Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wpx84 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-09T08:39:59.341Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reflections on reading: words and pictures and law

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2007

Christina Spiesel
Christina Spiesel*
Affiliation:
Yale Law School, Quinnipiac University School of Law, New York Law School
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The practice of law today is awash with pictures of all kinds – from those that begin conceptually like graphs, diagrams or flow charts to those that originate in perception, like photographs, or those that emerge from the actions of technology, like animations and fMRI. Pictures are used as evidence, demonstratives, and for argument. The legal academy has yet seriously to come to grips with the changes that this infusion of the visual means for legal thinking and rhetoric. This article explores the intellectual implications of picturing in a discipline that has thought of itself as preeminently about the use of words and their linear logics. To do this, the author has sought out eye movement research, asking the question: Do we read pictures differently from words? If so, what are the implications of this as understood both in cognitive terms and in cultural terms? That is, can the differences in perceptual behaviour be seen as offering clues to differences in cognitive behaviour? Existing knowledge seems to answer these questions in the affirmative, which means that the deeply held cultural bias that maintains that only words containing thought needs revision. This article concludes with reflections on some benefits that adjustments to our understanding might give to legal thinkers.

Type
Research Article
Information
International Journal of Law in Context , Volume 2 , Issue 3 , September 2006 , pp. 305 - 320
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arnheim, Rudolph (1971) Visual Thinking. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Berns, Gregory S. et al. (2005) ‘Neurobiological Correlates of Social Conformity and Independence During Mental Rotation’, Biological Psychiatry 58: 245–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buswell, Guy T. (1935) How People Look at Pictures. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Carney, Brian and Feigenson, Neal (2004) ‘Visual Persuasion in the Skakel Trial: Enhancing Advocacy through Interactive Multimedia Presentations’, Criminal Justice 19(1): 22–35.Google Scholar
Eliot, Lise (1999) What’s Going On in There? How the Brain and Mind Develop in the First Five Years of Life. New York: Bantam Books.Google Scholar
Elkins, James (1999) The Domain of Images. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Finnegan, Ruth H. (1988) Literacy and Oralit: Studies in the Technology of Communication. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Fuchs, Albert F. (1976) ‘The Neurophysiology of Saccades’ in Monty, Richard A. and Senders, John W. (eds.) Eyemovements and Psychological Processes. Hillsboro, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates (publishers), New York: John Wiley (distributors).Google Scholar
Goodrich, Peter (1999) ‘The Iconography of Nothing, Blank Spaces and the Representation of Law in Edward VI and the Pope’ in Douzinas, Costas and Nead, LyndaLaw and the Image. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 89–114.Google Scholar
Goolsby, T. W. (1994a) ‘Eye Movement in Music Reading: Effects of Reading Ability, Notational Complexity, and Encounters’, Music Perception 12: 77–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goolsby, T. W. (1994b) ‘Profiles of Processing: Eye Movements During Sight Reading’, Music Perception 12: 97–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hochberg, Julian (1976) ‘Toward a Speech-Plan Eye-Movement Model of Reading’ in Monty, Richard A. and Senders, John W.Eye Movements and Psychological Processes. Hillsboro, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates (publishers), New York: John Wiley (distributors), pp. 397–416.Google Scholar
Hockney, David (2001) Secret Knowledge, Rediscovering the Lost Techniques of the Old Masters. New York: Viking Studio.Google Scholar
Hoffman, Douglas D. (1998) Visual Intelligence, How We Create What We See. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
http://www.indatacorp.com/software/trialdirector.asp?PageID=3.Google Scholar
http://www.sanction.com/software/?content=screenshots&title=Screenshots%20of%20Sanction.Google Scholar
http://viscog.beckman.uiuc.edu?djs_lab/demos.htm.Google Scholar
Ifrah, Georges (2001) The Universal History of Computing from the Abacus to the Quantum Computer. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Inhoff, A. W., Radach, R. and Heller, D. (1996) ‘Morphological Processes During Word Recognition’, Abstracts of the Psychonomic Society 1: 54.Google Scholar
