Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-02T02:24:31.498Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An improved procedure for combining Type A and Type B components of measurement uncertainty

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2013

Get access

Abstract

The Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement describes a method of evaluating measurement uncertainty that involves attributing an underlying variance to each component of the total measurement error. Assessment of such a variance by statistical methods is known as Type A evaluation of uncertainty, while assessment by any other means is known as Type B evaluation. The involvement of degrees of freedom with Type A evaluation is in accordance with statistical theory. However, the use of “degrees of freedom” with Type B evaluation is an idea primarily developed for practicality, and might be improved upon. That idea ignores the fact that the underlying distribution of the corresponding error will often be assumed to be blunter than normal, as with a uniform distribution, and it can lead to underestimation of the total error variance. Consequently, an alternative concept for Type B evaluation is presented. The resulting analysis fits easily with the use of degrees of freedom in Type A evaluation and leads to an overall method of evaluation that often permits the proper quotation of shorter uncertainty intervals.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© EDP Sciences 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, 1995)
Welch, B.L., The significance of the difference between two means when the population variances are unequal, Biometrika 29, 350362 (1937) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welch, B.L., The generalization of “Student’s” problem when several different population variances are involved, Biometrika 34, 2835 (1947) Google Scholar
Satterthwaite, F.E., An approximate distribution of estimates of variance components, Biometrics 2, 110114 (1946) CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Willink, R., A procedure for the evaluation of measurement uncertainty based on moments, Metrologia 42, 329343 (2005) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
R. Willink, Measurement Uncertainty and Probability (Cambridge University Press, 2013)
Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology,Evaluation of measurement data – Supplement 1 to the “Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement” – Propagation of distributions using a Monte Carlo method (2006)