Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gvh9x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T13:23:25.144Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Review of David A. Scott, Art: Authenticity, Restoration and Forgery. 500 pp. Los Angeles: University of California, Los Angeles, Cotsen Institute of Archaeology Press, 2016

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2017

Betty L. Schlothan*
Affiliation:
Department of History of Art and Architecture, University of California, Santa Barbara; Email: bschlothan@umail.ucsb.edu.

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Copyright
Copyright © International Cultural Property Society 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Brandi, Cesare, and Basile, Giuseppe. 2005. Theory of Restoration. Rome: Instituto Centrale per il Restauro.Google Scholar
De Clerq, Rafael. 2013. “The Metaphysics of Restoration.” British Journal of Aesthetics 53, no. 3: 261–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dutton, Denis. 2003. “Authenticity in Art.” In The Oxford Handbook of Aesthetics, edited by Levinson, Jerrold, 258–74. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goodman, Nelson. 1968. Languages of Art: An Approach to a Theory of Symbols. Indianapolis: Bobb-Merrill.Google Scholar
Rowe, Mark. 2013. “The Problem of Perfect Fakes.” In Philosophy and the Arts, edited by O’Hear, Anthony, 151–75. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sagoff, Mark. 1978. “On Restoring and Reproducing Art.” Journal of Philosophy 75, no. 9: 453–70.Google Scholar
Scott, David A. 2015. “Conservation and Authenticity: Interactions and Enquiries.” Studies in Conservation 60, no. 5: 291305.Google Scholar
Scott, David A. 2016. Art: Authenticity, Restoration and Forgery. Los Angeles: University of California, Los Angeles, Cotsen Institute of Archaeology Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar