Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-swr86 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T09:24:57.407Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Antenatal Screening and Risk Factors for Intrauterine Growth Retardation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2009

Margareta Wennergren
Margareta Wennergren
Affiliation:
University of Göteborg
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Antenatal risk factors in combination with symphysis-fundus distance can identify pregnancies with small infants, who can be divided in genetically small, malformed, and malnourished infants. Only the last category benefit from fetal surveillance. Maternal diseases, pregnancy complications (hypertension), and environmental factors (smoking) are connected to malnourished small infants.

Type
Antenatal Screening for Intrauterine Growth Retardation
Information
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care , Volume 8 , Supplement S1 , January 1992 , pp. 147 - 151
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Abe, S., Amagasaki, Y., Konishi, K., et al. The influence of antecedent renal disease on pregnancy. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1985, 153, 508–14.Google Scholar
2.Andreasson, B., Svenningsen, N. W., & Nordenfelt, E.Screening for viral infections in infants with poor intrauterine growth. Acta Paediatrica Scandinavica, 1981, 70, 673–76.Google Scholar
3.Bakketeig, L. S., Hoffman, H. J., & Harley, E. E.The tendency to repeat gestational age and birth weight in successive births. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1979, 136, 1086–103.Google Scholar
4.Beaufils, M., Uzan, S., Donsimoni, R., & Colau, J. C.Prevention of pre-eclampsia by early antiplatelet therapy. Lancet, 1985, i, 840–42.Google Scholar
5.Carlson, D. E.Maternal diseases associated with intrauterine growth retardation. Seminars in Perinatology, 1988, 12, 17–22.Google Scholar
6.Chiswick, M. L.Intrauterine growth retardation. British Medical Journal, 1985, 291, 845–48.Google Scholar
7.Cnattingius, S., Axelsson, O., Eklund, G., & Lindmark, G. Early pregnancy screening for intrauterine growth retardation. Early Human Development, 1984, 10.Google Scholar
8.Cnattingius, S., Axelsson, O., Eklund, G., & Lindmark, G.Screening for intrauterine growth retardation in late pregnancy. Early Human Development, 1985, 10, 225–35.Google Scholar
9.Fredrick, J., & Adelstein, P.Factors associated with low birthweight of infants delivered at term. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1978, 85, 1–7.Google Scholar
10.Galbraith, R. S., Karchmer, E. J., Piercy, W. N., & Low, J. A.The clinical prediction of intrauterine growth retardation. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1979, 133, 281–86.Google Scholar
11.Gaziano, E. P., Freeman, D. W., & Allen, T. E.Antenatal prediction of women at increased risk for infants with low birth weight. A discriminant analysis of maternal characteristics known at 24 weeks. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1981, 140, 99–107.Google Scholar
12.Hagberg, B., Hagberg, G., & Olow, I.The changing panorama of cerebral palsy in Sweden 1954–1970. III. The importance of foetal deprivation of supply. Acta Paediatrica Scandinavica, 1976, 65, 403–08.Google Scholar
13.Hill, L. M., Guzick, D., Belfar, H. L., et al. A combined historic and sonographic score for the detection of intrauterine growth retardation. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1989, 73, 291–95.Google Scholar
14.Langhoff-Roos, J., Lindmark, G., Gustavson, K.-H., et al. Relative effect of parental birth weight on infant birth weight at term. Clinical Genetics, 1987, 32, 1–9.Google Scholar
15.Mintz, G., Niz, J., Gutierrez, G., Garcia-Alonso, A., & Karchmer, S.Prospective study of pregnancy in systemic lupus erythematosus. Results of a multidisciplinary approach. Journal of Rheumatology, 1986, 13, 732–39.Google Scholar
16.Nicolaides, K. H., Bradley, R. J., Soothill, P. W., et al. Maternal oxygen therapy for intrauterine growth retardation. Lancet, 1987, i, 942–45.Google Scholar
17.Olegård, R., Sabel, K.-G., Aronsson, M., et al. Effects on the child of alcohol abuse during pregnancy. Acta Paediatrica Scandinavica. 1979, 275(suppl.), 112–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18.Ounsted, M., Moar, V., & Scott, W. A.Perinatal morbidity and mortality in small-for-dates babies: The relative importance of some maternal factors. Early Human Development, 1981, 5, 367–75.Google Scholar
19.Primhac, R. A., & Simpson, R. M.Screening small for gestational age babies for congenital infection. Clinical Pediatrics, 1982, 21, 417–20.Google Scholar
20.Rosenberg, K., Grant, J. M., & Hepburn, M.Antenatal detection of growth retardation: Actual practice in a large maternity hospital. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1982, 89, 12–15.Google Scholar
21.Ruth, V., Fyhrquist, F., Clemons, G., & Raivio, K. O.Cord plasma vasopressin, erythropoietin, and hypoxanthine as indices of asphyxia at birth. Pediatric Research, 1988, 24, 490–94.Google Scholar
22.Soothill, P. W., Nicolaides, K. H., Bilardo, C. M., & Campbell, S.Relation of fetal hypoxia in growth retardation to mean blood velocity in the fetal aorta. Lancet, 1986, ii, 1118–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23.Tejani, N. A.Recurrence of intrauterine growth retardation. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1982, 59, 329–31.Google Scholar
24.Wennergren, M., Karlsson, K., & Olsson, T.A scoring system for antenatal identification of fetal growth retardation. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1982, 89, 520–24.Google Scholar
25.Wennergren, M., Wennergren, G., & Vilbergsson, G.Obstetric characteristics and neonatal performance in a four-year small for gestational age population. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1988, 72, 615–20.Google Scholar
26.Villar, J., & Belizan, J. M.The evaluation of the methods used in the diagnosis of intrauterine growth retardation. Obstetrical and Gynecological Survey, 1986, 41, 187–99.Google Scholar
27.Vintzileos, A. M., Lodeiro, J. G., Feinstein, S. J., et al. Value of fetal ponderal index in predicting growth retardation. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1986, 67, 584–88.Google ScholarPubMed
28.Visser, G. H. A., Huisman, A., Saathof, P. W. F., & Sinnige, H. A. M.Early fetal growth retardation. Obstetric background and recurrence rate. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1986, 67, 40–43.Google Scholar
29.Wolfe, H. M., Gross, T. L., & Sokol, R. J.Recurrent small for gestational age birth. Perinatal risks and outcomes. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1987, 157, 288–93.Google Scholar
30.Yagel, S., Zacut, D., Igelstein, S., et al. In utero ponderal index as a prognostic factor in the evaluation of intrauterine growth retardation. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1987, 157, 415–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
31.Vilbergsson, G., & Wennergren, M.Fetal ponderal index as an instrument for further classification of intra-uterine growth retardation. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 1992, 71, 186–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed