Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-n9wrp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T14:35:47.387Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Transforming Customary Law of Marriage in South Africa and the Challenges of Its Implementation with Specific Reference to Matrimonial Property

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2019

Extract

This paper briefly discusses the transformation of the customary law of marriage in South Africa by the Recognition of Customary Marriages Act of 1998 Act (hereafter referred to as the Act), and the likely challenges of implementing the new law. The latter will be demonstrated by reference to section 7 of the Act, which regulates the matrimonial property.

Type
Proceedings
Copyright
Copyright © 2004 by the International Association of Law Libraries. 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Act 120 of 1998 (commencement 15 November 2000).Google Scholar

2 See for example, Ex parte Minister of Native Affairs: In Re Yako v Beyi 1948 (1) SA 388 (A).Google Scholar

3 See the Law of Evidence Amendment Act 45 of 1988, s 1 (1). Bennett, T.W. Customary Law in South Africa. Juta & Co., Cape Town, 1991. 42 p.Google Scholar

4 Act 200 of 1993.Google Scholar

5 See for example, Ismail v Ismail 1983 (1)SA 1006 (A), Sanatam v Fondo 1960 (2) SA 467 (A). But cf Ryland v Edros 1997 (2) SA 690 (C).Google Scholar

6 Act 108 of 1996.Google Scholar

7 See Rylands v Edros supra fn. 5.Google Scholar

8 See, for example, Mthembu v Letsela 1997 (2) SA 936 (T) at 944.Google Scholar

9 See supra fn. 1.Google Scholar

11 See South African Law Commission Report on Customary Marriages of 1998 (Project 90 the Harmonisation of the Common Law and the Indigenous Law) 130.Google Scholar

12 See report of the South African Law Commission on Marriages and Customary Unions of Black Persons of 1986 (Project 51).Google Scholar

13 See s 2 (1-4) and s 1 (iii) of the Act.Google Scholar

14 See supra fn. 11 at 95.Google Scholar

15 See s 3 (3)(a).Google Scholar

16 S6 of the Act.Google Scholar

17 See Age of Majority Act 57 of 1972, s1.Google Scholar

18 See the Transkei Marriage Act of 1978, 29, 37-39; the Kwazulu Code and the Natal Code of Zulu law, 27(3). These provisions were repealed by section 13 of the Act. For the discussion of the position before the commencement of the Act see Bennett, T.W. A Sourcebook of African Customary Law, Cape Town: Juta & Co., 1991. 317-37 pp.; Sinclair, J.D., The Law of Marriage, Cape Town, Juta & Co., 1996. 247-250 pp.Google Scholar

19 The application of certain provisions of the Matrimonial Property Act 88 of 1984, which governs civil marriages contracted under common law, extends to customary marriages as well.Google Scholar

20 That is marriages contracted in accordance with the Marriage Act 25 of 1961, which were the only marriages that received full legal recognition until the commencement of the Recognition of Customary Marriages Act.Google Scholar

21 Act 120 of 1998, s 7(6) and (8).Google Scholar

22 Ibid. S 7(1).Google Scholar

23 Ibid. S 7(4).Google Scholar

24 The Act does not, however, prohibit mediation of marital disputes by traditional methods (see s8 (5)).Google Scholar

25 See 8(1)(2) of the Act.Google Scholar

26 According to Mbata, the presiding officers in traditional institutions comprising of chiefs and headmen's courts are exclusively men (Mbata, Likhapha Gender Research Project Bulletin vol. 4/99 summer 5-6).Google Scholar

27 See supra fn. 11.Google Scholar

28 S 8 (4) (e) of the Act, which incorporates s 7 (1) (2) of the Divorce Act 70 of 1979.Google Scholar

29 Sees 8 (4) (a) of the Act, which extends the application of the relevant provisions of the Divorce Act of 1979 to customary marriages as well.Google Scholar

30 See s 7 (4).Google Scholar

31 S 7(8).Google Scholar

32 S 7 (7)(a)(i-iii).Google Scholar

33 S 7 (7)(b)(i-iii)).Google Scholar

34 S 7 (9).Google Scholar

35 See section 4 of the Act.Google Scholar