Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-11T04:56:27.602Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

‘Where is everybody?’ An empirical appraisal of occurrence, prevalence and sustainability of technological species in the Universe

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 January 2019

John-Oliver Engler  and
Henrik von Wehrden
John-Oliver Engler*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Sustainability, Leuphana University of Lüneburg, Germany
Henrik von Wehrden
Affiliation:
Faculty of Sustainability, Leuphana University of Lüneburg, Germany
*
Author for correspondence: John-Oliver Engler, E-mail: engler@leuphana.de
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We use recent results from astrobiology, particularly the A-form of the Drake equation and combine it with data on the evolution of life on Earth to obtain a new assessment of the prevalence of technological species in our Universe. A species is technological if it is, in theory, capable of interstellar communication. We find that between seven and 300 technological species have likely arisen in the Milky Way until today, the current state of which however unknown. Assuming that we are currently alone in our Galaxy, we estimate that we would need to wait for roughly 26 million years for a 50% chance of another technological species to arise. By relating our results to the much-debated Fermi–Hart paradox, we discuss if and to what extent our results may help quantify the chances of humanity to manage the transition to a long-term sustainable path of existence.

Keywords

Drake equationextraterrestrial intelligencefuture of humanitySETIsustainability
Type
Research Article
Information
International Journal of Astrobiology , Volume 18 , Issue 6 , December 2019 , pp. 495 - 501
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Batalha, NM, Borucki, WJ, Bryson, ST, Buchhave, LA, Caldwell, DA, Christensen-Dalsgaard, J, Ciardi, D, Dunham, EW, Fressin, F, Gautier, TN III, Gilliland, RL, Haas, MR, Howell, SB, Jenkins, JM, Kjeldsen, H, Koch, DG, Latham, , David, W, Lissauer, JJ, Marcy, GW, Rowe, JF, Sasselov, DD, Seager, S, Steffen, JH, Torres, G, Basri, GS, Brown, TM, Charbonneau, D, Christiansen, J, Clarke, B, Cochran, WD, Dupree, A, Fabrycky, DC, Fischer, D, Ford, EB, Fortney, J, Girouard, FR, Holman, MJ, Johnson, J, Isaacson, H, Klaus, TC, Machalek, Pl, Moorehead, AV, Morehead, RC, Ragozzine, D, Tenenbaum, P, Twicken, J, Quinn, S, VanCleve, J, Walkowicz, LM, Welsh, WF, Devore, E, Gould, A (2011) Kepler's first rocky planet: Kepler-10b. The Astrophysical Journal 729, 27, (21 pp).Google Scholar
Benton, M (2011) Paleontology and the history of life. In Ruse, M and Travis, J (eds), Evolution: The First 4 Billion Years. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 80–104.Google Scholar
Bostrom, N (2008) Where are they? Why I hope that the search for extraterrestrial life finds nothing. MIT Technology Review May/June, 72–77.Google Scholar
Cailleux, A (1952) How many species? Evolution 8, 83.Google Scholar
Campante, TL, Barclay, T, Swift, JJ, Huber, D, Adibekyan, V. Zh, Cochran, W, Burke, WJ, Isaacson, H, Quintana, WJ, Davies, GR, Silva Aguirre, V, Ragozzine, D, Riddle, R, Baranec, C, Basu, S, Chaplin, WJ, Christensen-Dalsgaard, J, Metcalfe, WJ, Bedding, WJ, Handberg, R, Stello, D, Brewer, WJ, Hekker, S, Karoff, C, Kolbl, R, Law, NM, Lundkvist, M, Miglio, A, Rowe, F, Santos, NC, Van Laerhoven, C, Arentoft, T, Elsworth, YP, Fischer, DA, Kawaler, SD, Kjeldsen, H, Lund, MN, Marcy, GW, Sousa, SG, Sozzetti, A, and White, TR (2015) An ancient extrasolar system with five sub-earth-size planets. The Astrophysical Journal 799, 170, (17pp).Google Scholar
Carter, B (1983) The anthropic principle and its implications for biological evolution. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A 310, 347–363.Google Scholar
Cassan, A, Kubas, D, Beaulieu, J-P, Dominik, M, Horne, K, Greenhill, J, Wambsganss, J, Menzies, J et al. (2012) One or more bound planets per Milky Way star from microlensing observations. Nature 481, 167–169.Google Scholar
Crowe, MJ (1986) The Extraterrestrial Life Debate, 1750–1900. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
de Vladar, HP and Barton, NH (2011) The contribution of statistical physics to evolutionary biology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 26, 424–432.Google Scholar
Dick, SJ (1982) Plurality of Words: The Extraterrestrial Life Debate from Democritus to Kant, 1st Edn. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Drake, F (1965) The radio search for intelligent extraterrestrial life. In Mamikunian, G and Briggs, MH (eds), Current Aspects of Exobiology. New York, NY: Pergamon, pp. 323–345.Google Scholar
Drake, F and Sobel, D (1991) Is Anyone Out There?. London, UK: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Ferus, M, Pietrucci, F, Saitta, AM, Knížek, A, Kubelik, P, Ivanek, O, Shestivska, V and Civiš, S (2016) Formation of nucleobases in a Miller-Urey reducing atmosphere. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114, 4306–4311.Google Scholar
Finney, BR and Jones, EM (1985) Is anybody home? Introduction; Synopsis of Fermi's question. In Finney, BR and Jones, EM (eds), Interstellar Migration and the Human Experience. Berkeley, USA: University of California Press, pp. 298–300.Google Scholar
Forgan, DH and Rice, K (2010) Numerical testing of the Rare Earth Hypothesis using Monte Carlo realization techniques. International Journal of Astrobiology 9, 73–80.Google Scholar
Frank, A and Sullivan, WT (2014) Sustainability and the astrobiological context: framing human futures in a planetary context. Anthropocene 5, 32–41.Google Scholar
Frank, A and Sullivan, WT (2016) A new empirical constraint on the prevalence of technological species in the Universe. Astrobiology 16, 359–362.Google Scholar
Frank, A, Carroll-Nellenback, J, Alberti, M and Kleidon, A (2018) The Anthropocene generalized: evolution of exo-civilizations and their planetary feedback. Astrobiology 18, 503–518.Google Scholar
Freitas, RA (1983) Extraterrestrial intelligence in the solar system: resolving the Fermi Paradox. Journal of the British Interplanetary Society 36, 496–500.Google Scholar
Freitas, RA (1985) There is no Fermi Paradox, Icarus 62, 518–520.Google Scholar
Fukugita, M and Peebles, PJE (2004) The cosmic energy inventory. Astrophysical Journal 616, 643–668.Google Scholar
Glade, N, Ballet, P and Bastien, O (2012) A stochastic process approach of the Drake equation parameters. International Journal of Astrobiology 11, 103–108.Google Scholar
Gott III, JR (1993) Implications of the Copernican principle for our future prospects. Nature 363, 315–319.Google Scholar
Gray, RH (2015) The Fermi paradox is neither Fermi's nor a paradox. Astrobiology 15, 195–199.Google Scholar
Grimaldi, C (2017) Signal coverage approach to the detection probability of hypothetical extraterrestrial emitters in the Milky Way. Nature Scientific Reports 7, 46273, DOI: 10.1038/srep46273.Google Scholar
Grimaldi, C, Marcy, GW, Tellis, NK and Drake, F (2018) Area coverage of expanding E.T. signals in the galaxy: SETI and Drake's N, preprint available online at https://arxiv.org/pdf/1802.09399v1.pdf, accessed on 06/08/2018.Google Scholar
Hacking, I (1971) Jacques Bernoulli's art of conjecturing. British Journal of Philosophical Science 22, 209–229.Google Scholar
Hanson, R (1998) The Great Filter – Are we almost past it? retrieved from http://mason.gmu.edu/rhanson/greatfilter.html on 03/16/2018.Google Scholar
Hart, MH (1975) An explanation of the absence of extraterrestrials on Earth. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Astrophysical Society 16, 128–135.Google Scholar
Hubbart, GS (2008) What is Astrobiology? retrieved from https://www.nasa.gov/feature/what-is-astrobiology on 11/13/2018.Google Scholar
Iberall, AS (1989) How many species?. GeoJournal 18, 133–139.Google Scholar
Keynes, JM (1921) A Treatise on Probability. London, UK: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Landis, GA (1998) The Fermi paradox: an approach based on percolation theory. Journal of the British Interplanetary Society 51, 163–166.Google Scholar
Laplace, PS (1820) Théorie Analytique des Probabilités. Paris: Mme Ve Courcier.Google Scholar
Locey, KJ and Lennon, JT (2016) Scaling laws predict global microbial diversity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113, 5970–5975.Google Scholar
Lunine, JI (2006) Physical conditions on the early Earth. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 361, 1721–1731.Google Scholar
Maccone, C (2010) The statistical Drake equation. Acta Astronautica 67, 1366–1383.Google Scholar
McLeish, TCB (2015) Are there ergodic limits to evolution? Ergodic exploration of genome space and convergence. Interface Focus 5, 20150041, (12pp).Google Scholar
Mora, C, Tittensor, DP, Adl, S, Simpson, AGB and Worm, B (2011) How many species are there on Earth and in the ocean?. PLoS Biology 9, e1001127, 8 pp.Google Scholar
Parfit, D (2011) On What Matters, vol. 2. UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Petigura, EA, Howard, AW and Marcy, GW (2013) Prevalence of Earth-size planets orbiting Sun-like stars. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 110, 19273–19278.Google Scholar
Queloz, D, Bouchy, F, Moutou, C, Hatzes, A, Hébrard, G, Alonso, R, Auvergne, M, Baglin, A, Barbieri, M, Barge, P, Benz, W, Bordé, P, Deeg, WJ, Deleuil, M, Dvorak, R, Erikson, A, Ferraz Mello, S, Fridlund, M, Gandolfi, D, Gillon, M, Guenther, E, Guillot, T, Jorda, L, Hartmann, M, Lammer, H, Léger, A, Llebaria, A, Lovis, C, Magain, P, Mayor, M, Mazeh, T, Ollivier, M, Pätzold, M, Pepe, F, Rauer, H, Rouan, D, Schneider, J, Segransan, D, Udry, S and Wuchterl, G (2009) The CoRoT-7 planetary system: two orbiting super-Earths. Astronomy and Astrophysics 506, 303–319.Google Scholar
Quintana, EV, Barclay, T, Raymond, SN, Rowe, JF, Bolmont, E, Caldwell, DA, Howell, SB, Kane, SR, Huber, D, Crepp, JR, Lissauer, JJ, Ciardi, DR, Coughlin, JL, Everett, ME, Henze, CE, Horch, E, Isaacson, H, Ford, EB, Adams, FC, Still, M, Hunter, RC, Quarles, B, Selsis, F (2014) An Earth-sized planet in the habitable zone of a cool star. Science 344, 277–280.Google Scholar
Ramirez, R, Gómez-Muñoz, MA, Vázquez, Roberto and Núñez, PG (2018) New numerical determination of habitability in the galaxy: the SETI connection, International Journal of Astrobiology 17(1), 34–43.Google Scholar
Rossmo, DK (2017) Bernoulli, Darwin, and Sagan: the probability of life on other planets. International Journal of Astrobiology 16, 185–189.Google Scholar
Sagan, C (2015) The Quest for ET Intelligence, Cosmic Search 1(2), available online at www.bigear.org/vol1no2/sagan.htm, retrieved on 01/31/2018.Google Scholar
Schloss, PD and Handelsman, J (2004) Status of the microbial census. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews 68, 686–691.Google Scholar
Shklovsky, IS and Sagan, C (1966) Intelligent Life in the Universe. San Francisco, CA: Holden-Day.Google Scholar
Simpson, GG (1952) How many species?. Evolution 6, 342.Google Scholar
Sullivan, WT and Baross, JA (2007) Planets and Life: The Emerging Science of Astrobiology. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tipler, FJ (1980) Extraterrestrial intelligent beings do not exist. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Astrophysical Society 22, 267–281.Google Scholar
Weisstein, EW (2018) ‘Principle of Insufficient Reason’, From MathWorld – A Wolfram Web Ressource, retrieved from http://mathworld.wolfram.com/PrincipleofInsufficientReason.html on 09/13/2018.Google Scholar