Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-n9wrp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T06:21:22.337Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Register Studies and Clinical Studies in the Evaluation of Antenatal Care

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2009

Olav Meirik
Olav Meirik
Affiliation:
World Health Organization
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The advantages and limitations of national registers containing individual identification numbers in clinical epidemiological research are reviewed. The author concludes that such registers are very valuable for epidemiological research and for formulation of research questions of public health importance.

Type
Methodological Considerations in the Evaluation of Antenatal Care Programs
Information
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care , Volume 8 , Supplement S1 , January 1992 , pp. 46 - 48
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Bradford Hill, A.The environment and disease: Association or causation? Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine, 1965, 58, 295–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Cnattingius, S., Ericson, A., Gunnarskog, J., & Källén, B.Quality study of a medical birth registry. Scandinavian Journal of Social Medicine, 1990, 18, 143–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Feinstein, A. R.Scientific standards in epidemiologic studies of the menace of daily life. Science, 1988, 242, 1257–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Mcllwaine, G. M., Howat, R. C. L., Dunn, F., & Macnaughton, M. C.The Scottish perinatal mortality survey. British Medical Journal, 1979, 2, 1103–06.CrossRefGoogle Scholar