Our systems are now restored following recent technical disruption, and we’re working hard to catch up on publishing. We apologise for the inconvenience caused. Find out more: https://www.cambridge.org/universitypress/about-us/news-and-blogs/cambridge-university-press-publishing-update-following-technical-disruption
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 February 2019
Good afternoon. I would like to thank the International Association of Law Libraries, the organizing committee and especially Gloria Orrego Hoyos for the invitation. It is a real pleasure and honor for me to be here.
Today I will talk about the influence of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights in the rulings of Argentina's Supreme Court. I will focus particularly on the importance that the Argentinian Supreme Court gave to the Inter-American Court in the most significant decisions during the process of reopening cases of crimes against humanity.
1 Among them, the work of Basch, et al. Google Scholar
2 See, e.g., Acosta, 1998; Boico, 2000; and Felicetti 2000. Google Scholar
3 Literally, it means “Due Obedience.”Google Scholar
4 Meaning “Full Stop.”Google Scholar
5 This case declared the applicability of crimes against humanity.Google Scholar
6 It declared the unconstitutionally of the Acts.Google Scholar
7 It reopened the case Riveros and declared the unconstitutionality of Menem's Executive pardons.Google Scholar
8 Paragraph 41.Google Scholar
9 Point 23.Google Scholar
10 Point 31.Google Scholar
11 Paragraph 124.Google Scholar
