Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-2l2gl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-02T08:17:54.841Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Some Thoughts on Multiple Stars

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

David S. Evans*
Affiliation:
Department of Astronomy, University of Texas, Austin and McDonald Observatory

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The occultation and spectroscopic approaches to the discovery of multiple stars are reviewed, and the technique of spectroscopic measurement recapitulated. A notation for multiple stars is proposed. An examination of the gravitational interaction levels suggests an average value of ∆ log P for one hierarchical step close to 3.0 and ∆ log a near 2.0 consistent with a binding ratio near 1 : 10000. The distribution for B stars seems to differ from other types and it is conjectured that they cannot be old enough to be residues of clusters. In general few multiple systems seems to show evidence of age sufficient for advanced evolution of the components.

Resumen

Resumen

Se ha hecho una reseña de los métodos para el descubrimiento de estrellas múltiples por medio de ocultación y espectroscopia y de la técnica de mediciones espectroscópicas. Se propone una notación para estrellas múltiples. Un examen de los niveles de interacción gravitational sugieren un valor promedio de ∆ log P para un paso jerárquico cercano a 3 y para ∆ log a cercano a 2.0, consistente con una razón de amarre cerca de 1:10000. La distribución para las estrellas B parece ser diferente a la de otros tipos y se conjetura que ellas no pueden ser lo suficientemente viejas para ser residuos de cúmulos. En general, pocos sistemas múltiples parecen mostrar evidencia de una edad suficiente, como para que presenten una evolución avanzada las componentes.

Type
Session 1
Copyright
Copyright © Otto G. Franz and Paris Pismis 1977

References

Abt, H., and Levy, S. 1976, Ap. J. Suppl., 30, 273.Google Scholar
Bartholdi, P. 1975, A. J., 80, 445.Google Scholar
Batten, A. H. 1967, Pub. D.A.O., 13, No. 8.Google Scholar
Batten, A. H., and Petrie, R. M. 1970, Pub. D.A.O., 13, No. 15.Google Scholar
Bolton, C. T., and Hurkens, R. 1974, J. R. Astron. Soc. Canada, 68, 262.Google Scholar
Dunham, D. W., Evans, D. S., McGraw, J. T., Sandmann, W. H. and Wells, D. C. 1973, A. J., 78, 482.Google Scholar
Evans, D. S. 1968, Quart. J.R.A.S., 9, 388.Google Scholar
Fekel, F. C. 1975, A. J., 80, 844.Google Scholar
Frazier, T. H., and Hall, D. S. 1974, Pub. A.S.P., 86, 66.Google Scholar
McGraw, J. T., Dunham, D. W., Evans, D. W., and Moffett, T. J. 1974, A. J., 79, 1299.Google Scholar
Nather, R. E., and Evans, D. S. 1971, Ap. and Space Sci., 11, 28.Google Scholar
Schöffel, E., and Popper, D. M. 1974, Pub. A.S.P., 86, 267.Google Scholar
Van Flandern, T. C, and Espenschied, P. 1975, Ap. J., 200, 61.Google Scholar
Wilson, R. E., and Joy, A. H. 1950, Ap. J., 111, 221.Google Scholar