Last updated 09/07/24: Online ordering is currently unavailable due to technical issues. We apologise for any delays responding to customers while we resolve this. For further updates please visit our website: https://www.cambridge.org/news-and-insights/technical-incident
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 February 2019
In his Introduction to the study of the Law of the Constitution, which appeared in its first edition in 1885, Professor A. V. Dicey of the University of Oxford emphasized in particular the doctrine of Parliamentary sovereignty and the concept of the Rule of Law as guiding principles of the constitution. His exposition was clear and trenchant, inspired by the self-confidence of late Victorian Britain, and through nine editions it provided the authoritative text which to this day has influenced judges and lawyers, politicians, observers from abroad, and many others in their interpretation of the constitutional law of the United Kingdom.
1 See Davies, Rees, “The Matter of Britain and the Matter of England” (Inaugural Lecture as Chichele Professor of Medieval History, University of Oxford, 29 February 1996) (Oxford Clarendon Press 1996) at 17ff. Professor Davies also spoke (at 23) of “the often claustrophobically proprietorial attitude of historians of Ireland, Scotland and Wales towards ‘their own’ history.”Google Scholar
2 Cm 4534 (January 2000).Google Scholar
3 Heuston, R.F.V., Essays in Constitutional Law (2nd ed., 1964) át 2–3.Google Scholar
4 The Belfast Agreement: An Agreement Reached at the Multi-Party Talks on Northern Ireland, Cm 3883 (April 1998). The Agreement was dated April 10 1998.Google Scholar
5 See Report of the Royal Commission on the Constitution, Cmnd. 5460 (1973). This is commonly referred to as the Report of the Kilbrandon Commission.Google Scholar
6 Scotland's Parliament, Cm 3658 (July 1997).Google Scholar
7 A Voice for Wales, Cm 3718 (July 1997).Google Scholar
8 See A Mayor and Assembly for London. The Government's Proposals for modernizing the government of London, Cm 3897 (March 1998).Google Scholar
9 Blackburn v Attorney-General [1971] 1 WLR 1037.Google Scholar
10 October 21, 1995, at 65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11 Redmond-Bate v Director of Public Prosecutions (23 July 1999), Case No. CO/188/99.Google Scholar
12 (1882) 9 QBD 308.Google Scholar
13 Rights Brought Home: The Human Rights Bill, Cm 3782.Google Scholar
14 Arthur J. S. Hall & Co (a firm) v Simons [2000] 3 All ER 673, 717–18. See The Human Rights Act and the Criminal Justice and Regulatory Process (papers presented at a conference organized by the Centre for Public Law at the University of Cambridge, 9–10 January 1999), Oxford: Hart Publishing (1999).Google Scholar
15 The Rape of the Constitution? (ed. Keith Sutherland), Imprint Academic (2000).Google Scholar
16 Legal Essays (1908) at 191.Google Scholar
17 Hilton, Tim, John Ruskin: The Later Years (2000) at 316.Google Scholar
