Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-c9gpj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T01:24:04.976Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Combined D-optimal design and generalized regression neural network for modeling of plasma etching rate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2014

Hailong You*
Affiliation:
School of Microelectronics, Xidian University, Xi’an 710071, P.R. China Key Laboratory of Wide Band-Gap Semiconductor Materials and Devices, Xi’an 710071, P.R. China
Yong Chen
Affiliation:
School of Economics and Management, Xidian University, Xi’an 710071, P.R. China
Peng Liu
Affiliation:
School of Microelectronics, Xidian University, Xi’an 710071, P.R. China Key Laboratory of Wide Band-Gap Semiconductor Materials and Devices, Xi’an 710071, P.R. China
Xinzhang Jia
Affiliation:
School of Microelectronics, Xidian University, Xi’an 710071, P.R. China Key Laboratory of Wide Band-Gap Semiconductor Materials and Devices, Xi’an 710071, P.R. China
*
Correspondence: hlyou@mail.xidian.edu.cn
Get access

Abstract

Plasma etching process plays a critical role in semiconductor manufacturing. Because physical and chemical mechanisms involved in plasma etching are extremely complicated, models supporting process control are difficult to construct. This paper uses a 35-run D-optimal design to efficiently collect data under well planned conditions for important controllable variables such as power, pressure, electrode gap and gas flows of Cl2 and He and the response, etching rate, for building an empirical underlying model. Since the relationship between the control and response variables could be highly nonlinear, a generalized regression neural network is used to select important model variables and their combination effects and to fit the model. Compared with the response surface methodology, the proposed method has better prediction performance in training and testing samples. A success application of the model to control the plasma etching process demonstrates the effectiveness of the methods.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© EDP Sciences 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

H. Ramakrishnan et al., Analysing the effect of process variation to reduce parametric yield loss, IEEE International Conference on Integrated Circuit Design and Technology and Tutorial, ICICDT. Austin, TX, USA, 2008
Sung-Woo, P. et al., Microelectron. Eng. 66, 488495 (2003)
Hsin-Te, L., Jie-Ren, S., Y. Yung-Kuang, Int. J. Adv. Manufact. Technol. 38, 674682 (2008) Google Scholar
Z.N. Mevawalla, G.S. May, M.W. Kiehlbauch, Neural networks for advanced process control, in Advanced Semiconductor Manufacturing Conference (ASMC), IEEE/SEMI, San Francisco, CA, USA, 2010
Long, Y.H., J.X. Zhang, Chin. J. Electron. 16, 6972 (2007) Google Scholar
Byungwhan, K., Bae, J.K., W.-S. Hong, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 23, 355358 (2005) Google Scholar
Stokes, D., G.S. May, IEEE Trans. Semicond. Manufact. 13, 469480 (2000) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hong, S.J., May, G.S., P. Dong-Cheol, IEEE Trans. Semicond. Manufact. 16, 598608 (2003) Google Scholar
Byungwhan, K. et al., J. Appl. Phys. 105, 113302 (2009)
Hong, S.J., G.S. May, IEEE Trans. Semicond. Manufact. 17, 408421 (2004) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, B., Lee, D., K.H. Kwon, J. Appl. Phys. 96, 36123616 (2004) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, B., K. Park, Microelectron. Eng. 77, 150157 (2005) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Specht, D.F., IEEE Trans. Neural Networks 2, 568576 (1991) CrossRef