Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-sjtt6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-04T22:27:40.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The concept of the civilian: legal recognition, adjudication and the trials of international criminal justice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 November 2012

Claire Garbett
Claire Garbett*
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology, Goldsmiths, University of London
*
c.garbett@gold.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Contemporary initiatives to address civilian victimisation in armed conflict increasingly focus on international criminal justice institutions, rules and practices. These institutions are now expected to construct legal recognition of civilian victims of armed conflict, as well as prosecute the perpetrators. This article uses a case-study of the Prosecutor v. Dragomir Milošević heard by the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia to explore the concept of the civilian. It first examines the international legal frameworks and obligations that enforce the protection of civilians. It then explores the concept of the civilian as defined by the rules of humanitarian law, and the different approaches to defining civilians utilised by the parties to the Milošević trial. The article argues that the current ‘negative’ definition of civilians creates significant difficulties for understanding civilians as a distinct category of persons, and does not adequately capture their choices, actions and experiences in armed conflict.

Type
Articles
Information
International Journal of Law in Context , Volume 8 , Issue 4 , December 2012 , pp. 469 - 486
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arbour, Louise (2008) ‘The Responsibility to Protect as a Duty of Care in International Law and Practice’, Review of International Studies 34: 445–58.Google Scholar
Bassiouni, M. Cherif (2006) ‘International Recognition of Victims’ Rights’, Human Rights Law Review 6(2): 203–269.Google Scholar
Bruderlein, Claude and Leaning, Jennifer (1999) ‘New Challenges for Humanitarian Protection?’, British Medical Journal 319: 430–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carpenter, Charli (2006) “Innocent Women and Children”: Gender, Norms and the Protection of Civilians. Farnham and Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing.Google Scholar
Cassese, Antonio (2003) International Criminal Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Caverzasio, Sylvie (2001) Strengthening Protection in War: A Search for Professional Standards. Geneva: International Committee of the Red Cross.Google Scholar
Cockburn, Cynthia (2001) The Space Between Us: Negotiating Gender and National Identities in Conflict. London and New York: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Dembour, Marie-Benedicte and Haslam, Emily (2004) ‘Silencing Hearings? Victim-Witnesses at War Crimes Trials’, European Journal of International Law 15(1): 151–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dinstein, Yoram (2004) The Conduct of Hostilities under the Law of International Armed Conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Donia, Robert (2006) Sarajevo: A Biography. London: Hurst and Company.Google Scholar
Evans, Gareth (2008) ‘The Responsibility to Protect: An Idea Whose Time Has Come … and Gone?’, International Relations 22(3): 283–98.Google Scholar
Ewald, Uwe (2006) ‘Large-Scale Victimisation and the Jurisprudence of the ICTY – Victimological Issues’, in Ewald, Uwe and Turkovic, Ksenija (eds), Large-Scale Victimisation as a Potential Source of Terrorist Activities: Importance of Regaining Security in Post-Conflict Societies. Amsterdam: IOS Press, 171–96.Google Scholar
Gardam, Judith (1993a) Non-Combatant Immunity as a Norm of International Humanitarian Law. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardam, Judith (1993b) ‘The Law of Armed Conflict: A Gendered Regime?’, Studies in Transnational Legal Policy 25: 171–202.Google Scholar
Held, David (2002) ‘Law of States, Law of Peoples: Three Models of Sovereignty’, Legal Theory 8(1): 1–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henckaerts, Jean-Marie and Doswald-Beck, Louise (2005) Customary International Humanitarian Law, Volume I: Rules. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hodzic, Refik (2010) ‘Living the Legacy of Mass Atrocities: Victims’ Perspectives on War Crimes Trials’, Journal of International Criminal Justice 8(1): 113–36.Google Scholar
International Committee of the Red Cross (2009) Our World, Views from the Field. Geneva: ICRC.Google Scholar
Jones, Bruce and Cater, Charles (2001) ‘From Chaos to Coherence? Toward a Regime Change for Protecting Civilians in War’, in Chesterman, Simon (ed.), Civilians in War. London: Lynne Rienner Publications, Inc, 237–62.Google Scholar
Kaldor, Mary (2001) New and Old Wars: Organized Violence in a Global Era, 2nd edn.Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Kinsella, Helen (2006) ‘Securing the Civilian: Sex and Gender in the Laws of War’, in Barnett, Michael and Duvall, Raymond (eds), Power in Global Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 249–72.Google Scholar
Kravetz, Daniela (2004) ‘The Protection of Civilians in War: The ICTY's Galić Case’, Leiden Journal of International Law 17: 521–36.Google Scholar
Margetts, Katharina and Hayden, Patrick (2010) ‘Current Developments at the Ad Hoc International Criminal Tribunals’, Journal of International Criminal Justice 8: 649–93.Google Scholar
Mcclean, Emma (2008) ‘The Responsibility to Protect: The Role of International Human Rights Law’, Journal of Conflict and Security Law 13(1): 123–52.Google Scholar
Mettraux, Guenael (2005) International Crimes and the Ad Hoc Tribunals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nabulsi, Karma (2001) ‘Evolving Conceptions of Civilians and Belligerents: One Hundred Years After the Hague Peace Conferences’, in Chesterman, Simon (ed.), Civilians in War. London: Lynne Rienner Publications, Inc, 9–24.Google Scholar
Palmer-Fernandez, Gabriel (1998) ‘Civilian Populations in War, Targeting Of’, in Chadwick, Ruth (ed.), Encyclopaedia of Applied Ethics Volume I. London: Academic Press Limited, 509–525.Google Scholar
Roberts, Adam (2001) ‘Humanitarian Issues and Agencies as Triggers for International Military Action’, in Chesterman, Simon (ed.), Civilians in War. London: Lynne Rienner Publications, Inc, 177–96.Google Scholar
Rogers, A. P. V. (2004) Law on the Battlefield, 2nd edn.Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Sassoli, Marco and Bouvier, Antoine (2006) How Does Law Protect in War? Volume 1, 2nd edn.Geneva: ICRC.Google Scholar
Slaughter, Anne-Marie and Burke-White, William (2002) ‘The Future of Law: Protecting the Rights of Civilians’, Harvard International Review 24(1): 66–70.Google Scholar
Slim, Hugo (2007) Killing Civilians: Method, Madness and Morality in War. London: Hurst Publishers.Google Scholar