Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-495rp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-14T09:10:33.021Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Differentiating and connecting indicators: the quality and performance of law in the World Bank's Doing Business Project

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2020

Melike Arslan Open the ORCID record for Melike Arslan [Opens in a new window]
Melike Arslan*
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology, Northwestern University
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: Melikearslan2020@u.northwestern.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Scholars have long argued that transnational legal indicators (TLIs) suffer from significant validity problems. In response to such critiques, the World Bank (WB) reformed its Doing Business (DB) legal indicators in 2014. This paper evaluates two important results of this reform: the WB distinguished between the quality and performance (efficiency) of law indicators and also claimed that they are positively correlated. I argue that this distinction is based on two different utilitarian perspectives; therefore, these indicators try to quantify different aspects of laws. However, new empirical tests indicate that they are not correlated. The statistical tests on the DB Resolving Insolvency Indicators do not show any strong correlation, and the case of Turkey's WB-led insolvency-law reform suggests that the developing countries can even incur efficiency losses from legal-quality improvements. Thus, this study demonstrates that the 2014 DB reform reproduced the validity problems inside the new distinctions and connections between its indicators, potentially creating new misconceptions for policy-makers.

Keywords

legal indicatorsthe World Banklegal reforminsolvencyTurkey
Type
Article
Information
International Journal of Law in Context , Volume 16 , Issue 1 , March 2020 , pp. 17 - 38
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alchian, AA (1965) Some economics of property rights. Il politico 30, 816–829.Google Scholar
Amariles, DR (2015) Legal indicators, global law and legal pluralism: an introduction. The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law 47, 9–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amariles, DR (2017) Supping with the Devil? Indicators and the rise of managerial rationality in law. International Journal of Law in Context 13, 465–484.10.1017/S1744552317000398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amariles, DR and Mclachlan, J (2018) Legal indicators in transnational law practice: a methodological assessment. Jurimetrics Journal of Law, Science and Technology 58, 163.Google Scholar
ANKA (2007) TBB: ‘Kötü Niyetli Borçluların Zaman Kazanması Engellenmeli’. Haberler.com, 10 January. Available at https://www.haberler.com/tbb-kotu-niyetli-borclularin-zaman-kazanmasi-haberi/ (accessed 13 June 2019).Google Scholar
Armour, J et al. (2015) How do creditor rights matter for debt finance? A review of empirical evidence. In: Chapters. Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 3–25. Available at https://ideas.repec.org/h/elg/eechap/14776_1.html (accessed 15 January 2019).Google Scholar
Arruñada, B (2009) How doing business jeopardises institutional reform. European Business Organization Law Review (EBOR) 10, 555–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Babb, S (2013) The Washington Consensus as transnational policy paradigm: its origins, trajectory and likely successor. Review of International Political Economy 20, 268–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, CJ (1991) What is policy convergence and what causes it? British Journal of Political Science 21, 215–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentham, J (1879) An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. Oxford: Clarendon. Legal Classics Library.Google Scholar
Berkowitz, D, Pistor, K and Richard, JF (2003) Economic development, legality, and the transplant effect. European Economic Review 47, 165–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bris, A, Welch, I and Zhu, N (2006) The costs of bankruptcy: chapter 7 liquidation versus chapter 11 reorganization. The Journal of Finance 61, 1253–1303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bromley, P and Powell, WW (2012) From smoke and mirrors to walking the talk: decoupling in the contemporary world. Academy of Management Annals 6, 483–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broome, A, Homolar, A and Kranke, M (2018) Bad science: international organizations and the indirect power of global benchmarking. European Journal of International Relations 24, 514–539.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carruthers, BG and Halliday, TC (1998) Rescuing Business: The Making of Corporate Bankruptcy Law in England and the United States. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chorev, N (2005) The institutional project of neo-liberal globalism: the case of the WTO. Theory and Society 34, 317–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cirmizi, E, Klapper, L and Uttamchandani, M (2012) The challenges of bankruptcy reform. The World Bank Research Observer 27, 185–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clague, C et al. (1996) Property and contract rights in autocracies and democracies. Journal of Economic Growth 1, 243–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coase, RH (1960) The problem of social cost. In Classic Papers in Natural Resource Economics. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 87–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, KE (2014) Legal indicators: the power of quantitative measures of law. Annual Review of Law and Social Science 10, 37–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, KE and Kruse, MB (2007) Taking the measure of law: the case of the Doing Business Project. Law & Social Inquiry 32, 1095–1119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, KE, Kingsbury, B and Merry, SE (2012a) Indicators as a technology of global governance. Law & Society Review 46, 71–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, KE et al. (2012b) Governance by Indicators: Global Power through Classification and Rankings. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Oliveira Gomes, A, de Aquino Guimaraes, T and Akutsu, L (2016) The relationship between judicial staff and court performance: evidence from Brazilian state courts. International Journal 12. Available at http://ijca.ubiquitypress.com/articles/214/galley/216/download/ (accessed 21 May 2017).Google Scholar
Djankov, S et al. (2002) The regulation of entry. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 117, 1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Djankov, S et al. (2003) Courts. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 118, 453–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Djankov, S et al. (2006) Debt enforcement around the world. Scholarly Articles 2961825, Harvard University Department of Economics. Available at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=955240 (accessed 9 May 2017).Google Scholar
Dobbin, F, Simmons, B and Garrett, G (2007) The global diffusion of public policies: social construction, coercion, competition, or learning? Annual Review of Sociology 33, 449–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edelman, LB and Stryker, R (2005) A sociological approach to law and the economy. In Smelser, NJ and Swedberg, R (eds), The Handbook of Economic Sociology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, p. 527.Google Scholar
Eroğlu, EC (2005) 4949 ve 5092 Sayılı İcra ve İflas Kanunu'nda Değişiklik Yapılmasına Dair Kanunlar’ın Adı Konkordato İle İlgili Hükümlerde Getirmiş Oldukları Değişikliklerin Tespiti ve Değerlendirilmesi. Ankara Bar Association 3, 85–120.Google Scholar
Espasa, M and Esteller-Moré, A (2015) Analyzing judicial courts’ performance: inefficiency vs. congestion. Revista de Economía Aplicada 23, 61.Google Scholar
Fauvarque-Cosson, B and Kerhuel, AJ (2009) Is law an economic contest? French reactions to the Doing Business World Bank reports and economic analysis of the law. The American Journal of Comparative Law 57, 811–829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frydman, B (2017) From accuracy to accountability: subjecting global indicators to the rule of law. International Journal of Law in Context 13, 450–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, M (2017) The poverty of numbers: reflections on the legitimacy of global development indicators. International Journal of Law in Context 13, 485–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hafner-Burton, EM (2008) Sticks and stones: naming and shaming the human rights enforcement problem. International Organization 62, 689–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haggard, S, MacIntyre, A and Tiede, L (2008) The rule of law and economic development. Annual Review of Political Science 11, 205–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, TC and Carruthers, BG (2007) The recursivity of law: global norm making and national lawmaking in the globalization of corporate insolvency regimes. American Journal of Sociology 112, 1135–1202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, TC and Osinsky, P (2006) Globalization of law. Annual Review of Sociology 32, 447–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henisz, WJ, Zelner, BA and Guillén, MF (2005) The worldwide diffusion of market-oriented infrastructure reform, 1977–1999. American Sociological Review 70, 871–897.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IEG (2008) Doing Business: An Independent Evaluation – Taking the Measure of the World Bank-IFC Doing Business Indicators. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
International Monetary Fund (IMF) (1999) Orderly & Effective Insolvency Procedures, http://dx.doi.org/10.5089/9781557758200.071.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IP (2013) Review of the Doing Business Report. Available at http://hendrikwolff.com/web/Doing%20business%20review%20panel%20report%20with%20signatures%20and%20Bibliography.pdf (accessed 10 October 2017).Google Scholar
Kanda, H and Milhaupt, CJ (2003) Re-examining legal transplants: the director's fiduciary duty in Japanese corporate law. The American Journal of Comparative Law 51, 887–901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kentikelenis, AE and Seabrooke, L (2017) The politics of world polity: script-writing in international organizations. American Sociological Review 82, 1065–1092.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khartchenko-Dorbec, A, Blanchet, D and Gaudusson, J de (2006) Des indicateurs pour mesurer le droitroit?:limites méthodologiques des rapports Doing Business: études du programme de recherches sur l'Attractivité économique du droit. Marais BA, Du and Mission de recherche Droit et justice (eds). Paris: la Documentation française.Google Scholar
Knack, S and Keefer, P (1995) Institutions and economic performance: cross-country tests using alternative institutional measures. Economics & Politics 7, 207–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krever, T (2013) Quantifying law: legal indicator projects and the reproduction of neoliberal common sense. Third World Quarterly 34, 131–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
