Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-l4ctd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-26T07:18:47.271Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Diffusion of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scanners in a Changing U.S. Health Care Environment

II. How Experiences with X-ray Computed Tomography Influenced Providers' Plans for Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scanners

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2009

Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Our assessment of influences affecting MRI acquisition, described in Part I of this paper, also elicited interesting parallels between the acquisition, operation, and marketing of this new technology and experiences with x-ray computed tomography (CT). We noted that acquirers' personal experiences with CT and how individuals perceived the occurrences surrounding the diffusion of CT in general strongly determined their approach to MRI. Specifically, we found that potential and actual acquirers of MRI had learned three categories of lessons from experiences with CT: (a) “Optimal” timing for acquiring MRI; (b) how acquisition decisions are made; and (c) how to best acquire, operate, and market MRI.

Type
General Essays
Information
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care , Volume 3 , Issue 4 , October 1987 , pp. 554 - 559
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Baker, S. R.The diffusion of high technology in medical innovation: The computed tomography scanner example. Social Science Medicine, 1979, 130, 155–162.Google Scholar
2.Brust, J. C. M., Dickinson, P. C. T., & Healton, E. B.Failure of CT sharing in a large municipal hospital. New England Journal of Medicine, 1981, 304, 388–393.Google Scholar
3.Fuchs, V. R.The battle for control of health care. Health Affairs, 1982, Summer, 5–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Marasco, J. A. Jr, Memo to the membership. ACR Bulletin, 1985, 06, 2–3.Google Scholar
5.Mekell, D.Alternative delivery systems. Administrative Radiol, 1985, Summer, 29–31.Google Scholar
6.Reimbursement for magnetic resonance imaging services. Medicare Carriers Manual, Part 3, 1985, 11, 5–81.Google Scholar
7.Relman, A. S.The new medical-industrial complex. New England Journal of Medicine, 1980, 303, 963–970.Google Scholar
8.Rollo, F. D.The role of hospitals and physicians in technology diffusion. Journal of Health Care Technology, 1984, 1, 121–132.Google ScholarPubMed
9.Rollo, F. D.Corporate practice of medicine and radiology: A glimpse into your future. Paper presented at the Radiology Summit Meeting, 08, 1985.Google Scholar
10.Starr, P.The social transformation of American medicine. New York: Basic Books, 1982, 420–449.Google Scholar