Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pjpqr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-29T12:47:57.773Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Humanity should colonize space in order to survive but not with embryo space colonization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 May 2021

Konrad Szocik Open the ORCID record for Konrad Szocik [Opens in a new window]
Konrad Szocik*
Affiliation:
Department of Social Sciences, University of Information Technology and Management, Sucharskiego 2 Street, Rzeszów, 35-311, Poland
*
Author for correspondence: Konrad Szocik, E-mail: kszocik@wsiz.edu.pl
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The embryo space colonization (ESC) concept is an interesting, very rational and quite effective way to guarantee the survival of the human species, as long as the technology is achieved and no unforeseen complications arise during even many millions of years journey to an exoplanet. Despite these formal advantages of the concept, this paper points to a number of arguments against its validity. These arguments revolve around two issues. One is to point out that while the concept of saving the Homo sapiens species is noble and should be supported, the way of saving humanity envisioned by the ESC departs from what should be understood by the concept of saving humanity through space colonization. The second issue is to draw attention to the ethical controversies that make this concept perhaps unsuitable for implementation at all. At least some of these objections do not address the concept of saving humanity by sending adult living persons on space missions.

Keywords

Embryo space colonizationethics of quality of lifefuture generationsmind uploadingspace bioethicsspace refugesurvival of humanity
Type
Research Article
Information
International Journal of Astrobiology , Volume 20 , Issue 4 , August 2021 , pp. 319 - 322
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Edwards, MR (2021) Android Noahs and embryo Arks: ectogenesis in global catastrophe survival and space colonization. International Journal of Astrobiology 20, 150–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gheaus, A (2016) The right to parent and duties concerning future generations. The Journal of Political Philosophy 24, 487–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gosseries, A (2008) On future generations’ future rights. The Journal of Political Philosophy 16, 446–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mill, JS (1859) On liberty. In Robson, JM (ed.), Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Vol. XVIII: Essays on Politics and Society Part I. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1977, pp. 214–310.Google Scholar
Norris, P and Inglehart, R (2004) Sacred and Secular. Religion and Politics Worldwide. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, JSJ (2021) Lunar settlement and the right to return to earth. In Boone Rappaport, M and Szocik, K (eds), The Human Factor in the Settlement of the Moon. An Interdisciplinary Approach. Cham: Springer, in press.Google Scholar