No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Antiquity market trends in Cycladic figurines, 2000–19: Studies in price, prevalence, and provenance
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 23 January 2023
Abstract
While the illicit trade in Cycladic figurines is a well-known phenomenon, and the escalatory impact of auction sales upon the looting of Cycladic deposits is widely accepted, there has been to date no systematic study of commercial transactions in Cycladic figurines. This study addresses this gap by performing a quantitative market analysis of auction house sales in Cycladic figurines between 2000 and 2019, examining the frequency with which they appear on the market, fluctuations in their price, and the nature of their provenance. In doing so, it sets out a methodology for navigating the ambiguous nature of antiquity market data, which can often give the misleading impression of a reforming market if the latent commercial contexts are not considered. Overall, a comprehensive insight is gained into the present state of the antiquities market in Cycladic figurines. This insight contributes much needed empirical data on the illicit antiquities trade and offers a new interpretative methodology that can be incorporated in future studies that seek to understand the true nature of antiquity market data.
- Type
- Article
- Information
- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the International Cultural Property Society
References
Alder, C., Chappell, D., and Polk, K.. 2009. “Perspectives on the Organization and Control of the Illicit Traffic in Antiquities in South East Asia.” In Organized Crime in Art and Antiquities, edited by Manacorda, S., 119–44. Milan: International Scientific and Professional Advisory Council of the United Nations Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice Programme.Google Scholar
Alder, C., and Polk, K.. 2005. “The Illicit Traffic in Plundered Antiquities.” In Handbook of Transnational Crime and Justice, edited by P. Reichel, 98–113. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aston, A. 2020. “How the Cycladic Islanders Found Their Marbles: Material Engagement, Social Cognition and the Emergence of Keros.” Cambridge Archaeological Journal 30, no. 4: 587–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, T. D., Bosanquet, R. C., Edgar, C. C., Evans, A. J., Hogarth, D. G., MacKenzie, D., Smith, C., and Welch, F. B.. 1904. Excavations at Phylakopi in Melos. Society for the Promotion of Hellenic Studies Supplement no. 4. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Atwood, R. 2004. Stealing History: Tomb Raiders, Smugglers, and the Looting of the Ancient World. New York: St. Martin’s PressGoogle Scholar
Balcells, M. 2019. “One Looter, Two Looters, Three Looters … The Discipline of Cultural Heritage Crime within Criminology and Its Inherent Measurement Problems.” In The Palgrave Handbook on Art Crime, edited by Chappell, D. and Huffnagel, S., 33–54. London: Palgrave MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balestrieri, B. 2019. “The Antiquities Licit-Illicit Interface.” In The Palgrave Handbook on Art Crime, edited by Chappell, D. and Huffnagel, S., 79–88. London: Palgrave MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berg, I. 2019. The Cyclades and the Aegean Islands in Prehistory. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bent, T. 1884. “Researches among the Cyclades.” Journal of Hellenic Studies 5: 42–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowman, B. 2008. “Transnational Crimes against Culture: Looting at Archaeological Sites and the ‘Grey’ Market in Antiquities.” Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice 24, no. 3: 225–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brodie, N. 2002. “Introduction.” In Illicit Antiquities: The Theft of Culture and the Extinction of Archaeology, edited by Brodie, N. and Tubb, K., 1–22. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Brodie, N. 2006. “An Archaeologist’s View of the Trade in Unprovenanced Antiquities.” In Art and Cultural Heritage, edited by B. Hoffman, 52–63. