Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T11:32:53.110Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Planar suspended line technique based UWB-MIMO antenna having dual-band notching characteristics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 November 2020

Kirti Vyas*
Affiliation:
ECE Department, Arya College of Engineering and I.T., Kukas, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India ECE Department, MNIT, JLN Marg, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India
Rajendra Prasad Yadav
Affiliation:
ECE Department, MNIT, JLN Marg, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India
*
Author for correspondence: Kirti Vyas, E-mail: kirtivyas19@gmail.com

Abstract

This communication reports significant isolation improvement utilizing planar suspended line (PSL) technique in ultra wideband (UWB) antenna for Multiple Input Multiple Output (MIMO) application. The antenna exhibits dual-band notched characteristic in Wireless Local Area Network (WLAN) band covering 5.45–5.85 GHz range; and in 7.15–7.95 GHz range for X-band downlink operations in satellite communication. Band-notching characteristics have been obtained by employing a single Elliptical Split Ring Resonator (ESSR) placed adjacent to each microstrip feed line of the radiating element and duo of “Y”-shaped strips employed within the circular ring of individual radiating elements. Two elements antenna occupy a compact space of 20 × 36 × 1.6 mm3 exhibiting huge measured impedance bandwidth (S11/S22 < −10 dB) covering 3.1–11.5 GHz and significant isolation of >21 dB in the almost entire band of operation. The electrical performance of antennas has been analyzed in terms of various MIMO parameters. Measured results demonstrate good accord with simulated results proving the competency of proposed antenna in high-density package systems and massive MIMO applications.

Type
Antenna Design, Modelling and Measurements
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press in association with the European Microwave Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Li, Q, Feresidis, AP, Mavridou, M and Hall, PS (2015) Miniaturized double-layer EBG structures for broadband mutual coupling reduction between UWB monopoles. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 63, 11681171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhu, J, Li, S, Feng, B, Deng, L and Yin, S (2016) Compact dual-polarized UWB quasi-self-complementary MIMO/diversity antenna with band-rejection capability. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters 15, 905908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, J-Y, Zhang, F, Tian, WP and Luo, YL (2015) ACS-fed UWB-MIMO antenna with shared radiator. Electronics Letters 51, 13011302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Y-F and Wang, P (2014) Compact ACS-fed UWB antenna for diversity application. Electronics Letters 50, 13361338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wani, Z and Kumar, D (2017) Dual-band-notched antenna for UWB MIMO applications. International Journal of Microwave and Wireless Technologies 9, 381386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, B and Chakraborty, U (2019) Compact wearable MIMO antenna with improved port isolation for ultra-wideband applications. IET Microwaves Antennas & Propagation 13, 498504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, L, Du, Z, Yang, H, Ma, R, Zhao, Y, Cui, X and Xi, X (2019) Compact UWB MIMO antenna with high isolation using fence-type decoupling structure. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters 18, 16411645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radhi, AH, Nilavalan, R, Wang, Y, Al-Raweshidy, HS, Eltokhy, AA and Aziz, NA (2018) Mutual coupling reduction with a wideband planar decoupling structure for UWB–MIMO antennas. International Journal of Microwave and Wireless Technologies 10, 1143–1154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khan, MS, Capobianco, A, Iftikhar, A, Shubair, RM, Anagnosto, DE and Braaten, BD (2017) Ultracompact dual-polarised UWB MIMO antenna with meandered feeding lines. IET Microwaves, Antennas & Propagation 11, 9971002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jehangir, SS and Sharawi, MS (2017) A miniaturized UWB biplanar Yagi-like MIMO antenna system. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters 16, 23202323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, S and Pedersen, GF (2015) Mutual coupling reduction for UWB MIMO antennas with a wideband neutralization line. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters 15, 166169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadeem, I and Choi, DY (2019) Study on mutual coupling reduction technique for MIMO antennas. IEEE Access 7, 563586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diallo, A, Luxey, C, Thuc, PL, Staraj, R and Kossiavas, G (2006) Study and reduction of the mutual coupling between two mobile phone PIFAs operating in the DCS 1800 and UMTS bands. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 54, 30633074.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, G and Ray, KP (2003) Broadband Microstrip Antennas. Boston, MA: Artech House.Google Scholar
Ellis, MS, Zhao, Z, Wu, J, Nie, Z and Liu, QH (2015) Small planar monopole ultra-wideband antenna with reduced ground plane effect. IET Microwaves, Antennas & Propagation 9, 10281034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharawi, MS (2017) Current misuses and future prospects for printed multiple-input, multiple-output antenna systems. [Wireless Corner] IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine 59, 162170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathur, R and Dwari, S (2019) Compact planar reconfigurable UWB-MIMO antenna with on-demand worldwide interoperability for microwave access/wireless local area network rejection. IET Microwaves, Antennas & Propagation 13, 16841689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, X, Quan, X and Li, R (2012) A dual-broadband MIMO antenna system for GSM/UMTS/LTE and WLAN handset. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters 11, 551554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar