Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-wxhwt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T02:23:23.397Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Individual Perception of Education and Treatment Versus Actual Outcome: A Theoretical Model Exemplified by an Interventional Study on Patients with Insulin-Dependent Diabetes Mellitus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2009

Margareta Furu ,
Siv Fischbein  and
Urban Rosenqvist
Margareta Furu
Affiliation:
Stockholm University
Siv Fischbein
Affiliation:
Stockholm Institute of Education
Urban Rosenqvist
Affiliation:
Karolinska Institute
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An educational model is presented that stresses the importance of the interaction between individual characteristics and intentional educational influences on outcome variation. This model is exemplified by an interventional study of patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus who, despite long-term conventional medical treatment, had been unable to achieve satisfactory hemoglobin Aic levels. Treatment modes and their importance for understanding variations in outcomes are discussed from the interactional perspective suggested in the model.

Type
Research Notes
Information
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care , Volume 10 , Issue 4 , Fall 1994 , pp. 701 - 709
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Baumrind, D.Authoritarian vs. authoritative parental control. Adolescence, 1968, 3, 255–72.Google Scholar
2.Becker, W. C. Consequences of different kinds of parental discipline. In Hoffman, M. Z. & Hoffman, L. W. (eds.), Review of child development research, vol. 1. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press, 1964, 169–208.Google Scholar
3.Bergstrand, R., Vedin, A., Wilhelmsson, C., & Wilhelmsen, L.Bias due to non-participation and heterogenous sub-groups in population surveys. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 1983, 36, 725–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Fagerlind, I. The MalmÖ study. In Mednick, S. A. & Baert, A. E. (eds.), Prospective longitudinal research: An empirical basis for the primary prevention of psychosocial disoders. London: Oxford University Press, 1981, 146–47.Google Scholar
5.Fischbein, S.Person-environment interaction in educational settings. Stockholm, Sweden: Stockholm Institute of Education, Department of Educational Research. Reports on Education and Psychology, No. 1, 1986.Google Scholar
6.Fischbein, S. Samspel mellan individförutsättningar och miljöpåverkan i individens utveckling. (Interaction between individual prerequisites and environmental influences on individual development.) In Bjorklid, P. & Fischbein, S. (eds.), Individens samspel med miljön. Ett interaktionistiskt perspektiv på pedagogik. (The individual's interplay with the environment. An interactional perspective on education.) Stockholm, Sweden: HLS’ Forlag, 1992, 43–57.Google Scholar
7.Furu, M.Life patterns and health. A longitudinal study of men from childhood to middle age. Stockholm, Sweden: Stockholm Institute of Education, Department of Educational Research. Studies in Education and Psychology, No. 20, 1985.Google Scholar
8.Furu, M. Individ-Miljö-Hälsa. (Person-Environment-Health.) In Björklid, P. & Fischbein, S. (eds.), Individens samspel med miljon. Ett interaktionistiskt perspektiv på pedagogik. (The individual's interplay with the environment. An interactional perspective on education.) Stockholm, Sweden: HLS’ Forlag, 1992, 58–66.Google Scholar
9.Holme, I., Helgeland, A., Hjermann, I. et al. , Oslo-undersökelsen — Fire års dödelighet, koronare risikofaktorer og socioökonomiske indikatorer. Tidskrift for Norsk Laegeforening, 1980, 100, 1262–66.Google Scholar
10.Lofland, J., & Lofland, L. H.Analyzing social settings. A guide to qualitative observation and analysis, (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Inc., 1984.Google Scholar
11.Reichard, P.Intensified conventional treatment in insulin dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) — long term feasibility, effects and side effects. Stockholm, Sweden: Department of Internal Medicine II, Sodersjukhuset, and Endocrinology, Karolinska sjukhuset, the Karolinska Institute, 1990.Google Scholar
12.Reichard, P., Nilsson, B.·Y., & Rosenqvist, U.The effect of long-term intensified insulin treatment on the development of microvascular complications of diabetes mellitus. New England Journal of Medicine, 1993, 329, 304–09.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Schaefer, E. S.A circumplex model for maternal behavior. Journal of Abnormal Social Psychology, 1959, 59, 226–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14.Schaefer, E. S. Converging conceptual models for maternal behavior and for child behavior. In Glidewell, J. C. (ed), Parental attitudes and child behavior. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas, 1961, 124–46.Google Scholar
15.Steinberg, L.Adolescence, (2nd ed.) New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1989.Google Scholar
16.Wilhelmsen, L., Ljungberg, S., Wedel, H., & Werkö, L. A.A comparison between participants and non-participants in primary preventive trial. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 1976, 29, 331–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17.World Health Organization. Evaluation of the strategy of health for all by the year 2000 Seventh report on the world health situation. Volume 5, Europe region. Copenhagen, Denmark: WHO Regional Office for Europe, 1986a.Google Scholar
18.World Health Organization. Targets for health for all. Targets in support of the European regional strategy for health for all. Copenhagen, Denmark: WHO Regional Office for Europe, 1986b.Google Scholar