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brodie, N. 2014. “Provenance and Price: Autoregulation of the Antiquities Market?” European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research 20, no. 4: 427–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brodie, N. 2018. “The Illicit Antiquities Research Centre: Afterthoughts and Aftermaths.” In The Adventure of the Illustrious Scholar: Papers Presented to Oscar White Muscarella, edited by Simpson, E., 719–73. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Brodie, N. 2019. “Through a Glass, Darkly: Long-Term Antiquities Auction Data in Context.” International Journal of Cultural Property 26, no. 3: 265–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brodie, N., Doole, J., and Watson, P.. 2000. Stealing History: The Illicit Trade in Cultural Material. Cambridge, UK: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.Google Scholar
Brodie, N., and Manivet, P.. 2017. “Cylinder Seal Sales at Sotheby’s and Christie’s (1985–2013).” Journal of Art Crime 7: 3–16.Google Scholar
Broodbank, C. 2000. An Island Archaeology of the Early Cyclades. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Broodbank, C. 2008. “The Early Bronze Age in the Cyclades.” In The Cambridge Companion to the Aegean Bronze Age, edited by Shelmerdine, C. W., 47–76. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, P. B. 2013. “The Illicit Antiquities Trade as a Transnational Criminal Network: Characterizing and Anticipating Trafficking of Cultural Heritage.” International Journal of Cultural Property 20, no. 2: 113–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chappell, D., and Huffnagel, S.. 2019. “Art Crime: Exposing a Panoply of Theft, Fraud and Plunder.” In The Palgrave Handbook on Art Crime, edited by Chappell, D. and Huffnagel, S., 3–32. London: Palgrave MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chippindale, C. 2011. “Cultural Property.” Classical Review 61, no. 1: 256–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chippindale, C., and Gill, D.. 1995. “Cycladic Figurines: Art vs. Archaeology?” In Antiquities: Trade or Betrayed: Legal, Ethical and Conservation Issues, edited by Tubb, K., 131–42. London: Archetype Publications.Google Scholar
Christie’s. 2010. Antiquities Including Property of the Collection of Max Pavlevsky. 9 December. https://www.christies.com/lotfinder/ancient-art-antiquities/a-cycladic-marble-reclining-female-figure-name-piece-5385394-details.aspx?from=searchresults&intObjectID=5385394 (accessed 27 July 2020).Google Scholar
Craxton, J., and Warren, P.. 2004. “A Neocycladic Harpist?” In Material Engagements: Studies in Honour of Colin Renfrew, edited by Brodie, N. and Hills, C., 109–13. Cambridge, UK: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.Google Scholar
Dammer, H., and Albanese, J.. 2011. Comparative Criminal Justice Systems. 4th ed. Belmont: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
Davis, J. 1984. “A Cycladic Figure in Chicago and the Non-Funereal Use of Cycladic Marble Figures.” In Cycladica: Studies in Memory of N. P. Goulandris, Proceedings of the Seventh British Museum Classical Colloquium, edited by Fitton, L., 15–23. London: British Museum Publications.Google Scholar
Desmarais, F. 2015. “Introduction.” In Countering Illicit Traffic in Cultural Goods: The Global Challenge of Protecting the World’s Heritage, edited by Desmarais, F., vii–ix. Paris: International Council of Museums.Google Scholar
Doumas, C. 1991. “The Discovery of Early Cycladic Civilization.” In The Cycladic Spirit: Masterpieces from the Nicholas P. Goulandris Collection, edited by Renfrew, C., 25–30. London: Thames and Hudson.Google Scholar
Doumas, C. 1996. “Modern Forgeries.” In Dictionary of Art, edited by Turner, J.. Vol. 8. London: McMillanGoogle Scholar
Doumas, C. 2016. “The Human Condition as Reflected in Early Aegean Art.” In Studies in Aegean Art and Culture: A Colloquium in Memory of Ellen N. Davis, edited by Koehl, R., 47–58. Philadelphia: INSTAP Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dümmler, F. 1886. “Mitteilungen von den griechischen Inseln: I. Reste vorgriechischer Bevölkerung auf den Cykladen.” Mitteilungen des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts 11: 15–46.Google Scholar
