Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g78kv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-27T23:23:09.624Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

LONG-TERM IMPACT OF A RESTRICTIVE LABORATORY TEST ORDERING FORM ON TUMOR MARKER PRESCRIPTIONS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 January 2003

Pierre Durieux
Affiliation:
Faculté de Médecine Broussais Hôtel Dieu
Philippe Ravaud
Affiliation:
Hôpital Bichat
Raphaél Porcher
Affiliation:
Hôpital Saint-Louis
Yvonne Fulla
Affiliation:
Hôpital Cochin
Catherine-Sophie Manet
Affiliation:
Hôpital Cochin
Stanislas Chaussade
Affiliation:
Hôpital Cochin

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the long-term impact of an intervention designed to reduce the ordering of three tumor markers frequently prescribed for gastroenterologic diseases (carcinoembryonic antigen, alpha-fetoprotein, carbohydrate antigen 19-9).

Methods: A prospective study with time series analysis in a teaching hospital. Local clinical guidelines were developed and implemented through a new order form, designed as a reminder to the physician, restricting the ordering of laboratory tests. Ratios between the number of markers ordered and number of admissions were recorded during a 3-month period before and after intervention in the whole hospital and monthly on a 4-year period in two wards of the hospital (Department of Gastroenterology and Department of Internal Medicine). To evaluate the appropriateness of tumor marker orders, audits were performed on a sample of order forms, before and after (1 month and 2 years after) the implementation of the new order form.

Results: The analysis of covariance showed a significant effect of the intervention in the hospital (p < .01), and in the Departments of Gastroenterology (p < .01) and Internal Medicine (p < .007). The decrease of tumor marker orders ranged from 25% (Internal Medicine Department) to 55% (whole hospital). A similar decrease was observed for the three studied markers. The appropriateness of prescriptions increased from 54.6% before to 73.6% after the implementation of the new order form, but decreased to 52.9% 2 years after intervention.

Conclusions: Providing a reminder to clinicians through a specific order form represents an inexpensive and easy way to implement guidelines on use of laboratory tests.

Type
GENERAL ESSAYS
Copyright
© 2003 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)