Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-n9wrp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-22T15:41:03.046Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Perspectives of Users of the Services

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2009

Ann Oakley
Ann Oakley
Affiliation:
University of London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article draws on social science evidence concerning the views and experiences of those using the antenatal services. It identifies several important themes in this evidence, including the need to consider pregnancy a normal process, to provide care that is sensitive to individual circumstances and that offers continuity of care throughout the antenatal period, and the obligation on providers to assess scientifically the effectiveness of the care they give.

Type
Screening for Phychosocial risk Factors
Information
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care , Volume 8 , Supplement S1 , January 1992 , pp. 112 - 122
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Cartwright, A.Health surveys in practice and in potential. London: King Edward's Hospital Fund, 1983.Google Scholar
2.Elbourne, D., Richardson, M., Chalmers, I., et al. The Newbury Maternity Care Study-A randomized controlled trial to assess a policy of women holding their own obstetric records. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1987, 94, 612–19.Google Scholar
3.Farrant, W.Stress after amniocentesis for high serum alpha-fetoprotein concentrations (letter). British Medical Journal, 1980, 281, 452.Google Scholar
4.Garcia, J. Women's views of antenatal care. In Enkin, M. & Chalmers, I. (eds.), Effectiveness and satisfaction in antenatal care. London: Spastics International Medical Publications, 1982.Google Scholar
5.Graham, H., & McKee, L.The first months of motherhood. London: Health Education Council, 1979.Google Scholar
6.Hall, M., Macintyre, S., & Porter, M.Antenatal care assessed. Aberdeen: Aberdeen University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
7.Lancet. Routine vaginal examination at antenatal booking (editorial). Lancet, 1988, 20, 432–33.Google Scholar
8.Lumley, J., & Astbury, J. Advice for pregnancy. In Chalmers, I., Enkin, M., & Kierse, M. (eds.), Effective care in pregnancy and childbirth. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
9.Oakley, A., Rajan, L., & Grant, A.Social support and pregnancy outcome. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1990, 97, 155–62.Google Scholar
10.Oakley, A.Women confined: Towards a sociology of childbirth. Oxford: Martin Robertson, 1980.Google Scholar
11.Romito, P.Women's paid and unpaid work and pregnancy outcome: A discussion of some open questions. Health Promotion, 1989, 4, 31–41.Google Scholar
12.Social Services Committee. Perinatal and neonatal mortality. London: HMSO, 1980.Google Scholar
13.Zander, L. I., Watson, M., Taylor, R. W., & Morrell, D. C.Integration of general practitioner and specialist antenatal care. Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 1978, 455–58.Google Scholar