Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-thh2z Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-07T03:30:49.813Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Two-Mirror Telescope (2MT)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

Richard G. Bingham*
Affiliation:
Royal Greenwich Observatory, Herstmonceux, Hailsham, East Sussex BN27 1RP, England

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Two eight-metre mirrors on an alt-azimuth mount are considered as a Future Large Telescope. The combined collecting area is ten times that of a four-metre class telescope, and the main modes of use are for optical spectroscopy and infrared imaging. In one square arc second, at 10µm wavelength, the telescope with adaptive auxiliary optics will yield 30 to 100 fully resolved image elements (not speckles). The mechanical arrangement proposed to give path length stability is to link the two tube centre sections along a horizontal axis and to use a total of four altitude bearings. A combined focus is necessary for the highest angular resolution, but other work such as spectroscopy can be carried out either at a combined focus or using separate instrumentation for the two eight-metre apertures. Twin prime and Cassegrain foci and horizontal Nasmyth platforms are intended for such pairs of spectrographs and other instruments, depending on their weight and field requirements. A pair of prime focus spectrographs with f/0.8 cameras is one appropriate system. (The horizontal Nasmyth platforms to accommodate larger spectrographs are a feature of this telescope which is not feasible in other MMT-type configurations). Another significant capability is that for a coud6-type light path from either aperture to the vertical axis. This can be achieved with four reflections (including the primary) for some applications. In addition to the conventional uses of the coudg light path, there is the possibility of using it to produce interferometric links to other telescopes. These links may be important as a future extension of the instrument.

Type
III. Atmospheric Seeing, Interferometry, Speckle, MMTs and Arrays
Copyright
Copyright © ESO 1984

References

Beckers, J. K. and Hege, E.K., 1982. IAU Colloquium No. 67, 199 (Ed. Humphries, C.)Google Scholar
Bingham, R. G., 1978. Q.JI.R.astr.Soc., 20, 395.Google Scholar
Bingham, R. G., 1982. Proc. S.P.I.E. 369, 303.Google Scholar
Bingham, R. G., 1983(a). The Observatory, 103, 286.Google Scholar
Bingham, R. G., 1983(b). Proc. S.P.I.E. 444, 118.Google Scholar
Bingham, R. G., 1983(c). Proc. S.P.I.E. 445, 516.Google Scholar
Disney, M. J., 1972. Mon. Not. R. astr. Soc, 160, 213.Google Scholar
Hardy, J. H., 1982. roc. S.P.I.E. 332, 252.Google Scholar
Mast, T. S., and Nelson, J.E., 1982. Appl. Opt. 21, 2631.Google Scholar
Meinel, A. B., Meinel, P. and Woolf, N. J., Appl. Opt. & Opt. Eng., 9, 149, 1983.Google Scholar
Nelson, J. E. 1982. Proc. S.P.I.E. 332, 109.Google Scholar
Strittmatter, P., 1980. In “Optical and infrared telescopes for the 1990’s, ed. Hewitt, A. (Kitt Peak National Observatory, Tucson), p. A–i.Google Scholar
Traub, W. A. and Davis, W. F., 1982. Proc. SPIE 332, 164.Google Scholar
Traub, W. A. 1983 in Proc. SPIE 440.Google Scholar
Woolf, N. J. 1982 Ann. Rev. Astron. Ap. 20, 367.Google Scholar
Woolf, N. J. and Angel, J. R. P., 1980. In “Optical and Infrared Telescopes for the 1990’s, ed. Hewitt, A. (Kitt Peak National Observatory, Tucson) p.1062.Google Scholar
Woolf, N. J., Angel, J. R. P., and McCarthy, D. W. Jr., , 1983. Proc. SPIE 444, 78.Google Scholar