Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-l82ql Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-26T06:27:02.276Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Nomad-Sedentary Interethnic Relations in Iran and Afghanistan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2009

Abraham Rosman  and
Paula G. Rubel
Abraham Rosman
Affiliation:
Barnard College, Columbia University
Paula G. Rubel
Affiliation:
Barnard College, Columbia University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The following is a report of a pilot study on nomad-sedentary relations viewed in terms of exchange. The study was conducted in the Zagros Mountains of Iran and in the central Hazarajat of Afghanistan during the summer of 1971. The research involved the application in a field situation of a theoretical framework that links exchange and social structure. In previous research we had investigated the relationship between social structure and exchange in societies having a particular kind of exchange system—the potlatch. Utilizing Levi-Strausss approach to structure, we have taken certain kinds of rules, preferential marriage rules or rules of succession, and built models of social structure on the basis of such rules (Levi-Strauss, 1963). These were related to other models based upon the analysis of exchange behavior. In an earlier volume, Feasting with Mine Enemy, we demonstrated the applicability of this approach in our analysis of six Northwest Coast societies by relating their different forms of social structure to the variations they exhibited in their potlatch activity (Rosman and Rubel, 1971). The purpose of the pilot study reported on here was to apply our conceptual framework relating exchange and social structure to more complex social systems.

Type
Articles
Information
International Journal of Middle East Studies , Volume 7 , Issue 4 , October 1976 , pp. 545 - 570
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Barth, F. 1956. “Ecologic Relationships of Ethnic Groups in Swat, Pakistan,” American Anthropologist, 58:1,079–1,089.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barth, F. 1959. Political Leadership amnong Swat Pathans. London School of Economics, Monographs on Social Anthropology, No. 19. London, The Athione Press.Google Scholar
Barth, F. 1959–1960. “The Land Use Pattern of Migratory Tribes of South Persia,” Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift. Vol. 17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barth, F. 1960. “Nomadism in the Mountain and Plateau Areas of Southwest Asia,” in The Problems of tile Arid Zone. UNESCO. Pp. 341–355.Google Scholar
Barth, F. 1961. Nomads of South Persia. London, George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Barth, F. 1964. “Capital, Investment and the Social Structure of a Pastoral Nomad Group in South Persia,” in Firth, Raymond and Yamey, B. S., eds., Capital, Saving and Credit in Peasant Societies. Chicago, Aldine.Google Scholar
Barth, F. 1966. “Models of Social Organization”. Royal Anthropological Institute, Occasional Paper, No. 23.Google Scholar
Barth, F., ed. 1969. Ethnic Groups and Boundaries. New York, Little Brown.Google Scholar
Bates, D. 1971. “The Role of the State in Peasant-Nomad Mutualism,” Comparative Studies of Nomadism and Pastoralism. Anthropological Quarterly, 44, no. 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blau, P. 1964. Exchange and Power in Social Life. New York, John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Cooper, M. C. 1925. Grass. New York, G. P. Putnam's Sons.Google Scholar
Feilberg, G. 1952. Les Papis. National Musseets Skrifter, Etnogrofisk Raekke IV. Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Ferdinand, K. 1959 a. “Preliminary Notes on Hazara Culture”. Hist. Fibs. Medd. Dan. Vid. Selsk. 37, No. 5. Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Ferdinand, K. 1959 b. “Les nomades Afghans,” in J. Humlum, La Geographie de l'Afghanistan. Gyldendal, Copenhagen. Pp. 277–290.Google Scholar
Ferdinand, K. 1962 a. “Nomad Expansion and Commerce in Central Afghanistan: A Sketch of Some Modern Trends,” Folk, 4:123–159.Google Scholar
Ferdinand, K. 1962 b. “Ethnographic Notes on Chahar Aimaq, Hazara and Moghul: A Review of and Some Comments on H. F. Schurman: The Mongols of Afghanistan,” Acta Orientalia, 28: 175–203.Google Scholar
Ferdinand, K. 1969. “Nomadism in Afghanistan,” in Viehwirfschaf und Hirtenkultur: Ethnographische Studien, Foldes, L., ed. Budapest.Google Scholar
Homans, G. C. 1961. Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms. New York, Harcourt, Brace and World. Iran. National Census of Population and Housing.Google Scholar
Homans, G. C. 1966. Vols. 130, 132, 148.Google Scholar
Levi-Strauss, C. 1949. Les Structures elementaires de la parente. Paris. 2d ed., Engl. trans., 1969.Google Scholar
Levi-Strauss, C. 1963. Structural Anthropology. Jacobson, Claire and Schoepf, Brooke Grundfest, trans. New York, Basic Books.Google Scholar
Mauss, M. 1954. The Gift. Cunnison, Ian, trans. London, Cohen and West.Google Scholar
Rosman, A., and Rubel, P. G.. 1971. Feasting with Mine Enemy: Rank and Exchange among Northwest Coast Societies. New York, Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Rosman, A., and Rubel, P. G.. 1972. “The Potlatch: A Structural Analysis,” American Anthropologist, 74, 3:658–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubel, P. G. 1971. “Ethnic Identity among the Soviet Nationalities,” in Soviet Nationality Problems, Allworth, Edward, ed. New York, Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Schurman, J. F. 1962. The Mongols of Afghanistan: An Ethnography of tile Mongols and Related Peoples of Afghanistan. Central Asiatic Studies IV. Mouton.Google Scholar
Spooner, B. 1971. “Towards a Generative Model of Nomadism: Comparative Studies of Nomadism and Pastoralism,” Anthropological Quarterly 44, 3:198–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swidler, W. 1968. “Technology and Social Structure in Baluchistan and West Pakistan.” Ph.D. dissertation, Columbia University, New York.Google Scholar