Efrat, A. 2012. Governing Guns, Preventing Plunder: International Cooperation against Illicit Trade. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galanakis, Y. 2013. “Early Prehistoric Research on Amorgos and the Beginnings of Cycladic Archaeology.” American Journal of Archaeology 117: 181–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerstenblith, P. 2004. Art, Cultural Heritage, and the Law: Cases and Materials. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.Google Scholar
Gerstenblith, P. 2013. “The Meaning of 1970 for the Acquisition of Archaeological Objects.” Journal of Field Archaeology 38: 364–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Getz-Gentle, P. 2001. Personal Styles in Early Cycladic Sculpture. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Getz-Preziosi, P. 1987. Sculptors of the Cyclades: Individual and Tradition in the Third Millennium B.C. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press / J. Paul Getty Trust.Google Scholar
Gill, D. 2007. “Review of The ‘Keros Hoard’: Myth or Reality? Searching for the Lost Pieces of a Puzzle by Sotirakopoulou, P.” American Journal of Archaeology 111: 163–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gill, D. 2011. “Context Matters: Compliance and the Antiquities Market.” Journal of Art Crime 6: 52–56.Google Scholar
Gill, D., and Chippindale, C.. 1993. “Material and Intellectual Consequences of Esteem for Cycladic Figures.” American Journal of Archaeology 97: 601–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardy, S. A. 2016. Illicit Trafficking, Provenance Research and Due Diligence: The State of the Art. Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO).Google Scholar
Hendrix, E. 2003. “Painted Early Cycladic Figurines. An Exploration of Context and Meaning.” Hesperia 72: 405–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffman, G. 2002. “Painted Ladies: Early Cycladic II Mourning Figures?” American Journal of Archaeology 106, no. 4: 525–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joyce, R. 2012. “From Place to Place: Provenience, Provenance, and Archaeology.” In Provenance: An Alternate History of Art, edited by Feigenbaum, G. and Reist, I., 48–60. Los Angeles: Getty Research Institute.Google Scholar
Kaye, L., and Main, C.. 1995. “The Saga of the Lydian Hoard Antiquities: From Uşak to New York and Back Again.” In Antiquities Trade or Betrayed: Legal, Ethical and Conservation Issues, edited by Tubb, K., 150–61. London: Archetype.Google Scholar
Kiel, K., and Tedesco, K.. 2011. “Stealing history: How Does Provenance Affect the Price of Antiquities?” Department of Economics, College of the Holy Cross Working Paper no. 11–05.Google Scholar
Levine, J. 2009. “The Importance of Provenance Documentation in the Market for Ancient Art and Artefacts: The Future of the Market May Depend on Documenting the Past.” DePaul Journal of Art, Technology and Intellectual Property Law 19: 219–33.Google Scholar
Levine, M., and De Luna, L.. 2013. “Museum Salvage: A Case Study of Mesoamerican Artefacts in Museum Collections and on the Antiquities Market.” Journal of Field Archaeology 38, no. 3: 264–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackenzie, S. 2005. Going, Going, Gone: Regulating the Market in Illicit Antiquities. Leicester, UK: Institute of Art and Law.Google Scholar
Marangou, L. 1984. “Evidence for the Early Cycladic Period on Amorgos.” In Cycladica: Studies in Memory of N. P. Goulandris, Proceedings of the Seventh British Museum Classical Colloquium, edited by J. Fitton, 99–115. London: British Museum Publications.Google Scholar
Marangou, L. 1990. “Figurines.” In Naxos in the 3rd Millennium BC, edited by Marangou, L., 136–50. Athens: N. P. Goulandris Foundation / Museum of Cycladic Art.Google Scholar
Marthari, M. 2001. “Altering Information from the Past: Illegal Excavations in Greece and the Case of the Early Bronze Age Cyclades.” In Trade in Illicit Antiquities: The Destruction of the World’s Archaeological Heritage, edited by Brodie, N., Doole, J., and Renfrew, C., 161–72. Cambridge, UK: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.Google Scholar
Mazza, R. 2015. “Papyri, Ethics, and Economics: A Biography of P.Oxy 15.1780 (P39).” Bulletin of the American Society of Papyrologists 52: 113–42.Google Scholar
