Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gvh9x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-22T15:16:37.298Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Norwegian Experiences: Competence of the Providers and Compliance to the Treatment Program for Antenatal Care in Norway

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2009

Bjørn Backe
Bjørn Backe
Affiliation:
Norwegian Institute of Hospital Research, Trondheim
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Antenatal care was established in Norway during the 1930s. Unlike the other Nordic countries, care is provided by general practitioners, not be midwives. Guidelines were first issued in 1984 after a debate about the quality of the care. This article reports providers' compliance to important parts of the guidelines.

Type
The Setting of the Problem
Information
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care , Volume 8 , Supplement S1 , January 1992 , pp. 13 - 19
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Backe, B. Quality assurance in perinatal and obstetrical care: The Norwegian approach. Australian Clinical Review, 03 1988, 13–18.Google Scholar
2.Backe, B., Bakketeig, L. S., Jacobsen, G., & Bergsjø, P.Bruk av ultralyd i svangerskapet. Tidsskrift for den Norske Lægeforening, 1987, 107, 471–73.Google Scholar
3.Backe, B., Herland, R., Jacobsen, G., et al. Evaluering av svangerskapsomsorgen. NIS-rapport 3/91. Norwegian Institute of Hospital Research, Trondheim, 1991.Google Scholar
4.Births in the Nordic countries. Registration of the outcome of pregnancy 1979–1983. NOMESKO, Reykjavik, 1987.Google Scholar
5.Braut, R. M.Helsekort for gravide. Tidsskrift for den Norske Lægeforening, 1989, 109, 1180–83.Google Scholar
6.Larssen, K. E., Bakketeig, L. S., Bergsjø, P., et al. Perinatal audit in Norway 1980. NIS-rapport 7/82, Norwegian Institute of Hospital Research, Trondheim, 1982.Google Scholar
7.Nafstad, P., & Backe, B.Bruk av ultralyd i svangerskapet i 1988. Tidsskrift for den Norske Lægeforening, 1989, 109, 2975–78.Google Scholar
8. Perinatal omsorg i Norge. Norges offentlige utredninger 1984:17, Universitetsforlaget Oslo-Bergen-Tromsø, 1984.Google Scholar
9.Røssaak, E., & Heggen, K.Omsorg eller kontroll? Tidsskrift for den Norske Lægeforening, 1987, 107, 2059–63.Google Scholar
10.Røssaak, E., & Jacobsen, G.Svangerskapsomsorgen i Møre og Romsdal. Tidsskrift for den Norske Lægeforening, 1987, 107, 959–62.Google Scholar
11.Ultrasound in pregnancy: Consensus statement. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 1987, 3, 463–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar