Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T13:09:37.718Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Burning Issues in Health Technology Assessment and Policy Making: What's Keeping Senior Health Technology Assessment Users and Producers up at Night?

Part of: Special Collection - Policy Forums

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2020

Rebecca Trowman ,
Daniel A Ollendorf  and
Laura Sampietro-Colom
Rebecca Trowman*
Affiliation:
Health Technology Assessment International, Edmonton, Canada
Daniel A Ollendorf
Affiliation:
Tufts Medical Center, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Edmonton, Canada
Laura Sampietro-Colom
Affiliation:
Hospital Clinic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
*
Author for Corespondence Rebecca Trowman E-mail: rstiffell@htai.org
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A key working session, held as part of the Health Technology Assessment international (HTAi) Global Policy Forum meeting asks members to share “What's Keeping Me Up At Night.” Members—senior thought leaders from health technology assessment (HTA) agencies, payer organizations, industry, and the HTAi Board—share without fear or favor the thorny issues related to HTA that are challenging them now or likely to do so in the near future. This article contains a reflection on the discussions at this session over the last 2 years and focuses on the recurrent and repeated themes: internal and external stakeholder involvement in HTA processes; globalization of HTA and the future of HTA (namely innovative technologies, tide of data and the “war for talent”). While the aim of these informal sessions is not to produce solutions, it reinforces the importance of developing a truly multi-stakeholder HTA community with working relationships built on mutual trust and long-standing engagement.

Keywords

Health technology assessmentHTA processesGlobalizationFuture of HTAStakeholder involvement
Type
Perspective
Information
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care , Volume 36 , Issue 1 , 2020 , pp. 5 - 7
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Chatham House, The Royal Institute of International Affairs (2019) Chatham House Rule. Available at: https://www.chathamhouse.org/chatham-house-rule (Accessed 30 August 2019).Google Scholar
Health Technology Assessment international (HTAi) (2019) Patient and Citizen Involvement Interest Group. Available at: https://htai.org/interest-groups/pcig/ (Accessed 30 August 2019).Google Scholar
European Network for Health Technology Assessment (EUnetHTA) (2019) Vision, mission and values. Available at: https://www.eunethta.eu/about-eunethta/mission-vision-and-values/ (Accessed 30 August 2019).Google Scholar
Kristensen, FB, Husereau, D and Huić, M et al. (2019) Identifying the need for good practices in Health Technology Assessment: Summary of the ISPOR HTA Council Working Group Report on Good Practices in HTA. Value in Health 22:1, 13-20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The International Decision Support Initiative (2018) Health Technology Assessment Toolkit. Available at: https://f1000research.com/documents/7-1545 (Accessed 30 August 2019).Google Scholar
Health Technology Assessment international (HTAi) (2019) HTAi Global Policy Forum. Available at: https://htai.org/policy-forum/global-policy-forum/ (Accessed 30 August 2019).Google Scholar
Health Technology Assessment international (HTAi) (2019) HTAi Annual Meeting, Beijing 2020. Available at: https://htai2020.org/ (Accessed 30 August 2019).Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Trowman et al. supplementary material

Tables S1 and S2

Download Trowman et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 45 KB