Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-txr5j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-16T16:16:47.118Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Art Lawyers’ Due Diligence Obligations: A Difficult Equilibrium between Law and Ethics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 2015

Sandrine Giroud  and
Charles Boudry
Sandrine Giroud
Affiliation:
LALIVE, Geneva. Email: sgiroud@lalive.ch
Charles Boudry
Affiliation:
LALIVE, Geneva. Email: cboudry@lalive.ch
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

This article examines the duties of diligence of lawyers when handling art-related matters. Due diligence is paramount to any activity in the art market and a key element in ascertaining ownership, authenticity or provenance. In particular, it is a benchmark to help determine the existence of possible criminal activities, including money laundering, terrorism financing or document forgery, to which the art market is regularly exposed. The question arises as to the obligations incumbent to art lawyers who are privileged witnesses of the functioning of the art market. Such obligations include in particular the duty to enquire on the particularities of a transaction, the duty to terminate a mandate or the duty to report any suspicious transaction under threat of civil or criminal sanctions. A survey has shown that art law specialists would welcome more guidance in the form of tailored regulations or professional guidelines.

Type
Research Article
Information
International Journal of Cultural Property , Volume 22 , Issue 2-3 , August 2015 , pp. 401 - 417
Copyright
Copyright © International Cultural Property Society 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Bauer, Alexander A. 2015. “Editorial: The Destruction of Heritage in Syria and Iraq and Its Implications.” International Journal of Cultural Property 22, no. 1: 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellingham, David. 2008. “Ethics and the art market.” In The Art Business, edited by Robertson, Iain and Chong, Derrick, 176–195. New York-London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellingham, David. 2014. “The Underwater Heritage of the Riace Bronzes: Ethics, Provenance and the Art in Ancient Rome and Today.” In Art Cultural Heritage and the Market: Ethical and Legal Issues, edited by Vadi, Valentina and Schneider, Hildegard E. G. S., 141–164. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Chappuis, Benoît. 2013. “Le secret de l’avocat face aux exigences de la lutte contre le blanchiment d’argent: l’avis de la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme.” Forumpoenale 6, no. 2: 118–24.Google Scholar
Dietzler, Jessica. 2013. “On Organized Crime in the Illicit Antiquities Trade: Moving Beyond the Definitional Debate.” Trends in Organized Crime 16, no. 3: 329–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Financial Action Task Force (FAFT). 1998. “Annual Report, 1997–1998.” Paris: FATF, www.fatf-gafi.org/media/fatf/documents/reports/1997%201998%20ENG.pdf (accessed 8 July 2015).Google Scholar
Financial Action Task Force (FAFT). 2012. “International Standards on Combating Money Laundering and the Financing of Terrorism & Proliferation—the FATF Recommendations.” Paris: FATF, http://www.fatf-gafi.org/media/fatf/documents/recommendations/pdfs/FATF_Recommendations.pdf (accessed 10 July 2015).Google Scholar
Financial Action Task Force (FAFT). 2013. “FATF Report: Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Vulnerabilities of Legal Professionals.” Paris: FATF, http://www.fatf-gafi.org/media/fatf/documents/reports/ML%20and%20TF%20vulnerabilities%20legal%20professionals.pdf (accessed 10 July 2015).Google Scholar
Graham, Jason-Louise. 2014. “Art Exchange? How the International Art Market Lacks a Clear Regulatory Framework.” In Art Cultural Heritage and the Market: Ethical and Legal Issues, edited by Vadi, Valentina and Schneider, Hildegard E. G. S., 319–40. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prowda, Judith B. 2014. “The Perils of Buying and Selling Art at the Fair: Legal Issues in Title.” In Art Cultural Heritage and the Market: Ethical and Legal Issues, edited by Vadi, Valentina and Schneider, Hildegard E. G. S., 141–63. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renold, Marc-André. 2013. “Stolen Art: The Ubiquitous Question of Good Faith.” In Resolution of Cultural Property Disputes, edited by The International Bureau of the Permanent Court of Arbitration, 251–63. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
Merryman, John H., Elsen, Albert E., and Urice, Stephen K.. 2007. Law, Ethics and the Visual Arts. 5th ed.Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
UNESCO. 2011. “The Fight against the Illicit Trafficking of Cultural Objects: The 1970 Convention: Past and Future.” Information Kit. Division of Public Information and the Culture Sector of UNESCO, Paris, http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0019/001916/191606e.pdf (accessed 10 July 2015).Google Scholar
Von Fliedner, Isabel. 2010. “Le secret professionnel de l'avocat et le blanchiment: notes de droit comparé.” Revue de l’avocat 13, no. 1: 49–54.Google Scholar