La Porta, R, Lopez-de-Silanes, F and Shleifer, A (2008) The economic consequences of legal origins. Journal of Economic Literature 46, 285–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
La Porta, R et al. (1996) Law and finance. National Bureau of Economic Research. Available at http://www.nber.org/papers/w5661 (accessed 18 May 2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menezes, AP (2014) Debt resolution and business exit: insolvency reform for credit, entrepreneurship, and growth. 90759, 1 July. The World Bank. Available at http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/912041468178733220/Debt-resolution-and-business-exit-insolvency-reform-for-credit-entrepreneurship-and-growth (accessed 15 January 2019).Google Scholar
Merry, SE and Conley, JM (2011) Measuring the world: indicators, human rights, and global governance. Current Anthropology 52, 000–000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merry, SE, Davis, KE and Kingsbury, B (2015) The Quiet Power of Indicators: Measuring Governance, Corruption, and Rule of Law. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, JW et al. (1997) World society and the nation-state. American Journal of sociology 103, 144–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrison, ER (2007) Bankruptcy decision making: an empirical study of continuation bias in small-business bankruptcies. The Journal of Law and Economics 50, 381–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, SC (2014) Playing favorites: how shared beliefs shape the IMF's lending decisions. International Organization 68, 297–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niemann, JM (2013) Doing business in politics – how benchmarking changes global governance. Unpublished MSc thesis, Copenhagen Business School.Google Scholar
North, DC (1990) Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Öniş, Z (2009) Beyond the 2001 financial crisis: the political economy of the new phase of neo-liberal restructuring in Turkey. Review of International Political Economy 16, 409–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palumbo, G et al. (2013) Judicial Performance and its Determinants: A Cross-Country Perspective. OECD Publishing. Available at http://econpapers.repec.org/paper/oececoaab/5-en.htm (accessed 21 May 2017).Google Scholar
Peng, MW, Yamakawa, Y and Lee, SH (2010) Bankruptcy laws and entrepreneur-friendliness. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 34, 517–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry-Kessaris, A (2011) Prepare your indicators: economics imperialism on the shores of law and development. International Journal of Law in Context 7, 401–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry-Kessaris, A (2017) The re-co-construction of legitimacy of/through the Doing Business indicators. International Journal of Law in Context 13, 498–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pistor, K (2002) The standardization of law and its effect on developing economies. The American Journal of Comparative Law 50, 97–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pistor, K, Raiser, M and Gelfer, S (2000) Law and finance in transition economies. Economics of Transition 8, 325–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowat, M and Astigarraga, J (1999) Latin American Insolvency Systems: A Comparative Assessment. Washington, DC: The World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scully, GW (1988) The institutional framework and economic development. Journal of Political Economy 96, 652–662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaffer, GC (2009) How business shapes law: a socio-legal framework. Connecticut Law Review 42, 147.Google Scholar
Siems, M and Nelken, D (2017) Global social indicators and the concept of legitimacy. International Journal of Law in Context 13, 436–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
T24 (2008) Yeni moda, iflas erteleme! t24.com.tr, 3 December. Available at https://t24.com.tr/haber/yeni-moda-iflas-erteleme,19212 (accessed 13 June 2019).Google Scholar
Thorburn, KS (2000) Bankruptcy auctions: costs, debt recovery, and firm survival. Journal of Financial Economics 58, 337–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trubek, DM and Galanter, M (1974) Scholars in self-estrangement: some reflections on the crisis in law and development studies in the United States. Wisconsin Law Review 1062.Google Scholar
Twining, W (2005) Social science and diffusion of law. Journal of Law and Society 32, 203–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WBDB (2004a) Doing Business 2004: Understanding Regulation. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
WBDB (2004b) Doing Business 2005: Removing Obstacles to Growth. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
WBDB (2013) Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises. Washington, DC: World Bank Group.Google Scholar
WBDB (2014) Doing Business 2015: Going Beyond Efficiency. Washington, DC: World Bank Group.Google Scholar
WBDB (2016) Doing Business 2016: Measuring Regulatory Quality and Efficiency. Washington, DC: World Bank Group.Google Scholar
WBDB (2017) Doing Business 2017: Equal Opportunity for All. Washington, DC: World Bank Group.Google Scholar
WBDB (2018) Resolving Insolvency Questionnaire. Available at http://www.doingbusiness.org/content/dam/doingBusiness/media/Methodology/Survey-Instruments/DB18/DB18-RI-questionnaire-en.pdf (accessed 15 January 2019).Google Scholar
Williamson, OE (1971) The vertical integration of production: market failure considerations. The American Economic Review 61, 112–123.Google Scholar
World Bank (2001) Principles and Guidelines for Effective Insolvency and Creditor Rights Systems. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar