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, R.E. 1989, “New Ways to Rotation Rates” (this volume).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, R.E. and Mukherjee, J.D. 1988, Astron. J. 96, 747 (WM).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, R.E. and Plavec, MJ. 1988, Astron. J. 95, 1828 (WP).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, R.E., Rafert, J.B., and Markworth, N.L. 1987, in “The Photoelectric Photometry Handbook”, ed. Genet, D.R., Genet, R.M., and Genet, K.A. (Fairborn Press), p. 199.Google Scholar
Wilson, R.E., Van Hamme, W., and Pettera, L.E. 1985, Ap. J. 289, 748 (WVP).CrossRefGoogle Scholar