Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-07T20:56:21.462Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Law and Neuroscience Bibliography: Navigating the Emerging Field of Neurolaw†

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2019

Francis X. Shen
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In the past five years, we have witnessed extraordinary growth in the amount of legal scholarship, legal practice, and public policy at the intersection of law and neuroscience. For instance, in 2010 the first Daubert hearing was held on the admissibility of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) lie detection evidence; a Florida court was the first in the nation to admit quantitative encephalography (qEEG) evidence; and a Supreme Court decision on life imprisonment for minors cited brain development research. In France, the Prime Minister established the first Neuroscience and Public Policy program within the France Ministry for Social Affairs, and in the United States, multiple state legislators proposed bills related to neuroscience and law. Academics, too, have taken notice, with a number of symposia being offered around the country over the past few years.

Type
Articles
Information
International Journal of Legal Information , Volume 38 , Issue 3 , Winter 2010 , pp. 352 - 399
Copyright
Copyright © 2010 by the International Association of Law Libraries. 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

The Law and Neuroscience Bibliography28

This bibliography includes publications through November 2010. Entries are listed by year, and then by first author's last name.29 Google Scholar
Abrams, Kathryn& Keren, Hila, Who's Afraid of Law and the Emotions?, 94 Minn. L. Rev. 1997 (2010).Google Scholar
Alexander, Larry Criminal and Moral Responsibility and the Libet Experiments, in Conscious Will and Responsibility: A Tribute to Benjamin Libet (Oxford Univ. Press, Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter & Nadel, Lynn, eds., 2010).Google Scholar
Aronson, Jay D. The Law's Use of Brain Evidence, 6 Ann. Rev. L. & Soc. Sci. 7.1 (2010).Google Scholar
Bader, Elizabeth E. The Psychology of Mediation: Issues of Self and Identity and the IDR Cycle, 10 Pepp. Disp. Resol. L.J. 183 (2010).Google Scholar
Bandes, Susan A. The Promise and Pitfalls of Neuroscience for Criminal Law and Procedure, 8 Ohio St. J. Crim. L. 119 (2010).Google Scholar
Banks, William P.& Isham, Eve A., Do We Really Know What We Are Doing? Implications of Reported Time of Decision for Theories of Volition, in Conscious Will and Responsibility: A Tribute to Benjamin Libet (Oxford Univ. Press, Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter & Nadel, Lynn, eds., 2010).Google Scholar
Belcher, Annabelle& Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter, Neurolaw, 1 Wiley Interdisc. Revs: Cognitive Sci. 18 (2010).Google Scholar
Birke, Richard Neuroscience and Settlement: An Examination of Scientific Innovations and Practical Applications, 25 Ohio St. J. on Disp. Resol. 477 (2010).Google Scholar
Bloch, Kate E. Changing the Topography of Sentencing, 7 Hastings Race & Poverty L.J. 185 (2010).Google Scholar
Bloom, Floyd E. Does Neuroscience Give Us New Insights Into Drug Addiction?, in A Judge's Guide to Neuroscience 42 (SAGE Center For the Study of the Mind, 2010).Google Scholar
Blumoff, T. Y. How (Some) Criminals are Made, in Law and Neuroscience: Current Legal Issues (Oxford Univ. Press, Freeman, Michael, ed., 2010).Google Scholar
Blumoff, Theodore Y. The Neuropsychology of Justifications and Excuses: Some Cases from Self-Defense, Duress, and Provocation, 50 Jurimetrics J. 391 (2010).Google Scholar
Bockman, Collin R. Cybernetic-Enhancement Technology and the Future of Disability Law, 95 Iowa L. Rev. 1315 (2010).Google Scholar
Bonnie, Richard J. The Virtues of Pragmatism in Drug Policy, 13 J. Health Care L. & Pol'y 7 (2010).Google Scholar
Boudreau, Cheryl Coulson, Seana & McCubbins, Mathew D., Pathways to Persuasion: How Neuroscience Can Inform the Study and Practice of Law, in Law and Neuroscience: Current Legal Issues (Oxford Univ. Press, Freeman, Michael, ed., 2010).Google Scholar
Brown, Teneille& Murphy, Emily, Through A Scanner Darkly: Functional Neuroimaging as Evidence of a Criminal Defendant's Past Mental States, 62 Stan. L. Rev. 1119 (2010).Google Scholar
Buchman, Daniel Z.& Illes, Judy, Imaging Genetics for Our Neurogenetic Future, 11 Minn. J.L. Sci. & Tech. 79 (2010).Google Scholar
Buchman, Daniel Z. Illes, Judy & Reiner, Peter B., The Paradox of Addiction Google Scholar
Neuroscience, _____ Neuroethics _____ (2010).Google Scholar
Buckholtz, J.et al, The Neural Correlates of Third-Party Punishment, in Law and Neuroscience: Current Legal Issues (Oxford Univ. Press, Freeman, Michael, ed., 2010).Google Scholar
Burgess, Hillary Deepening the Discourse Using the Legal Mind's Eye: Lessons from Neuroscience and Educational Psychology that Optimize Law School Learning, _____ Quinnipiac L. Rev. _____ (2010).Google Scholar
Burton, Angela O. “They Use it Like Candy”: How the Prescription of Psychotropic Drugs to State-Involved Children Violates International Law, 35 Brook. J. Int'l L. 453 (2010).Google Scholar
Buss, Emily What the Law Should (and Should Not) Learn from Child Development Research, 38 Hofstra L. Rev. 13 (2010).Google Scholar
Cárceres, Enrique Steps Toward a Constructivist and Coherentist Theory of Judicial Reasoning in Civil Law Tradition, in Law and Neuroscience: Current Legal Issues (Oxford Univ. Press, Freeman, Michael, ed., 2010).Google Scholar
Callender, John S. Free Will and Responsibility: A Guide for Practitioners (Oxford University Press 2010).Google Scholar
Capraro, Laura The Juridical Rise of Emotions in the Decisional Process of Popular Juries, in Law and Neuroscience: Current Legal Issues (Oxford Univ. Press, Freeman, Michael, ed., 2010).Google Scholar
Carbone, J. Neuroscience and Ideology: Why Science Can Never Supply a Complete Answer for Adolescent Immaturity, in Law and Neuroscience: Current Legal Issues (Oxford Univ. Press, Freeman, Michael, ed., 2010).Google Scholar
Carota, Francesca Desmurget, M. & Sirigu, A., Forward Modeling Mediates Motor Awareness, in Conscious Will and Responsibility: A Tribute to Benjamin Libet (Oxford Univ. Press, Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter & Nadel, Lynn, eds., 2010).Google Scholar
Chandler, Jennifer A. Reading the Judicial Mind: Predicting the Courts’ Reaction to the Use of Neuroscientific Evidence for Lie Detection, 33 Dalhousie L.J. _____ (2010).Google Scholar
Chiesa, Luis E. Beyond Torture: The Nemo Tenetur Principle in Borderline Cases, 30 B.C. Third World L.J. 35 (2010).Google Scholar
Churchill, Christopher J. The Parity Cure: Solving Unequal Treatment of Mental Illness Health Insurance Through Federal Legislation, 44 Ga. L. Rev. 511 (2010).Google Scholar
Claydon, L. Law, Neuroscience, and Criminal Culpability, in Law and Neuroscience: Current Legal Issues (Oxford Univ. Press, Freeman, Michael, ed., 2010).Google Scholar
Compton, E. Spencer Not Guilty by Reason of Neuroimaging: The Need for Cautionary Jury Instructions for Neuroscience Evidence in Criminal Trials, 12 Vand. J. Ent. & Tech. L. 333 (2010).Google Scholar
Conason, Robert L.& Pegalis, Steven E., Neurologic Birth Injury, 31 J. Legal Med. 249 (2010).Google Scholar
Cormier, Joseph W. Providing Those With Mental Illness Full and Fair Treatment: Legislative Considerations in the Post-Clark Era, 47 Am. Crim. L. Rev. 129 (2010).Google Scholar
Dailey, Anne C. Imagination and Choice, 35 Law & Soc. Inquiry 175 (2010).Google Scholar
Denno, Deborah W. Neuroscience, Cognitive Psychology, and the Criminal Justice System: Introduction, 8 Ohio St. J. Crim. L. 1 (2010).Google Scholar
Duffy, James D. What Hobbes Left Out: The Neuroscience of Comparison and its Implications For a New Commonwealth, in Law and Neuroscience: Current Legal Issues (Oxford Univ. Press, Freeman, Michael, ed., 2010).Google Scholar
Eagleman, David M. Why Neuroscience Matters For Rational Drug Policy, 11 Minn. J.L. Sci. & Tech. 7 (2010).Google Scholar
Ebert, Jeffrey P.& Wegner, Daniel M., Bending Time to One's Will in Conscious Will and Responsibility: A Tribute to Benjamin Libet (Oxford Univ. Press, Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter & Nadel, Lynn, eds., 2010).Google Scholar
Erickson, Megan J. Blaming the Brain, 11 Minn. J.L. Sci. & Tech. 27 (2010).Google Scholar
Farrell, Brian Can't Get You Out of My Head:The Human Rights Implications of Using Brain Scans as Criminal Evidence, 4 Interdisc. J. Hum. Rts. L. 101 (2010).Google Scholar
Fields, Howard Can Neuroscience Identify Pain?, in A Judge's Guide to Neuroscience 32 (SAGE Center For the Study of the Mind, 2010).Google Scholar
Fins, Joseph J. Minds Apart: Severe Brain Injury, Citizenship and Civil Rights, in Law and Neuroscience: Current Legal Issues (Oxford Univ. Press, Freeman, Michael, ed., 2010).Google Scholar
Fischer, J. Indeterminism and Control: An Approach to the Problem of Luck, in Law and Neuroscience: Current Legal Issues (Oxford Univ. Press, Freeman, Michael, ed., 2010).Google Scholar
Fisher, Carl E.& Appelbaum, Paul S., Diagnosing Consciousness: Neuroimaging, Law, and the Vegetative State, 38 J.L. Med. & Ethics 374 (2010).Google Scholar
Flatt, Gregory C. All in Your Head: A Comprehensive Approach to Somatoform Disorders in Adult Disability Claims, 87 Wash. U. L. Rev. 1397 (2010).Google Scholar
Fox, Dov The Right to Silence as Protecting Mental Control, in Law and Neuroscience: Current Legal Issues (Oxford Univ. Press, Freeman, Michael, ed., 2010).Google Scholar
Freeman, Michael ed., Law and Neuroscience: Current Legal Issues (Oxford University Press 2010).Google Scholar
Fruehwald, Edwin S. A Biological Basis of Rights, 19 S. Cal. Interdisc. L.J. 195 (2010).Google Scholar
Fruehwald, Edwin S. Postmodern Legal Thought and Cognitive Science, _____ Ga. St. U. L. Rev. _____ (2010).Google Scholar
Gazzaniga, Michael S. What Is Cognitive Neuroscience?, in A Judge's Guide to Neuroscience 2 (SAGE Center For the Study of the Mind, 2010).Google Scholar
Gazzaniga, Michael Neuroscience and the Correct Level of Explanation for Understanding Mind, 14 Trends in Cognitive Science 291 (2010).Google Scholar
Glannon, W. What Neuroscience Can (and cannot) Tell Us About Criminal Responsibility, in Law and Neuroscience: Current Legal Issues (Oxford Univ. Press, Freeman, Michael, ed., 2010).Google Scholar
Goldberg, Steven Neuroscience and the Free Exercise of Religion, in Law and Neuroscience: Current Legal Issues (Oxford Univ. Press, Freeman, Michael, ed., 2010).Google Scholar
Goldberg, Daniel S. The History of Scientific and Clinical Images in Mid-to-Late 19th Century American Legal Culture: Implications for Contemporary Law and Neuroscience, in Law and Neuroscience: Current Legal Issues (Oxford Univ. Press, Freeman, Michael, ed., 2010).Google Scholar
Goodenough, Oliver R.& Tucker, Micaela, Law and Cognitive Neuroscience, 6 Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 28.1 (2010).Google Scholar
Grafton, Scott T. Has Neuroscience Already Appeared in the Courtroom?, in A Judge's Guide to Neuroscience 54 (SAGE Center For the Study of the Mind, 2010).Google Scholar
Graves, Tashina Maniscalco, Brian & Lau, Hakwan, Volition and the Function of Consciousness, in Conscious Will and Responsibility: A Tribute to Benjamin Libet (Oxford Univ. Press, Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter & Nadel, Lynn, eds., 2010).Google Scholar
Greely, Henry T. Neuroscience and Criminal Responsibility: Proving “Can't Help Himself as a Narrow Bar to Liability, in Law and Neuroscience: Current Legal Issues (Oxford Univ. Press, Freeman, Michael, ed., 2010).Google Scholar
Grey, B. J. Neuroscience and Emotional Harm in Tort Law: Rethinking the American Approach to Freestanding Emotional Distress Claims, in Law and Neuroscience: Current Legal Issues (Oxford Univ. Press, Freeman, Michael, ed., 2010).Google Scholar
Hafemeister, Thomas L.& Stockey, Nicole A., Last Stand? The Criminal Responsibility of War Veterans Returning from Iraq and Afghanistan with Posttraumatic Stress Disorder, 85 Ind. L.J. 87 (2010).Google Scholar
Hallett, Mark Volition: How Physiology Speaks to the Issue of Responsibility, in Conscious Will and Responsibility: A Tribute to Benjamin Libet (Oxford Univ. Press, Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter & Nadel, Lynn, eds., 2010).Google Scholar
Haynes, John-Dylan Beyond Libet: Long-term Prediction of Free Choices from Neuroimaging Signals, in Conscious Will and Responsibility: A Tribute to Benjamin Libet (Oxford Univ. Press, Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter & Nadel, Lynn, eds., 2010).Google Scholar
Hirstein, William& Sifferd, Katrina, The Legal Self: Executive Processes And Legal Theory, _____ Consciousness and Cognition _____ (2010).Google Scholar
Hoffman, Morris B. Evolutionary Jurisprudence: The End of the Naturalistic Fallacy and the Beginning of Natural Reform?, in Law and Neuroscience: Current Legal Issues (Oxford Univ. Press, Freeman, Michael, ed., 2010).Google Scholar
Horgan, Terry The Phenomenology of Agency and the Libet Results, in Conscious Will and Responsibility: A Tribute to Benjamin Libet (Oxford Univ. Press, Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter & Nadel, Lynn, eds., 2010).Google Scholar
Jacobson, M.H. Sam Paying Attention or Fatally Distracted? Concentration, Memory, and Multi-Tasking in a Multi-Media World, 16 J. Legal Writing Inst. 419 (2010).Google Scholar
Lucille, A.Jewel, Through a Glass Darkly: Using Brain Science and Visual Rhetoric to Gain a Professional Perspective on Visual Advocacy, 19 S. Cal. Interdisc. L.J. 237 (2010).Google Scholar
Johansen, Steven J. Was Colonel Sanders a Terrorist? An Essay on the Ethical Limits of Applied Legal Storytelling, 1 J. Ass'n Legal Writing Directors 63 (2010).Google Scholar
Jones, Owen D. Intuitions of Punishment, _____ Chicago L. Rev. _____ (2010).Google Scholar
Kapp, Marhsall B. Legal Issues Arising in the Process of Determining Decisional Capacity in Older Persons, _____ J. Long-Term Health Care _____ (2010).Google Scholar
Kaye, Anders Powerful Particulars: The Real Reason the Behavioral Sciences Threaten Criminal Responsibility, 37 Fla. St. U. L. Rev. 539 (2010).Google Scholar
Keane, David Survival of the Fairest? Evolution and the Geneticization of Rights, 30 Oxford J. Legal Stud. 467 (2010).Google Scholar
Keren, Hila Considering Affective Consideration, 40 Golden Gate U. L. Rev. 165 (2010).Google Scholar
Kiehl, Kent Can Neuroscience Identify Psychopaths?, in A Judge's Guide to Neuroscience 47 (SAGE Center For the Study of the Mind, 2010).Google Scholar
Kolber, Adam J. The Experiential Future of the Law, _____ Emory L.J. _____ (2010).Google Scholar
Kowalski, Tonya True North: Navigating for the Transfer of Learning in Legal Education, 34 Seattle U. L. Rev. 51 (2010).Google Scholar
Krauss, Rebecca Neuroscience and Institutional Choice in Federal Sentencing Law, 120 Yale L.J. 367 (2010).Google Scholar
Lamparello, Adam Using Cognitive Neuroscience As a Basis Upon Which To Accurately Predict the Future Dangerousness of Violent Criminals and Thus Provide a Procedure for the Involuntary Commitment of Such Individuals As a Part of or Following the Duration of their Sentence, 42 Colum. Hum. Rts. L. Rev. _____ (2010).Google Scholar
Libet, Benjamin Do We Have Free Will?, in Conscious Will and Responsibility: A Tribute to Benjamin Libet (Oxford Univ. Press, Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter & Nadel, Lynn, eds., 2010).Google Scholar
Lokhorst, Gert-Jan Mens Rea, Logic, and the Brain, in Law and Neuroscience: Current Legal Issues (Oxford Univ. Press, Freeman, Michael, ed., 2010).Google Scholar
Looney, J. W. Neuroscience's New Techniques For Evaluating Future Dangerousness: Are We Returning To Lombroso's Biological Criminality?, 32 U. Ark. Little Rock L. Rev. 301 (2010).Google Scholar
MacKenzie, R.& Sakel, M., The Neuroscience of Cruelty as Brain Damage: Legal Framings of Capacity and Ethical Issues in the Neurorehabilitation of Motor Neurone Disease, in Law and Neuroscience: Current Legal Issues (Oxford Univ. Press, Freeman, Michael, ed., 2010).Google Scholar
MacMillan, Scott N.& Vaughn, Michael S., Weighing the Evidence: Neuroimagery Evidence of Brain Trauma or Disorder in Courts, 46 No. 3 Crim. L. Bull. ART 5 (2010).Google Scholar
Mandel, Gregory N. Left-Brain Versus Right-Brain: Competing Conceptions of Creativity in Intellectual Property Law, 44 U.C. Davis L. Rev. _____ (2010).Google Scholar
Maroney, Terry Adolescent Brain Science and Juvenile Justice, in Law and Neuroscience: Current Legal Issues (Oxford Univ. Press, Freeman, Michael, ed., 2010).Google Scholar
Maroney, Terry A. Adolescent Brain Science after Graham v. Florida, 85 Notre Dame L. Rev. _____ (2010).Google Scholar
Mayberg, Helen Does Neuroscience Give Us New Insights Into Criminal Responsibility?, in A Judge's Guide to Neuroscience 37 (SAGE Center For the Study of the Mind, 2010).Google Scholar
Mele, Alfred R. Libet on Free Will: Readiness Potentials, Decisions, and Awareness, in Conscious Will and Responsibility: A Tribute to Benjamin Libet (Oxford Univ. Press, Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter & Nadel, Lynn, eds., 2010).Google Scholar
Meszaros, Jozsef Achieving Peace of Mind: The Benefits of Neurobiology Evidence for Battered Women Defendants, _____ Yale Journal of Law & Feminism _____ (2010).Google Scholar
Montague, Read How Is Neuroscience Likely to Impact Law in the Near Future?, in A Judge's Guide to Neuroscience 60 (SAGE Center For the Study of the Mind, 2010).Google Scholar
Moore, Michael S. Libet's Challenge(s) to Responsible Agency, in Conscious Will and Responsibility: A Tribute to Benjamin Libet (Oxford Univ. Press, Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter & Nadel, Lynn, eds., 2010).Google Scholar
Moore, Michael Intention, Responsibility and the Challenges of Recent Neuroscience, 2010 Stan. Tech. L. Rev. _____ (2010).Google Scholar
Morse, Stephen J. Lost in Translation? An Essay on Law and Neuroscience, in Law and Neuroscience: Current Legal Issues (Oxford Univ. Press, Freeman, Michael, ed., 2010).Google Scholar
Myers, Julie E. The Moment of Truth for fMRI: Will Deception Detection Pass Admissibility Hurdles in Oklahoma?, 6 Okla. J. L. & Tech. 47 (2010).Google Scholar
Nadelhoffer, Thomas The Threat of Shrinking Agency and Free Will Disillusionism, in Conscious Will and Responsibility: A Tribute to Benjamin Libet (Oxford Univ. Press, Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter & Nadel, Lynn, eds., 2010).Google Scholar
Nadelhoffer, Thomas Bibas, Stephanos, Grafton, Scott, Kiehl, Kent A., Mansfield, Andrew, Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter & Gazzaniga, Michael, Neuroprediction, _____ Neuroethics _____ (2010).Google Scholar
Nevins-Saunders, Elizabeth Incomprehensible Crimes: Defendants with Mental Retardation Charged with Statutory Rape, _____ N.Y.U.L. Rev. _____ (2010).Google Scholar
O'Neill, Timothy P. Mirror Neurons, the New Neuroscience, and the Law: Some Preliminary Observations, 39 Sw. L. Rev. 499 (2010).Google Scholar
Pacherie, Elisabeth& Haggard, Patrick, What are Intentions?, in Conscious Will and Responsibility: A Tribute to Benjamin Libet (Oxford Univ. Press, Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter & Nadel, Lynn, eds., 2010).Google Scholar
Pardo, Michael S. Philosophical Foundations of Law and Neuroscience, _____ U. Ill. L. Rev. _____ (2010).Google Scholar
Pfaff, Donald W. Possible Neural Mechanisms Underlying Ethical Behaviour, in Law and Neuroscience: Current Legal Issues (Oxford Univ. Press, Freeman, Michael, ed., 2010).Google Scholar
Pockett, Susan& Purdy, Suzanne, Are Voluntary Movements Initiated Preconsciously? The Relationships Between Readiness Potentials, Urges, and Decisions, in Conscious Will and Responsibility: A Tribute to Benjamin Libet (Oxford Univ. Press, Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter & Nadel, Lynn, eds., 2010).Google Scholar
Ptacek, Louis J. What Is Neurogenetics?, in A Judge's Guide to Neuroscience 26 (SAGE Center For the Study of the Mind, 2010).Google Scholar
Raichle, Marcus What is an fMRI?, in A Judge's Guide to Neuroscience 5 (SAGE Center For the Study of the Mind, 2010).Google Scholar
Rissman, Jesse Greely, Hank & Wagner, Anthony D., Detecting Individual Memories Through The Neural Decoding Of Memory States And Past Experience, 107 PNAS 9849 (2010).Google Scholar
Rissman, Jesse Greely, Henry T. & Wagner, Anthony D., Detecting Individual Memories Through the Neural Decoding of Memory States and Past Experience, 107 PNAS 9849 (2010).Google Scholar
Robertson, John A. Law, Science, and Innovation: Introduction to the Symposium, 38 J.L. Med. & Ethics 175 (2010).Google Scholar
Roskies, A. L.& Sinnott-Armstrong, W., Brain Images as Evidence in the Criminal Law, in Law and Neuroscience: Current Legal Issues (Oxford Univ. Press, Freeman, Michael, ed., 2010).Google Scholar
Roskies, Adina L. Why Libet's Studies Don't Pose a Threat to Free Will, in Conscious Will and Responsibility: A Tribute to Benjamin Libet (Oxford Univ. Press, Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter & Nadel, Lynn, eds., 2010).Google Scholar
Roskies, Adina How Is Neuroscience Likely to Impact the Law in the Long Run?, in A Judge's Guide to Neuroscience 66 (SAGE Center For the Study of the Mind, 2010).Google Scholar
Roskies, Adina How Does Neuroscience Affect Our Concept of Volition, 33 Ann. Rev. Neurosciences 109 (2010).Google Scholar
Schauer, Frederick Can Bad Science Be Good Evidence? Lie Detection, Neuroscience and the Mistaken Conflation of Legal and Scientific Norms, 95 Cornell L. Rev. 1191 (2010).Google Scholar
Schleim, Stephan Spranger, Tade M., Erk, Susanne & Walter, Henrik, From Moral to Legal Judgment: The Influence of Normative Context in Lawyers and Other Academics, Social, Cognitive & Affective Neuroscience (2010).Google Scholar
Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter& Nadel, Lynn, Conscious Will and Responsibility: A Tribute to Benjamin Libet (Oxford University Press 2010).Google Scholar
Sirkin, Mark I. Managing Your Brain: Lessons From Neuroscience, 82-SEP N.Y. St. B.J. 38 (2010).Google Scholar
Skene, Loane Recent Developments in Stem Cell Research: Social, Ethical, and Legal Issues for the Future, 17 Ind. J. Global Legal Stud. 211 (2010).Google Scholar
Snead, O. Carter Memory and Punishment, _____ Vand. L. Rev. _____ (2010).Google Scholar
Stucke, Maurice E. Money, Is That What I Want?: Competition Policy and the Role of Behavioral Economics, 50 Santa Clara L. Rev. 893 (2010).Google Scholar
Swedloff, Rick& Huang, Peter H., Tort Damages and the New Science of Happiness, 85 Ind. L.J. 553 (2010).Google Scholar
Talmi, Debora& Frith, Chris D., Neuroscience, Free Will, and Responsibility, in Conscious Will and Responsibility: A Tribute to Benjamin Libet (Oxford Univ. Press, Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter & Nadel, Lynn, eds., 2010).Google Scholar
Terracina, D. Neuroscience and Penal Law: Ineffectiveness of the Penal Systems and Flawed Perception of the Underevaluation of Behaviour Constituting Crime, in Law and Neuroscience: Current Legal Issues (Oxford Univ. Press, Freeman, Michael, ed., 2010).Google Scholar
Tovino, Stacey A. Scientific Understandings of Postpartum Illness: Improving Health Law and Policy?, 33 Harv. J. L. & Gender 99 (2010).Google Scholar
Viens, A.M. Reciprocity and Neuroscience in Public Health Law, in Law and Neuroscience: Current Legal Issues (Oxford Univ. Press, Freeman, Michael, ed., 2010).Google Scholar
Vincent, N. Madness, Badness and Neuro-imaging-based Responsibility Assessments, in Law and Neuroscience: Current Legal Issues (Oxford Univ. Press, Freeman, Michael, ed., 2010).Google Scholar
Wagner, Anthony Can Neuroscience Identify Lies?, in A Judge's Guide to Neuroscience 13 (SAGE Center For the Study of the Mind, 2010).Google Scholar
Waldman, Ellen A. Mindfulness, Emotions, and Ethics: The Right Stuff?, 10 Nev. L.J. 513 (2010).Google Scholar
Wheatley, Thalia& Looser, Christine, Prospective Codes Fulfilled: A Potential Neural Mechanism of the Will, in Conscious Will and Responsibility: A Tribute to Benjamin Libet (Oxford Univ. Press, Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter & Nadel, Lynn, eds., 2010).Google Scholar
Wilkinson, Dominic& Foster, Charles, The Carmentis Machine: Legal and Ethical Issues in the Use of Neuroimaging to Guide Treatment Withdrawal in Newborn Infants, in Law and Neuroscience: Current Legal Issues (Oxford Univ. Press, Freeman, Michael, ed., 2010).Google Scholar
Yaffe, Gideon Libet and the Criminal Law's Voluntary Act Requirement, in Conscious Will and Responsibility: A Tribute to Benjamin Libet (Oxford Univ. Press, Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter & Nadel, Lynn, eds., 2010).Google Scholar
Zimmerman, Adam S. Funding Irrationality, 59 Duke L.J. 1105 (2010).Google Scholar
Aggarwal, Neil K. Neuroimaging, Culture, and Forensic Psychiatry, 37 J. Am. Acad. Psychiatry L. 239 (2009).Google Scholar
Aronson, Jay D. Neuroscience and Juvenile Justice, 42 Akron L. Rev. 917 (2009).Google Scholar
Ball, David Damages and the Reptilian Brain, 45-SEP TRIAL 24 (2009).Google Scholar
Bandes, Susan A. Repellent Crimes and Rational Deliberation: Emotion and the Death Penalty, 33 Vt. L. Rev. 489 (2009).Google Scholar
Barnard, Jayne W. Deception, Decisions, and Investor Education, 17 Elder L.J. 201 (2009).Google Scholar
Batts, Shelley Brain Lesions and Their Implications in Criminal Responsibility, 27 Behav. Sci. & L. 261 (2009).Google Scholar
Bles, M.& Haynes, J.D., Detecting Concealed Information Using Brain-Imaging Technology, in Neuroscience and Crime: A Special Issue of Neurocase (Psychology Press, Markowitsch, Hans, ed., 2009).Google Scholar
Bloch, Kate E. Cognition and Star Trek: Learning and Legal Education, 42 J. Marshall L. Rev. 959 (2009).Google Scholar
Blumoff, Theodore Y. The Problems with Blaming, in Law, Mind and Brain 127 (Ashgate, Freeman, Michael & Goodenough, Oliver R., eds., 2009).Google Scholar
Boudreau, Cheryl Cues in the Courtroom: When Do They Improve Jurors’ Decisions?, in Law, Mind and Brain 373 (Ashgate, Freeman, Michael & Goodenough, Oliver R., eds., 2009).Google Scholar
Bryant, Bethany C. Expanding Atkins and Roper: A Diagnostic Approach to Excluding the Death Penalty as Punishment for Schizophrenic Offenders, 78 Miss. L.J. 905 (2009).Google Scholar
Buss, Emily Rethinking the Connection Between Developmental Science and Juvenile Justice, 76 U. Chi. L. Rev. 493 (2009).Google Scholar
Carbone, June& Cahn, Naomi, Examining the Biological Bases of Family Law: Lessons to be Learned for the Evolutionary Analysis of Law, in Law, Mind and Brain 323 (Ashgate, Freeman, Michael & Goodenough, Oliver R., eds., 2009).Google Scholar
Casebeer, William D. Reason's Ends: Ecological Rationality and Moral Judgment, 35 Queen's L.J. 359 (2009).Google Scholar
Claydon, Lisa Mind the Gap: Problems of Mind, Body and Brain in the Criminal Law, in Law, Mind and Brain 55 (Ashgate, Freeman, Michael & Goodenough, Oliver R., eds., 2009).Google Scholar
Dawson, John& Szmukler, George, Why Distinguish “Mental” and “Physical” Illness in the Law of Involuntary Treatment?, in Law, Mind and Brain 173 (Ashgate, Freeman, Michael & Goodenough, Oliver R., eds., 2009).Google Scholar
Denno, Deborah W. Consciousness and Culpability in American Criminal Law, 12 Waseda Procs. Comp. L. 115 (2009).Google Scholar
Destro, Robert A. Learning Neuroscience the Hard Way: The Terri Schiavo Case and the Ethics of Effective Representation, 78 Miss. L.J. 833 (2009).Google Scholar
Domin, Christopher Mitigating Evidence? The Admissibility of Polygraph Results in the Penalty Phase of a Capital Trial, 43 U.C. Davis L. Rev. 1461 (2009).Google Scholar
Dressing, H. Sartorius, A. & Meyer-Lindenberg, A., Implications of fMRI and Genetics for the Law and the Routine Practice of Forensic Psychiatry, in Neuroscience and Crime: A Special Issue of Neurocase (Psychology Press, Markowitsch, Hans, ed., 2009).Google Scholar
Laing, Bart Du Equality in Exchange Revisited: From an Evolutionary (Genetic and Cultural) Point of View, in Law, Mind and Brain 267 (Ashgate, Freeman, Michael & Goodenough, Oliver R., eds., 2009).Google Scholar
Roger, Kristen G.& DuBois, Alan, The Present and Future Impact of Neuroscience Evidence on Criminal Law, 33-APR Champion 18 (2009).Google Scholar
Eagleman, David M. Correro, Mark A. & Singh, Jyotpal, What Neuroscience May Be Able to Tell Us About Criminal Behavior and Rehabilitation, Gruter Institute Squaw Valley Conference 2009: Law, Behavior & the Brain (2009).Google Scholar
Ellenberg, Cooper Lie Detection: A Changing of the Guard in the Quest for Truth in Court?, 33 Law & Psychol. Rev. 139 (2009).Google Scholar
Emery, Robert E. Anger is Not Anger is Not Anger: Different Motivations Behind Anger and Why They Matter for Family Law, 16 Va. J. Soc. Pol'y & L. 346 (2009).Google Scholar
Erickson, Steven K. The Neuroscience and Psychology of Moral Decision Making and the Law, 27 Behav. Sci. & L. 119 (2009).Google Scholar
Fabian, John M. Forensic Neuropsychological Assessment and Death Penalty Litigation, 33-APR Champion 24 (2009).Google Scholar
Farahany, Nita& Greely, Hank, Genetics, Neuroscience, and Criminal Responsibility, in The Impact of Behavioral Sciences on Criminal Law 183 (Oxford Univ. Press, Farahany, Nita, ed., 2009).Google Scholar
Farahany, Nita Cruel and Unequal Punishments, 86 Wash. U. L. Rev. 859 (2009).Google Scholar
Federle, Katherine H.& Skendelas, Paul, Thinking Like a Child: Legal Implications of Recent Developments in Brain Research for Juvenile Offenders, in Law, Mind and Brain 199 (Ashgate, Freeman, Michael & Goodenough, Oliver R., eds., 2009).Google Scholar
Feigenson, Neal Brain Imaging and Courtroom Evidence: On the Admissibility and Persuasiveness of fMRI, in Law, Mind and Brain 23 (Ashgate, Freeman, Michael & Goodenough, Oliver R., eds., 2009).Google Scholar
Fox, Dov The Right to Silence as Protecting Mental Control, 42 Akron L. Rev. 763 (2009).Google Scholar
Freeman, Michael& Goodenough, Oliver R., eds., Law, Mind and Brain (Ashgate 2009).Google Scholar
Fruehwald, Edwin S. Reciprocal Altruism as the Basis for Contract, 47 U. Louisville L. Rev. 489 (2009).Google Scholar
Gewirtzman, Don Our Founding Feelings: Emotion, Commitment, and Imagination in Constitutional Culture, 43 U. Rich. L. Rev. 623 (2009).Google Scholar
Glenn, Andrea L.& Raine, Adrian, Psychopathy and Instrumental Aggression: Evolutionary, Neurobiological, and Legal Perspectives, 32 Int'l J.L. & Psychiatry 253 (2009).Google Scholar
Goel, Rashmi Delinquent or Distracted? Attention Deficit Disorder and the Construction of the Juvenile Offender, 27 Law & Ineq. 1 (2009).Google Scholar
Goodenough, Oliver R.& Decker, Gregory, Why Do Good People Steal Intellectual Property?, in Law, Mind and Brain 345 (Ashgate, Freeman, Michael & Goodenough, Oliver R., eds., 2009).Google Scholar
Graham, Lorie M.& McJohn, Stephen M., Cognition, Law, Stories, 10 Minn. J.L. Sci. & Tech. 255 (2009).Google Scholar
Gray, Oscar S. Third Restatement of Torts: Issue Two Articles and Commentary: Commentary, 44 Wake Forest L. Rev. 1193 (2009).Google Scholar
Greely, Hank Neuroscience-Based Lie Detection: The Need for Regulation, in Using Imaging to Identify Deceit 46 (American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 2009).Google Scholar
Greely, Hank Who Knows What Evil Lurks in the Hearts of Men? Behavioral Genomics, Neuroscience, Criminal Law, and the Search for Hidden Knowledge, in The Impact of Behavioral Sciences on Criminal Law 161 (Oxford Univ. Press, Farahany, Nita, ed., 2009).Google Scholar
Greely, Henry T. Law and the Revolution in Neuroscience: An Early Look at the Field, 42 Akron L. Rev. 687 (2009).Google Scholar
Greene, Joshua D.& Paxton, Joseph M., Patterns Of Neural Activity Associated With Honest And Dishonest Moral Decisions, 106 Proc. Nat'l Acad. Sci. 12506 (2009).Google Scholar
Guttentag, Michael D. Is There a Law Instinct?, 87 Wash. U. L. Rev. 269 (2009).Google Scholar
Hakun, J. G. Seelig, D., Ruparel, K., Loughead, J.W., Busch, E., Gur, R.C. & Langleben, D.D., Exploring the Cognitive Structure of the Concealed Information Test with fMRI, in Neuroscience and Crime: A Special Issue of Neurocase (Psychology Press, Markowitsch, Hans, ed., 2009).Google Scholar
Halliburton, Christian M. How Privacy Killed Katz: A Tale of Cognitive Freedom and the Property of Personhood as Fourth Amendment Norm, 42 Akron L. Rev. 803 (2009).Google Scholar
Hammond, Jeffrey B. The Minimally Conscious Person: A Case Study in Dignity and Personhood and the Standard of Review for Withdrawal of Treatment, 55 Wayne L. Rev. 821 (2009).Google Scholar
Harrison, Jeffrey L. Happiness, Efficiency, and the Promise of Decisional Equity: From Outcome to Process, 36 Pepp. L. Rev. 935 (2009).Google Scholar
Heller, Kevin J. The Cognitive Psychology of Mens Rea, 99 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 317 (2009).Google Scholar
Herring, David J. Losing? Losing What? The Law and Dementia, 3 Child & Fam. L.Q. (2009).Google Scholar
Hill, Claire A. Rationality in an Unjust World: A Research Agenda, 35 Queen's L.J. 185 (2009).Google Scholar
Holley, Mary It's All In Your Head: Neurotechnological Lie Detection and the Fourth and Fifth Amendments, 28 Dev. Mental Health L. 1 (2009).Google Scholar
Illes, Judy& Lombera, Sofia, Identifiable Neuro Ethics Challenges to the Banking of Neuro Data, 10 Minn. J.L. Sci. & Tech. 71 (2009).Google Scholar
Iselin, Anne-Marie R. DeCoster, Jamie & Salekin, Randall T., Maturity in Adolescent and Young Adult Offenders, 33 Law & Hum. Behav. 455 (2009).Google Scholar
Johnson, Mark L. Guilty or Innocent? Just Take a Look at my Brain - Analyzing the Nexus Between Traumatic Brain Injury and Criminal Responsibility, 37 S.U. L. Rev. 25 (2009).Google Scholar
Jones, Owen D.& Brosnan, Sarah F., Brain Imaging for Legal Thinkers: A Guide for the Perplexed, 2009 Stan. Tech. L. Rev. 5 (2009).Google Scholar
Kalbe, E. Brand, M., Thiel, A, Kessler, J. & Markowitsch, H.J., Neuropsychological and Neural Correlates of Autobiographical Deficits in a Mother Who Killed Her Children, in Neuroscience and Crime: A Special Issue of Neurocase (Psychology Press, Markowitsch, Hans, ed., 2009).Google Scholar
Katt, William J. Roper and the Scientific Amicus, 49 Jurimetrics J. 253 (2009).Google Scholar
Klaming, Laura& Vedder, Anton H., Brushing Up Our Memories: Can We Use Neurotechnologies to Improve Eyewitness Memory?, 1 Law, Innovation & Tech. 203 (2009).Google Scholar
Klein, Dora W. Unreasonable: Involuntary Medications, Incompetent Criminal Defendants, and the Fourth Amendment, 46 San Diego L. Rev. 161 (2009).Google Scholar
Knabb, Joshua J. et. al., Neuroscience, Moral Reasoning, and the Law, 27 Behav. Sci. & L. 219 (2009).Google Scholar
Kolber, Adam J. Legal Implications of Memory-Dampening, in Law, Mind and Brain 215 (Ashgate, Freeman, Michael & Goodenough, Oliver R., eds., 2009).Google Scholar
Kolber, Adam J. The Subjective Experience of Punishment, 109 Colum. L. Rev. 182 (2009).Google Scholar
Korobkin, Russell Libertarian Welfarism, 97 Cal. L. Rev. 1651 (2009).Google Scholar
Kozel, F.A. Developing a Neuropsychiatric Functional Brain Imaging Test, in Neuroscience and Crime: A Special Issue of Neurocase (Psychology Press, Markowitsch, Hans, ed., 2009).Google Scholar
Kulich, Ronald Maciewicz, Raymond & Scrivani, Steven J., Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (FMRI) and Expert Testimony, 10 Pain Med. 373 (2009).Google Scholar
Lamb, Cassandra M. Behavioral Biology: The Impact of Neuroimaging and Brain Dysfunction on the Sentencing of Sexual Offenders, 35 New Eng. J. on Crim. & Civ. Confinement 421 (2009).Google Scholar
Mackenzie, Robin Reframing the Good Death: Enhancing Choice in Dying, Neuroscience, End-of-Life Research and the Potential of Psychedelics in Palliative Care, in Law, Mind and Brain 239 (Ashgate, Freeman, Michael & Goodenough, Oliver R., eds., 2009).Google Scholar
Markowitsch, Hans ed., Neuroscience and Crime: A Special Issue of Neurocase (Psychology Press 2009).Google Scholar
Markowitsch, H.J. Neuroscience and Crime, in Neuroscience and Crime: A Special Issue of Neurocase (Psychology Press, Markowitsch, Hans, ed., 2009).Google Scholar
Maroney, Terry A. The False Promise of Adolescent Brain Science in Juvenile Justice, 85 Notre Dame L. Rev. 89 (2009).Google Scholar
Maroney, Terry A. Emotional Competence and “Rational Understanding”: A Guide for Defense Counsel, 33-APR Champion 36 (2009).Google Scholar
Maroney, Terry A. Emotional Common Sense as Constitutional Law, 62 Vand. L. Rev. 851 (2009).Google Scholar
Martell, Daniel A. Neuroscience and the Law: Philosophical Differences and Practical Constraints, 27 Behav. Sci. & L. 123 (2009).Google Scholar
McCauliff, C.M.A. Cognition and Consensus in the Natural Law Tradition and in Neuroscience: Jacques Maritain and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, 54 Vill. L. Rev. 435 (2009).Google Scholar
Mello, Michael Ford's Delusions - And Our Own: Executing the Insane, 45 No. 6 Crim. L. Bull. ART 7 (2009).Google Scholar
Meyer, Carlin Brain, Gender, Law: A Cautionary Tale, 53 N.Y.L. Sch. L. Rev. 995 (2009).Google Scholar
Mobbs, Dean Lau, Hakwan C., Jones, Owen D. & Frith, Christopher D., Law, Responsibility and the Brain, in Law, Mind and Brain 1 (Ashgate, Freeman, Michael & Goodenough, Oliver R., eds., 2009).Google Scholar
Moreno, Joelle A. The Future of Neuroimaged Lie Detection and the Law, 42 Akron L. Rev. 717 (2009).Google Scholar
Moriarty, Jane C. Visions of Deception: Neuroimages and the Search for Truth, 42 Akron L. Rev. 739 (2009).Google Scholar
Moriarty, Jane C. Forward to the Neuroscience, Law & Government Symposium, 42 Akron L. Rev. 681 (2009).Google Scholar
Morse, Stephen Actions Speak Louder Than Images, in Using Imaging to Identify Deceit 23 (American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 2009).Google Scholar
Mushlin, Michael B.& Galtz, Naomi R., Getting Real About Race and Prisoner Rights, 36 Fordham Urb. L.J. 27 (2009).Google Scholar
O'Hanlon, Stephen Toward a More Reasonable Approach to Free Will in Criminal Law, 7 Cardozo Pub. L. Pol'y & Ethics J. 395 (2009).Google Scholar
Perlin, Michael L. 'And I See Through Your Brain “: Access to Experts, Competency to Consent, and the Impact of Antipsychotic Medications in Neuroimaging Cases in the Criminal Trial Process, 2009 Stan. Tech. L. Rev. 4 (2009).Google Scholar
Perlin, Michael L. “His Brain Has Been Mismanaged With Great Skill”: How Will Jurors Respond to Neuroimaging Testimony in Insanity Defense Cases?, 42 Akron L. Rev. 885 (2009).Google Scholar
Perlin, Michael L.& McClain, Valerie R., Unasked (and Unanswered) Questions About the Role of Neuroimaging in the Criminal Trial Process, 28 Am. J. Forensic Psychol. (2009).Google Scholar
Pietrini, Pietro& Bambini, Valentina, Homo Ferox: The Contribution of Functional Brain Studies to Understanding the Neural Bases of Aggressive and Criminal Behavior, 32 Int'l J.L. & Psychiatry 259 (2009).Google Scholar
Pontius, Anneliese A. Neuro-Image and Crime Kindled Nonconvulsive Behavioral Seizures in 24th Case of “Limbic Psychotic Trigger Reaction” with Bizarre Infanticide by Parent: Is His Nonvoluntariness Testable by LPTR's Primate Model?, in Neuroscience and Crime: A Special Issue of Neurocase (Psychology Press, Markowitsch, Hans, ed., 2009).Google Scholar
Pustilnik, Amanda C. Violence on the Brain: A Critique of Neuroscience in Criminal Law, 44 Wake Forest L. Rev. 183 (2009).Google Scholar
Rakoff, Jed Lie Detection in the Courts: The Vain Search for the Magic Bullet, in Using Imaging to Identify Deceit 40 (American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 2009).Google Scholar
Reese, Brian Comment: Using fMRI as a Lie Detector - Are We Lying to Ourselves?, 19 Alb. L.J. Sci. & Tech. 205 (2009).Google Scholar
Reinders, A.A. T. Simone Neuroimage and Crime: Cross-examining Dissociative Identity Disorder: Neuroimaging and Tiology on Trial, in Neuroscience and Crime: A Special Issue of Neurocase (Psychology Press, Markowitsch, Hans, ed., 2009).Google Scholar
Robinson, Robert Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals and the Local Construction of Reliability, 19 Alb. L.J. Sci. & TechH. 39 (2009).Google Scholar
Roosa, Steven B. The Next Generation of Artificial Intelligence in Light of In re Bilski, 21 No. 3 Intell. Prop. & Tech. L.J. 6 (2009).Google Scholar
Ross, Catherine J. A Stable Paradigm: Revisiting Capacity, Vulnerability and the Rights Claims of Adolescents after Roper v. Simmons, in Law, Mind and Brain 183 (Ashgate, Freeman, Michael & Goodenough, Oliver R., eds., 2009).Google Scholar
Sanchirico, Chris W. What Makes the Engine Go? Cognitive Limitations and Cross-Examination, 14 Widener L. Rev. 507 (2009).Google Scholar
Sartwelle, Thomas P. Defending a Neurological Birth Injury: Asphyxia Neonatorum Redux, 30 J. Legal Med. 181 (2009).Google Scholar
Sartwelle, Thomas P. Defending a Neurologic Birth Injury: Asphyxia Neonatorum Redux, 30 J. LEGAL MED. 181 (2009).Google Scholar
Sasso, Peggy Criminal Responsibility in the Age of “Mind-Reading”, 46 Am. Crim. L. Rev. 1191 (2009).Google Scholar
Schaller, Barry R. Using Neuroscience in Criminal Law, Gruter Institute Squaw Valley Conference 2009: Law, Behavior & the Brain (2009).Google Scholar
Schauer, Frederick Neuroscience, Lie-Detection, and the Law, 14 Trends in Cognitive Sciences 101 (2009).Google Scholar
Seaman, Julie Black Boxes: fMRI Lie Detection and the Role of the Jury, 42 Akron L. Rev. 931 (2009).Google Scholar
Silva, J. Arturo Forensic Psychiatry, Neuroscience, and the Law, 37 J. Am. Acad. Psychiatry L. 489 (2009).Google Scholar
Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter Neural Lie Detection in Courts, in Using Imaging to Identify Deceit 35 (American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 2009).Google Scholar
Skene, Loane Wilkinson, Dominic, Kahane, Guy, & Savulescu, Julian, Neuroimaging and the Withdrawal of Life-Sustaining Treatment from Google Scholar
Patients in Vegetative State, 17 Med. L. Rev. 245 (2009).Google Scholar
Slobogin, Christopher& Fondacaro, Mark R., Juvenile Justice: The Fourth Option, 95 Iowa L. Rev. 1 (2009).Google Scholar
Slocum, Robin W. The Dilemma of the Vengeful Client: A Prescriptive Framework for Cooling the Flames of Anger, 92 Marq. L. Rev. 481 (2009).Google Scholar
Sousa, David A. How Brain Science Can Make You a Better Lawyer (ABA Publishing 2009).Google Scholar
Spellman, Barbara A. Embodied Rationality, 35 QUEEN'S L.J. 117 (2009).Google Scholar
Spence, S.A.& Kaylor-Hughes, C.J., Looking for the Truth and Finding Lies: The Prospects for a Nascent Neuroimaging of Deception, in Neuroscience and Crime: A Special Issue of Neurocase (Psychology Press, Markowitsch, Hans, ed., 2009).Google Scholar
Spiesel, Christina Reflections on Reading: Words and Pictures and Law, in Law, Mind and Brain 391 (Ashgate, Freeman, Michael & Goodenough, Oliver R., eds., 2009).Google Scholar
Spranger, Tade M. Legal Implications in Connection with the Generation and Usage of Neuro-Scientific Findings, 6 J. Int'l Biotechnology L. 228 (2009).Google Scholar
Stake, Jeffrey E. Just (and Efficient?) Compensation for Governmental Expropriations, in Law, Mind and Brain 299 (Ashgate, Freeman, Michael & Goodenough, Oliver R., eds., 2009).Google Scholar
Stronge, Aaron M. Absolute Truth or Deus Ex Machina? The Legal and Philosophical Ramifications of Guilt-Assessment Technology, 10 J. High Tech. L. 113 (2009).Google Scholar
Strueber, D.& Roth, G., Sex, Aggression and Impulse Control: An Integrative Account, in Neuroscience and Crime: A Special Issue of Neurocase (Psychology Press, Markowitsch, Hans, ed., 2009).Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass R. Some Effects of Moral Indignation on Law, 33 Vt. L. Rev. 405 (2009).Google Scholar
Tesler, Pauline H. Goodbye Homo Economicus: Cognitive Dissonance, Brain Science, and Highly Effective Collaborative Practice, 38 Hofstra L. Rev. 635 (2009).Google Scholar
Torrance, Andrew W. Neurobiology and Patenting Thought, 50 IDEA 27 (2009).Google Scholar
Tovino, Stacey A. Neuroscience and Health Law: An Integrative Approach, 42 Akron L. Rev. 469 (2009).Google Scholar
Tovino, Stacey A. Remarks: Neuroscience, Gender, and the Law, 42 Akron L. Rev. 941 (2009).Google Scholar
Victoroff, Jeff Aggression, Science and Law: The Origins Framework, 32 Int'l J. L. & Psychiatry 189 (2009).Google Scholar
Vincent, Nicole A. Neuroimaging and Responsibility Assessments, _____ Neuroethics _____ (2009).Google Scholar
Vincent, Nicole A. On the Relevance of Neuroscience to Criminal Responsibility, 4 Crim. L. & Philosophy 77 (2009).Google Scholar
Papp, Florian Wagner-von Self-Exclusion Agreements: Should We Be Free not to Be Free to Ruin Ourselves? Gambling, Self-Exclusion Agreements and the Brain, in Law, Mind and Brain 81 (Ashgate, Freeman, Michael & Goodenough, Oliver R., eds., 2009).Google Scholar
Young, Jeffrey E. Bilski and the Transformation of the Brain, 2 No. 2 Landslide 46 (2009).Google Scholar
Aharoni, Eyal Funk, Chadd, Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter & Gazzaniga, Michael, Can Neurological Evidence Help Courts Assess Criminal Responsibility? Lessons from Law and Neuroscience, 1124 Annals N.Y. Acad. Of Sci. 145 (2008).Google Scholar
Arkush, David J. Situating Emotion: A Critical Realist View of Emotion and Nonconscious Cognitive Processes for Law and Legal Theory, 2008 B.Y.U.L. Rev. 1275 (2008).Google Scholar
Brookbanks, Warren Neuroscience, “Folk Psychology”, and the Future of Criminal Responsibility, 2008 N.Z. L. Rev. 623 (2008).Google Scholar
Buckholtz, Joshua W. Asplund, Christopher L., Dux, Paul E., Zald, David H., Gore, John C., Jones, Owen D. & Marois, René, The Neural Correlates of Third Party Punishment, 60 Neuron 930 (2008).Google Scholar
Casper, Stewart M. Cross-Examination of the Defense Expert in a Traumatic Brain Injury Case—No Perry Mason Moments, 1 Ann. 2008 AAJ-CLE 1103 (2008).Google Scholar
Choi, Eun-Kyounget al., Brain Death Revisited: The Case for a National Standard, 36 J.L. Med. & Ethics 824 (2008).Google Scholar
Clark, Steven E.& Wells, Gary L., On The Diagnosticity Of Multiple-Witness Identifications, 32 Law & Hum. Behav. 406 (2008).Google Scholar
Delgado, Mauricio R.& Dilmore, James G., Social and Emotional Influences on Decision Making and the Brain, 9 Minn. J.L. Sci. & Tech. 899 (2008).Google Scholar
Eagleman, David M. Neuroscience and the Law, 45-APR Hous. Law. 36 (2008).Google Scholar
Faulkner, Megan Rational Jury Assessment of Damages Through Neuroeconomics, 32 Law & Psychol. Rev. 163 (2008).Google Scholar
Federspiel, William 1984 Arrives: Thought(Crime), Technology, and the Constitution, 16 Wm. & Mary Bill Rts. J. 865 (2008).Google Scholar
Fruehwald, Edwin S. Behavioral Biology and Constitutional Analysis, 32 Okla. City U. L. Rev. 375 (2008).Google Scholar
Gazzaniga, Michael S. The Law and Neuroscience, 60 Neuron 412 (2008).Google Scholar
Gerard, Eric K. Waiting in the Wings? The Admissibility of Neuroimagery for Lie Detection, 27 Dev. Mental Health L. 1 (2008).Google Scholar
Granacher, Robert P. Applications of Functional Neuroimaging to Civil Litigation of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury, 36 J. Am. Acad. Psychiatry L. 323 (2008).Google Scholar
Greely, Henry T. Neuroscience and Criminal Justice: Not Responsibility But Treatment, 56 U. Kan. L. Rev. 1103 (2008).Google Scholar
Greely, Henry T. Remarks on Human Biological Enhancement, 56 U. Kan. L. Rev. 1139 (2008).Google Scholar
Gurley, Jessica R.& Marcus, David K., The Effects of Neuroimaging and Brain Injury on Insanity Defenses, 26 Behav. Sci. & L. 85 (2008).Google Scholar
Haushofer, Johannes& Fehr, Ernst, You Shouldn't Have: Your Brain on Others’ Crimes, 60 Neuron 735 (2008).Google Scholar
Herring, Jonathan Kinship Foster Care: Implications of Behavioral Biology Research, 56 Buff. L. Rev. 495 (2008).Google Scholar
Holloway, Matthew B. One Image, One Thousand Incriminating Words: Images of Brain Activity and the Privilege Against Self-incrimination, 27 Temp. J. Sci. Tech. & Envtl. L. 141 (2008).Google Scholar
Huang, Peter H. How Do Securities Laws Influence Affect, Happiness, & Trust?, 3 J. Bus. & Tech. L. 257 (2008).Google Scholar
Illes, Judy& Chin, Vivian, Bridging Philosophical and Practical Implications of Incidental Findings in Brain Research, 36 J.L. Med. & Ethics 298 (2008).Google Scholar
Jones, Owen D. Buckholtz, Joshua W., Schall, Jeffrey D. & Marois, Rene, Law, Biology, and Property: A New Theory of the Endowment Effect, 49 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 1935 (2008).Google Scholar
Keil, Frank C. Getting to the Truth, 73 Brook. L. Rev. 1035 (2008).Google Scholar
Leal, Manuel D. Why There Is Disobedience of Court Orders: Contempt of Court and Neuroeconomics, 26 QLR 1015 (2008).Google Scholar
Lekovic, Gregory P. Neuroscience and the Law, 69 Surgical Neurology 99 (2008).Google Scholar
Leslie, Jeanne M. Understanding Addiction, Helping Clients and Colleagues, 69 Ala. Law. 348 (2008).Google Scholar
Lijtmaer, Martin The Felony Murder Rule in Illinois: The Injustice of the Proximate Cause Theory Explored via Research in Cognitive Psychology, 98 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 621 (2008).Google Scholar
Linden, David J. Brain Evolution and Human Cognition: The Accidental Mind, 45 Willamette L. Rev. 17 (2008).Google Scholar
Marks, Jonathan H. Interrogation Using Functional MRI and Cognitive Engrams, 2008 J. Inst. Just. Int'l Stud. 31 (2008).Google Scholar
Merikangas, James R. Functional MRI Lie Detection, 36 J. Am. Acad. Psychiatry L. 499 (2008).Google Scholar
Milstein, Alan C. Research Malpractice and the Issue of Incidental Findings, 36 J.L. Med. & Ethics 356 (2008).Google Scholar
Moriarty, Jane Campbell Flickering Admissibility: Neuroimaging Evidence in the U.S. Courts, 26 Behav. Sci. & L. 29 (2008).Google Scholar
Morse, Stephen J. Determinism and the Death of Folk Psychology: Two Challenges to Responsibility from Neuroscience, 9 Minn. J.L. Sci. & Tech. 1 (2008).Google Scholar
Morse, Stephen J. Vice, Disorder, Conduct and Culpability, 5 Philosophy, Psychiatry, & Psychology 47 (2008).Google Scholar
Morse, Stephen J. Psychopathy and Criminal Responsibility, 1 Neuroethics 205 (2008).Google Scholar
Nelson, Charles A. Incidental Findings in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Brain Research, 36 J.L. Med. & Ethics 315 (2008).Google Scholar
New, John G. If You Could Read My Mind: Implications of Neurological Evidence for Twenty-First Century Criminal Jurisprudence, 29 J. Legal Med. 179 (2008).Google Scholar
Osburn, Alexis Immunizing Against Addiction: The Argument for Incorporating Emerging Anti-Addiction Vaccines into Existing Compulsory Immunization Statutes, 56 Clev. St. L. Rev. 159 (2008).Google Scholar
Rakoff, Jed S. Science and the Law: Uncomfortable Bedfellows, 38 Seton Hall L. Rev. 1379 (2008).Google Scholar
Ram, Natalie Tiered Consent and the Tyranny of Choice, 48 Jurimetrics 253 (2008).Google Scholar
Rapp, Geoffrey The Wreckage of Recklessness, 86 Wash. U. L. Rev. 111 (2008).Google Scholar
Richland, Lindsey Ethnography and Cognitive Psychology: Shared Dilemmas of the Local and Unlocatable, 31 PoLar: Pol. & Legal Anthropology Rev. 48 (2008).Google Scholar
Roskies, Adina Neuroimaging and Inferential Distance, 1 Neuroethics 1874 (2008).Google Scholar
Royal, Jason M.& Peterson, Braley S., The Risks and Benefits of Searching for Incidental Findings in MRI Research Scans, 36 J.L. Med. & Ethics 305 (2008).Google Scholar
Schmeiser, Susan R. The Ungovernable Citizen: Psychopathy, Sexuality, and the Rise of Medico-Legal Reasoning, 20 Yale J.L. & Human. 163 (2008).Google Scholar
Sifferd, Katrina L. Nanotechnology and the Attribution of Responsibility, 5 Nanotechnology L. & Bus. 177 (2008).Google Scholar
Simpson, Joseph R. Functional MRI Lie Detection: Too Good to Be True?, 36 J. Am. Acad. Psychiatry L. 491 (2008).Google Scholar
Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter Roskies, Adina, Brown, Teneille & Murphy, Emily, Brain Images as Legal Evidence, 5 Episteme 359 (2008).Google Scholar
Tonsing, Michael J. Truth Detection via Polygraphs and fMRIs, 55-AUG Fed. Law. 10 (2008).Google Scholar
Tovino, Stacey A. Neuroimaging Research into Disorders of Consciousness: Moral Imperative or Ethical and Legal Failure?, 13 Va. J.L. & Tech. 2 (2008).Google Scholar
Tovino, Stacey A. The Impact of Neuroscience on Health Law, 1 Neuroethics 73 (2008).Google Scholar
Tripathi, Surya M. Advances in Neuroscience and Evidentiary Value of Brain Mapping: A Legal Debate, 29 Indian J. Criminology & Criminalistics 1 (2008).Google Scholar
Tushnet, Rebecca Gone In Sixty Milliseconds: Trademark Law and Cognitive Science, 86 Tex. L. Rev. 507 (2008).Google Scholar
Uttal, William R. Neuroscience in the Courtroom: What Every Lawyer Should Know about the Mind and the Brain (Lawyers & Judges Publishing Company 2008).Google Scholar
Vincent, Nicole A. Responsibility, Dysfuncton and Capacity, 1 Neuroethics 199 (2008).Google Scholar
Vrij, Aldertet al., Increasing Cognitive Load to Facilitate Lie Detection: The Benefit of Recalling an Event in Reverse Order, 32 Law & Hum. Behav. 253 (2008).Google Scholar
Weisberg, Deena S.et al., The Seductive Allure of Neuroscience Explanations, 20 J. Cognitive Neuroscience 470 (2008).Google Scholar
Wells, Gary L. Field Experiments on Eyewitness Identification: Towards a Better Understanding of Pitfalls and Prospects, 32 Law & Hum. Behav. 6 (2008).Google Scholar
White, Stephen E. Brave New World: Neurowarfare and the Limits of International Humanitarian Law, 41 Cornell Int'l L.J. 177 (2008).Google Scholar
Wolf, Susan M. Managing Incidental Findings in Human Subjects Research: Analysis and Recommendations, 36 J.L. Med. & Ethics 219 (2008).Google Scholar
Wolf, Susan M.et al., The Challenge of Incidental Findings, 36 J. L. Med. & Ethics 216 (2008).Google Scholar
Wolf, Susan Neurolaw: The Big Question, 8 Am. J. Bioethics 21 (2008).Google Scholar
Wortzel, Hal S.& Arciniegas, David B., Amnesia and Crime: A Neuropsychiatric Response, 36 J. Am. Acad. Psychiatry L. 218 (2008).Google Scholar
Wright, Beth Ann Preserving the Social Contract: Translating Academic Education into Professional Practice Through Contemporary Cognitive Theories, 11 T.M. Cooley J. Prac. & Clinical L. 17 (2008).Google Scholar
Yang, Yaling Glenn, Andrea L. & Raine, Adrian, Brain Abnormalities in Antisocial Individuals: Implications for the Law, 26 Behav. Sci. & L. 65 (2008).Google Scholar
Allen, Stephanie W. Law Firm Leadership on the Neuro Frontier, 26 No. 2 Of Counsel 10 (2007).Google Scholar
Annas, George J. Foreword: Imagining a New Era of Neuroimaging, Neuroethics, and Neurolaw, 33 Am. J.L. & Med. 163 (2007).Google Scholar
Appelbaum, Paul S. The New Lie Detectors: Neuroscience, Deception, and the Courts, 58 Psychiatry Servs. 460 (2007).Google Scholar
Aronson, Jay D. Brain Imaging, Culpability and the Juvenile Death Penalty, 13 Psychol. Pub. Pol'y & L. 115 (2007).Google Scholar
Arrigo, Bruce A. Punishment, Freedom, and the Culture of Control: The Case of Brain Imaging and the Law, 33 Am. J.L. & Med. 457 (2007).Google Scholar
Barth, Abram S. A Double-Edged Sword: The Role of Neuroimaging in Federal Capital Sentencing, 33 Am. J.L. & Med. 501 (2007).Google Scholar
Baskin, Joseph H. Edersheim, Judith G. & Price, Bruce H., Is a Picture Worth a Thousand Words? Neuroimaging in the Courtroom, 33 Am. J.L. & Med. 239 (2007).Google Scholar
Bellin, Jeffrey Significance (If Any) for the Federal Criminal Justice System of Advances in Lie Detector Technology, 80 Temp. L. Rev. 711 (2007).Google Scholar
Jeremy, A.Blumenthal, Emotional Paternalism, 35 Fla. St. U. L. Rev. 1 (2007).Google Scholar
Bourget, Dominique& Whitehurst, Laurie, Amnesia and Crime, 35 J. Am. Acad. Psychiatry L. 469 (2007).Google Scholar
Caulum, Melissa S. Postadolescent Brain Development: A Disconnect Between Neuroscience, Emerging Adults, and the Corrections System, 2007 Wis. L. Rev. 729 (2007).Google Scholar
Chan, Erik D. The Food and Drug Administration and the Future of the Brain-Computer Interface: Adapting FDA Device Law to the Challenges of Human-Machine Enhancement, 25 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 117 (2007).Google Scholar
Covey, Russell Reconsidering the Relationship Between Cognitive Psychology and Plea Bargaining, 91 Marq. L. Rev. 213 (2007).Google Scholar
Dyer, Charles R. The Queen of Chula Vista: Stories of Self-Represented Litigants and a Call for Using Cognitive Linguistics to Work With Them, 99 Law Libr. J. 717 (2007).Google Scholar
Erickson, Steven K.& Felthous, Alan R., Daubert's Bipolar Treatment Of Scientific Expert Testimony–From Frye's Polygraph To Farwell's Brain Fingerprinting, 55 Drake L. Rev. 763 (2007).Google Scholar
Feigenson, Neal& Sherwin, Richard K., Thinking Beyond the Shown: Implicit Inferences in Evidence and Argument, 6 Law, Probability & Risk 295 (2007).Google Scholar
Fradella, Henry F. Why Judges Should Admit Expert Testimony on the Unreliability of Eyewitness Testimony, 2 Fed. Cts. L. Rev. 1 (2007).Google Scholar
Goldberg, Steven MRIs and the Perception of Risk, 33 Am. J.L. & Med. 229 (2007).Google Scholar
Greely, Henry T.& Illes, Judy, Neuroscience-Based Lie Detection: The Urgent Need For Regulation, 33 Am. J.L. & Med. 377 (2007).Google Scholar
Grey, Betsy J. Neuroscience, Emotional Harm, and Emotional Distress Tort Claims, 1 Am. J. Bioethics 65 (2007).Google Scholar
Guthrie, Chris Blinking On The Bench: How Judges Decide Cases, 93 Cornell L. Rev. 1 (2007).Google Scholar
Halliburton, Christian M. Letting Katz Out of the Bag: Cognitive Freedom and Fourth Amendment Fidelity, 59 Hastings L.J. 309 (2007).Google Scholar
Joffe, Ari R. The Neurological Determination of Death: What Does It Really Mean?, 23 Issues L. & Med. 119 (2007).Google Scholar
Johnson, Lydia D. Mind, Metaphor, Law, 58 Mercer L. Rev. 845 (2007).Google Scholar
Kelly, Rachael Childhood Neglect and Its Effects on Neurodevelopment: Suggestions for Future Law and Policy, 8 Hous. J. Health L. & Pol'y 133 (2007).Google Scholar
Khoshbin, Laura S.& Khoshbin, Shahram, Imaging the Mind, Minding the Image: A Historical Introduction to Brain Imaging and the Law, 33 Am. J.L. & Med. 171 (2007).Google Scholar
Kittay, Leo Admissibility of fMRI Lie Detection, 72 Brook. L. Rev. 1351 (2007).Google Scholar
Kolber, Adam J. Pain Detection and the Privacy of Subjective Experience, 33 Am. J.L. & Med. 433 (2007).Google Scholar
Kulynych, Jennifer The Regulation of MR Neuroimaging Research: Disentangling the Gordian Knot, 33 Am. J.L. & Med. 295 (2007).Google Scholar
Kulynych, Jennifer J. Some Thoughts about the Evaluation of Non-Clinical Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 7 Am. J. Bioethics 57 (2007).Google Scholar
Levinson, Justin D. Forgotten Racial Equality: Implicit Bias, Decisionmaking, and Misremembering, 57 Duke L.J. 345 (2007).Google Scholar
Loue, Sana& Ioan, Beatrice, Legal and Ethical Issues in Heroin Diagnosis, Treatment, and Research, 28 J. Legal Med. 193 (2007).Google Scholar
Mahlmann, Matthias Ethics, Law and the Challenge of Cognitive Science, 8 German L.J. 577 (2007).Google Scholar
Marks, Donald H. Interrogational Neuroimaging In Counterterrorism: A “No-Brainer” or a Human Rights Hazard?, 33 Am. J.L. & Med. 483 (2007).Google Scholar
McGee, Ellen M Should There Be A Law? Brain Chips: Ethical and Policy Issues, 24 T.M. Cooley L. Rev. 81 (2007).Google Scholar
Merkel, Reinhard Boer, G., Fegert, J., Galert, T., Hartmann, D., Nuttin, B., Rosahl, S., & Wuetscher, F., Intervening in the Brain: Changing Psyche and Society (Springer 2007).Google Scholar
Mishler, Carl F. How Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) Will Change the Legal Profession - A View from the United States of America, 9 Eur. J.L. Reform 17 (2007).Google Scholar
Moffatt, Gregory K.& Smith, Savannah L., Childhood Exposure to Conjugal Violence: Consequences for Behavioral and Neural Development, 56 DePaul L. Rev. 879 (2007).Google Scholar
Morse, Stephen J. Criminal Responsibility and the Disappearing Person, 28 Cardozo L. Rev. 2545 (2007).Google Scholar
Morse, Stephen J. The Uneasy Entente Between Legal Insanity and Mens Rea: Beyond Clark v. Arizona, 97 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 1071 (2007).Google Scholar
Murphy, Nancey& Brown, Warren S., Did My Neurons Make Me Do It? Philosophical and Neurobiological Perspectives on Moral Resonsibility and Free Will (Oxford Univ. Press 2007).Google Scholar
Niehoff, Debra Invisible Scars: The Neurobiological Consequences of Child Abuse, 56 DePaul L. Rev. 847 (2007).Google Scholar
Patel, Purvaket al., The Role of Imaging in United States Courtrooms, 17 Neuroimaging Clinics N. Am. 557 (2007).Google Scholar
Pettit, Mark Jr., fMRI and BF Meet FRE: Brain Imaging and the Federal Rules of Evidence, 33 Am. J.L. & Med. 319 (2007).Google Scholar
Pockett, Susan The Concept of Free Will: Philosophy, Neuroscience and the Law, 25 Behav. Sci. & L. 281 (2007).Google Scholar
Prohaska, Mark L.& Martin, David P., Obtaining Neuropsychological Test Data: Why Is This So Hard?, 68 Ala. Law. 216 (2007).Google Scholar
Radulovic, Jelena& Stankovic, Bratislav, Genetic Determinants of Emotional Behavior: Legal Lessons from Genetic Models, 56 DePaul L. Rev. 823 (2007).Google Scholar
Roberts, Alexandra J. Everything New is Old Again: Brain Fingerprinting and Evidentiary Analogy, 9 Yale J.L. & Tech. 234 (2007).Google Scholar
Robinson, Paul H.& Darley, John M., The Origins of Shared Intuitions of Justice, 60 Vand. L. Rev. 1633 (2007).Google Scholar
Robinson, Paul H. Kurzban, Robert O. & Jones, Owen D., Intuitions of Justice: Implications for Criminal Law and Justice Policy, 81 S. Cal. L. Rev. 1 (2007).Google Scholar
Sasso, Peggy Implementing the Death Penalty: The Moral Implications of Recent Advances in Neuropsychology, 29 Cardozo L. Rev. 765 (2007).Google Scholar
Slovic, Paul Affect, Reason, and Mere Hunches, 4 J.L. Econ. & Pol'y 191 (2007).Google Scholar
Snead, O. Carter Neuroimaging and the “Complexity” of Capital Punishment, 82 N.Y.U.L. Rev. 1265 (2007).Google Scholar
Snodgrass, Laura B.& Justice, Brad, “Death Is Different”: Limits on the Imposition of the Death Penalty to Traumatic Brain Injuries, 26 Dev. Mental Health L. 81 (2007).Google Scholar
Stoller, Sarah E.& Wolpe, Paul R., Emerging Neurotechnologies For Lie Detection and The Fifth Amendment, 33 Am. J.L. & Med. 359 (2007).Google Scholar
Stucke, Maurice E. Behavioral Economists at the Gate: Antitrust in the Twenty-First Century, 38 Loy. U. Chi. L.J. 513 (2007).Google Scholar
Suzuki, Carol M. Unpacking Pandora's Box: Innovating Techniques for Effectively Counseling Asylum Applicants Suffering from Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder, 4 Hastings Race & Poverty L. J. 235 (2007).Google Scholar
Tancredi, Laurence R.& Brodie, Jonathan D., The Brain and Behavior: Limitations in the Legal Use of Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 33 Am. J.L. & Med. 271 (2007).Google Scholar
Thompson, Robert B. Brave New World of Interrogation Jurisprudence?, 33 Am. J.L. & Med. 341 (2007).Google Scholar
Tovino, Stacey A. Imaging Body Structure and Mapping Brain Function: A Historical Approach, 33 Am. J.L. & Med. 193 (2007).Google Scholar
Tovino, Stacey A. Functional Neuroimaging Information: A Case for Neuro Exceptionalism?, 34 Fla. St. U. L. Rev. 415 (2007).Google Scholar
Truog, Robert D. Brain Death – Too Flawed to Endure, too Ingrained to Abandon, 35 J.L. Med. & Ethics 273 (2007).Google Scholar
Wardle, Lynn D. The Biological Causes and Consequences of Homosexual Behavior and Their Relevance for Family Law Policies, 56 DePaul L. Rev. 997 (2007).Google Scholar
Alexander, Archie A. Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Lie Detection: Is a “Brainstorm” Heading Toward the “Gatekeeper”?, 7 Hous. J. Health L. & Pol'y 1 (2006).Google Scholar
Baird, Abigail A.& Fugelsang, Jonathan A., The Emergence of Consequential Thought: Evidence from Neuroscience, in Law and the Brain 245 (Oxford Univ. Press, Zeki, Semir & Goodenough, Oliver, eds., 2006).Google Scholar
Barillare, Jody C. As Its Next Witness, the State Calls … the Defendant: Brain Fingerprinting As “Testimonial” Under the Fifth Amendment, 79 Temp. L. Rev. 971 (2006).Google Scholar
Bauermeister, Don C. Responding to Juror Bias—Gaining Insight From Cognitive Neuroscience, Winter 2006 ATLA-CLE 89 (2006).Google Scholar
Beecher-Monas, Erica& Garcia-Rill, Edgar, Genetic Predictions of Future Dangerousness: Is There a Blueprint for Violence?, 69-SPG Law & Contemp. Probs. 301 (2006).Google Scholar
Beschle, Donald L. Cognitive Dissonance Revisited: Roper v. Simmons and the Issue of Adolescent Decision-Making Competence, 52 Wayne L. Rev. 1 (2006).Google Scholar
Burke, Alafair S. Improving Prosecutorial Decision Making: Some Lessons of Cognitive Science, 47 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 1587 (2006).Google Scholar
Camerer, Colin F. Wanting, Liking, and Learning: Neuroscience and Paternalism, 73 U. Chi. L. Rev. 87 (2006).Google Scholar
Chorvat, Terrence& McCabe, Kevin, The Brain and the Law, in Law and the Brain 113 (Oxford Univ. Press, Zeki, Semir & Goodenough, Oliver, eds., 2006).Google Scholar
Deaton, Rodney J. S. Neuroscience and the In Corpore-ted First Amendment, 4 First Amend. L. Rev. 181 (2006).Google Scholar
Denno, Deborah W. Revisiting the Legal Link Between Genetics and Crime, 69 Law & Contemp. Probs. 209 (2006).Google Scholar
Drobac, Jennifer A. “Developing Capacity”: Adolescent “Consent” at Work, at Law, and in the Sciences of the Mind, 10 U.C. Davis J. Juv. L. & Pol'y 1 (2006).Google Scholar
Epstein, Richard A. Behavioral Economics: Human Errors and Market Correction, 73 U. Chi. L. Rev. 111 (2006).Google Scholar
Fallon, James H. Neuroanatomical Background to Understanding the Brain of the Young Psychopath, 3 Ohio St. J. Crim. L. 341 (2006).Google Scholar
Farahany, Nita A.& Coleman, James E. Jr., Genetics and Responsibility: To Know the Criminal From the Crime, 69 Law & Contemp. Probs. 115 (2006).Google Scholar
Feigenson, Neal Brain Imaging and Courtroom Evidence: On the Admissibility and Persuasiveness of fMRI, 2/3 Int'l J. of L. in Context 233 (2006).Google Scholar
Fruehwald, Edwin S. The Emperor Has No Clothes: Postmodern Legal Thought and Cognitive Science, 23 Ga. St. U. L. Rev. 375 (2006).Google Scholar
Fugelsang, Jonathan A.& Dunbar, Kevin N., A Cognitive Neuroscience Framework for Understanding Causal Reasoning and the Law, in Law and the Brain 157 (Oxford Univ. Press, Zeki, Semir & Goodenough, Oliver, eds., 2006).Google Scholar
Garland, Brent& Frankel, Mark S., Considering Convergence: A Policy Dialogue About Behavioral Genetics, Neuroscience, and Law, 69-SPG Law & Contemp. Probs. 101 (2006).Google Scholar
Garland, Brent& Glimcher, Paul W., Cognitive Neuroscience and the Law, 16 Neurobiology 130 (2006).Google Scholar
Goodenough, Oliver R.& Prehn, Kristin, A Neuroscientific Approach to Normative Judgment in Law and Justice, in Law and The Brain 77 (Oxford Univ. Press, Zeki, Semir & Goodenough, Oliver, eds., 2006).Google Scholar
Goodenough, Oliver R. Responsibility and Punishment: Whose Mind? A Response, in Law and the Brain 259 (Oxford Univ. Press, Zeki, Semir & Goodenough, Oliver, eds., 2006).Google Scholar
Greely, Henry T. Neuroethics and ELSI: Similarities and Differences, 7 Minn. J.L. Sci. & Tech. 599 (2006).Google Scholar
Greene, Joshua& Cohen, Jonathan, For the Law, Neuroscience Changes Nothing and Everything, in Law and the Brain 207 (Oxford Univ. Press, Zeki, Semir & Goodenough, Oliver, eds., 2006).Google Scholar
Greenwald, Anthony G.& Krieger, Linda Hamilton, Implicit Bias: Scientific Foundations, 94 Cal. L. Rev. 945 (2006).Google Scholar
Gruber, Staci A.& Yurgelun-Todd, Deborah A., Neurobiology and The Law: A Role in Juvenile Justice?, 3 Ohio St. J. Crim. L. 321 (2006).Google Scholar
Heller, Kevin J. The Cognitive Psychology of Circumstantial Evidence, 105 Mich. L. Rev. 241 (2006).Google Scholar
Hinde, Robert A. Law and the Sources of Morality, in Law and the Brain 37 (Oxford Univ. Press, Zeki, Semir & Goodenough, Oliver, eds., 2006).Google Scholar
Hoffman, Morris B. The Neuroeconomic Path of the Law, in Law And The Brain 3 (Oxford Univ. Press, Zeki, Semir & Goodenough, Oliver, eds., 2006).Google Scholar
Holley, Benjamin How Reversible Is Methamphetamine-Related Brain Damage?, 82 N.D. L. Rev. 1135 (2006).Google Scholar
Jones, Owen D. Law, Evolution, and the Brain: Applications and Open Questions, in Law and the Brain 57 (Oxford Univ. Press, Zeki, Semir & Goodenough, Oliver, eds., 2006).Google Scholar
Jones, Owen D.& Goldsmith, Timothy H., Behavioral Genetics and Crime, in Context, 69 Law & Contemp. Probs. 81 (2006).Google Scholar
Kaye, D. H. Behavioral Genetics Research and Criminal DNA Databases, 69 Law & Contemp. Probs. 259 (2006).Google Scholar
Keckler, Charles N.W. Cross-Examining the Brain: A Legal Analysis of Neural Imaging for Credibility Impeachment, 57 Hastings L.J. 509 (2006).Google Scholar
Kolber, Adam J. Therapeutic Forgetting: The Legal and Ethical Implications of Memory Dampening, 59 Vand. L. Rev. 1561 (2006).Google Scholar
Maroney, Terry A. Emotional Competence, “Rational Understanding,” and the Criminal Defendant, 43 Am. Crim. L. Rev. 1375 (2006).Google Scholar
McCormick, Brian Your Thoughts May Deceive You: The Constitutional Implications of Brain Fingerprinting Technology and How It May Be Used to Secure Our Skies, 30 Law & Psychol. Rev. 171 (2006).Google Scholar
Mitchell, Gregory& Tetlock, Philip E., Antidiscrimination Law and the Perils of Mindreading, 67 Ohio St. L.J. 1023 (2006).Google Scholar
Morse, Stephen J. Brain Overclaim Syndrome and Criminal Responsibility: A Diagnostic Note, 3 Ohio St. J. Crim. L. 397 (2006).Google Scholar
Morse, Stephen J.& Hoffman, Morris B., Addiction, Genetics and Criminal Responsibility, 69 Law & Contemp. Probs. 165 (2006).Google Scholar
Murphy, Richard W. Neurocongress, 37 Seton Hall L. Rev. 221 (2006).Google Scholar
Oberstar, Joel V. Anderson, Elise M. & Jensen, Jonathan B., Cognitive and Moral Development, Brain Development, and Mental Illness: Important Considerations for the Juvenile Justice System, 32 Wm. Mitchell L. Rev. 1051 (2006).Google Scholar
O'Hara, Erin A. How Neuroscience Might Advance the Law, in Law and the Brain 21 (Oxford Univ. Press, Zeki, Semir & Goodenough, Oliver, eds., 2006).Google Scholar
Pardo, Michael S.& Patterson, Dennis, Neuroscience Evidence, Legal Culture, and Criminal Procedure, 33 Am. J. Crim. L. 301 (2006).Google Scholar
Purdy, Jedediah S. The Promise (and Limits) of Neuroeconomics, 58 Ala. L. Rev. 1 (2006).Google Scholar
Racine, Eric Bar-Ilan, Ofek & Illes, Judy, fMRI In the Public Eye, 6 Nature 159 (2006).Google Scholar
Redding, Richard E. The Brain-Disordered Defendant: Neuroscience and Legal Insanity in the Twenty-First Century, 56 Am. U. L. Rev. 51 (2006).Google Scholar
Rothenberg, Karen and Wang, Alice, The Scarlet Gene: Behavioral Genetics, Criminal Law, and Racial and Ethnic Stigma, 69 Law & Contemp. Probs. 343 (2006).Google Scholar
Sapolsky, Robert M. The Frontal Cortex and the Criminal Justice System, in Law and the Brain 227 (Oxford Univ. Press, Zeki, Semir & Goodenough, Oliver, eds., 2006).Google Scholar
Sherwin, Richard K. Feigenson, Neal & Spiesel, Christina O., Law in the Digital Age: How Visual Communication Technologies are Transforming the Practice, Theory, and Teaching of Law, 12 B.U. J. Sci. & Tech. L. 227 (2006).Google Scholar
Spence, Sean A.et al., A Cognitive Neurobiological Account of Deception: Evidence From Functional Neuroimaging, in Law and the Brain 169 (Oxford Univ. Press, Zeki, Semir & Goodenough, Oliver, eds., 2006).Google Scholar
Stake, Jeffrey E. The Property “Instinct”, in Law and the Brain 185 (Oxford Univ. Press, Zeki, Semir & Goodenough, Oliver, eds., 2006).Google Scholar
Taylor, Erich A New Wave of Police Interrogation? “Brain Fingerprinting,” the Constitutional Privilege Against Self-incrimination, and Hearsay Jurisprudence, 2006 U. Ill. J.L. Tech. & Pol'y 287 (2006).Google Scholar
Thompson, Sean K. My Brain Made Me Do It, 2006-FEB Legal Aff. 50 (2006).Google Scholar
Zak, Paul J. Neuroeconomics, in Law and the Brain 133 (Oxford Univ. Press, Zeki, Semir & Goodenough, Oliver, eds., 2006).Google Scholar
Zeki, Semir& Goodenough, Oliver, eds., Law and the Brain (Oxford University Press 2006).Google Scholar
Appelbaum, Paul S. Behavioral Genetics and the Punishment of Crime, 56 Law & Psychiatry 25 (2005).Google Scholar
Blasi, Gary L. What Lawyers Know: Lawyering Expertise, Cognitive Science, and the Functions of Theory, 45 J. Legal Educ. 313 (2005).Google Scholar
Blumenthal, Jeremy A. Law and the Emotions: The Problems of Affective Forecasting, 80 Ind. L.J. 155 (2005).Google Scholar
Buller, Tom Brains, Lies, and Psychological Explanations, in Neuroethics: Defining the Issues in Theory, Practice and Policy 51 (Oxford Univ. Press, Illes, Judy, ed., 2005).Google Scholar
Canli, Turhan When Genes and Brains Unite: Ethical Implications of Genomic Neuroimaging, in Neuroethics: Defining the Issues in Theory, Practice and Policy 169 (Oxford Univ. Press, Illes, Judy, ed., 2005).Google Scholar
Chorvat, Terrence R.& McCabe, Kevin A., Neuroeconomics and Rationality, 80 Chi.-Kent L. Rev. 1235 (2005).Google Scholar
Chorvat, Terrence R. McCabe, Kevin A. & Smith, Vernon L., Law and Neuroeconomics, 13 Sup. Ct. Econ. Rev. 35 (2005).Google Scholar
Churchland, Patricia S. Moral Decision-making and the Brain, in Neuroethics: Defining the Issues in Theory, Practice and Policy 3 (Oxford Univ. Press, Illes, Judy, ed., 2005).Google Scholar
Farah, Martha J. Noble, Kimberly G. & Hurt, H., Poverty, Privilege and the Developing Brain: Empirical Findings and Ethical Implications, in Neuroethics: Defining the Issues in Theory, Practice and Policy 277 (Oxford Univ. Press, Illes, Judy, ed., 2005).Google Scholar
Farah, Martha J. Neuroethics: The Practical and the Philosophical, 9 Trends in Cognitive Sciences 34 (2005).Google Scholar
Ford, Paul J.& Henderson, Jaimie, Functional Neurosurgical Intervention: Neuroethics in the Operating Room, in Neuroethics: Defining the Issues in Theory, Practice and Policy 213 (Oxford Univ. Press, Illes, Judy, ed., 2005).Google Scholar
Foster, Kenneth R. Engineering the Mind, in Neuroethics: Defining the Issues in Theory, Practice and Policy 185 (Oxford Univ. Press, Illes, Judy, ed., 2005).Google Scholar
Gazzaniga, Michael S. Facts, Fictions and the Future of Neuroethics, in Neuroethics: Defining the Issues in Theory, Practice and Policy 141 (Oxford Univ. Press, Illes, Judy, ed., 2005).Google Scholar
Greely, Henry T. The Social Effects of Advances in Neuroscience: Legal Problems, Legal Perspectives, in Neuroethics: Defining the Issues in Theory, Practice and Policy 245 (Oxford Univ. Press, Illes, Judy, ed., 2005).Google Scholar
Green, Ron M. From Genome to Brainome: Charting Lessons Learned, in Neuroethics: Defining the Issues in Theory, Practice and Policy 105 (Oxford Univ. Press, Illes, Judy, ed., 2005).Google Scholar
Huang, Peter H. Moody Investing and the Supreme Court: Rethinking the Materiality of Information and the Reasonableness of Investors, 13 Sup. Ct. Econ. Rev. 99 (2005).Google Scholar
Illes, Judy ed., Neuroethics: Defining the Issues in Theory, Practice and Policy (Oxford University Press 2005).Google Scholar
Illes, Judy Racine, Eric & Kirschen, Matthew P., A Picture is Worth 1000 Words, but Which 1000?, in Neuroethics: Defining the Issues in Theory, Practice and Policy 149 (Oxford Univ. Press, Illes, Judy, ed., 2005).Google Scholar
Jaworska, Agnieszka Ethical Dilemmas in Neurodegenerative Disease: Respecting the Margins of Agency, in Neuroethics: Defining the Issues in Theory, Practice and Policy 87 (Oxford Univ. Press, Illes, Judy, ed., 2005).Google Scholar
Jones, Owen D.& Kurzban, Robert, Law and Behavioral Biology, 105 Colum. L. Rev. 405 (2005).Google Scholar
Kaufman, Paul M. Protecting the Objectivity, Fairness, and Integrity of Neuropsychological Evaluations in Litigation, 26 J. Legal Med. 95 (2005).Google Scholar
Klitzman, Robert Clinicians, Patients and the Brain, in Neuroethics: Defining the Issues in Theory, Practice and Policy 229 (Oxford Univ. Press, Illes, Judy, ed., 2005).Google Scholar
Miller, Franklin G.& Fins, Joseph, Protecting Human Subjects in Brain Research: A Pragmatic Perspective, in Neuroethics: Defining the Issues in Theory, Practice and Policy 123 (Oxford Univ. Press, Illes, Judy, ed., 2005).Google Scholar
Grainger-Monsen, Maren& Karetsky, Kim, The Mind in the Movies: A Neuroethical Analysis of the Portrayal of the Mind in Popular Media, in Neuroethics: Defining the Issues in Theory, Practice and Policy 297 (Oxford Univ. Press, Illes, Judy, ed., 2005).Google Scholar
Morse, Stephen J. Moral and Legal Responsibility and the New Neuroscience, in Neuroethics: Defining the Issues in Theory, Practice and Policy 33 (Oxford Univ. Press, Illes, Judy, ed., 2005).Google Scholar
Nolan, Donald J.& Pankovits, Tressa A., High-Tech Proof in Brain Injury Cases, 41-JUN Trial 27 (2005).Google Scholar
Parens, Erik Creativity, Gratitude and the Enhancement Debate: On the Fertile Tension Between Two Ethical Frameworks, in Neuroethics: Defining the Issues in Theory, Practice and Policy 75 (Oxford Univ. Press, Illes, Judy, ed., 2005).Google Scholar
Rightmer, Tracy Arrested Development: Juveniles’ Immature Brains Make Them Less Culpable Than Adults, 9 Quinnipiac Health L.J. 1 (2005).Google Scholar
Roskies, Adina A Case Study in Neuroethics: The Nature of Moral Judgment, in Neuroethics: Defining the Issues in Theory, Practice and Policy 17 (Oxford Univ. Press, Illes, Judy, ed., 2005).Google Scholar
Rothstein, Mark A. Applications of Behavioural Genetics: Outpacing the Science?, 6 Nature Reviews 793 (2005).Google Scholar
Saunders, Kevin W. A Disconnect Between Law and Neuroscience: Modern Brain Science, Media Influences, and Juvenile Justice, 2005 Utah L. Rev. 695 (2005).Google Scholar
Shepherd, Robert E. The Relevance of Brain Research to Juvenile Defense, 19-WTR Crim. Just. 51 (2005).Google Scholar
Sheridan, Kim Zinchenko, Elena & Gardner, Howard, Neuroethics in Education, in Neuroethics: Defining the Issues in Theory, Practice and Policy 265 (Oxford Univ. Press, Illes, Judy, ed., 2005).Google Scholar
Steven, Megan S.& Pascual-Leone, Alvaro, Trascranial Magnetic Stimulation and the Human Brain: An Ethical Evaluation, in Neuroethics: Defining the Issues in Theory, Practice and Policy 201 (Oxford Univ. Press, Illes, Judy, ed., 2005).Google Scholar
Thompson, Nicholas The Legality of the Use of Psychiatric Neuroimaging in Intelligence Interrogation, 90 Cornell L. Rev. 1601 (2005).Google Scholar
Tovino, Stacey A.& Winslade, William J., A Primer on the Law and Ethics of Treatment, Research, and Public Policy in the Context of Severe Traumatic Brain Injury, 14 Annals Health L. 1 (2005).Google Scholar
Tovino, Stacey A. The Confidentiality and Privacy Implications of Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 33 J.L. Med. & Ethics 844 (2005).Google Scholar
Weinstein, Janet& Weinstein, Ricardo, “I Know Better Than That”: The Role of Emotions and the Brain in Family Law Disputes, 7 J. L. & Fam. Stud. 351 (2005).Google Scholar
Wolpe, Paul R. Religious Responses to Neuroscientific Questions, in Neuroethics: Defining the Issues in Theory, Practice and Policy 289 (Oxford Univ. Press, Illes, Judy, ed., 2005).Google Scholar
Zoloth, Laurie Being in the World, in Neuroethics: Defining the Issues in Theory, Practice and Policy 61 (Oxford Univ. Press, Illes, Judy, ed., 2005).Google Scholar
Boire, Richard G. Neurocops: The Politics of Prohibition and the Future of Enforcing Social Policy From Inside the Body, 19 J.L. & Health 215 (2004).Google Scholar
Chorvat, Terrence& McCabe, Kevin, The Brain and the Law, 359 Phil. Transactions Royal Soc'y London B. Biological Sci. 1727 (2004).Google Scholar
Ferguson, Lucy C. The Implications of Developmental Cognitive Research on “Evolving Standards of Decency” and the Imposition of the Death Penalty on Juveniles, 54 Am. U. L. Rev. 441 (2004).Google Scholar
Fugelsang, Jonathan A.& Dunbar, Kevin N., A Cognitive Neuroscience Framework for Understanding Causal Reasoning and the Law, 359 Phil. Transactions Royal Soc'y London B. Biological Sci. 1749 (2004).Google Scholar
Garland, Brent ed., Neuroscience and the Law: Brain, Mind, and the Scales of Justice (Dana Foundation 2004).Google Scholar
Gazzaniga, Michael S.& Steven, Megan S., Free Will in the 21st Century: A Discussion of Neuroscience and the Law, in Neuroscience and the Law: Brain, Mind, and the Scales of Justice 51 (Dana Foundation, Garland, Brent, ed., 2004).Google Scholar
Goodenough, Oliver R. A Neuroscientific Approach to Normative Judgment in Law and Justice, 359 Phil. Transactions Royal Soc'y London B. Biological Sci. 1709 (2004).Google Scholar
Greely, Henry T. Prediction, Litigation, Privacy, and Property: Some Possible Legal and Social Implications of Advances in Neuroscience, in Neuroscience and the Law: Brain, Mind, and the Scales of Justice 114 (Dana Foundation, Garland, Brent, ed., 2004).Google Scholar
Greene, Joshua& Cohen, Jonathan, For the Law, Neuroscience Changes Nothing and Everything, 359 Phil. Transactions Royal Soc'y London B. Biological Sci. 1775 (2004).Google Scholar
Guthrie, Chris Rachlinski, Jeffrey J. & Wistrich, Andre J., Insights From Cognitive Psychology, 54 J. Legal Educ. 42 (2004).Google Scholar
Hanson, Jon D.& Yosifon, David G., The Situational Character: A Critical Realist Perspective on the Human Animal, 93 Geo. L.J. 1 (2004).Google Scholar
Jones, Owen D. Law, Evolution, and the Brain: Applications and Open Questions, 359 Phil. Transactions Royal Soc'y London B. Biological Sci. 1697 (2004).Google Scholar
Lerner, Alan M. Using Our Brains: What Cognitive Science and Social Psychology Teach Us About Teaching Law Students to Make Ethical, Professionally Responsible, Choices, 23 QLR 643 (2004).Google Scholar
Morse, Stephen New Neuroscience, Old Problems, in Neuroscience and the Law: Brain, Mind, and the Scales of Justice 157 (Dana Foundation, Garland, Brent, ed., 2004).Google Scholar
Sanchirico, Chris W. Evidence, Procedure, and the Upside of Cognitive Error, 57 Stan. L. Rev. 291 (2004).Google Scholar
Sapolsky, Robert M. The Frontal Cortex and the Criminal Justice System, 359 Phil. Transactions Royal Soc'y London B. Biological Sci. 1787 (2004).Google Scholar
Seiden, Jessie A. The Criminal Brain: Frontal Lobe Dysfunction Evidence in Capital Proceedings, 16 Cap. Def. J. 395 (2004).Google Scholar
Spellman, Barbara A.& Schnall, Simone, Reflections of a Recovering Lawyer: How Becoming a Cognitive Psychologist–and (In Particular) Studying Analogical and Causal Reasoning– Changed My Views About the Field of Psychology and Law, 79 Chi.-Kent L. Rev. 1187 (2004).Google Scholar
Tancredi, Laurence Neuroscience Developments and the Law, in Neuroscience and the Law: Brain, Mind, and the Scales of Justice 71 (Dana Foundation, Garland, Brent, ed., 2004).Google Scholar
Beecher-Monas, Erica& Garcia-Rill, Edgar, Danger at the Edge Of Chaos: Predicting Violent Behavior in a Post-Daubert World, 24 Cardozo L. Rev. 1845 (2003).Google Scholar
Bird, Joseph S. Cognitive Neuroscience as a Model for Neural Software Patent Examination, 31 AIPLA Q.J. 273 (2003).Google Scholar
Briner, John D. Brain Trauma and the Myth of the Resilient Child, 39-MAR Trial 64 (2003).Google Scholar
Kitchin, William The Fundamental Right to Be Free of Arbitrary Categorization: The Brain Sciences and the Issue of Sex Classification, 42 Washburn L.J. 257 (2003).Google Scholar
Loue, Sana The Criminalization of the Addictions, 24 J. Legal Med. 281 (2003).Google Scholar
Morse, Stephen J. Inevitable Mens Rea, 27 Harv. J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 51 (2003).Google Scholar
Orme, Daniel R.& Johnstone, George, Clinical Neuropsychologists: Training, Credentials and Courtroom Credibility, 59 J. Mo. B. 184 (2003).Google Scholar
Reeves, Donald Mills, Mark J., Billick, Stephen & Brodie, Jonathan D., Limitations of Brain Imaging in Forensic Psychiatry, 31 J. Am. Acad. Psychiatry L. 89 (2003).Google Scholar
Siegel, David M. Psychoactive Medication and Your Client: Better Living and (Maybe) Better Law Through Chemistry, 27-DEC Champion 22 (2003).Google Scholar
Stein, Edward The Admissibility of Expert Testimony About Cognitive Science Research on Eyewitness Identification, 2 Law, Probability & Risk 295 (2003).Google Scholar
Denno, Deborah W. Crime and Consciousness: Science and Involuntary Acts, 87 Minn. L. Rev. 269 (2002).Google Scholar
Farah, Martha J. Emerging Ethical Issues in Neuroscience, 5 Nature Neuroscience 1123 (2002).Google Scholar
Karaktasanis, K. G.& Tsanakas, J. N., A Critique on the Concept of “Brain Death”, 18 Issues L. & Med. 127 (2002).Google Scholar
Moenssens, Andre A. Brain Fingerprinting - Can It Be Used to Detect the Innocence of Persons Charged With a Crime?, 70 UMKC L. Rev. 891 (2002).Google Scholar
Rachlinski, Jeffrey J.& Farina, Cynthia R., Cognitive Psychology and Optimal Government Design, 87 Cornell L. Rev. 549 (2002).Google Scholar
Risinger, Michael D. Saks, Michael J., Thompson, William C. & Rosenthal, Robert, Three Card Monte, Monty Hall, Modus Operandi and “Offender Profiling”: Some Lessons of Modern Cognitive Science for the Law of Evidence, 24 Cardozo L. Rev. 193 (2002).Google Scholar
Risinger, Michael& Loop, Jeffrey L., The Daubert/Kumho Implications of Observer Effects in Forensic Science: Hidden Problems of Expectation and Suggestion, 90 Cal. L. Rev. 1 (2002).Google Scholar
Roskies, Adina Neuroethics for the New Millenium, 35 Neuron 21 (2002).Google Scholar
Rutherford, Jane Juvenile Justice Caught Between the Exorcist and a Clockwork Orange, 51 DePaul L. Rev. 715 (2002).Google Scholar
Simon, Dan Freedom and Constraint in Adjudication: A Look Through the Lens of Cognitive Psychology, 67 Brook. L. Rev. 1097 (2002).Google Scholar
Barnden, John A.& Peterson, Donald M., Artificial Intelligence, Mindreading and Reasoning in Law, 22 Cardozo L. Rev. 1381 (2001).Google Scholar
Goodenough, Oliver R.& Prehn, Kristin, Mapping Cortical Areas Associated With Legal Reasoning and Moral Intuition, 41 Jurimetrics J. 429 (2001).Google Scholar
Jones, Owen D. Time-shifted Rationality and the Law of Law's Leverage: Behavioral Economics Meets Behavioral Biology, 95 Nw. U. L. Rev. 1141 (2001).Google Scholar
O'Hara, Erin A. Brain Plasticity and Spanish Moss In Biolegal Analysis, 53 Fla. L. Rev. 905 (2001).Google Scholar
Tazbir, Janice The Human Genome Project: Ethical and Legal Considerations for Neuroscience Nurses, 33 J Neurosci Nurs. 180 (2001).Google Scholar
Waldbauer, Jacob R.& Gazzaniga, Michael S., The Divergence of Neuroscience and Law, 41 Jurimetrics J. 357 (2001).Google Scholar
Crawford, Colin Criminal Penalties for Creating a Toxic Environment: Mens Rea, Environmental Criminal Liability Standard and the Neurotoxicity Hypothesis, 27 B.C. Envtl. Aff. L. Rev. 341 (2000).Google Scholar
McCormack, Michael J. Applying the Basic Principles of Cognitive Science to the Standard State Zoning Enabling Act, 27 B.C. Envtl. Aff. L. Rev. 519 (2000).Google Scholar
Samole, Rena M. Real Employees: Cognitive Psychology and the Adjudication of Non-Competition Agreements, 4 Wash. U. J.L. & Pol'y 289 (2000).Google Scholar
Weinstein, Janet& Weinstein, Ricardo, Before It's Too Late: Neuropsychological Consequences of Child Neglect and Their Implications for Law and Social Policy, 33 U. Mich. J.L. Ref. 561 (2000).Google Scholar
Beecher-Monas, Erica& Garcia-Rill, Edgar, The Law and the Brain: Judging Scientific Evidence of Intent, 1 J. App. Prac. & Process 243 (1999).Google Scholar
Bitz, Donald M.& Bitz, Jean S., Incompetence in the Brain Injured Individual, 12 St. Thomas L. Rev. 205 (1999).Google Scholar
Blank, Robert H. Brain Policy: How the New Neuroscience Will Change Our Lives and Our Politics (Georgetown Univ. Press 1999).Google Scholar
McMorris, Greta A. Critical Race Theory, Cognitive Psychology, and the Social Meaning of Race: Why Individualism Will Not Solve Racism, 67 UMKC L. Rev. 695 (1999).Google Scholar
Millstein, Richard A.& Leshner, Alan I., The Science of Addiction: Research and Public Health Perspectives, 3 J. Health Care L. & Pol'y 151 (1999).Google Scholar
Neuckranz, Thomas H.& Nahrstadt, Bradley C., Refuting Diagnostic and Neuropsychological Testing in Toxic Tort Cases, 23 Am. J. Trial Advoc. 19 (1999).Google Scholar
Jacobs, W. Jake& Nadel, Lynn, Neurobiology of Reconstructed Memory, 4 Psychol. Pub. Pol'y & L. 1110 (1998).Google Scholar
Lidsky, Theodore I. Schneider, Jay S. & Karpf, Dennis D., The Neuropsychologist in Brain Injury Cases, 34-JUL Trial 70 (1998).Google Scholar
Reider, Laura Toward a New Test for the Insanity Defense: Incorporating the Discoveries of Neuroscience into Moral and Legal Theories, 46 UCLAL. Rev. 289 (1998).Google Scholar
Gabor, Barcset al., Investigation of Vehicle Driving Ability in Two Diagnostic Groups of Epileptic Patients With Special Neuropsychological Approach, 16 Med. & L. 277 (1997).Google Scholar
Kulynych, Jennifer J. Psychiatric Neuroimaging Evidence: A High-Tech Crystal Ball?, 49 Stan. L. Rev. 1249 (1997).Google Scholar
McLachlan, Richard S. Medical Conditions & Driving: Legal Requirements & Approach Of Neurologists, 16 Med. & L. 269 (1997).Google Scholar
Oldershaw, John B.et al., Persistent Vegetative State: Medical, Ethical, Religious, Economic and Legal Perspectives, 1 DePaul J. Health Care L. 495 (1997).Google Scholar
Thompson, Sean K. Securities Regulation in an Electronic Age: The Impact of Cognitive Psychology, 75 Wash. U. L.Q. 779 (1997).Google Scholar
Dauer, Robert E. Evidentiary Admissibility of Evidence of Neurodiagnostic Testing Showing Frontal Brain Lesion as a Defense in a Criminal Homicide Trial, 1 Seminars in Clinical Neuropsychiatry 211 (1996).Google Scholar
Greiffenstein, M. Frank The Neuropsychological Autopsy, 75 MICH. B.J. 424 (1996).Google Scholar
Kulynych, Jennifer Brain, Mind, and Criminal Behavior: Neuroimages as Scientific Evidence, 36 Jurimetrics J. 235 (1996).Google Scholar
Martell, Daniel A. Causal Relation Between Brain Damage and Homicide: The Prosecution, 1 Seminars in Clinical Neuropsychiatry 184 (1996).Google Scholar
Mayberg, Helen S. Medical-Legal Inferences from Functional Neuroimaging Evidence, 1 Seminars in Clinical Neuropsychiatry 195 (1996).Google Scholar
Morse, Stephen J. Brain and Blame, 84 Geo. L.J. 527 (1996).Google Scholar
Relkin, Normanet al., Impulsive Homicide Associated with an Arachnoid Cyst and Unilateral Frontotempo-ral Cerebral Dysfunction, 1 Seminars in Clinical Neuropsychiatry 172 (1996).Google Scholar
Restak, Richard M. Brain Damage and Legal Responsibility, 1 Seminars in Clinical Neuropsychiatry 170 (1996).Google Scholar
Weiss, Zachary The Legal Admissibility of Positron Emission Tomography Scans in Criminal Cases: People v. Spyder Cystkopf, 1 Seminars in Clinical Neuropsychiatry 202 (1996).Google Scholar
Schacter, Daniel L. Kagan, Jerome & Leichtman, Michelle D., True and False Memories in Children and Adults: A Cognitive Neuroscience Perspective, 1 Psychol. Pub. Pol'y & L. 411 (1995).Google Scholar
Denno, Deborah W. Gender, Crime, and the Criminal Law Defenses, 85 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 80 (1994).Google Scholar
McConnell, David B. The Sevin Made Me Do It: Mental Non-Responsibility and the Neurotoxic Damage Defense, 14 Va. Envtl. L.J. 151 (1994).Google Scholar
Lelling, Andrew E. Eliminative Materialism, Neuroscience and the Criminal Law, 141 U. Pa. L. Rev. 1471 (1993).Google Scholar
Martell, D.A. Forensic Neuropsychology and the Criminal Law, 16 Law & Hum. Behav. 313 (1992).Google Scholar
Martinez, John A Cognitive Science Approach to Teaching Property Rights in Body Parts, 42 J. Legal Educ. 290 (1992).Google Scholar
Callen, Craig R. Cognitive Science and the Sufficiency of “Sufficiency of the Evidence” Tests, 65 Tul. L. Rev. 1113 (1991).Google Scholar
Denno, Deborah W. Human Biology and Criminal Responsibility: Free Will or Free Ride?, 137 U. Pa. L. Rev. 615 (1988).Google Scholar
Smith, David Randolph Legal Recognition of Neocortical Death, 71 Cornell L. Rev. 850 (1986).Google Scholar
Denno, Deborah W. Neuropsychological and Early Environmental Correlates of Sex Differences in Crime, 23 Int'l J. Neuroscience 199 (1984)Google Scholar
Abrams, Kathryn& Keren, Hila, Who's Afraid of Law and the Emotions?, 94 Minn. L. Rev. 1997 (2010).Google Scholar
Alexander, Larry Criminal and Moral Responsibility and the Libet Experiments, in Conscious Will and Responsibility: A Tribute to Benjamin Libet (Oxford Univ. Press, Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter & Nadel, Lynn, eds., 2010).Google Scholar
Aronson, Jay D. The Law's Use of Brain Evidence, 6 Ann. Rev. L. & Soc. Sci. 7.1 (2010).Google Scholar
Bader, Elizabeth E. The Psychology of Mediation: Issues of Self and Identity and the IDR Cycle, 10 Pepp. Disp. Resol. L.J. 183 (2010).Google Scholar
Bandes, Susan A. The Promise and Pitfalls of Neuroscience for Criminal Law and Procedure, 8 Ohio St. J. Crim. L. 119 (2010).Google Scholar
Banks, William P.& Isham, Eve A., Do We Really Know What We Are Doing? Implications of Reported Time of Decision for Theories of Volition, in Conscious Will and Responsibility: A Tribute to Benjamin Libet (Oxford Univ. Press, Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter & Nadel, Lynn, eds., 2010).Google Scholar
Belcher, Annabelle& Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter, Neurolaw, 1 Wiley Interdisc. Revs: Cognitive Sci. 18 (2010).Google Scholar
Birke, Richard Neuroscience and Settlement: An Examination of Scientific Innovations and Practical Applications, 25 Ohio St. J. on Disp. Resol. 477 (2010).Google Scholar
Bloch, Kate E. Changing the Topography of Sentencing, 7 Hastings Race & Poverty L.J. 185 (2010).Google Scholar
Bloom, Floyd E. Does Neuroscience Give Us New Insights Into Drug Addiction?, in A Judge's Guide to Neuroscience 42 (SAGE Center For the Study of the Mind, 2010).Google Scholar
Blumoff, T. Y. How (Some) Criminals are Made, in Law and Neuroscience: Current Legal Issues (Oxford Univ. Press, Freeman, Michael, ed., 2010).Google Scholar
Blumoff, Theodore Y. The Neuropsychology of Justifications and Excuses: Some Cases from Self-Defense, Duress, and Provocation, 50 Jurimetrics J. 391 (2010).Google Scholar
Bockman, Collin R. Cybernetic-Enhancement Technology and the Future of Disability Law, 95 Iowa L. Rev. 1315 (2010).Google Scholar
Bonnie, Richard J. The Virtues of Pragmatism in Drug Policy, 13 J. Health Care L. & Pol'y 7 (2010).Google Scholar
Boudreau, Cheryl Coulson, Seana & McCubbins, Mathew D., Pathways to Persuasion: How Neuroscience Can Inform the Study and Practice of Law, in Law and Neuroscience: Current Legal Issues (Oxford Univ. Press, Freeman, Michael, ed., 2010).Google Scholar
Brown, Teneille& Murphy, Emily, Through A Scanner Darkly: Functional Neuroimaging as Evidence of a Criminal Defendant's Past Mental States, 62 Stan. L. Rev. 1119 (2010).Google Scholar
Buchman, Daniel Z.& Illes, Judy, Imaging Genetics for Our Neurogenetic Future, 11 Minn. J.L. Sci. & Tech. 79 (2010).Google Scholar
Buchman, Daniel Z. Illes, Judy & Reiner, Peter B., The Paradox of Addiction Google Scholar
Neuroscience, _____ Neuroethics _____ (2010).Google Scholar
Buckholtz, J.et al, The Neural Correlates of Third-Party Punishment, in Law and Neuroscience: Current Legal Issues (Oxford Univ. Press, Freeman, Michael, ed., 2010).Google Scholar
Burgess, Hillary Deepening the Discourse Using the Legal Mind's Eye: Lessons from Neuroscience and Educational Psychology that Optimize Law School Learning, _____ Quinnipiac L. Rev. _____ (2010).Google Scholar
Burton, Angela O. “They Use it Like Candy”: How the Prescription of Psychotropic Drugs to State-Involved Children Violates International Law, 35 Brook. J. Int'l L. 453 (2010).Google Scholar
Buss, Emily What the Law Should (and Should Not) Learn from Child Development Research, 38 Hofstra L. Rev. 13 (2010).Google Scholar
Cárceres, Enrique Steps Toward a Constructivist and Coherentist Theory of Judicial Reasoning in Civil Law Tradition, in Law and Neuroscience: Current Legal Issues (Oxford Univ. Press, Freeman, Michael, ed., 2010).Google Scholar
Callender, John S. Free Will and Responsibility: A Guide for Practitioners (Oxford University Press 2010).Google Scholar
Capraro, Laura The Juridical Rise of Emotions in the Decisional Process of Popular Juries, in Law and Neuroscience: Current Legal Issues (Oxford Univ. Press, Freeman, Michael, ed., 2010).Google Scholar
Carbone, J. Neuroscience and Ideology: Why Science Can Never Supply a Complete Answer for Adolescent Immaturity, in Law and Neuroscience: Current Legal Issues (Oxford Univ. Press, Freeman, Michael, ed., 2010).Google Scholar
Carota, Francesca Desmurget, M. & Sirigu, A., Forward Modeling Mediates Motor Awareness, in Conscious Will and Responsibility: A Tribute to Benjamin Libet (Oxford Univ. Press, Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter & Nadel, Lynn, eds., 2010).Google Scholar
Chandler, Jennifer A. Reading the Judicial Mind: Predicting the Courts’ Reaction to the Use of Neuroscientific Evidence for Lie Detection, 33 Dalhousie L.J. _____ (2010).Google Scholar
Chiesa, Luis E. Beyond Torture: The Nemo Tenetur Principle in Borderline Cases, 30 B.C. Third World L.J. 35 (2010).Google Scholar
Churchill, Christopher J. The Parity Cure: Solving Unequal Treatment of Mental Illness Health Insurance Through Federal Legislation, 44 Ga. L. Rev. 511 (2010).Google Scholar
Claydon, L. Law, Neuroscience, and Criminal Culpability, in Law and Neuroscience: Current Legal Issues (Oxford Univ. Press, Freeman, Michael, ed., 2010).Google Scholar
Compton, E. Spencer Not Guilty by Reason of Neuroimaging: The Need for Cautionary Jury Instructions for Neuroscience Evidence in Criminal Trials, 12 Vand. J. Ent. & Tech. L. 333 (2010).Google Scholar
Conason, Robert L.& Pegalis, Steven E., Neurologic Birth Injury, 31 J. Legal Med. 249 (2010).Google Scholar
Cormier, Joseph W. Providing Those With Mental Illness Full and Fair Treatment: Legislative Considerations in the Post-Clark Era, 47 Am. Crim. L. Rev. 129 (2010).Google Scholar
Dailey, Anne C. Imagination and Choice, 35 Law & Soc. Inquiry 175 (2010).Google Scholar
Denno, Deborah W. Neuroscience, Cognitive Psychology, and the Criminal Justice System: Introduction, 8 Ohio St. J. Crim. L. 1 (2010).Google Scholar
Duffy, James D. What Hobbes Left Out: The Neuroscience of Comparison and its Implications For a New Commonwealth, in Law and Neuroscience: Current Legal Issues (Oxford Univ. Press, Freeman, Michael, ed., 2010).Google Scholar
Eagleman, David M. Why Neuroscience Matters For Rational Drug Policy, 11 Minn. J.L. Sci. & Tech. 7 (2010).Google Scholar
Ebert, Jeffrey P.& Wegner, Daniel M., Bending Time to One's Will in Conscious Will and Responsibility: A Tribute to Benjamin Libet (Oxford Univ. Press, Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter & Nadel, Lynn, eds., 2010).Google Scholar
Erickson, Megan J. Blaming the Brain, 11 Minn. J.L. Sci. & Tech. 27 (2010).Google Scholar
Farrell, Brian Can't Get You Out of My Head:The Human Rights Implications of Using Brain Scans as Criminal Evidence, 4 Interdisc. J. Hum. Rts. L. 101 (2010).Google Scholar
Fields, Howard Can Neuroscience Identify Pain?, in A Judge's Guide to Neuroscience 32 (SAGE Center For the Study of the Mind, 2010).Google Scholar
Fins, Joseph J. Minds Apart: Severe Brain Injury, Citizenship and Civil Rights, in Law and Neuroscience: Current Legal Issues (Oxford Univ. Press, Freeman, Michael, ed., 2010).Google Scholar
Fischer, J. Indeterminism and Control: An Approach to the Problem of Luck, in Law and Neuroscience: Current Legal Issues (Oxford Univ. Press, Freeman, Michael, ed., 2010).Google Scholar
Fisher, Carl E.& Appelbaum, Paul S., Diagnosing Consciousness: Neuroimaging, Law, and the Vegetative State, 38 J.L. Med. & Ethics 374 (2010).Google Scholar
Flatt, Gregory C. All in Your Head: A Comprehensive Approach to Somatoform Disorders in Adult Disability Claims, 87 Wash. U. L. Rev. 1397 (2010).Google Scholar
Fox, Dov The Right to Silence as Protecting Mental Control, in Law and Neuroscience: Current Legal Issues (Oxford Univ. Press, Freeman, Michael, ed., 2010).Google Scholar
Freeman, Michael ed., Law and Neuroscience: Current Legal Issues (Oxford University Press 2010).Google Scholar
Fruehwald, Edwin S. A Biological Basis of Rights, 19 S. Cal. Interdisc. L.J. 195 (2010).Google Scholar
Fruehwald, Edwin S. Postmodern Legal Thought and Cognitive Science, _____ Ga. St. U. L. Rev. _____ (2010).Google Scholar
Gazzaniga, Michael S. What Is Cognitive Neuroscience?, in A Judge's Guide to Neuroscience 2 (SAGE Center For the Study of the Mind, 2010).Google Scholar
Gazzaniga, Michael Neuroscience and the Correct Level of Explanation for Understanding Mind, 14 Trends in Cognitive Science 291 (2010).Google Scholar
Glannon, W. What Neuroscience Can (and cannot) Tell Us About Criminal Responsibility, in Law and Neuroscience: Current Legal Issues (Oxford Univ. Press, Freeman, Michael, ed., 2010).Google Scholar
Goldberg, Steven Neuroscience and the Free Exercise of Religion, in Law and Neuroscience: Current Legal Issues (Oxford Univ. Press, Freeman, Michael, ed., 2010).Google Scholar
Goldberg, Daniel S. The History of Scientific and Clinical Images in Mid-to-Late 19th Century American Legal Culture: Implications for Contemporary Law and Neuroscience, in Law and Neuroscience: Current Legal Issues (Oxford Univ. Press, Freeman, Michael, ed., 2010).Google Scholar
Goodenough, Oliver R.& Tucker, Micaela, Law and Cognitive Neuroscience, 6 Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 28.1 (2010).Google Scholar
Grafton, Scott T. Has Neuroscience Already Appeared in the Courtroom?, in A Judge's Guide to Neuroscience 54 (SAGE Center For the Study of the Mind, 2010).Google Scholar
Graves, Tashina Maniscalco, Brian & Lau, Hakwan, Volition and the Function of Consciousness, in Conscious Will and Responsibility: A Tribute to Benjamin Libet (Oxford Univ. Press, Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter & Nadel, Lynn, eds., 2010).Google Scholar
Greely, Henry T. Neuroscience and Criminal Responsibility: Proving “Can't Help Himself as a Narrow Bar to Liability, in Law and Neuroscience: Current Legal Issues (Oxford Univ. Press, Freeman, Michael, ed., 2010).Google Scholar
Grey, B. J. Neuroscience and Emotional Harm in Tort Law: Rethinking the American Approach to Freestanding Emotional Distress Claims, in Law and Neuroscience: Current Legal Issues (Oxford Univ. Press, Freeman, Michael, ed., 2010).Google Scholar
Hafemeister, Thomas L.& Stockey, Nicole A., Last Stand? The Criminal Responsibility of War Veterans Returning from Iraq and Afghanistan with Posttraumatic Stress Disorder, 85 Ind. L.J. 87 (2010).Google Scholar
Hallett, Mark Volition: How Physiology Speaks to the Issue of Responsibility, in Conscious Will and Responsibility: A Tribute to Benjamin Libet (Oxford Univ. Press, Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter & Nadel, Lynn, eds., 2010).Google Scholar
Haynes, John-Dylan Beyond Libet: Long-term Prediction of Free Choices from Neuroimaging Signals, in Conscious Will and Responsibility: A Tribute to Benjamin Libet (Oxford Univ. Press, Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter & Nadel, Lynn, eds., 2010).Google Scholar
Hirstein, William& Sifferd, Katrina, The Legal Self: Executive Processes And Legal Theory, _____ Consciousness and Cognition _____ (2010).Google Scholar
Hoffman, Morris B. Evolutionary Jurisprudence: The End of the Naturalistic Fallacy and the Beginning of Natural Reform?, in Law and Neuroscience: Current Legal Issues (Oxford Univ. Press, Freeman, Michael, ed., 2010).Google Scholar
Horgan, Terry The Phenomenology of Agency and the Libet Results, in Conscious Will and Responsibility: A Tribute to Benjamin Libet (Oxford Univ. Press, Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter & Nadel, Lynn, eds., 2010).Google Scholar
Jacobson, M.H. Sam Paying Attention or Fatally Distracted? Concentration, Memory, and Multi-Tasking in a Multi-Media World, 16 J. Legal Writing Inst. 419 (2010).Google Scholar
Lucille, A.Jewel, Through a Glass Darkly: Using Brain Science and Visual Rhetoric to Gain a Professional Perspective on Visual Advocacy, 19 S. Cal. Interdisc. L.J. 237 (2010).Google Scholar
Johansen, Steven J. Was Colonel Sanders a Terrorist? An Essay on the Ethical Limits of Applied Legal Storytelling, 1 J. Ass'n Legal Writing Directors 63 (2010).Google Scholar
Jones, Owen D. Intuitions of Punishment, _____ Chicago L. Rev. _____ (2010).Google Scholar
Kapp, Marhsall B. Legal Issues Arising in the Process of Determining Decisional Capacity in Older Persons, _____ J. Long-Term Health Care _____ (2010).Google Scholar
Kaye, Anders Powerful Particulars: The Real Reason the Behavioral Sciences Threaten Criminal Responsibility, 37 Fla. St. U. L. Rev. 539 (2010).Google Scholar
Keane, David Survival of the Fairest? Evolution and the Geneticization of Rights, 30 Oxford J. Legal Stud. 467 (2010).Google Scholar
Keren, Hila Considering Affective Consideration, 40 Golden Gate U. L. Rev. 165 (2010).Google Scholar
Kiehl, Kent Can Neuroscience Identify Psychopaths?, in A Judge's Guide to Neuroscience 47 (SAGE Center For the Study of the Mind, 2010).Google Scholar
Kolber, Adam J. The Experiential Future of the Law, _____ Emory L.J. _____ (2010).Google Scholar
Kowalski, Tonya True North: Navigating for the Transfer of Learning in Legal Education, 34 Seattle U. L. Rev. 51 (2010).Google Scholar
Krauss, Rebecca Neuroscience and Institutional Choice in Federal Sentencing Law, 120 Yale L.J. 367 (2010).Google Scholar
Lamparello, Adam Using Cognitive Neuroscience As a Basis Upon Which To Accurately Predict the Future Dangerousness of Violent Criminals and Thus Provide a Procedure for the Involuntary Commitment of Such Individuals As a Part of or Following the Duration of their Sentence, 42 Colum. Hum. Rts. L. Rev. _____ (2010).Google Scholar
Libet, Benjamin Do We Have Free Will?, in Conscious Will and Responsibility: A Tribute to Benjamin Libet (Oxford Univ. Press, Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter & Nadel, Lynn, eds., 2010).Google Scholar
Lokhorst, Gert-Jan Mens Rea, Logic, and the Brain, in Law and Neuroscience: Current Legal Issues (Oxford Univ. Press, Freeman, Michael, ed., 2010).Google Scholar
Looney, J. W. Neuroscience's New Techniques For Evaluating Future Dangerousness: Are We Returning To Lombroso's Biological Criminality?, 32 U. Ark. Little Rock L. Rev. 301 (2010).Google Scholar
MacKenzie, R.& Sakel, M., The Neuroscience of Cruelty as Brain Damage: Legal Framings of Capacity and Ethical Issues in the Neurorehabilitation of Motor Neurone Disease, in Law and Neuroscience: Current Legal Issues (Oxford Univ. Press, Freeman, Michael, ed., 2010).Google Scholar
MacMillan, Scott N.& Vaughn, Michael S., Weighing the Evidence: Neuroimagery Evidence of Brain Trauma or Disorder in Courts, 46 No. 3 Crim. L. Bull. ART 5 (2010).Google Scholar
Mandel, Gregory N. Left-Brain Versus Right-Brain: Competing Conceptions of Creativity in Intellectual Property Law, 44 U.C. Davis L. Rev. _____ (2010).Google Scholar
Maroney, Terry Adolescent Brain Science and Juvenile Justice, in Law and Neuroscience: Current Legal Issues (Oxford Univ. Press, Freeman, Michael, ed., 2010).Google Scholar
Maroney, Terry A. Adolescent Brain Science after Graham v. Florida, 85 Notre Dame L. Rev. _____ (2010).Google Scholar
Mayberg, Helen Does Neuroscience Give Us New Insights Into Criminal Responsibility?, in A Judge's Guide to Neuroscience 37 (SAGE Center For the Study of the Mind, 2010).Google Scholar
Mele, Alfred R. Libet on Free Will: Readiness Potentials, Decisions, and Awareness, in Conscious Will and Responsibility: A Tribute to Benjamin Libet (Oxford Univ. Press, Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter & Nadel, Lynn, eds., 2010).Google Scholar
Meszaros, Jozsef Achieving Peace of Mind: The Benefits of Neurobiology Evidence for Battered Women Defendants, _____ Yale Journal of Law & Feminism _____ (2010).Google Scholar
Montague, Read How Is Neuroscience Likely to Impact Law in the Near Future?, in A Judge's Guide to Neuroscience 60 (SAGE Center For the Study of the Mind, 2010).Google Scholar
Moore, Michael S. Libet's Challenge(s) to Responsible Agency, in Conscious Will and Responsibility: A Tribute to Benjamin Libet (Oxford Univ. Press, Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter & Nadel, Lynn, eds., 2010).Google Scholar
Moore, Michael Intention, Responsibility and the Challenges of Recent Neuroscience, 2010 Stan. Tech. L. Rev. _____ (2010).Google Scholar
Morse, Stephen J. Lost in Translation? An Essay on Law and Neuroscience, in Law and Neuroscience: Current Legal Issues (Oxford Univ. Press, Freeman, Michael, ed., 2010).Google Scholar
Myers, Julie E. The Moment of Truth for fMRI: Will Deception Detection Pass Admissibility Hurdles in Oklahoma?, 6 Okla. J. L. & Tech. 47 (2010).Google Scholar
Nadelhoffer, Thomas The Threat of Shrinking Agency and Free Will Disillusionism, in Conscious Will and Responsibility: A Tribute to Benjamin Libet (Oxford Univ. Press, Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter & Nadel, Lynn, eds., 2010).Google Scholar
Nadelhoffer, Thomas Bibas, Stephanos, Grafton, Scott, Kiehl, Kent A., Mansfield, Andrew, Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter & Gazzaniga, Michael, Neuroprediction, _____ Neuroethics _____ (2010).Google Scholar
Nevins-Saunders, Elizabeth Incomprehensible Crimes: Defendants with Mental Retardation Charged with Statutory Rape, _____ N.Y.U.L. Rev. _____ (2010).Google Scholar
O'Neill, Timothy P. Mirror Neurons, the New Neuroscience, and the Law: Some Preliminary Observations, 39 Sw. L. Rev. 499 (2010).Google Scholar
Pacherie, Elisabeth& Haggard, Patrick, What are Intentions?, in Conscious Will and Responsibility: A Tribute to Benjamin Libet (Oxford Univ. Press, Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter & Nadel, Lynn, eds., 2010).Google Scholar
Pardo, Michael S. Philosophical Foundations of Law and Neuroscience, _____ U. Ill. L. Rev. _____ (2010).Google Scholar
Pfaff, Donald W. Possible Neural Mechanisms Underlying Ethical Behaviour, in Law and Neuroscience: Current Legal Issues (Oxford Univ. Press, Freeman, Michael, ed., 2010).Google Scholar
Pockett, Susan& Purdy, Suzanne, Are Voluntary Movements Initiated Preconsciously? The Relationships Between Readiness Potentials, Urges, and Decisions, in Conscious Will and Responsibility: A Tribute to Benjamin Libet (Oxford Univ. Press, Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter & Nadel, Lynn, eds., 2010).Google Scholar
Ptacek, Louis J. What Is Neurogenetics?, in A Judge's Guide to Neuroscience 26 (SAGE Center For the Study of the Mind, 2010).Google Scholar
Raichle, Marcus What is an fMRI?, in A Judge's Guide to Neuroscience 5 (SAGE Center For the Study of the Mind, 2010).Google Scholar
Rissman, Jesse Greely, Hank & Wagner, Anthony D., Detecting Individual Memories Through The Neural Decoding Of Memory States And Past Experience, 107 PNAS 9849 (2010).Google Scholar
Rissman, Jesse Greely, Henry T. & Wagner, Anthony D., Detecting Individual Memories Through the Neural Decoding of Memory States and Past Experience, 107 PNAS 9849 (2010).Google Scholar
Robertson, John A. Law, Science, and Innovation: Introduction to the Symposium, 38 J.L. Med. & Ethics 175 (2010).Google Scholar
Roskies, A. L.& Sinnott-Armstrong, W., Brain Images as Evidence in the Criminal Law, in Law and Neuroscience: Current Legal Issues (Oxford Univ. Press, Freeman, Michael, ed., 2010).Google Scholar
Roskies, Adina L. Why Libet's Studies Don't Pose a Threat to Free Will, in Conscious Will and Responsibility: A Tribute to Benjamin Libet (Oxford Univ. Press, Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter & Nadel, Lynn, eds., 2010).Google Scholar
Roskies, Adina How Is Neuroscience Likely to Impact the Law in the Long Run?, in A Judge's Guide to Neuroscience 66 (SAGE Center For the Study of the Mind, 2010).Google Scholar
Roskies, Adina How Does Neuroscience Affect Our Concept of Volition, 33 Ann. Rev. Neurosciences 109 (2010).Google Scholar
Schauer, Frederick Can Bad Science Be Good Evidence? Lie Detection, Neuroscience and the Mistaken Conflation of Legal and Scientific Norms, 95 Cornell L. Rev. 1191 (2010).Google Scholar
Schleim, Stephan Spranger, Tade M., Erk, Susanne & Walter, Henrik, From Moral to Legal Judgment: The Influence of Normative Context in Lawyers and Other Academics, Social, Cognitive & Affective Neuroscience (2010).Google Scholar
Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter& Nadel, Lynn, Conscious Will and Responsibility: A Tribute to Benjamin Libet (Oxford University Press 2010).Google Scholar
Sirkin, Mark I. Managing Your Brain: Lessons From Neuroscience, 82-SEP N.Y. St. B.J. 38 (2010).Google Scholar
Skene, Loane Recent Developments in Stem Cell Research: Social, Ethical, and Legal Issues for the Future, 17 Ind. J. Global Legal Stud. 211 (2010).Google Scholar
Snead, O. Carter Memory and Punishment, _____ Vand. L. Rev. _____ (2010).Google Scholar
Stucke, Maurice E. Money, Is That What I Want?: Competition Policy and the Role of Behavioral Economics, 50 Santa Clara L. Rev. 893 (2010).Google Scholar
Swedloff, Rick& Huang, Peter H., Tort Damages and the New Science of Happiness, 85 Ind. L.J. 553 (2010).Google Scholar
Talmi, Debora& Frith, Chris D., Neuroscience, Free Will, and Responsibility, in Conscious Will and Responsibility: A Tribute to Benjamin Libet (Oxford Univ. Press, Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter & Nadel, Lynn, eds., 2010).Google Scholar
Terracina, D. Neuroscience and Penal Law: Ineffectiveness of the Penal Systems and Flawed Perception of the Underevaluation of Behaviour Constituting Crime, in Law and Neuroscience: Current Legal Issues (Oxford Univ. Press, Freeman, Michael, ed., 2010).Google Scholar
Tovino, Stacey A. Scientific Understandings of Postpartum Illness: Improving Health Law and Policy?, 33 Harv. J. L. & Gender 99 (2010).Google Scholar
Viens, A.M. Reciprocity and Neuroscience in Public Health Law, in Law and Neuroscience: Current Legal Issues (Oxford Univ. Press, Freeman, Michael, ed., 2010).Google Scholar
Vincent, N. Madness, Badness and Neuro-imaging-based Responsibility Assessments, in Law and Neuroscience: Current Legal Issues (Oxford Univ. Press, Freeman, Michael, ed., 2010).Google Scholar
Wagner, Anthony Can Neuroscience Identify Lies?, in A Judge's Guide to Neuroscience 13 (SAGE Center For the Study of the Mind, 2010).Google Scholar
Waldman, Ellen A. Mindfulness, Emotions, and Ethics: The Right Stuff?, 10 Nev. L.J. 513 (2010).Google Scholar
Wheatley, Thalia& Looser, Christine, Prospective Codes Fulfilled: A Potential Neural Mechanism of the Will, in Conscious Will and Responsibility: A Tribute to Benjamin Libet (Oxford Univ. Press, Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter & Nadel, Lynn, eds., 2010).Google Scholar
Wilkinson, Dominic& Foster, Charles, The Carmentis Machine: Legal and Ethical Issues in the Use of Neuroimaging to Guide Treatment Withdrawal in Newborn Infants, in Law and Neuroscience: Current Legal Issues (Oxford Univ. Press, Freeman, Michael, ed., 2010).Google Scholar
Yaffe, Gideon Libet and the Criminal Law's Voluntary Act Requirement, in Conscious Will and Responsibility: A Tribute to Benjamin Libet (Oxford Univ. Press, Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter & Nadel, Lynn, eds., 2010).Google Scholar
Zimmerman, Adam S. Funding Irrationality, 59 Duke L.J. 1105 (2010).Google Scholar
Aggarwal, Neil K. Neuroimaging, Culture, and Forensic Psychiatry, 37 J. Am. Acad. Psychiatry L. 239 (2009).Google Scholar
Aronson, Jay D. Neuroscience and Juvenile Justice, 42 Akron L. Rev. 917 (2009).Google Scholar
Ball, David Damages and the Reptilian Brain, 45-SEP TRIAL 24 (2009).Google Scholar
Bandes, Susan A. Repellent Crimes and Rational Deliberation: Emotion and the Death Penalty, 33 Vt. L. Rev. 489 (2009).Google Scholar
Barnard, Jayne W. Deception, Decisions, and Investor Education, 17 Elder L.J. 201 (2009).Google Scholar
Batts, Shelley Brain Lesions and Their Implications in Criminal Responsibility, 27 Behav. Sci. & L. 261 (2009).Google Scholar
Bles, M.& Haynes, J.D., Detecting Concealed Information Using Brain-Imaging Technology, in Neuroscience and Crime: A Special Issue of Neurocase (Psychology Press, Markowitsch, Hans, ed., 2009).Google Scholar
Bloch, Kate E. Cognition and Star Trek: Learning and Legal Education, 42 J. Marshall L. Rev. 959 (2009).Google Scholar
Blumoff, Theodore Y. The Problems with Blaming, in Law, Mind and Brain 127 (Ashgate, Freeman, Michael & Goodenough, Oliver R., eds., 2009).Google Scholar
Boudreau, Cheryl Cues in the Courtroom: When Do They Improve Jurors’ Decisions?, in Law, Mind and Brain 373 (Ashgate, Freeman, Michael & Goodenough, Oliver R., eds., 2009).Google Scholar
Bryant, Bethany C. Expanding Atkins and Roper: A Diagnostic Approach to Excluding the Death Penalty as Punishment for Schizophrenic Offenders, 78 Miss. L.J. 905 (2009).Google Scholar
Buss, Emily Rethinking the Connection Between Developmental Science and Juvenile Justice, 76 U. Chi. L. Rev. 493 (2009).Google Scholar
Carbone, June& Cahn, Naomi, Examining the Biological Bases of Family Law: Lessons to be Learned for the Evolutionary Analysis of Law, in Law, Mind and Brain 323 (Ashgate, Freeman, Michael & Goodenough, Oliver R., eds., 2009).Google Scholar
Casebeer, William D. Reason's Ends: Ecological Rationality and Moral Judgment, 35 Queen's L.J. 359 (2009).Google Scholar
Claydon, Lisa Mind the Gap: Problems of Mind, Body and Brain in the Criminal Law, in Law, Mind and Brain 55 (Ashgate, Freeman, Michael & Goodenough, Oliver R., eds., 2009).Google Scholar
Dawson, John& Szmukler, George, Why Distinguish “Mental” and “Physical” Illness in the Law of Involuntary Treatment?, in Law, Mind and Brain 173 (Ashgate, Freeman, Michael & Goodenough, Oliver R., eds., 2009).Google Scholar
Denno, Deborah W. Consciousness and Culpability in American Criminal Law, 12 Waseda Procs. Comp. L. 115 (2009).Google Scholar
Destro, Robert A. Learning Neuroscience the Hard Way: The Terri Schiavo Case and the Ethics of Effective Representation, 78 Miss. L.J. 833 (2009).Google Scholar
Domin, Christopher Mitigating Evidence? The Admissibility of Polygraph Results in the Penalty Phase of a Capital Trial, 43 U.C. Davis L. Rev. 1461 (2009).Google Scholar
Dressing, H. Sartorius, A. & Meyer-Lindenberg, A., Implications of fMRI and Genetics for the Law and the Routine Practice of Forensic Psychiatry, in Neuroscience and Crime: A Special Issue of Neurocase (Psychology Press, Markowitsch, Hans, ed., 2009).Google Scholar
Laing, Bart Du Equality in Exchange Revisited: From an Evolutionary (Genetic and Cultural) Point of View, in Law, Mind and Brain 267 (Ashgate, Freeman, Michael & Goodenough, Oliver R., eds., 2009).Google Scholar
Roger, Kristen G.& DuBois, Alan, The Present and Future Impact of Neuroscience Evidence on Criminal Law, 33-APR Champion 18 (2009).Google Scholar
Eagleman, David M. Correro, Mark A. & Singh, Jyotpal, What Neuroscience May Be Able to Tell Us About Criminal Behavior and Rehabilitation, Gruter Institute Squaw Valley Conference 2009: Law, Behavior & the Brain (2009).Google Scholar
Ellenberg, Cooper Lie Detection: A Changing of the Guard in the Quest for Truth in Court?, 33 Law & Psychol. Rev. 139 (2009).Google Scholar
Emery, Robert E. Anger is Not Anger is Not Anger: Different Motivations Behind Anger and Why They Matter for Family Law, 16 Va. J. Soc. Pol'y & L. 346 (2009).Google Scholar
Erickson, Steven K. The Neuroscience and Psychology of Moral Decision Making and the Law, 27 Behav. Sci. & L. 119 (2009).Google Scholar
Fabian, John M. Forensic Neuropsychological Assessment and Death Penalty Litigation, 33-APR Champion 24 (2009).Google Scholar
Farahany, Nita& Greely, Hank, Genetics, Neuroscience, and Criminal Responsibility, in The Impact of Behavioral Sciences on Criminal Law 183 (Oxford Univ. Press, Farahany, Nita, ed., 2009).Google Scholar
Farahany, Nita Cruel and Unequal Punishments, 86 Wash. U. L. Rev. 859 (2009).Google Scholar
Federle, Katherine H.& Skendelas, Paul, Thinking Like a Child: Legal Implications of Recent Developments in Brain Research for Juvenile Offenders, in Law, Mind and Brain 199 (Ashgate, Freeman, Michael & Goodenough, Oliver R., eds., 2009).Google Scholar
Feigenson, Neal Brain Imaging and Courtroom Evidence: On the Admissibility and Persuasiveness of fMRI, in Law, Mind and Brain 23 (Ashgate, Freeman, Michael & Goodenough, Oliver R., eds., 2009).Google Scholar
Fox, Dov The Right to Silence as Protecting Mental Control, 42 Akron L. Rev. 763 (2009).Google Scholar
Freeman, Michael& Goodenough, Oliver R., eds., Law, Mind and Brain (Ashgate 2009).Google Scholar
Fruehwald, Edwin S. Reciprocal Altruism as the Basis for Contract, 47 U. Louisville L. Rev. 489 (2009).Google Scholar
Gewirtzman, Don Our Founding Feelings: Emotion, Commitment, and Imagination in Constitutional Culture, 43 U. Rich. L. Rev. 623 (2009).Google Scholar
Glenn, Andrea L.& Raine, Adrian, Psychopathy and Instrumental Aggression: Evolutionary, Neurobiological, and Legal Perspectives, 32 Int'l J.L. & Psychiatry 253 (2009).Google Scholar
Goel, Rashmi Delinquent or Distracted? Attention Deficit Disorder and the Construction of the Juvenile Offender, 27 Law & Ineq. 1 (2009).Google Scholar
Goodenough, Oliver R.& Decker, Gregory, Why Do Good People Steal Intellectual Property?, in Law, Mind and Brain 345 (Ashgate, Freeman, Michael & Goodenough, Oliver R., eds., 2009).Google Scholar
Graham, Lorie M.& McJohn, Stephen M., Cognition, Law, Stories, 10 Minn. J.L. Sci. & Tech. 255 (2009).Google Scholar
Gray, Oscar S. Third Restatement of Torts: Issue Two Articles and Commentary: Commentary, 44 Wake Forest L. Rev. 1193 (2009).Google Scholar
Greely, Hank Neuroscience-Based Lie Detection: The Need for Regulation, in Using Imaging to Identify Deceit 46 (American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 2009).Google Scholar
Greely, Hank Who Knows What Evil Lurks in the Hearts of Men? Behavioral Genomics, Neuroscience, Criminal Law, and the Search for Hidden Knowledge, in The Impact of Behavioral Sciences on Criminal Law 161 (Oxford Univ. Press, Farahany, Nita, ed., 2009).Google Scholar
Greely, Henry T. Law and the Revolution in Neuroscience: An Early Look at the Field, 42 Akron L. Rev. 687 (2009).Google Scholar
Greene, Joshua D.& Paxton, Joseph M., Patterns Of Neural Activity Associated With Honest And Dishonest Moral Decisions, 106 Proc. Nat'l Acad. Sci. 12506 (2009).Google Scholar
Guttentag, Michael D. Is There a Law Instinct?, 87 Wash. U. L. Rev. 269 (2009).Google Scholar
Hakun, J. G. Seelig, D., Ruparel, K., Loughead, J.W., Busch, E., Gur, R.C. & Langleben, D.D., Exploring the Cognitive Structure of the Concealed Information Test with fMRI, in Neuroscience and Crime: A Special Issue of Neurocase (Psychology Press, Markowitsch, Hans, ed., 2009).Google Scholar
Halliburton, Christian M. How Privacy Killed Katz: A Tale of Cognitive Freedom and the Property of Personhood as Fourth Amendment Norm, 42 Akron L. Rev. 803 (2009).Google Scholar
Hammond, Jeffrey B. The Minimally Conscious Person: A Case Study in Dignity and Personhood and the Standard of Review for Withdrawal of Treatment, 55 Wayne L. Rev. 821 (2009).Google Scholar
Harrison, Jeffrey L. Happiness, Efficiency, and the Promise of Decisional Equity: From Outcome to Process, 36 Pepp. L. Rev. 935 (2009).Google Scholar
Heller, Kevin J. The Cognitive Psychology of Mens Rea, 99 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 317 (2009).Google Scholar
Herring, David J. Losing? Losing What? The Law and Dementia, 3 Child & Fam. L.Q. (2009).Google Scholar
Hill, Claire A. Rationality in an Unjust World: A Research Agenda, 35 Queen's L.J. 185 (2009).Google Scholar
Holley, Mary It's All In Your Head: Neurotechnological Lie Detection and the Fourth and Fifth Amendments, 28 Dev. Mental Health L. 1 (2009).Google Scholar
Illes, Judy& Lombera, Sofia, Identifiable Neuro Ethics Challenges to the Banking of Neuro Data, 10 Minn. J.L. Sci. & Tech. 71 (2009).Google Scholar
Iselin, Anne-Marie R. DeCoster, Jamie & Salekin, Randall T., Maturity in Adolescent and Young Adult Offenders, 33 Law & Hum. Behav. 455 (2009).Google Scholar
Johnson, Mark L. Guilty or Innocent? Just Take a Look at my Brain - Analyzing the Nexus Between Traumatic Brain Injury and Criminal Responsibility, 37 S.U. L. Rev. 25 (2009).Google Scholar
Jones, Owen D.& Brosnan, Sarah F., Brain Imaging for Legal Thinkers: A Guide for the Perplexed, 2009 Stan. Tech. L. Rev. 5 (2009).Google Scholar
Kalbe, E. Brand, M., Thiel, A, Kessler, J. & Markowitsch, H.J., Neuropsychological and Neural Correlates of Autobiographical Deficits in a Mother Who Killed Her Children, in Neuroscience and Crime: A Special Issue of Neurocase (Psychology Press, Markowitsch, Hans, ed., 2009).Google Scholar
Katt, William J. Roper and the Scientific Amicus, 49 Jurimetrics J. 253 (2009).Google Scholar
Klaming, Laura& Vedder, Anton H., Brushing Up Our Memories: Can We Use Neurotechnologies to Improve Eyewitness Memory?, 1 Law, Innovation & Tech. 203 (2009).Google Scholar
Klein, Dora W. Unreasonable: Involuntary Medications, Incompetent Criminal Defendants, and the Fourth Amendment, 46 San Diego L. Rev. 161 (2009).Google Scholar
Knabb, Joshua J. et. al., Neuroscience, Moral Reasoning, and the Law, 27 Behav. Sci. & L. 219 (2009).Google Scholar
Kolber, Adam J. Legal Implications of Memory-Dampening, in Law, Mind and Brain 215 (Ashgate, Freeman, Michael & Goodenough, Oliver R., eds., 2009).Google Scholar
Kolber, Adam J. The Subjective Experience of Punishment, 109 Colum. L. Rev. 182 (2009).Google Scholar
Korobkin, Russell Libertarian Welfarism, 97 Cal. L. Rev. 1651 (2009).Google Scholar
Kozel, F.A. Developing a Neuropsychiatric Functional Brain Imaging Test, in Neuroscience and Crime: A Special Issue of Neurocase (Psychology Press, Markowitsch, Hans, ed., 2009).Google Scholar
Kulich, Ronald Maciewicz, Raymond & Scrivani, Steven J., Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (FMRI) and Expert Testimony, 10 Pain Med. 373 (2009).Google Scholar
Lamb, Cassandra M. Behavioral Biology: The Impact of Neuroimaging and Brain Dysfunction on the Sentencing of Sexual Offenders, 35 New Eng. J. on Crim. & Civ. Confinement 421 (2009).Google Scholar
Mackenzie, Robin Reframing the Good Death: Enhancing Choice in Dying, Neuroscience, End-of-Life Research and the Potential of Psychedelics in Palliative Care, in Law, Mind and Brain 239 (Ashgate, Freeman, Michael & Goodenough, Oliver R., eds., 2009).Google Scholar
Markowitsch, Hans ed., Neuroscience and Crime: A Special Issue of Neurocase (Psychology Press 2009).Google Scholar
Markowitsch, H.J. Neuroscience and Crime, in Neuroscience and Crime: A Special Issue of Neurocase (Psychology Press, Markowitsch, Hans, ed., 2009).Google Scholar
Maroney, Terry A. The False Promise of Adolescent Brain Science in Juvenile Justice, 85 Notre Dame L. Rev. 89 (2009).Google Scholar
Maroney, Terry A. Emotional Competence and “Rational Understanding”: A Guide for Defense Counsel, 33-APR Champion 36 (2009).Google Scholar
Maroney, Terry A. Emotional Common Sense as Constitutional Law, 62 Vand. L. Rev. 851 (2009).Google Scholar
Martell, Daniel A. Neuroscience and the Law: Philosophical Differences and Practical Constraints, 27 Behav. Sci. & L. 123 (2009).Google Scholar
McCauliff, C.M.A. Cognition and Consensus in the Natural Law Tradition and in Neuroscience: Jacques Maritain and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, 54 Vill. L. Rev. 435 (2009).Google Scholar
Mello, Michael Ford's Delusions - And Our Own: Executing the Insane, 45 No. 6 Crim. L. Bull. ART 7 (2009).Google Scholar
Meyer, Carlin Brain, Gender, Law: A Cautionary Tale, 53 N.Y.L. Sch. L. Rev. 995 (2009).Google Scholar
Mobbs, Dean Lau, Hakwan C., Jones, Owen D. & Frith, Christopher D., Law, Responsibility and the Brain, in Law, Mind and Brain 1 (Ashgate, Freeman, Michael & Goodenough, Oliver R., eds., 2009).Google Scholar
Moreno, Joelle A. The Future of Neuroimaged Lie Detection and the Law, 42 Akron L. Rev. 717 (2009).Google Scholar
Moriarty, Jane C. Visions of Deception: Neuroimages and the Search for Truth, 42 Akron L. Rev. 739 (2009).Google Scholar
Moriarty, Jane C. Forward to the Neuroscience, Law & Government Symposium, 42 Akron L. Rev. 681 (2009).Google Scholar
Morse, Stephen Actions Speak Louder Than Images, in Using Imaging to Identify Deceit 23 (American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 2009).Google Scholar
Mushlin, Michael B.& Galtz, Naomi R., Getting Real About Race and Prisoner Rights, 36 Fordham Urb. L.J. 27 (2009).Google Scholar
O'Hanlon, Stephen Toward a More Reasonable Approach to Free Will in Criminal Law, 7 Cardozo Pub. L. Pol'y & Ethics J. 395 (2009).Google Scholar
Perlin, Michael L. 'And I See Through Your Brain “: Access to Experts, Competency to Consent, and the Impact of Antipsychotic Medications in Neuroimaging Cases in the Criminal Trial Process, 2009 Stan. Tech. L. Rev. 4 (2009).Google Scholar
Perlin, Michael L. “His Brain Has Been Mismanaged With Great Skill”: How Will Jurors Respond to Neuroimaging Testimony in Insanity Defense Cases?, 42 Akron L. Rev. 885 (2009).Google Scholar
Perlin, Michael L.& McClain, Valerie R., Unasked (and Unanswered) Questions About the Role of Neuroimaging in the Criminal Trial Process, 28 Am. J. Forensic Psychol. (2009).Google Scholar
Pietrini, Pietro& Bambini, Valentina, Homo Ferox: The Contribution of Functional Brain Studies to Understanding the Neural Bases of Aggressive and Criminal Behavior, 32 Int'l J.L. & Psychiatry 259 (2009).Google Scholar
Pontius, Anneliese A. Neuro-Image and Crime Kindled Nonconvulsive Behavioral Seizures in 24th Case of “Limbic Psychotic Trigger Reaction” with Bizarre Infanticide by Parent: Is His Nonvoluntariness Testable by LPTR's Primate Model?, in Neuroscience and Crime: A Special Issue of Neurocase (Psychology Press, Markowitsch, Hans, ed., 2009).Google Scholar
Pustilnik, Amanda C. Violence on the Brain: A Critique of Neuroscience in Criminal Law, 44 Wake Forest L. Rev. 183 (2009).Google Scholar
Rakoff, Jed Lie Detection in the Courts: The Vain Search for the Magic Bullet, in Using Imaging to Identify Deceit 40 (American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 2009).Google Scholar
Reese, Brian Comment: Using fMRI as a Lie Detector - Are We Lying to Ourselves?, 19 Alb. L.J. Sci. & Tech. 205 (2009).Google Scholar
Reinders, A.A. T. Simone Neuroimage and Crime: Cross-examining Dissociative Identity Disorder: Neuroimaging and Tiology on Trial, in Neuroscience and Crime: A Special Issue of Neurocase (Psychology Press, Markowitsch, Hans, ed., 2009).Google Scholar
Robinson, Robert Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals and the Local Construction of Reliability, 19 Alb. L.J. Sci. & TechH. 39 (2009).Google Scholar
Roosa, Steven B. The Next Generation of Artificial Intelligence in Light of In re Bilski, 21 No. 3 Intell. Prop. & Tech. L.J. 6 (2009).Google Scholar
Ross, Catherine J. A Stable Paradigm: Revisiting Capacity, Vulnerability and the Rights Claims of Adolescents after Roper v. Simmons, in Law, Mind and Brain 183 (Ashgate, Freeman, Michael & Goodenough, Oliver R., eds., 2009).Google Scholar
Sanchirico, Chris W. What Makes the Engine Go? Cognitive Limitations and Cross-Examination, 14 Widener L. Rev. 507 (2009).Google Scholar
Sartwelle, Thomas P. Defending a Neurological Birth Injury: Asphyxia Neonatorum Redux, 30 J. Legal Med. 181 (2009).Google Scholar
Sartwelle, Thomas P. Defending a Neurologic Birth Injury: Asphyxia Neonatorum Redux, 30 J. LEGAL MED. 181 (2009).Google Scholar
Sasso, Peggy Criminal Responsibility in the Age of “Mind-Reading”, 46 Am. Crim. L. Rev. 1191 (2009).Google Scholar
Schaller, Barry R. Using Neuroscience in Criminal Law, Gruter Institute Squaw Valley Conference 2009: Law, Behavior & the Brain (2009).Google Scholar
Schauer, Frederick Neuroscience, Lie-Detection, and the Law, 14 Trends in Cognitive Sciences 101 (2009).Google Scholar
Seaman, Julie Black Boxes: fMRI Lie Detection and the Role of the Jury, 42 Akron L. Rev. 931 (2009).Google Scholar
Silva, J. Arturo Forensic Psychiatry, Neuroscience, and the Law, 37 J. Am. Acad. Psychiatry L. 489 (2009).Google Scholar
Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter Neural Lie Detection in Courts, in Using Imaging to Identify Deceit 35 (American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 2009).Google Scholar
Skene, Loane Wilkinson, Dominic, Kahane, Guy, & Savulescu, Julian, Neuroimaging and the Withdrawal of Life-Sustaining Treatment from Google Scholar
Patients in Vegetative State, 17 Med. L. Rev. 245 (2009).Google Scholar
Slobogin, Christopher& Fondacaro, Mark R., Juvenile Justice: The Fourth Option, 95 Iowa L. Rev. 1 (2009).Google Scholar
Slocum, Robin W. The Dilemma of the Vengeful Client: A Prescriptive Framework for Cooling the Flames of Anger, 92 Marq. L. Rev. 481 (2009).Google Scholar
Sousa, David A. How Brain Science Can Make You a Better Lawyer (ABA Publishing 2009).Google Scholar
Spellman, Barbara A. Embodied Rationality, 35 QUEEN'S L.J. 117 (2009).Google Scholar
Spence, S.A.& Kaylor-Hughes, C.J., Looking for the Truth and Finding Lies: The Prospects for a Nascent Neuroimaging of Deception, in Neuroscience and Crime: A Special Issue of Neurocase (Psychology Press, Markowitsch, Hans, ed., 2009).Google Scholar
Spiesel, Christina Reflections on Reading: Words and Pictures and Law, in Law, Mind and Brain 391 (Ashgate, Freeman, Michael & Goodenough, Oliver R., eds., 2009).Google Scholar
Spranger, Tade M. Legal Implications in Connection with the Generation and Usage of Neuro-Scientific Findings, 6 J. Int'l Biotechnology L. 228 (2009).Google Scholar
Stake, Jeffrey E. Just (and Efficient?) Compensation for Governmental Expropriations, in Law, Mind and Brain 299 (Ashgate, Freeman, Michael & Goodenough, Oliver R., eds., 2009).Google Scholar
Stronge, Aaron M. Absolute Truth or Deus Ex Machina? The Legal and Philosophical Ramifications of Guilt-Assessment Technology, 10 J. High Tech. L. 113 (2009).Google Scholar
Strueber, D.& Roth, G., Sex, Aggression and Impulse Control: An Integrative Account, in Neuroscience and Crime: A Special Issue of Neurocase (Psychology Press, Markowitsch, Hans, ed., 2009).Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass R. Some Effects of Moral Indignation on Law, 33 Vt. L. Rev. 405 (2009).Google Scholar
Tesler, Pauline H. Goodbye Homo Economicus: Cognitive Dissonance, Brain Science, and Highly Effective Collaborative Practice, 38 Hofstra L. Rev. 635 (2009).Google Scholar
Torrance, Andrew W. Neurobiology and Patenting Thought, 50 IDEA 27 (2009).Google Scholar
Tovino, Stacey A. Neuroscience and Health Law: An Integrative Approach, 42 Akron L. Rev. 469 (2009).Google Scholar
Tovino, Stacey A. Remarks: Neuroscience, Gender, and the Law, 42 Akron L. Rev. 941 (2009).Google Scholar
Victoroff, Jeff Aggression, Science and Law: The Origins Framework, 32 Int'l J. L. & Psychiatry 189 (2009).Google Scholar
Vincent, Nicole A. Neuroimaging and Responsibility Assessments, _____ Neuroethics _____ (2009).Google Scholar
Vincent, Nicole A. On the Relevance of Neuroscience to Criminal Responsibility, 4 Crim. L. & Philosophy 77 (2009).Google Scholar
Papp, Florian Wagner-von Self-Exclusion Agreements: Should We Be Free not to Be Free to Ruin Ourselves? Gambling, Self-Exclusion Agreements and the Brain, in Law, Mind and Brain 81 (Ashgate, Freeman, Michael & Goodenough, Oliver R., eds., 2009).Google Scholar
Young, Jeffrey E. Bilski and the Transformation of the Brain, 2 No. 2 Landslide 46 (2009).Google Scholar
Aharoni, Eyal Funk, Chadd, Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter & Gazzaniga, Michael, Can Neurological Evidence Help Courts Assess Criminal Responsibility? Lessons from Law and Neuroscience, 1124 Annals N.Y. Acad. Of Sci. 145 (2008).Google Scholar
Arkush, David J. Situating Emotion: A Critical Realist View of Emotion and Nonconscious Cognitive Processes for Law and Legal Theory, 2008 B.Y.U.L. Rev. 1275 (2008).Google Scholar
Brookbanks, Warren Neuroscience, “Folk Psychology”, and the Future of Criminal Responsibility, 2008 N.Z. L. Rev. 623 (2008).Google Scholar
Buckholtz, Joshua W. Asplund, Christopher L., Dux, Paul E., Zald, David H., Gore, John C., Jones, Owen D. & Marois, René, The Neural Correlates of Third Party Punishment, 60 Neuron 930 (2008).Google Scholar
Casper, Stewart M. Cross-Examination of the Defense Expert in a Traumatic Brain Injury Case—No Perry Mason Moments, 1 Ann. 2008 AAJ-CLE 1103 (2008).Google Scholar
Choi, Eun-Kyounget al., Brain Death Revisited: The Case for a National Standard, 36 J.L. Med. & Ethics 824 (2008).Google Scholar
Clark, Steven E.& Wells, Gary L., On The Diagnosticity Of Multiple-Witness Identifications, 32 Law & Hum. Behav. 406 (2008).Google Scholar
Delgado, Mauricio R.& Dilmore, James G., Social and Emotional Influences on Decision Making and the Brain, 9 Minn. J.L. Sci. & Tech. 899 (2008).Google Scholar
Eagleman, David M. Neuroscience and the Law, 45-APR Hous. Law. 36 (2008).Google Scholar
Faulkner, Megan Rational Jury Assessment of Damages Through Neuroeconomics, 32 Law & Psychol. Rev. 163 (2008).Google Scholar
Federspiel, William 1984 Arrives: Thought(Crime), Technology, and the Constitution, 16 Wm. & Mary Bill Rts. J. 865 (2008).Google Scholar
Fruehwald, Edwin S. Behavioral Biology and Constitutional Analysis, 32 Okla. City U. L. Rev. 375 (2008).Google Scholar
Gazzaniga, Michael S. The Law and Neuroscience, 60 Neuron 412 (2008).Google Scholar
Gerard, Eric K. Waiting in the Wings? The Admissibility of Neuroimagery for Lie Detection, 27 Dev. Mental Health L. 1 (2008).Google Scholar
Granacher, Robert P. Applications of Functional Neuroimaging to Civil Litigation of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury, 36 J. Am. Acad. Psychiatry L. 323 (2008).Google Scholar
Greely, Henry T. Neuroscience and Criminal Justice: Not Responsibility But Treatment, 56 U. Kan. L. Rev. 1103 (2008).Google Scholar
Greely, Henry T. Remarks on Human Biological Enhancement, 56 U. Kan. L. Rev. 1139 (2008).Google Scholar
Gurley, Jessica R.& Marcus, David K., The Effects of Neuroimaging and Brain Injury on Insanity Defenses, 26 Behav. Sci. & L. 85 (2008).Google Scholar
Haushofer, Johannes& Fehr, Ernst, You Shouldn't Have: Your Brain on Others’ Crimes, 60 Neuron 735 (2008).Google Scholar
Herring, Jonathan Kinship Foster Care: Implications of Behavioral Biology Research, 56 Buff. L. Rev. 495 (2008).Google Scholar
Holloway, Matthew B. One Image, One Thousand Incriminating Words: Images of Brain Activity and the Privilege Against Self-incrimination, 27 Temp. J. Sci. Tech. & Envtl. L. 141 (2008).Google Scholar
Huang, Peter H. How Do Securities Laws Influence Affect, Happiness, & Trust?, 3 J. Bus. & Tech. L. 257 (2008).Google Scholar
Illes, Judy& Chin, Vivian, Bridging Philosophical and Practical Implications of Incidental Findings in Brain Research, 36 J.L. Med. & Ethics 298 (2008).Google Scholar
Jones, Owen D. Buckholtz, Joshua W., Schall, Jeffrey D. & Marois, Rene, Law, Biology, and Property: A New Theory of the Endowment Effect, 49 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 1935 (2008).Google Scholar
Keil, Frank C. Getting to the Truth, 73 Brook. L. Rev. 1035 (2008).Google Scholar
Leal, Manuel D. Why There Is Disobedience of Court Orders: Contempt of Court and Neuroeconomics, 26 QLR 1015 (2008).Google Scholar
Lekovic, Gregory P. Neuroscience and the Law, 69 Surgical Neurology 99 (2008).Google Scholar
Leslie, Jeanne M. Understanding Addiction, Helping Clients and Colleagues, 69 Ala. Law. 348 (2008).Google Scholar
Lijtmaer, Martin The Felony Murder Rule in Illinois: The Injustice of the Proximate Cause Theory Explored via Research in Cognitive Psychology, 98 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 621 (2008).Google Scholar
Linden, David J. Brain Evolution and Human Cognition: The Accidental Mind, 45 Willamette L. Rev. 17 (2008).Google Scholar
Marks, Jonathan H. Interrogation Using Functional MRI and Cognitive Engrams, 2008 J. Inst. Just. Int'l Stud. 31 (2008).Google Scholar
Merikangas, James R. Functional MRI Lie Detection, 36 J. Am. Acad. Psychiatry L. 499 (2008).Google Scholar
Milstein, Alan C. Research Malpractice and the Issue of Incidental Findings, 36 J.L. Med. & Ethics 356 (2008).Google Scholar
Moriarty, Jane Campbell Flickering Admissibility: Neuroimaging Evidence in the U.S. Courts, 26 Behav. Sci. & L. 29 (2008).Google Scholar
Morse, Stephen J. Determinism and the Death of Folk Psychology: Two Challenges to Responsibility from Neuroscience, 9 Minn. J.L. Sci. & Tech. 1 (2008).Google Scholar
Morse, Stephen J. Vice, Disorder, Conduct and Culpability, 5 Philosophy, Psychiatry, & Psychology 47 (2008).Google Scholar
Morse, Stephen J. Psychopathy and Criminal Responsibility, 1 Neuroethics 205 (2008).Google Scholar
Nelson, Charles A. Incidental Findings in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Brain Research, 36 J.L. Med. & Ethics 315 (2008).Google Scholar
New, John G. If You Could Read My Mind: Implications of Neurological Evidence for Twenty-First Century Criminal Jurisprudence, 29 J. Legal Med. 179 (2008).Google Scholar
Osburn, Alexis Immunizing Against Addiction: The Argument for Incorporating Emerging Anti-Addiction Vaccines into Existing Compulsory Immunization Statutes, 56 Clev. St. L. Rev. 159 (2008).Google Scholar
Rakoff, Jed S. Science and the Law: Uncomfortable Bedfellows, 38 Seton Hall L. Rev. 1379 (2008).Google Scholar
Ram, Natalie Tiered Consent and the Tyranny of Choice, 48 Jurimetrics 253 (2008).Google Scholar
Rapp, Geoffrey The Wreckage of Recklessness, 86 Wash. U. L. Rev. 111 (2008).Google Scholar
Richland, Lindsey Ethnography and Cognitive Psychology: Shared Dilemmas of the Local and Unlocatable, 31 PoLar: Pol. & Legal Anthropology Rev. 48 (2008).Google Scholar
Roskies, Adina Neuroimaging and Inferential Distance, 1 Neuroethics 1874 (2008).Google Scholar
Royal, Jason M.& Peterson, Braley S., The Risks and Benefits of Searching for Incidental Findings in MRI Research Scans, 36 J.L. Med. & Ethics 305 (2008).Google Scholar
Schmeiser, Susan R. The Ungovernable Citizen: Psychopathy, Sexuality, and the Rise of Medico-Legal Reasoning, 20 Yale J.L. & Human. 163 (2008).Google Scholar
Sifferd, Katrina L. Nanotechnology and the Attribution of Responsibility, 5 Nanotechnology L. & Bus. 177 (2008).Google Scholar
Simpson, Joseph R. Functional MRI Lie Detection: Too Good to Be True?, 36 J. Am. Acad. Psychiatry L. 491 (2008).Google Scholar
Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter Roskies, Adina, Brown, Teneille & Murphy, Emily, Brain Images as Legal Evidence, 5 Episteme 359 (2008).Google Scholar
Tonsing, Michael J. Truth Detection via Polygraphs and fMRIs, 55-AUG Fed. Law. 10 (2008).Google Scholar
Tovino, Stacey A. Neuroimaging Research into Disorders of Consciousness: Moral Imperative or Ethical and Legal Failure?, 13 Va. J.L. & Tech. 2 (2008).Google Scholar
Tovino, Stacey A. The Impact of Neuroscience on Health Law, 1 Neuroethics 73 (2008).Google Scholar
Tripathi, Surya M. Advances in Neuroscience and Evidentiary Value of Brain Mapping: A Legal Debate, 29 Indian J. Criminology & Criminalistics 1 (2008).Google Scholar
Tushnet, Rebecca Gone In Sixty Milliseconds: Trademark Law and Cognitive Science, 86 Tex. L. Rev. 507 (2008).Google Scholar
Uttal, William R. Neuroscience in the Courtroom: What Every Lawyer Should Know about the Mind and the Brain (Lawyers & Judges Publishing Company 2008).Google Scholar
Vincent, Nicole A. Responsibility, Dysfuncton and Capacity, 1 Neuroethics 199 (2008).Google Scholar
Vrij, Aldertet al., Increasing Cognitive Load to Facilitate Lie Detection: The Benefit of Recalling an Event in Reverse Order, 32 Law & Hum. Behav. 253 (2008).Google Scholar
Weisberg, Deena S.et al., The Seductive Allure of Neuroscience Explanations, 20 J. Cognitive Neuroscience 470 (2008).Google Scholar
Wells, Gary L. Field Experiments on Eyewitness Identification: Towards a Better Understanding of Pitfalls and Prospects, 32 Law & Hum. Behav. 6 (2008).Google Scholar
White, Stephen E. Brave New World: Neurowarfare and the Limits of International Humanitarian Law, 41 Cornell Int'l L.J. 177 (2008).Google Scholar
Wolf, Susan M. Managing Incidental Findings in Human Subjects Research: Analysis and Recommendations, 36 J.L. Med. & Ethics 219 (2008).Google Scholar
Wolf, Susan M.et al., The Challenge of Incidental Findings, 36 J. L. Med. & Ethics 216 (2008).Google Scholar
Wolf, Susan Neurolaw: The Big Question, 8 Am. J. Bioethics 21 (2008).Google Scholar
Wortzel, Hal S.& Arciniegas, David B., Amnesia and Crime: A Neuropsychiatric Response, 36 J. Am. Acad. Psychiatry L. 218 (2008).Google Scholar
Wright, Beth Ann Preserving the Social Contract: Translating Academic Education into Professional Practice Through Contemporary Cognitive Theories, 11 T.M. Cooley J. Prac. & Clinical L. 17 (2008).Google Scholar
Yang, Yaling Glenn, Andrea L. & Raine, Adrian, Brain Abnormalities in Antisocial Individuals: Implications for the Law, 26 Behav. Sci. & L. 65 (2008).Google Scholar
Allen, Stephanie W. Law Firm Leadership on the Neuro Frontier, 26 No. 2 Of Counsel 10 (2007).Google Scholar
Annas, George J. Foreword: Imagining a New Era of Neuroimaging, Neuroethics, and Neurolaw, 33 Am. J.L. & Med. 163 (2007).Google Scholar
Appelbaum, Paul S. The New Lie Detectors: Neuroscience, Deception, and the Courts, 58 Psychiatry Servs. 460 (2007).Google Scholar
Aronson, Jay D. Brain Imaging, Culpability and the Juvenile Death Penalty, 13 Psychol. Pub. Pol'y & L. 115 (2007).Google Scholar
Arrigo, Bruce A. Punishment, Freedom, and the Culture of Control: The Case of Brain Imaging and the Law, 33 Am. J.L. & Med. 457 (2007).Google Scholar
Barth, Abram S. A Double-Edged Sword: The Role of Neuroimaging in Federal Capital Sentencing, 33 Am. J.L. & Med. 501 (2007).Google Scholar
Baskin, Joseph H. Edersheim, Judith G. & Price, Bruce H., Is a Picture Worth a Thousand Words? Neuroimaging in the Courtroom, 33 Am. J.L. & Med. 239 (2007).Google Scholar
Bellin, Jeffrey Significance (If Any) for the Federal Criminal Justice System of Advances in Lie Detector Technology, 80 Temp. L. Rev. 711 (2007).Google Scholar
Jeremy, A.Blumenthal, Emotional Paternalism, 35 Fla. St. U. L. Rev. 1 (2007).Google Scholar
Bourget, Dominique& Whitehurst, Laurie, Amnesia and Crime, 35 J. Am. Acad. Psychiatry L. 469 (2007).Google Scholar
Caulum, Melissa S. Postadolescent Brain Development: A Disconnect Between Neuroscience, Emerging Adults, and the Corrections System, 2007 Wis. L. Rev. 729 (2007).Google Scholar
Chan, Erik D. The Food and Drug Administration and the Future of the Brain-Computer Interface: Adapting FDA Device Law to the Challenges of Human-Machine Enhancement, 25 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 117 (2007).Google Scholar
Covey, Russell Reconsidering the Relationship Between Cognitive Psychology and Plea Bargaining, 91 Marq. L. Rev. 213 (2007).Google Scholar
Dyer, Charles R. The Queen of Chula Vista: Stories of Self-Represented Litigants and a Call for Using Cognitive Linguistics to Work With Them, 99 Law Libr. J. 717 (2007).Google Scholar
Erickson, Steven K.& Felthous, Alan R., Daubert's Bipolar Treatment Of Scientific Expert Testimony–From Frye's Polygraph To Farwell's Brain Fingerprinting, 55 Drake L. Rev. 763 (2007).Google Scholar
Feigenson, Neal& Sherwin, Richard K., Thinking Beyond the Shown: Implicit Inferences in Evidence and Argument, 6 Law, Probability & Risk 295 (2007).Google Scholar
Fradella, Henry F. Why Judges Should Admit Expert Testimony on the Unreliability of Eyewitness Testimony, 2 Fed. Cts. L. Rev. 1 (2007).Google Scholar
Goldberg, Steven MRIs and the Perception of Risk, 33 Am. J.L. & Med. 229 (2007).Google Scholar
Greely, Henry T.& Illes, Judy, Neuroscience-Based Lie Detection: The Urgent Need For Regulation, 33 Am. J.L. & Med. 377 (2007).Google Scholar
Grey, Betsy J. Neuroscience, Emotional Harm, and Emotional Distress Tort Claims, 1 Am. J. Bioethics 65 (2007).Google Scholar
Guthrie, Chris Blinking On The Bench: How Judges Decide Cases, 93 Cornell L. Rev. 1 (2007).Google Scholar
Halliburton, Christian M. Letting Katz Out of the Bag: Cognitive Freedom and Fourth Amendment Fidelity, 59 Hastings L.J. 309 (2007).Google Scholar
Joffe, Ari R. The Neurological Determination of Death: What Does It Really Mean?, 23 Issues L. & Med. 119 (2007).Google Scholar
Johnson, Lydia D. Mind, Metaphor, Law, 58 Mercer L. Rev. 845 (2007).Google Scholar
Kelly, Rachael Childhood Neglect and Its Effects on Neurodevelopment: Suggestions for Future Law and Policy, 8 Hous. J. Health L. & Pol'y 133 (2007).Google Scholar
Khoshbin, Laura S.& Khoshbin, Shahram, Imaging the Mind, Minding the Image: A Historical Introduction to Brain Imaging and the Law, 33 Am. J.L. & Med. 171 (2007).Google Scholar
Kittay, Leo Admissibility of fMRI Lie Detection, 72 Brook. L. Rev. 1351 (2007).Google Scholar
Kolber, Adam J. Pain Detection and the Privacy of Subjective Experience, 33 Am. J.L. & Med. 433 (2007).Google Scholar
Kulynych, Jennifer The Regulation of MR Neuroimaging Research: Disentangling the Gordian Knot, 33 Am. J.L. & Med. 295 (2007).Google Scholar
Kulynych, Jennifer J. Some Thoughts about the Evaluation of Non-Clinical Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 7 Am. J. Bioethics 57 (2007).Google Scholar
Levinson, Justin D. Forgotten Racial Equality: Implicit Bias, Decisionmaking, and Misremembering, 57 Duke L.J. 345 (2007).Google Scholar
Loue, Sana& Ioan, Beatrice, Legal and Ethical Issues in Heroin Diagnosis, Treatment, and Research, 28 J. Legal Med. 193 (2007).Google Scholar
Mahlmann, Matthias Ethics, Law and the Challenge of Cognitive Science, 8 German L.J. 577 (2007).Google Scholar
Marks, Donald H. Interrogational Neuroimaging In Counterterrorism: A “No-Brainer” or a Human Rights Hazard?, 33 Am. J.L. & Med. 483 (2007).Google Scholar
McGee, Ellen M Should There Be A Law? Brain Chips: Ethical and Policy Issues, 24 T.M. Cooley L. Rev. 81 (2007).Google Scholar
Merkel, Reinhard Boer, G., Fegert, J., Galert, T., Hartmann, D., Nuttin, B., Rosahl, S., & Wuetscher, F., Intervening in the Brain: Changing Psyche and Society (Springer 2007).Google Scholar
Mishler, Carl F. How Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) Will Change the Legal Profession - A View from the United States of America, 9 Eur. J.L. Reform 17 (2007).Google Scholar
Moffatt, Gregory K.& Smith, Savannah L., Childhood Exposure to Conjugal Violence: Consequences for Behavioral and Neural Development, 56 DePaul L. Rev. 879 (2007).Google Scholar
Morse, Stephen J. Criminal Responsibility and the Disappearing Person, 28 Cardozo L. Rev. 2545 (2007).Google Scholar
Morse, Stephen J. The Uneasy Entente Between Legal Insanity and Mens Rea: Beyond Clark v. Arizona, 97 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 1071 (2007).Google Scholar
Murphy, Nancey& Brown, Warren S., Did My Neurons Make Me Do It? Philosophical and Neurobiological Perspectives on Moral Resonsibility and Free Will (Oxford Univ. Press 2007).Google Scholar
Niehoff, Debra Invisible Scars: The Neurobiological Consequences of Child Abuse, 56 DePaul L. Rev. 847 (2007).Google Scholar
Patel, Purvaket al., The Role of Imaging in United States Courtrooms, 17 Neuroimaging Clinics N. Am. 557 (2007).Google Scholar
Pettit, Mark Jr., fMRI and BF Meet FRE: Brain Imaging and the Federal Rules of Evidence, 33 Am. J.L. & Med. 319 (2007).Google Scholar
Pockett, Susan The Concept of Free Will: Philosophy, Neuroscience and the Law, 25 Behav. Sci. & L. 281 (2007).Google Scholar
Prohaska, Mark L.& Martin, David P., Obtaining Neuropsychological Test Data: Why Is This So Hard?, 68 Ala. Law. 216 (2007).Google Scholar
Radulovic, Jelena& Stankovic, Bratislav, Genetic Determinants of Emotional Behavior: Legal Lessons from Genetic Models, 56 DePaul L. Rev. 823 (2007).Google Scholar
Roberts, Alexandra J. Everything New is Old Again: Brain Fingerprinting and Evidentiary Analogy, 9 Yale J.L. & Tech. 234 (2007).Google Scholar
Robinson, Paul H.& Darley, John M., The Origins of Shared Intuitions of Justice, 60 Vand. L. Rev. 1633 (2007).Google Scholar
Robinson, Paul H. Kurzban, Robert O. & Jones, Owen D., Intuitions of Justice: Implications for Criminal Law and Justice Policy, 81 S. Cal. L. Rev. 1 (2007).Google Scholar
Sasso, Peggy Implementing the Death Penalty: The Moral Implications of Recent Advances in Neuropsychology, 29 Cardozo L. Rev. 765 (2007).Google Scholar
Slovic, Paul Affect, Reason, and Mere Hunches, 4 J.L. Econ. & Pol'y 191 (2007).Google Scholar
Snead, O. Carter Neuroimaging and the “Complexity” of Capital Punishment, 82 N.Y.U.L. Rev. 1265 (2007).Google Scholar
Snodgrass, Laura B.& Justice, Brad, “Death Is Different”: Limits on the Imposition of the Death Penalty to Traumatic Brain Injuries, 26 Dev. Mental Health L. 81 (2007).Google Scholar
Stoller, Sarah E.& Wolpe, Paul R., Emerging Neurotechnologies For Lie Detection and The Fifth Amendment, 33 Am. J.L. & Med. 359 (2007).Google Scholar
Stucke, Maurice E. Behavioral Economists at the Gate: Antitrust in the Twenty-First Century, 38 Loy. U. Chi. L.J. 513 (2007).Google Scholar
Suzuki, Carol M. Unpacking Pandora's Box: Innovating Techniques for Effectively Counseling Asylum Applicants Suffering from Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder, 4 Hastings Race & Poverty L. J. 235 (2007).Google Scholar
Tancredi, Laurence R.& Brodie, Jonathan D., The Brain and Behavior: Limitations in the Legal Use of Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 33 Am. J.L. & Med. 271 (2007).Google Scholar
Thompson, Robert B. Brave New World of Interrogation Jurisprudence?, 33 Am. J.L. & Med. 341 (2007).Google Scholar
Tovino, Stacey A. Imaging Body Structure and Mapping Brain Function: A Historical Approach, 33 Am. J.L. & Med. 193 (2007).Google Scholar
Tovino, Stacey A. Functional Neuroimaging Information: A Case for Neuro Exceptionalism?, 34 Fla. St. U. L. Rev. 415 (2007).Google Scholar
Truog, Robert D. Brain Death – Too Flawed to Endure, too Ingrained to Abandon, 35 J.L. Med. & Ethics 273 (2007).Google Scholar
Wardle, Lynn D. The Biological Causes and Consequences of Homosexual Behavior and Their Relevance for Family Law Policies, 56 DePaul L. Rev. 997 (2007).Google Scholar
Alexander, Archie A. Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Lie Detection: Is a “Brainstorm” Heading Toward the “Gatekeeper”?, 7 Hous. J. Health L. & Pol'y 1 (2006).Google Scholar
Baird, Abigail A.& Fugelsang, Jonathan A., The Emergence of Consequential Thought: Evidence from Neuroscience, in Law and the Brain 245 (Oxford Univ. Press, Zeki, Semir & Goodenough, Oliver, eds., 2006).Google Scholar
Barillare, Jody C. As Its Next Witness, the State Calls … the Defendant: Brain Fingerprinting As “Testimonial” Under the Fifth Amendment, 79 Temp. L. Rev. 971 (2006).Google Scholar
Bauermeister, Don C. Responding to Juror Bias—Gaining Insight From Cognitive Neuroscience, Winter 2006 ATLA-CLE 89 (2006).Google Scholar
Beecher-Monas, Erica& Garcia-Rill, Edgar, Genetic Predictions of Future Dangerousness: Is There a Blueprint for Violence?, 69-SPG Law & Contemp. Probs. 301 (2006).Google Scholar
Beschle, Donald L. Cognitive Dissonance Revisited: Roper v. Simmons and the Issue of Adolescent Decision-Making Competence, 52 Wayne L. Rev. 1 (2006).Google Scholar
Burke, Alafair S. Improving Prosecutorial Decision Making: Some Lessons of Cognitive Science, 47 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 1587 (2006).Google Scholar
Camerer, Colin F. Wanting, Liking, and Learning: Neuroscience and Paternalism, 73 U. Chi. L. Rev. 87 (2006).Google Scholar
Chorvat, Terrence& McCabe, Kevin, The Brain and the Law, in Law and the Brain 113 (Oxford Univ. Press, Zeki, Semir & Goodenough, Oliver, eds., 2006).Google Scholar
Deaton, Rodney J. S. Neuroscience and the In Corpore-ted First Amendment, 4 First Amend. L. Rev. 181 (2006).Google Scholar
Denno, Deborah W. Revisiting the Legal Link Between Genetics and Crime, 69 Law & Contemp. Probs. 209 (2006).Google Scholar
Drobac, Jennifer A. “Developing Capacity”: Adolescent “Consent” at Work, at Law, and in the Sciences of the Mind, 10 U.C. Davis J. Juv. L. & Pol'y 1 (2006).Google Scholar
Epstein, Richard A. Behavioral Economics: Human Errors and Market Correction, 73 U. Chi. L. Rev. 111 (2006).Google Scholar
Fallon, James H. Neuroanatomical Background to Understanding the Brain of the Young Psychopath, 3 Ohio St. J. Crim. L. 341 (2006).Google Scholar
Farahany, Nita A.& Coleman, James E. Jr., Genetics and Responsibility: To Know the Criminal From the Crime, 69 Law & Contemp. Probs. 115 (2006).Google Scholar
Feigenson, Neal Brain Imaging and Courtroom Evidence: On the Admissibility and Persuasiveness of fMRI, 2/3 Int'l J. of L. in Context 233 (2006).Google Scholar
Fruehwald, Edwin S. The Emperor Has No Clothes: Postmodern Legal Thought and Cognitive Science, 23 Ga. St. U. L. Rev. 375 (2006).Google Scholar
Fugelsang, Jonathan A.& Dunbar, Kevin N., A Cognitive Neuroscience Framework for Understanding Causal Reasoning and the Law, in Law and the Brain 157 (Oxford Univ. Press, Zeki, Semir & Goodenough, Oliver, eds., 2006).Google Scholar
Garland, Brent& Frankel, Mark S., Considering Convergence: A Policy Dialogue About Behavioral Genetics, Neuroscience, and Law, 69-SPG Law & Contemp. Probs. 101 (2006).Google Scholar
Garland, Brent& Glimcher, Paul W., Cognitive Neuroscience and the Law, 16 Neurobiology 130 (2006).Google Scholar
Goodenough, Oliver R.& Prehn, Kristin, A Neuroscientific Approach to Normative Judgment in Law and Justice, in Law and The Brain 77 (Oxford Univ. Press, Zeki, Semir & Goodenough, Oliver, eds., 2006).Google Scholar
Goodenough, Oliver R. Responsibility and Punishment: Whose Mind? A Response, in Law and the Brain 259 (Oxford Univ. Press, Zeki, Semir & Goodenough, Oliver, eds., 2006).Google Scholar
Greely, Henry T. Neuroethics and ELSI: Similarities and Differences, 7 Minn. J.L. Sci. & Tech. 599 (2006).Google Scholar
Greene, Joshua& Cohen, Jonathan, For the Law, Neuroscience Changes Nothing and Everything, in Law and the Brain 207 (Oxford Univ. Press, Zeki, Semir & Goodenough, Oliver, eds., 2006).Google Scholar
Greenwald, Anthony G.& Krieger, Linda Hamilton, Implicit Bias: Scientific Foundations, 94 Cal. L. Rev. 945 (2006).Google Scholar
Gruber, Staci A.& Yurgelun-Todd, Deborah A., Neurobiology and The Law: A Role in Juvenile Justice?, 3 Ohio St. J. Crim. L. 321 (2006).Google Scholar
Heller, Kevin J. The Cognitive Psychology of Circumstantial Evidence, 105 Mich. L. Rev. 241 (2006).Google Scholar
Hinde, Robert A. Law and the Sources of Morality, in Law and the Brain 37 (Oxford Univ. Press, Zeki, Semir & Goodenough, Oliver, eds., 2006).Google Scholar
Hoffman, Morris B. The Neuroeconomic Path of the Law, in Law And The Brain 3 (Oxford Univ. Press, Zeki, Semir & Goodenough, Oliver, eds., 2006).Google Scholar
Holley, Benjamin How Reversible Is Methamphetamine-Related Brain Damage?, 82 N.D. L. Rev. 1135 (2006).Google Scholar
Jones, Owen D. Law, Evolution, and the Brain: Applications and Open Questions, in Law and the Brain 57 (Oxford Univ. Press, Zeki, Semir & Goodenough, Oliver, eds., 2006).Google Scholar
Jones, Owen D.& Goldsmith, Timothy H., Behavioral Genetics and Crime, in Context, 69 Law & Contemp. Probs. 81 (2006).Google Scholar
Kaye, D. H. Behavioral Genetics Research and Criminal DNA Databases, 69 Law & Contemp. Probs. 259 (2006).Google Scholar
Keckler, Charles N.W. Cross-Examining the Brain: A Legal Analysis of Neural Imaging for Credibility Impeachment, 57 Hastings L.J. 509 (2006).Google Scholar
Kolber, Adam J. Therapeutic Forgetting: The Legal and Ethical Implications of Memory Dampening, 59 Vand. L. Rev. 1561 (2006).Google Scholar
Maroney, Terry A. Emotional Competence, “Rational Understanding,” and the Criminal Defendant, 43 Am. Crim. L. Rev. 1375 (2006).Google Scholar
McCormick, Brian Your Thoughts May Deceive You: The Constitutional Implications of Brain Fingerprinting Technology and How It May Be Used to Secure Our Skies, 30 Law & Psychol. Rev. 171 (2006).Google Scholar
