Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Moher, David
Jadad, Alejandro R
Nichol, Graham
Penman, Marie
Tugwell, Peter
and
Walsh, Sharon
1995.
Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: An annotated bibliography of scales and checklists.
Controlled Clinical Trials,
Vol. 16,
Issue. 1,
p.
62.
Nony, P
Cucherat, M
Haugh, MC
and
Boissel, JP
1997.
Standardization of terminology in meta‐analysis: a proposal for working definitions.
Fundamental & Clinical Pharmacology,
Vol. 11,
Issue. 6,
p.
481.
van Tulder, Maurits W.
Assendelft, Willem J. J.
Koes, Bart W.
and
Bouter, Lex M.
1997.
Method Guidelines for Systematic Reviews in the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group for Spinal Disorders.
Spine,
Vol. 22,
Issue. 20,
p.
2323.
Saint, Sanjay
Elmore, Joann G
Sullivan, Sean D
Emerson, Scott S
and
Koepsell, Thomas D
1998.
The efficacy of silver alloy-coated urinary catheters in preventing urinary tract infection: a meta-analysis.
The American Journal of Medicine,
Vol. 105,
Issue. 3,
p.
236.
Dealey, Carol
1998.
Obtaining the evidence for clinically effective wound care.
British Journal of Nursing,
Vol. 7,
Issue. 20,
p.
1236.
Ioannidis, John PA
and
Lau, Joseph
1998.
Can quality of clinical trials and meta-analyses be quantified?.
The Lancet,
Vol. 352,
Issue. 9128,
p.
590.
Verhagen, Arianne P.
de Vet, Henrica C.W.
de Bie, Robert A.
Kessels, Alphons G.H.
Boers, Maarten
Bouter, Lex M.
and
Knipschild, Paul G.
1998.
The Delphi List.
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology,
Vol. 51,
Issue. 12,
p.
1235.
Ray, Joel G.
1998.
Meta-analysis of Nifedipine versus Beta-sympathomimetic Agents for Tocolysis during Preterm Labour.
Journal SOGC,
Vol. 20,
Issue. 3,
p.
259.
Henry, D.
Robertson, J.
O'connell, D.
and
Gillespie, W.
1998.
A systematic review of the skeletal effects of estrogen therapy in postmenopausal women. I. An assessment of the quality of randomized trials published between 1977 and 1995.
Climacteric,
Vol. 1,
Issue. 2,
p.
92.
Moher, D.
and
Schulz, K.F.
1998.
Randomized controlled trials in cancer: Improving the quality of their reports will also facilitate better conduct.
Annals of Oncology,
Vol. 9,
Issue. 5,
p.
483.
Moher, David
Pham, Ba'
Jones, Alison
Cook, Deborah J
Jadad, Alejandro R
Moher, Michael
Tugwell, Peter
and
Klassen, Terry P
1998.
Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?.
The Lancet,
Vol. 352,
Issue. 9128,
p.
609.
Clark, Michael
1998.
Removing the ‘Estimates And Guesses’ from Practice - Evidence Based Tissue Viability.
Journal of Tissue Viability,
Vol. 8,
Issue. 2,
p.
3.
Ray, Joel G.
1999.
The Efficacy and Safety of Beta-Blockers for the Treatment of Hypertension during Pregnancy: What the Trials Can and Cannot Tell Us.
Journal SOGC,
Vol. 21,
Issue. 7,
p.
670.
Ibrahim, Ezzeldin M.
and
Stuart, Robert K.
1999.
Evidence-Based Medicine for the New Millennium: Critical Appraisal and Pragmatic Approach.
Annals of Saudi Medicine,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 4,
p.
295.
Leng, Gillian C.
Royle, Elizabeth M.
and
Fowkes, F. G. R.
1999.
Venous Disease.
p.
192.
Kjaergard, Lise Lotte
Nikolova, Dimitrinka
and
Gluud, Christian
1999.
Randomized clinical trials inHepatology: Predictors of quality.
Hepatology,
Vol. 30,
Issue. 5,
p.
1134.
Berk, Paul D.
and
Sacks, Henry S.
1999.
Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: Quality of design is not the only relevant variable.
Hepatology,
Vol. 30,
Issue. 5,
p.
1332.
Etminan, Mahyar
and
Levine, Mitchell
1999.
Interpreting Meta‐Analyses of Pharmacologic Interventions: The Pitfalls and How to Identify Them.
Pharmacotherapy: The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 6,
p.
741.
Cleophas, Ton J.
1999.
Human Experimentation.
p.
90.
Vamvakas, E. C.
1999.
Risk Management in Blood Transfusion: The Virtue of Reality.
p.
147.