Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-fmk2r Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-15T11:15:32.630Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Physicians' Influence on the Decision to Acquire Magnetic Resonance Imagers in Acute Care Hospitals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2009

Leonard H. Friedman  and
Jane Jorgensen
Leonard H. Friedman
Affiliation:
Oregon State University
Jane Jorgensen
Affiliation:
Oregon State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The influences of four principal types of decision makers on the acquisition of magnetic resonance imagers were measured in hospitals in Southern California, Oregon, and Washington. We propose that of the decision makers assessed, physicians had the most influence on the acquisition of magnetic resonance imagers.

Type
General Essays
Information
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care , Volume 10 , Issue 4 , Fall 1994 , pp. 667 - 674
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Bautz, J., Schectman, J., Elinsky, E., & Pawlson, L. G.Magnetic resonance imaging: Diffusion of technology in an ambulatory setting. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 1992, 2, 301–08.Google Scholar
2.Coile, R.The new medicine: Reshaping medical practice and health care management. Rockville, MD: Aspen Publications, 1990.Google Scholar
3.Duncan, W. L., Ginter, P., & Swayne, L.Strategic management in health care organizations. Boston, MA: PWS-Kent Publishing Company, 1992.Google Scholar
4.Foote, S.Managing the medical arms race: Public policy and medical device innovation. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1992.Google Scholar
5.Friedman, L.Adoption of technological innovations in acute care hospitals.Ph.D. dissertation.Los Angeles, CA: University of Southern California, 1991.Google Scholar
6.Greer, A. L.Adoption of medical technology: The hospital's three decision systems. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 1985, 1, 669–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Greer, A. L.The state of the art versus the state of science. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 1988, 4, 5–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Herdmann, R., Wagner, J., Wolfe, L. et al. , Health technology and health reform. Cancer Investigation, 1993, 3, 337–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Hoppszallern, S., Hughes, C., & Zimmermann, R.Update in technology diffusion. Hospitals, 04 20, 1991, 56–58.Google ScholarPubMed
10.James, A. E., Perry, S., Warner, S. et al. , The diffusion of medical technology: Free enterprise and regulatory models in the USA. Journal of Medical Ethics, 1991, 17, 150–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Johansen, K., & Racoveanu, N.Big ticket health technology: Is rational utilization possible? Medical Progress Through Technology, 1991, 17, 85–91.Google ScholarPubMed
12.Meyer, A.Mingling decision making metaphors. Academy of Management Review, (1984), 9, 6–17.Google Scholar
13.Rakich, J., Longest, B., & Darr, K.Managing health services organizations, 3rd ed.Baltimore, MD: Health Professions Press, 1992.Google Scholar
14.Renshaw, L., Kimberly, J., & Schwartz, J. S. Technology diffusion and ecological analysis: The case of magnetic resonance imaging.Mick, S. et al. (eds.), Innovations in health care delivery: Insights for organizational theory. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1990.Google Scholar
15.Rogers, E.Diffusion of innovation, 3rd ed. New York, NY: The Free Press, 1983.Google Scholar
16.Schrieber, G., & Poullier, J.International health spending: Issues and trends. Health Affairs, 1991, 1, 106–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Schwartz, W., & Mendelson, D.Why managed care cannot contain hospital costs without rationing. Health Affairs, 1992, 2, 100–07.Google Scholar
18.Shortell, S., Morrison, E., & Friedman, B.Strategic choices for America's hospitals. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1992.Google Scholar
19.Steinberg, E., Sisk, J., & Locke, K.The diffusion of magnetic resonance imagers in the United States and worldwide. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 1985, 1, 499–514.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20.Stout, H. Clinton's health plan must face huge costs of a person's last days. Wall Street Journal, 04 22, 1993, sec. 1, p. 1.Google Scholar
21.Tannon, C., & Rogers, E. Diffusion research methodology: Focus on health care organizations. In Gordon, G. & Fisher, G. L. (eds.), The diffusion of medical technology. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing, 1978, 51–78.Google Scholar
22.Umbdenstock, R. The role of the board and its trustees. In Wolper, L. & Pena, J. (eds.), Health care administration: Principles and practices. Rockville, MD: Aspen Publications, 1987, 51–57.Google Scholar