Mitchell, Gregory& Tetlock, Philip E., Antidiscrimination Law and the Perils of Mindreading, 67 Ohio St. L.J. 1023 (2006).Google Scholar
Morse, Stephen J. Brain Overclaim Syndrome and Criminal Responsibility: A Diagnostic Note, 3 Ohio St. J. Crim. L. 397 (2006).Google Scholar
Morse, Stephen J.& Hoffman, Morris B., Addiction, Genetics and Criminal Responsibility, 69 Law & Contemp. Probs. 165 (2006).Google Scholar
Murphy, Richard W. Neurocongress, 37 Seton Hall L. Rev. 221 (2006).Google Scholar
Oberstar, Joel V. Anderson, Elise M. & Jensen, Jonathan B., Cognitive and Moral Development, Brain Development, and Mental Illness: Important Considerations for the Juvenile Justice System, 32 Wm. Mitchell L. Rev. 1051 (2006).Google Scholar
O'Hara, Erin A. How Neuroscience Might Advance the Law, in Law and the Brain 21 (Oxford Univ. Press, Zeki, Semir & Goodenough, Oliver, eds., 2006).Google Scholar
Pardo, Michael S.& Patterson, Dennis, Neuroscience Evidence, Legal Culture, and Criminal Procedure, 33 Am. J. Crim. L. 301 (2006).Google Scholar
Purdy, Jedediah S. The Promise (and Limits) of Neuroeconomics, 58 Ala. L. Rev. 1 (2006).Google Scholar
Racine, Eric Bar-Ilan, Ofek & Illes, Judy, fMRI In the Public Eye, 6 Nature 159 (2006).Google Scholar
Redding, Richard E. The Brain-Disordered Defendant: Neuroscience and Legal Insanity in the Twenty-First Century, 56 Am. U. L. Rev. 51 (2006).Google Scholar
Rothenberg, Karen and Wang, Alice, The Scarlet Gene: Behavioral Genetics, Criminal Law, and Racial and Ethnic Stigma, 69 Law & Contemp. Probs. 343 (2006).Google Scholar
Sapolsky, Robert M. The Frontal Cortex and the Criminal Justice System, in Law and the Brain 227 (Oxford Univ. Press, Zeki, Semir & Goodenough, Oliver, eds., 2006).Google Scholar
Sherwin, Richard K. Feigenson, Neal & Spiesel, Christina O., Law in the Digital Age: How Visual Communication Technologies are Transforming the Practice, Theory, and Teaching of Law, 12 B.U. J. Sci. & Tech. L. 227 (2006).Google Scholar
Spence, Sean A.et al., A Cognitive Neurobiological Account of Deception: Evidence From Functional Neuroimaging, in Law and the Brain 169 (Oxford Univ. Press, Zeki, Semir & Goodenough, Oliver, eds., 2006).Google Scholar
Stake, Jeffrey E. The Property “Instinct”, in Law and the Brain 185 (Oxford Univ. Press, Zeki, Semir & Goodenough, Oliver, eds., 2006).Google Scholar
Taylor, Erich A New Wave of Police Interrogation? “Brain Fingerprinting,” the Constitutional Privilege Against Self-incrimination, and Hearsay Jurisprudence, 2006 U. Ill. J.L. Tech. & Pol'y 287 (2006).Google Scholar
Thompson, Sean K. My Brain Made Me Do It, 2006-FEB Legal Aff. 50 (2006).Google Scholar
Zak, Paul J. Neuroeconomics, in Law and the Brain 133 (Oxford Univ. Press, Zeki, Semir & Goodenough, Oliver, eds., 2006).Google Scholar
Zeki, Semir& Goodenough, Oliver, eds., Law and the Brain (Oxford University Press 2006).Google Scholar
Appelbaum, Paul S. Behavioral Genetics and the Punishment of Crime, 56 Law & Psychiatry 25 (2005).Google Scholar
Blasi, Gary L. What Lawyers Know: Lawyering Expertise, Cognitive Science, and the Functions of Theory, 45 J. Legal Educ. 313 (2005).Google Scholar
Blumenthal, Jeremy A. Law and the Emotions: The Problems of Affective Forecasting, 80 Ind. L.J. 155 (2005).Google Scholar
Buller, Tom Brains, Lies, and Psychological Explanations, in Neuroethics: Defining the Issues in Theory, Practice and Policy 51 (Oxford Univ. Press, Illes, Judy, ed., 2005).Google Scholar
Canli, Turhan When Genes and Brains Unite: Ethical Implications of Genomic Neuroimaging, in Neuroethics: Defining the Issues in Theory, Practice and Policy 169 (Oxford Univ. Press, Illes, Judy, ed., 2005).Google Scholar
Chorvat, Terrence R.& McCabe, Kevin A., Neuroeconomics and Rationality, 80 Chi.-Kent L. Rev. 1235 (2005).Google Scholar
Chorvat, Terrence R. McCabe, Kevin A. & Smith, Vernon L., Law and Neuroeconomics, 13 Sup. Ct. Econ. Rev. 35 (2005).Google Scholar
Churchland, Patricia S. Moral Decision-making and the Brain, in Neuroethics: Defining the Issues in Theory, Practice and Policy 3 (Oxford Univ. Press, Illes, Judy, ed., 2005).Google Scholar
Farah, Martha J. Noble, Kimberly G. & Hurt, H., Poverty, Privilege and the Developing Brain: Empirical Findings and Ethical Implications, in Neuroethics: Defining the Issues in Theory, Practice and Policy 277 (Oxford Univ. Press, Illes, Judy, ed., 2005).Google Scholar
Farah, Martha J. Neuroethics: The Practical and the Philosophical, 9 Trends in Cognitive Sciences 34 (2005).Google Scholar
Ford, Paul J.& Henderson, Jaimie, Functional Neurosurgical Intervention: Neuroethics in the Operating Room, in Neuroethics: Defining the Issues in Theory, Practice and Policy 213 (Oxford Univ. Press, Illes, Judy, ed., 2005).Google Scholar
Foster, Kenneth R. Engineering the Mind, in Neuroethics: Defining the Issues in Theory, Practice and Policy 185 (Oxford Univ. Press, Illes, Judy, ed., 2005).Google Scholar
Gazzaniga, Michael S. Facts, Fictions and the Future of Neuroethics, in Neuroethics: Defining the Issues in Theory, Practice and Policy 141 (Oxford Univ. Press, Illes, Judy, ed., 2005).Google Scholar
Greely, Henry T. The Social Effects of Advances in Neuroscience: Legal Problems, Legal Perspectives, in Neuroethics: Defining the Issues in Theory, Practice and Policy 245 (Oxford Univ. Press, Illes, Judy, ed., 2005).Google Scholar
Green, Ron M. From Genome to Brainome: Charting Lessons Learned, in Neuroethics: Defining the Issues in Theory, Practice and Policy 105 (Oxford Univ. Press, Illes, Judy, ed., 2005).Google Scholar
Huang, Peter H. Moody Investing and the Supreme Court: Rethinking the Materiality of Information and the Reasonableness of Investors, 13 Sup. Ct. Econ. Rev. 99 (2005).Google Scholar
Illes, Judy ed., Neuroethics: Defining the Issues in Theory, Practice and Policy (Oxford University Press 2005).Google Scholar
Illes, Judy Racine, Eric & Kirschen, Matthew P., A Picture is Worth 1000 Words, but Which 1000?, in Neuroethics: Defining the Issues in Theory, Practice and Policy 149 (Oxford Univ. Press, Illes, Judy, ed., 2005).Google Scholar
Jaworska, Agnieszka Ethical Dilemmas in Neurodegenerative Disease: Respecting the Margins of Agency, in Neuroethics: Defining the Issues in Theory, Practice and Policy 87 (Oxford Univ. Press, Illes, Judy, ed., 2005).Google Scholar
Jones, Owen D.& Kurzban, Robert, Law and Behavioral Biology, 105 Colum. L. Rev. 405 (2005).Google Scholar
Kaufman, Paul M. Protecting the Objectivity, Fairness, and Integrity of Neuropsychological Evaluations in Litigation, 26 J. Legal Med. 95 (2005).Google Scholar
Klitzman, Robert Clinicians, Patients and the Brain, in Neuroethics: Defining the Issues in Theory, Practice and Policy 229 (Oxford Univ. Press, Illes, Judy, ed., 2005).Google Scholar
Miller, Franklin G.& Fins, Joseph, Protecting Human Subjects in Brain Research: A Pragmatic Perspective, in Neuroethics: Defining the Issues in Theory, Practice and Policy 123 (Oxford Univ. Press, Illes, Judy, ed., 2005).Google Scholar
Grainger-Monsen, Maren& Karetsky, Kim, The Mind in the Movies: A Neuroethical Analysis of the Portrayal of the Mind in Popular Media, in Neuroethics: Defining the Issues in Theory, Practice and Policy 297 (Oxford Univ. Press, Illes, Judy, ed., 2005).Google Scholar
Morse, Stephen J. Moral and Legal Responsibility and the New Neuroscience, in Neuroethics: Defining the Issues in Theory, Practice and Policy 33 (Oxford Univ. Press, Illes, Judy, ed., 2005).Google Scholar
Nolan, Donald J.& Pankovits, Tressa A., High-Tech Proof in Brain Injury Cases, 41-JUN Trial 27 (2005).Google Scholar
Parens, Erik Creativity, Gratitude and the Enhancement Debate: On the Fertile Tension Between Two Ethical Frameworks, in Neuroethics: Defining the Issues in Theory, Practice and Policy 75 (Oxford Univ. Press, Illes, Judy, ed., 2005).Google Scholar
Rightmer, Tracy Arrested Development: Juveniles’ Immature Brains Make Them Less Culpable Than Adults, 9 Quinnipiac Health L.J. 1 (2005).Google Scholar
Roskies, Adina A Case Study in Neuroethics: The Nature of Moral Judgment, in Neuroethics: Defining the Issues in Theory, Practice and Policy 17 (Oxford Univ. Press, Illes, Judy, ed., 2005).Google Scholar
Rothstein, Mark A. Applications of Behavioural Genetics: Outpacing the Science?, 6 Nature Reviews 793 (2005).Google Scholar
Saunders, Kevin W. A Disconnect Between Law and Neuroscience: Modern Brain Science, Media Influences, and Juvenile Justice, 2005 Utah L. Rev. 695 (2005).Google Scholar
Shepherd, Robert E. The Relevance of Brain Research to Juvenile Defense, 19-WTR Crim. Just. 51 (2005).Google Scholar
Sheridan, Kim Zinchenko, Elena & Gardner, Howard, Neuroethics in Education, in Neuroethics: Defining the Issues in Theory, Practice and Policy 265 (Oxford Univ. Press, Illes, Judy, ed., 2005).Google Scholar
Steven, Megan S.& Pascual-Leone, Alvaro, Trascranial Magnetic Stimulation and the Human Brain: An Ethical Evaluation, in Neuroethics: Defining the Issues in Theory, Practice and Policy 201 (Oxford Univ. Press, Illes, Judy, ed., 2005).Google Scholar
Thompson, Nicholas The Legality of the Use of Psychiatric Neuroimaging in Intelligence Interrogation, 90 Cornell L. Rev. 1601 (2005).Google Scholar
Tovino, Stacey A.& Winslade, William J., A Primer on the Law and Ethics of Treatment, Research, and Public Policy in the Context of Severe Traumatic Brain Injury, 14 Annals Health L. 1 (2005).Google Scholar
Tovino, Stacey A. The Confidentiality and Privacy Implications of Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 33 J.L. Med. & Ethics 844 (2005).Google Scholar
Weinstein, Janet& Weinstein, Ricardo, “I Know Better Than That”: The Role of Emotions and the Brain in Family Law Disputes, 7 J. L. & Fam. Stud. 351 (2005).Google Scholar
Wolpe, Paul R. Religious Responses to Neuroscientific Questions, in Neuroethics: Defining the Issues in Theory, Practice and Policy 289 (Oxford Univ. Press, Illes, Judy, ed., 2005).Google Scholar
Zoloth, Laurie Being in the World, in Neuroethics: Defining the Issues in Theory, Practice and Policy 61 (Oxford Univ. Press, Illes, Judy, ed., 2005).Google Scholar
Boire, Richard G. Neurocops: The Politics of Prohibition and the Future of Enforcing Social Policy From Inside the Body, 19 J.L. & Health 215 (2004).Google Scholar
Chorvat, Terrence& McCabe, Kevin, The Brain and the Law, 359 Phil. Transactions Royal Soc'y London B. Biological Sci. 1727 (2004).Google Scholar
Ferguson, Lucy C. The Implications of Developmental Cognitive Research on “Evolving Standards of Decency” and the Imposition of the Death Penalty on Juveniles, 54 Am. U. L. Rev. 441 (2004).Google Scholar
Fugelsang, Jonathan A.& Dunbar, Kevin N., A Cognitive Neuroscience Framework for Understanding Causal Reasoning and the Law, 359 Phil. Transactions Royal Soc'y London B. Biological Sci. 1749 (2004).Google Scholar
Garland, Brent ed., Neuroscience and the Law: Brain, Mind, and the Scales of Justice (Dana Foundation 2004).Google Scholar
Gazzaniga, Michael S.& Steven, Megan S., Free Will in the 21st Century: A Discussion of Neuroscience and the Law, in Neuroscience and the Law: Brain, Mind, and the Scales of Justice 51 (Dana Foundation, Garland, Brent, ed., 2004).Google Scholar
Goodenough, Oliver R. A Neuroscientific Approach to Normative Judgment in Law and Justice, 359 Phil. Transactions Royal Soc'y London B. Biological Sci. 1709 (2004).Google Scholar
Greely, Henry T. Prediction, Litigation, Privacy, and Property: Some Possible Legal and Social Implications of Advances in Neuroscience, in Neuroscience and the Law: Brain, Mind, and the Scales of Justice 114 (Dana Foundation, Garland, Brent, ed., 2004).Google Scholar
Greene, Joshua& Cohen, Jonathan, For the Law, Neuroscience Changes Nothing and Everything, 359 Phil. Transactions Royal Soc'y London B. Biological Sci. 1775 (2004).Google Scholar
Guthrie, Chris Rachlinski, Jeffrey J. & Wistrich, Andre J., Insights From Cognitive Psychology, 54 J. Legal Educ. 42 (2004).Google Scholar
Hanson, Jon D.& Yosifon, David G., The Situational Character: A Critical Realist Perspective on the Human Animal, 93 Geo. L.J. 1 (2004).Google Scholar
Jones, Owen D. Law, Evolution, and the Brain: Applications and Open Questions, 359 Phil. Transactions Royal Soc'y London B. Biological Sci. 1697 (2004).Google Scholar
Lerner, Alan M. Using Our Brains: What Cognitive Science and Social Psychology Teach Us About Teaching Law Students to Make Ethical, Professionally Responsible, Choices, 23 QLR 643 (2004).Google Scholar
Morse, Stephen New Neuroscience, Old Problems, in Neuroscience and the Law: Brain, Mind, and the Scales of Justice 157 (Dana Foundation, Garland, Brent, ed., 2004).Google Scholar
Sanchirico, Chris W. Evidence, Procedure, and the Upside of Cognitive Error, 57 Stan. L. Rev. 291 (2004).Google Scholar
Sapolsky, Robert M. The Frontal Cortex and the Criminal Justice System, 359 Phil. Transactions Royal Soc'y London B. Biological Sci. 1787 (2004).Google Scholar
Seiden, Jessie A. The Criminal Brain: Frontal Lobe Dysfunction Evidence in Capital Proceedings, 16 Cap. Def. J. 395 (2004).Google Scholar
Spellman, Barbara A.& Schnall, Simone, Reflections of a Recovering Lawyer: How Becoming a Cognitive Psychologist–and (In Particular) Studying Analogical and Causal Reasoning– Changed My Views About the Field of Psychology and Law, 79 Chi.-Kent L. Rev. 1187 (2004).Google Scholar
Tancredi, Laurence Neuroscience Developments and the Law, in Neuroscience and the Law: Brain, Mind, and the Scales of Justice 71 (Dana Foundation, Garland, Brent, ed., 2004).Google Scholar
Beecher-Monas, Erica& Garcia-Rill, Edgar, Danger at the Edge Of Chaos: Predicting Violent Behavior in a Post-Daubert World, 24 Cardozo L. Rev. 1845 (2003).Google Scholar
Bird, Joseph S. Cognitive Neuroscience as a Model for Neural Software Patent Examination, 31 AIPLA Q.J. 273 (2003).Google Scholar
Briner, John D. Brain Trauma and the Myth of the Resilient Child, 39-MAR Trial 64 (2003).Google Scholar
Kitchin, William The Fundamental Right to Be Free of Arbitrary Categorization: The Brain Sciences and the Issue of Sex Classification, 42 Washburn L.J. 257 (2003).Google Scholar
Loue, Sana The Criminalization of the Addictions, 24 J. Legal Med. 281 (2003).Google Scholar
Morse, Stephen J. Inevitable Mens Rea, 27 Harv. J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 51 (2003).Google Scholar
Orme, Daniel R.& Johnstone, George, Clinical Neuropsychologists: Training, Credentials and Courtroom Credibility, 59 J. Mo. B. 184 (2003).Google Scholar
Reeves, Donald Mills, Mark J., Billick, Stephen & Brodie, Jonathan D., Limitations of Brain Imaging in Forensic Psychiatry, 31 J. Am. Acad. Psychiatry L. 89 (2003).Google Scholar
Siegel, David M. Psychoactive Medication and Your Client: Better Living and (Maybe) Better Law Through Chemistry, 27-DEC Champion 22 (2003).Google Scholar
Stein, Edward The Admissibility of Expert Testimony About Cognitive Science Research on Eyewitness Identification, 2 Law, Probability & Risk 295 (2003).Google Scholar
Denno, Deborah W. Crime and Consciousness: Science and Involuntary Acts, 87 Minn. L. Rev. 269 (2002).Google Scholar
Farah, Martha J. Emerging Ethical Issues in Neuroscience, 5 Nature Neuroscience 1123 (2002).Google Scholar
Karaktasanis, K. G.& Tsanakas, J. N., A Critique on the Concept of “Brain Death”, 18 Issues L. & Med. 127 (2002).Google Scholar
Moenssens, Andre A. Brain Fingerprinting - Can It Be Used to Detect the Innocence of Persons Charged With a Crime?, 70 UMKC L. Rev. 891 (2002).Google Scholar
Rachlinski, Jeffrey J.& Farina, Cynthia R., Cognitive Psychology and Optimal Government Design, 87 Cornell L. Rev. 549 (2002).Google Scholar
Risinger, Michael D. Saks, Michael J., Thompson, William C. & Rosenthal, Robert, Three Card Monte, Monty Hall, Modus Operandi and “Offender Profiling”: Some Lessons of Modern Cognitive Science for the Law of Evidence, 24 Cardozo L. Rev. 193 (2002).Google Scholar
Risinger, Michael& Loop, Jeffrey L., The Daubert/Kumho Implications of Observer Effects in Forensic Science: Hidden Problems of Expectation and Suggestion, 90 Cal. L. Rev. 1 (2002).Google Scholar
Roskies, Adina Neuroethics for the New Millenium, 35 Neuron 21 (2002).Google Scholar
Rutherford, Jane Juvenile Justice Caught Between the Exorcist and a Clockwork Orange, 51 DePaul L. Rev. 715 (2002).Google Scholar
Simon, Dan Freedom and Constraint in Adjudication: A Look Through the Lens of Cognitive Psychology, 67 Brook. L. Rev. 1097 (2002).Google Scholar
Barnden, John A.& Peterson, Donald M., Artificial Intelligence, Mindreading and Reasoning in Law, 22 Cardozo L. Rev. 1381 (2001).Google Scholar
Goodenough, Oliver R.& Prehn, Kristin, Mapping Cortical Areas Associated With Legal Reasoning and Moral Intuition, 41 Jurimetrics J. 429 (2001).Google Scholar
Jones, Owen D. Time-shifted Rationality and the Law of Law's Leverage: Behavioral Economics Meets Behavioral Biology, 95 Nw. U. L. Rev. 1141 (2001).Google Scholar
O'Hara, Erin A. Brain Plasticity and Spanish Moss In Biolegal Analysis, 53 Fla. L. Rev. 905 (2001).Google Scholar
Tazbir, Janice The Human Genome Project: Ethical and Legal Considerations for Neuroscience Nurses, 33 J Neurosci Nurs. 180 (2001).Google Scholar
Waldbauer, Jacob R.& Gazzaniga, Michael S., The Divergence of Neuroscience and Law, 41 Jurimetrics J. 357 (2001).Google Scholar
Crawford, Colin Criminal Penalties for Creating a Toxic Environment: Mens Rea, Environmental Criminal Liability Standard and the Neurotoxicity Hypothesis, 27 B.C. Envtl. Aff. L. Rev. 341 (2000).Google Scholar
McCormack, Michael J. Applying the Basic Principles of Cognitive Science to the Standard State Zoning Enabling Act, 27 B.C. Envtl. Aff. L. Rev. 519 (2000).Google Scholar
Samole, Rena M. Real Employees: Cognitive Psychology and the Adjudication of Non-Competition Agreements, 4 Wash. U. J.L. & Pol'y 289 (2000).Google Scholar
Weinstein, Janet& Weinstein, Ricardo, Before It's Too Late: Neuropsychological Consequences of Child Neglect and Their Implications for Law and Social Policy, 33 U. Mich. J.L. Ref. 561 (2000).Google Scholar
Beecher-Monas, Erica& Garcia-Rill, Edgar, The Law and the Brain: Judging Scientific Evidence of Intent, 1 J. App. Prac. & Process 243 (1999).Google Scholar
Bitz, Donald M.& Bitz, Jean S., Incompetence in the Brain Injured Individual, 12 St. Thomas L. Rev. 205 (1999).Google Scholar
Blank, Robert H. Brain Policy: How the New Neuroscience Will Change Our Lives and Our Politics (Georgetown Univ. Press 1999).Google Scholar
McMorris, Greta A. Critical Race Theory, Cognitive Psychology, and the Social Meaning of Race: Why Individualism Will Not Solve Racism, 67 UMKC L. Rev. 695 (1999).Google Scholar
Millstein, Richard A.& Leshner, Alan I., The Science of Addiction: Research and Public Health Perspectives, 3 J. Health Care L. & Pol'y 151 (1999).Google Scholar
Neuckranz, Thomas H.& Nahrstadt, Bradley C., Refuting Diagnostic and Neuropsychological Testing in Toxic Tort Cases, 23 Am. J. Trial Advoc. 19 (1999).Google Scholar
Jacobs, W. Jake& Nadel, Lynn, Neurobiology of Reconstructed Memory, 4 Psychol. Pub. Pol'y & L. 1110 (1998).Google Scholar
Lidsky, Theodore I. Schneider, Jay S. & Karpf, Dennis D., The Neuropsychologist in Brain Injury Cases, 34-JUL Trial 70 (1998).Google Scholar
Reider, Laura Toward a New Test for the Insanity Defense: Incorporating the Discoveries of Neuroscience into Moral and Legal Theories, 46 UCLAL. Rev. 289 (1998).Google Scholar
Gabor, Barcset al., Investigation of Vehicle Driving Ability in Two Diagnostic Groups of Epileptic Patients With Special Neuropsychological Approach, 16 Med. & L. 277 (1997).Google Scholar
Kulynych, Jennifer J. Psychiatric Neuroimaging Evidence: A High-Tech Crystal Ball?, 49 Stan. L. Rev. 1249 (1997).Google Scholar
McLachlan, Richard S. Medical Conditions & Driving: Legal Requirements & Approach Of Neurologists, 16 Med. & L. 269 (1997).Google Scholar
Oldershaw, John B.et al., Persistent Vegetative State: Medical, Ethical, Religious, Economic and Legal Perspectives, 1 DePaul J. Health Care L. 495 (1997).Google Scholar
Thompson, Sean K. Securities Regulation in an Electronic Age: The Impact of Cognitive Psychology, 75 Wash. U. L.Q. 779 (1997).Google Scholar
Dauer, Robert E. Evidentiary Admissibility of Evidence of Neurodiagnostic Testing Showing Frontal Brain Lesion as a Defense in a Criminal Homicide Trial, 1 Seminars in Clinical Neuropsychiatry 211 (1996).Google Scholar
Greiffenstein, M. Frank The Neuropsychological Autopsy, 75 MICH. B.J. 424 (1996).Google Scholar
Kulynych, Jennifer Brain, Mind, and Criminal Behavior: Neuroimages as Scientific Evidence, 36 Jurimetrics J. 235 (1996).Google Scholar
Martell, Daniel A. Causal Relation Between Brain Damage and Homicide: The Prosecution, 1 Seminars in Clinical Neuropsychiatry 184 (1996).Google Scholar
Mayberg, Helen S. Medical-Legal Inferences from Functional Neuroimaging Evidence, 1 Seminars in Clinical Neuropsychiatry 195 (1996).Google Scholar
Morse, Stephen J. Brain and Blame, 84 Geo. L.J. 527 (1996).Google Scholar
Relkin, Normanet al., Impulsive Homicide Associated with an Arachnoid Cyst and Unilateral Frontotempo-ral Cerebral Dysfunction, 1 Seminars in Clinical Neuropsychiatry 172 (1996).Google Scholar
Restak, Richard M. Brain Damage and Legal Responsibility, 1 Seminars in Clinical Neuropsychiatry 170 (1996).Google Scholar
Weiss, Zachary The Legal Admissibility of Positron Emission Tomography Scans in Criminal Cases: People v. Spyder Cystkopf, 1 Seminars in Clinical Neuropsychiatry 202 (1996).Google Scholar
Schacter, Daniel L. Kagan, Jerome & Leichtman, Michelle D., True and False Memories in Children and Adults: A Cognitive Neuroscience Perspective, 1 Psychol. Pub. Pol'y & L. 411 (1995).Google Scholar
Denno, Deborah W. Gender, Crime, and the Criminal Law Defenses, 85 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 80 (1994).Google Scholar
McConnell, David B. The Sevin Made Me Do It: Mental Non-Responsibility and the Neurotoxic Damage Defense, 14 Va. Envtl. L.J. 151 (1994).Google Scholar
Lelling, Andrew E. Eliminative Materialism, Neuroscience and the Criminal Law, 141 U. Pa. L. Rev. 1471 (1993).Google Scholar
Martell, D.A. Forensic Neuropsychology and the Criminal Law, 16 Law & Hum. Behav. 313 (1992).Google Scholar
Martinez, John A Cognitive Science Approach to Teaching Property Rights in Body Parts, 42 J. Legal Educ. 290 (1992).Google Scholar
Callen, Craig R. Cognitive Science and the Sufficiency of “Sufficiency of the Evidence” Tests, 65 Tul. L. Rev. 1113 (1991).Google Scholar
Denno, Deborah W. Human Biology and Criminal Responsibility: Free Will or Free Ride?, 137 U. Pa. L. Rev. 615 (1988).Google Scholar
Smith, David Randolph Legal Recognition of Neocortical Death, 71 Cornell L. Rev. 850 (1986).Google Scholar
Denno, Deborah W. Neuropsychological and Early Environmental Correlates of Sex Differences in Crime, 23 Int'l J. Neuroscience 199 (1984)Google Scholar