Merryman, J. 1986. “Two Ways of Thinking about Cultural Property.” American Journal of International Law 80, no. 4: 831–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moustaira, E. 2014. “Greece.” In Handbook on the Law of Cultural Heritage and International Trade, edited by Nafziger, J. and Paterson, R., 176–91. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Muscarella, O. 1977. “‘Ziwiye’ and Ziwiye: The Forgery of a Provenience.” Journal of Field Archaeology 4, no. 2: 197–219.Google Scholar
O’Keefe, P. 1997. Trade in Antiquities: Reducing Destruction and Theft. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
Papamichelakis, G., and Renfrew, C.. 2010. “Hearsay About the ‘Keros Hoard’.” American Journal of Archaeology 114, no. 1: 181–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papathanasopoulos, G. 1962. “Κυκλαδικὰ Νὰξου.” Archaiologikon Deltion 17, no. A: 104–51.Google Scholar
Prott, L. 1997. “National and International Laws on the Protection of Cultural Heritage.” In Antiquities: Trade or Betrayed: Legal, Ethical and Conservation Issues, edited by Tubb, K., 57–72. London: Archetype Publications.Google Scholar
Prott, L. 2012. “Strengths and Weaknesses of the 1970 Convention: An Evaluation 40 Years after Its Adoption.” In Background Paper: Second Edition for Participants in the Second Meeting of States Parties to the 1970 Convention, 1–12. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
Prott, L. 2017. “Epilogue.” In Cultural Property and Contested Ownership: The Trafficking of Artefacts and the Quest for Restitution, edited by Hauser-Schäublin, B. and Prott, L., 198–217. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Proulx, B. B. 2013. “Archaeological Site Looting in ‘Glocal’ Perspective: Nature, Scope, and Frequency.” American Journal of Archaeology 117, no. 1: 111–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renfrew, C. 2017. “Early Cycladic Sculpture: Issues of Provenance, Terminology and Classification.” In Early Cycladic Sculpture in Context, edited by Marthari, M., Renfrew, C., and Boyd, M., 1–12. Oxford: Oxbow Books.Google Scholar
Renfrew, C., Marthari, M., and Boyd, M.. 2016. “The Curse of Looting: The Scourge of Cycladic Archaeology.” In Cycladic Art: 5000 Years Ago, edited by Stampolidis, N., 117–23. Athens: Museum of Cycladic Art.Google Scholar
Renfrew, C., Marthari, M., and Boyd, M.. 2019. “Early Cycladic Sculpture beyond the Cyclades: The Aegean Context.” In Beyond the Cyclades: Early Cycladic Sculpture in Context from Mainland Greece, the North and East Aegean, edited by Marthari, M., Renfrew, C., and Boyd, M., 280–96. Oxford: Oxbow.Google Scholar
Renfrew, C., Philaniotou, O., Brodie, N., Gavalas, G., and Boyd, M., eds. 2015. The Sanctuary on Keros and the Origins of Aegean Ritual Practice: The Excavations of 2006–2008. Vol. 2: Kavos and the Special Deposits. Cambridge, UK: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.Google Scholar
Renfrew, C., Philaniotou, O., Brodie, N., Gavalas, G., Margaritis, E., French, C., and Sotirakopoulou, P.. 2007. “Keros: Dhaskalio and Kavos, Early Cycladic Stronghold and Ritual Centre. Preliminary Report of 2006 and 2007 Seasons.” Annual of the British School at Athens 102: 103–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherratt, S. 2000. Catalogue of Cycladic Antiquities in the Ashmolean Museum: The Captive Spirit. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sotirakopoulou, P. 2008. “The Keros Hoard: Some Further Discussion.” American Journal of Archaeology 112, no. 2: 279–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tijhuis, A. 2006. Transnational Crime and the Interface between Legal and Illegal Factors: The Case of the Illicit Art and Antiquities Trade. Nijmegen, Netherlands: Wolf Legal Publishers.Google Scholar
Tsirogiannis, C. 2016. “Attitudes in Transit: Symes Material from Market to Source.” Journal of Art Crime 15: 79–86.Google Scholar
Voudouri, D. 2010. “Law and the Politics of the Past: Legal Protection of Cultural Heritage in Greece.” International Journal of Cultural Property 17, no. 3: 547–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, P., and Todeschini, C.. 2007. The Medici Conspiracy: The Illicit Journey of Looted Antiquities from Italy’s Tomb Raiders to the World’s Greatest Museum’s. Prahran, Australia: Hardie Grant Books.Google Scholar
Xanthoudides, S. 1924. The Vaulted Tombs of the Mesarà: An Account of Some Early Cemeteries of Southern Crete. London: Hodder and Stoughton.Google Scholar