Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gq7q9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-24T08:20:25.162Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Describing Patterns of Recovery as a Basis for Evaluating Progress

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2009

Cecily J. Partridge
Cecily J. Partridge
Affiliation:
King's College London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Collecting descriptive data on patterns of recovery from a disabling condition could provide a baseline for assessing treatment methods and for monitoring the progress of individual patients. An illustrative study of patients recovering from stroke is presented and the strengths and weaknesses of such studies are discussed.

Type
Special Section: Assessing The Technology Of Physical Therapy
Information
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care , Volume 8 , Issue 1 , Winter 1992 , pp. 55 - 61
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Bayley, N.Bayley scales of infant development. New York: Psychological Corporation, 1969.Google Scholar
2.Bobath, B.Adult hemiplegia. Evaluation and treatment. London: Wm. Heinemann, 1978.Google Scholar
3.Brunnstrom, S.Movement therapy in hemiplegia, a neurophysiological approach. Hagerstown, NJ: Harper & Row, 1970.Google Scholar
4.Carr, J. H., & Shepherd, R. B.Physiotherapy in disorders of the brain. London: Wm. Heinemann, 1980.Google Scholar
5.Fugl Meyer, A. R., Jaasko, L., Leyman, I., et al. The post stroke hemiplegic patient. Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 1975, 7, 13–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Garraway, W. M., Aktar, A. J., Hockey, L., & Prescott, R. J.Management of acute stroke in the elderly. Follow-up of a controlled trial. British Medical Journal, 1980, 281, 827–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Gesell, A., Halverson, H. M., Ilg, F. L., et al. The first five years of life. New York: Harper, 1940.Google Scholar
8.Ham, R., & Van de Ven, C. Patterns of recovery of patients with below knee amputations, (forthcoming).Google Scholar
9.Lincoln, N., & Leadbitter, D.Assessment of motor function in stroke patients. Physiotherapy, 1979, 65, 48–51.Google ScholarPubMed
10.Mulley, G. P.Practical management of stroke. London: Croom Helm, 1985.Google Scholar
11.Partridge, C. J., Johnston, M., & Edwards, S. M.Recovery from physical disability after stroke: Normal patterns as a basis for evaluation. Lancet, 1987, i, 8528, 373–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Partridge, C. J., Morris, L., & Edwards, S. M. Profiles of recovery of patients with hemiplegia following a stroke, (forthcoming).Google Scholar
13.Riley, G.Riley motor problems inventory. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services, 1976.Google Scholar
14.Sheik, K., Smith, D. S., Meade, T. W., et al. Assessments of motor function in studies of chronic disability. Rheumatology Rehabilitation, 1980, 19, 83–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar