No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
GREAT WALL?: OVERCOMING THE BOUNDARY BETWEEN EURO-AMERICAN AND SINO-JAPANESE SINOLOGIES
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 31 July 2009
Extract
It is well known that the nations of Europe and North America take the lead in the majority of disciplines in the academic world today. In most fields, unless a scholarly work makes reference in some way or other to the findings of Euro-American research, it is not considered worthy of mention. It is not, however, so common for the accomplishments of Euro-American scholars to be taken up by Japanese and Chinese scholars working in the field of ancient Chinese history. Presumably one reason for this is that in East Asia, especially in Japan and China, there are long and rich traditions of scholarship on Chinese ancient history that reach back to premodern times. Yet to just what extent is the research of European and American scholars referenced in the introductory books and general surveys concerning ancient Chinese history that are published in Japan and China?
- Type
- Review article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009
References
1 Ginpū, Uchida 内田吟風. Kita Ajia shi kenkyū: Kyōdo hen 北アジア史研究―匈奴篇. Kyoto: Dōhōsha, 1975Google Scholar; Changshou, Ma 马长寿. Bei Di yu Xiongnu 北狄与匈奴. Beijing: Sanlian shudian, 1962Google Scholar.
2 Michio, Tanigawa 谷川道雄. Zui Tō teikoku keisei shiron 隋唐帝国形成史論. Tokyo: Chikuma shobō, 1971Google Scholar.
3 Yinke, Chen 陈寅恪. Sui Tang zhidu yuanyuan lüelungao 隋唐制度渊源略论稿. Chongqing: Guoli Zhongyang Yanjiuyuan Lishi Yuyan Yanjiusuo Zhuankan, 1944Google Scholar; Beijing: Sanlian shudian, 1954.
4 Kiyoyoshi, Utsunomiya 宇都宮清吉. “Shin Kan seijishi” 秦漢政治史. In vol. 4 of Shina chiri rekishi taikei 支那地理歴史大系. Tokyo: Hakuyōsha, 1941Google Scholar; “Kanshi teishi shokuhen ni yosete: kodai sensei taisei to shakai shoshūdan to no kankei ni tsuite no kōsatsu” 管子弟子職篇によせて―古代専制体制と社会諸集団との関係に就いての考察―. Nagoya Daigaku Bungakubu kenkyū ronshū: shigaku 名古屋大学文学部研究論集: 史学, no. 10 (March 1963); “Chūgoku kodai chūseishi haaku no tame no ichi shikaku” 中国古代中世史把握のための一視角. Chūgoku chūseishi kenkyū 中国中世史研究. Tokyo: Tōkai Daigaku shuppankai, 1970.
5 Kiyoyoshi, Utsunomiya. Chūgoku kodai chūseishi kenkyū 中国古代中世史研究. Tokyo: Sōbunsha, 1977Google Scholar.
6 Konan, Naitō 内藤湖南. Shina jōkoshi 支那上古史. Tokyo: Kōbundō 弘文堂, 1944Google Scholar; Chūgoku kinseishi 中国近世史. Tokyo: Kōbundō, 1947.
7 Kiyoyoshi, Utsunomiya. Kandai shakai keizaishi kenkyū 漢代社会経済史研究. Tokyo: Kōbundō, 1955Google Scholar.
8 Maeda Naonori 前田直典. “Higashi Ajiya ni okeru kodai no shūmatsu” 東アジヤに於ける古代の終末. Rekishi 歴史 1–4, April 1948. The article is also included in his Genchōshi no kenkyū 元朝史の研究 [Research in the history of the Yuan dynasty] Tokyo: Tōkyō Daigaku shuppankai, 1973.
9 Shinji, Higashi 東晋次. “Shin Kan Teikokuron” 秦漢帝国論. In Michio, Tanigawa 谷川道雄, ed., Sengo Nihon no Chūgokushi ronsō 戦後日本の中国史論争 [Contentious debates on Chinese history in postwar Japan]. Nagoya: Kawai Bunka Kyōiku Kenkyūjo, 1993Google Scholar.
10 Sadao, Nishijima 西嶋定生. “Chūgoku kodai teikoku no ichi kōsatsu: Kan no kōso to sono kōshin” 中国古代帝国の一考察―漢の高祖とその功臣―. Rekishigaku kenkyū 歴史学研究 141 (September 1949)Google Scholar.
11 Sadao, Nishijima. Chūgoku kodai teikoku no keisei to kōzō: nijūttō shakusei no kenkyū 中国古代帝国の形成と構造―二十等爵制の研究―. Tokyo: Tōkyō Daigaku shuppankai, 1961Google Scholar.
12 Tatsuo, Masubuchi 増淵龍夫. Chūgoku kodai no shakai to kokka: Shin Kan teikoku seiritsu katei no shakaishiteki kenkyū 中国古代の社会と国家―秦漢帝国成立過程の社会史的研究―. Tokyo: Kōbundō, 1960Google Scholar.
13 Masao, Kimura 木村正雄. Chūgoku kodai teikoku no keisei: toku ni sono seiritsu no kiso jōken 中国古代帝国の形成―特にその成立の基礎条件―. Tokyo: Fumaidō, 1965Google Scholar.
14 Michio, Tanigawa 谷川道雄 and Yoshio, Kawakatsu 川勝義雄. “Chūgoku chūseishi kenkyū ni okeru tachiba to hōhō” 中国中世史研究における立場と方法. In Kenkyūkai, Chūgoku Chūseishi 中国中世史研究会, ed., Chūgoku chūseishi kenkyū 中国中世史研究. Tokyo: Tōkai Daigaku shuppankai, 1970Google Scholar.
15 Naohiro, Goi 五井直弘. “Chūgoku kodaishi to kyōdōtai: Tanigawa Michio shi no shoron o megutte” 中国古代史と共同体―谷川道雄氏の所論をめぐって―. Rekishi hyōron 歴史評論 255 (October 1971)Google Scholar.
16 Kensuke, Tada 多田狷介. “Chūgoku kodaishi kenkyū oboegaki” 中国古代史研究覚書. Shisō 史艸 12 (October 1971)Google Scholar.
17 Yukio, Ōta 太田幸男. “Chūgoku kodai kokka ni kansuru nōto: saikin no shosetsu e no hihan o fumaete” 中国古代国家に関するノート―最近の諸説への批判をふまえて―. Rekishi hyōron 歴史評論 357 (January 1980)Google Scholar.
18 Yukio, Ōta. “Shō Ō henpō no saikentō” 商鞅変法の再検討 kenkyūkai, Rekishigaku 歴史学研究会 ed. Rekishi ni okeru minzoku no keisei 歴史における民族の形成 [The formation of ethnicity in history]. Tokyo: Aoki shoten, 1975Google Scholar.
19 Takashi, Yoshinami 好並隆司. “Zenkan teikoku no nijū kōzō to jidai kitei” 前漢帝国の二重構造と時代規定. Rekishigaku kenkyū 歴史学研究 375 (August 1971)Google Scholar; “Shinkan teikoku seiritsu katei ni okeru shōnomin to kyōdōtai” 秦漢帝国成立過程における小農民と共同体. Rekishi hyōron 歴史評論 279 (August 1973); “Chūgoku ni okeru kōteiken no seiritsu to tenkai” 中国における皇帝権の成立と展開. Shisō 思想 644 (February 1978). These three articles were then reprinted in Shinkan teikokushi kenkyū 秦漢帝国史研究. Tokyo: Miraisha, 1978.
20 Shin'ichirō, Watanabe 渡辺信一郎. “Shinkan Teikoku kara Zuitō ritsuryōsei kokka e: Chūgoku ni okeru sensei kokka keitai to nōdosei keisei ni kansuru ichi shiron” 秦漢帝国から隋唐律令制国家へ―中国における専制国家形態と農奴制形成に関する一試論―. Atarashii rekishigaku no tame ni 139 (August 1975)Google Scholar; “Chūgoku ni okeru ritsuryōsei to shakai kōsei” 中国における律令制と社会構成. In kenkyūkai, Rekishigaku 歴史学研究会, ed., Sekaishi no shin kyokumen to rekishizō no saikentō 世界史の新局面と歴史像の再検討 [New aspects of world history and reconsiderations of images of history]. Tokyo: Aoki shoten, 1976Google Scholar.
21 Kazuyuki, Tsuruma 鶴間和幸. “Shinkanki no suirihō to zaichi nōgyō keiei” 秦漢期の水利法と在地農業経営. In Kenkyūkai, Rekishigaku 歴史学研究会, ed., Sekaishi ni okeru chiiki to minshū (zoku) 世界史における地域と民衆（続） [Locality and the masses in global history (continued)]. Tokyo: Aoki shoten, 1980Google Scholar.
22 Wailu, Hou 侯外卢. “Zhongguo fengjian shehui tudi suoyouzhi xingshi de wenti: Zhongguo fengjian shehui fazhan guilu shangdui zhi yi” 中国封建社会土地所有制形式的问题―中国封建社会発展规律商兑之一―. Lishi yanjiu 历史研究 1954–1 (January 1954)Google Scholar.
23 Rulei, Hu 胡如雷. “Shi lun Zhongguo fengjian shehui de tudi suoyouzhi xingshi: dui Hou Wailu xiansheng yijian de shangquan” 试论中国封建社会的土地所有制形式——对侯外庐先生意见的商榷. Guangming ribao 光明日报 13 September 1956Google Scholar.
24 Quan, Jiang 江泉. “Shilun Handai de tudi suoyouzhi xingshi” 试论汉代的土地所有制形式. Wen shi zhe 文史哲 1957–9 (September 1957)Google Scholar.
25 Jiaoyanzu, Nankai Daxue Lishixi Zhongguo Gudaishi 南开大学历史系中国古代史教研组 eds. Zhongguo fengjian shehui tudi suoyouzhi xingshi wenti taolunji 中国封建社会土地所有制形式问题讨论集. Beijing: Sanlian shudian, 1962Google Scholar.
26 Tian Changwu 田昌五 and An Zuozhang 安作璋. Qin Han shi 秦汉史 1993, rev. edn. 2008.
27 Jian Bozan 翦伯赞. Qin Han shi 秦汉史 1947; Lin Jianming 林剑鸣. Qin Han shi 秦汉史 1989.
28 Motoko, Hara 原宗子. ‘Nōhon'shugi to ‘kōdo’ no hassei 「農本」主義と「黄土」の発生. Tokyo: Kenbun shuppan, 2005Google Scholar.
29 In drafting this review article, the following works were especially helpful: Bozan, Jian 翦伯赞. Qin Han shi 秦汉史. 3rd edn.Shanghai: Dafu chuban gongsi 大孚出版公司, 1947Google Scholar; Lin Jianming 林剑鸣. Qin Han shi 秦汉史. Shanghai: Shanghai renmin chubanshe 上海人民出版社, 1989; Misaki Yoshiaki 三崎良章. “Goko Jūrokkoku: Chūgoku shijō no minzoku daiidō” 五胡十六国―中国史上の民族大移動―. Tokyo: Tōhō shoten 東方書店, 2002; Sadao, Nishijima 西嶋定生. Chūgoku no rekishi 2: Shinkan teikoku 中国の歴史２ 秦漢帝国. Tokyo: Kōdansha 講談社, 1974Google Scholar; Isamu, Ogata 尾形勇 and Takao, Hirase 平勢隆郎. Sekai no rekishi 2: Chūka bunmei no tanjō 世界の歴史２ 中華文明の誕生. Tokyo: Chūō kōronsha 中央公論社, 1998Google Scholar; Michio, Tanigawa 谷川道雄 ed. Sengo Nihon no Chūgokushi ronsō 戦後日本の中国史論争. Nagoya: Kawai Bunka Kyōiku Kenkyūjo 河合文化教育研究所, 1993Google Scholar; Changwu, Tian 田昌五 and Zuozhang, An 安作璋 eds. Qin Han shi 秦汉史. Beijing: Renmin chubanshe 人民出版社, 1993Google Scholar, rev. edn. 2008; Kazuyuki, Tsuruma 鶴間和幸. Chūgoku no rekishi 03: faasuto enperaa no isan – Shin Kan teikoku 中国の歴史０３ ファーストエンペラーの遺産―秦漢帝国―. Tokyo: Kōdansha 講談社, 2004Google Scholar; Ke, Yuan 袁珂. Zhongguo gudai shenhua 中国古代神话. Rev. edn.Beijing: Zhonghua shuju 中華書局, 1960Google Scholar.