Klin, Ami, et al. (2002) ‘Visual Fixation Patterns During viewing of Naturalistic Social Situations as Predictors of Social Competence in Individuals with Autism’, Archives of General Psychiatry 59: 809–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kolers, Paul A. (1976) ‘Buswell’s Discoveries’ in Monty, Richard A. and Senders, John W.Eye Movements and Psychological Processes. Hillsboro, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates (publishers), New York: John Wiley (distributors), pp. 373–95.Google Scholar
Kohsom, C. and Gobet, E (1997). ‘Adding Spaces to Thai and English: Effects on Reading’, Proceedings of the Cognitive Science Society 19: 388–93.Google Scholar
Kosslyn, Stephen M. (1994) Image and Brain: The Resolution of the Imagery Debate. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kress, Gunther (2003) Literacy in the New Media Age. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George, and Johnson, Mark (1999) Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno (1999) Pandora’s Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. Cambridge, MA; London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lester, Paul Martin (1996) ‘Digital Hegemony: The Clash Between Words and Pictures’ at http://commfaculty.fullerton.edu/lester/writings/murspeech.html (last accessed 6 March 2006).Google Scholar
Mack, Arien, and Rock, Irvin (1998) Inattentional Blindness. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mnookin, Jennifer (1998) ‘The Image of Truth: Photographic Evidence and the Power of Analogy’, Yale Journal of Law and the Humanities 10(1): 17.Google Scholar
Monty, Richard A. and Senders, John W. (1976) Eye Movements and Psychological Processes. Hillsboro, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, Thomas E., Oxley, Zoe M. and Clawson, Rosalee A. (1997) ‘Toward A Psychology of Framing Effects’, Political Behavior 19(3).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinker, Steven (2002) The Blank Slate, The Modern Denial of Human Nature. New York: Viking Books.Google Scholar
Plyshyn, Zenon W. (2006) Seeing and Visualizing, It’s Not What You Think, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Rayner, Keith (1998) ‘Eye Movements in Reading and Information Processing: 20 Years of Research’, Psychological Bulletin 124: 372–422.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schjeldahl, Peter (2005) ‘Words and Pictures. Graphic Novels Come of Age’, The New Yorker, 17 October 2005, available at: http://www.newyorker.com/critics/content/articles/051017crbo_bookslist.Google Scholar
Sherwin, Richard K. (2000) When The Law Goes Pop. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Sherwin, Richard K. (2006) ‘Visual Literacy in Action: Law in the Age of Images’ in Elkins, JamesVisual Literacy. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sherwin, Richard K., Feigenson, Neal and Spiesel, Christina (2006) ‘Law in the Digital Age: How Visual Communication Technologies are Transforming the Practice, Theory, and Teaching of Law’, Boston University Journal of Science and Technology Law 12.Google Scholar
Sinha, Pawan et al. (2005) ‘Face Recognition by Humans: 20 Results all Computer Vision Researchers Should Know About’, Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, MA, 2005: http://web.mit.edu/bcs/sinha/papers/20Results_2005.pdf (last accessed 6 February 2006).Google Scholar
Smith Churchland, Patricia (2002) Brain-Wise, Studies in Neurophilosophy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Spiesel, Christina (2006) ‘A Las Meninas for the Law’ in Wagner, Anne and Penzak, William (eds.) Images in Law. London: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Spiesel, Christina, Feigenson, Neal and Sherwin, Richard (2005) ‘Law in the Age of Images’ in Summerfield, T., Banegas, F. S. B. and Wagner, A (eds.) Contemporary Issues of the Semiotics of Law, Cultural and Symbolic Analyses of Law in a Global Context (Onati International Series in Law and Society). Portland, OR: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Underwood, Geoffrey et al. (2004) ‘Inspecting Pictures for Information To Verify a Sentence: Eye Movements in General Encoding and In Focused Search’, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 57A(1), 165–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Velasquez, Diego (1656) Las Meninas. Madrid: Museo del Prado.Google Scholar
Whelan, Darius (2005) ‘The Bloody Sunday Tribunal,’ exhibit at First International Conference on Visual Literacy, Cork, Ireland, 14–15 April.Google Scholar
www.wikipedia.org.Google Scholar
Yarbus, Alfred L. (1967) ‘Eye Movements During Perception of Complex Objects’ in Riggs, L. A. (ed.) Eye Movements and Vision. New York: Plenum Press, ch. VII, pp. 171–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar