Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T20:04:44.706Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

International comparison of the definition and the practical application of health technology assessment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 March 2005

Eva Draborg ,
Dorte Gyrd-Hansen ,
Peter Bo Poulsen  and
Mogens Horder
Eva Draborg
Affiliation:
University of Southern Denmark
Dorte Gyrd-Hansen
Affiliation:
University of Southern Denmark
Peter Bo Poulsen
Affiliation:
Muusmann Research & Consulting AS
Mogens Horder
Affiliation:
University of Southern Denmark and Odense University Hospital
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objectives: Health Technology Assessment (HTA) is defined as a policy research approach that examines the short- and long-term social consequences of the application or use of technology. Internationally different institutions have translated this definition to local contexts. In Denmark, HTA is comprehensive with focus on four aspects of the problem in question (technology [clinical evidence], economy, patient, and organization). The objective of this study is to study how the application of HTA differs across leading countries and to study the extent to which Danish HTA reports differ from foreign HTAs.

Methods: A sample of 433 HTA reports published in the period 1989–2002 by eleven leading institutions or agencies in Denmark and eight other countries were reviewed. We looked at the characteristics of the HTA with respect to focus on the four main aspects and the manner in which each aspect has been approached.

Results: The study shows health technology procedures to be the most common type of health technology assessed in HTAs and literature review to be the most often used method of analysis. Policy recommendations are only present in approximately half of the HTA reports.

Conclusions: In the HTAs one generally sees a great focus on the clinical aspect of health technologies, leaving the economic, the patient-related, and the organizational aspect much more unanalyzed. The Danish HTAs generally have a wider scope than HTAs produced in other countries and tend to focus more frequently on patient-related and organizational dimensions.

Keywords

International comparisonContent of HTA
Type
GENERAL ESSAYS
Information
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care , Volume 21 , Issue 1 , January 2005 , pp. 89 - 95
Copyright
© 2005 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Banta HD, Luce BR. 1993. Health care technology and its assessment. An international perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press;
Chan L, Topfer L-A. Health technology assessment on the Net: A guide to Internet sources of information. Edmonton: Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research & Institute of Health Economic; August 2000.
EUR-ASSESS Project Subgroup on Methodology. 1997; Methodology guidance for the conduct of health technology assessment. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 13: 186– 219.
Goodman CS. 1998; Healthcare technology assessment: Methods, framework, and role in policy making. Am J Manag Care. 4: (Special Issue) SP200– SP214.Google Scholar
Health Technology Assessment International. Available at http://www.htai.org.
International Network for Agencies in Health Technology Assessment. Available at: http://www.inahta.org.
International Society for Technology Assessment in Health Care. Available at: http://www.istahc.org.
Health Technology Assessment Database. Available at: http://nhscrd.york.ac.uk.
Jørgensen T, Hvenegaard A, Kristensen FB. 2000; Health technology assessment in Denmark. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 16: 347– 381.Google Scholar
Mears R, Taylor R, Littlejohns P, Dillon A. 2000. Review of international health technology assessments (IHTA). Project report. London: National Institute of Clinical Excellence;
Menon D, Topfer L-A. 2000; Health technology assessment in Canada. A decade in review. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 16: 896– 902.Google Scholar
National Institute of Health. 2003. Etext on health technology assessment (HTA) information resources. Bethesda, MD: National Institute of Health;
Office of Technology Assessment (OTA). 1976. Development of medical technology: Opportunities for assessment. Washington DC: US Government Printing Office;
Perry S, Gardner E, Thamer M. 1997; The status of health technology assessment worldwide. Results of an International Survey. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 13: 81– 98.Google Scholar
Poulsen PB. 1999. Health technology assessment and diffusion of health technology. Odense: Odense University Press;