Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T19:45:34.977Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Breeding chickpea (Cicer arietinum [Fabaceae]) for better seed quality inadvertently increased susceptibility to adzuki bean beetle (Callosobruchus chinensis [Coleoptera: Bruchidae])

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 January 2012

Gemechu Keneni ,
Endashaw Bekele ,
Muhammad Imtiaz ,
Emana Getu ,
Kifle Dagne  and
Fassil Assefa
Gemechu Keneni*
Affiliation:
Holetta Agricultural Research Center, PO Box 2003, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia College of Natural Sciences, Addis Ababa University, PO Box 1176, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
Endashaw Bekele
Affiliation:
College of Natural Sciences, Addis Ababa University, PO Box 1176, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
Muhammad Imtiaz
Affiliation:
International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA), PO Box 5466, Aleppo, Syria
Emana Getu
Affiliation:
College of Natural Sciences, Addis Ababa University, PO Box 1176, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
Kifle Dagne
Affiliation:
College of Natural Sciences, Addis Ababa University, PO Box 1176, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
Fassil Assefa
Affiliation:
College of Natural Sciences, Addis Ababa University, PO Box 1176, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
*
*E-mail: gemechukeneni@yahoo.com
Get access

Abstract

Continuous breeding efforts in Ethiopia resulted in the release of 15 improved chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) varieties with improved yield, seed quality, disease resistance and better adaptation to different production zones within Ethiopia. This study was conducted to examine whether breeding for increased yield and other important agronomic traits without direct selection for resistance to the adzuki bean beetle (Callosobruchus chinensis L.) has inadvertently resulted in a significant level of susceptibility to this seed pest within the new cultivars. Field and laboratory studies were conducted to see whether breeding for better seed quality has increased susceptibility to infestation by the adzuki bean beetle. Seeds of 130 accessions/genotypes were infested with the beetle in 2009 under ambient temperature and relative humidity at Holetta, Ambo and Debre Zeit, Ethiopia. Data were recorded on attributes of infestation level and seed damage. Data on seed size, proportion of seed coat and grain yield were collected from a replicated field trial conducted with the same accessions/genotypes grown under the same conditions in 2009/10 at Ginchi and Ambo, Ethiopia. Differences among the genotypes were significant for most traits with the exception of the number of uninfested seeds. Accessions with partial resistance include 41320, 41289, 41291, 41134, 41315, 207658, 41103, 41168, 41142, 41174, 41029, 41207, 209087, 231327, 41161 and 41008. The improved varieties were more susceptible than germplasm accessions. The results indicate that genetic progress was achieved both in grain yield and seed size, but breeding efforts for these traits had also inadvertently increased seed susceptibility to C. chinensis. Improvements in seed size resulted in higher infestation levels and seed damage. Future breeding to improve seed quality should simultaneously consider corrective measures to incorporate resistance to the adzuki bean beetle.

Keywords

adzuki bean beetlebreeding progressCallosobruchus chinensischickpeaCicer arietinumEthiopia
Type
Research Paper
Information
International Journal of Tropical Insect Science , Volume 31 , Issue 4 , December 2011 , pp. 249 - 261
Copyright
Copyright © ICIPE 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acosta-Gallegos, J. A., Kelly, J. D. and Gepts, P. (2008) Prebreeding in common bean and use of genetic diversity from wild germplasm. Crop Science 48, 3–16.Google Scholar
Ahmed, K., Khalique, F., Afzal, M., Tahir, M. and Malik, B. A. (1989) Variability in chickpea (C. arietinum L.) genotypes for resistance to Callosobruchus maculates F. (Bruchidae). Journal of Stored Products Research 25, 91–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alemayehu, M. (2005) Post harvest losses in chickpea caused by bruchids and management of Callosobruchus chinensis using botanicals in Enemay Woreda. MSc thesis, Alemaya University, Ethiopia.Google Scholar
Ali, K. and Habtewold, T. (1994) Research on insect pests of cool-season food legumes, pp. 367–396. In Cool-Season Food Legumes of Ethiopia. Proceedings of the First National Cool-Season Food Legumes Review Conference, 16–20 December 1993, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. ICARDA/IAR. ICARDA, Syria.Google Scholar
Aslam, M., Shaheen, F. A., Abbas, M. A. and Saba, A. (2006) Management of Callosobruchus chinensis Linnaeus through use of resistance in stored chickpea varieties. World Journal of Agricultural Sciences 2, 82–84.Google Scholar
Bejiga, G. and van der Maesen, L. J. G. (2006) Cicer arietinum L., pp. 42–46. In Plant Resources of Tropical Africa 1: Cereals and Pulses. PROTA Foundation, Wageningen, Netherlands/Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, Netherlands/CTA, Wageningen, Netherlands.Google Scholar
Bekele, E. (1985) The biology of cereal landrace population I. Problems of gene conservation, plant breeding selection schemes and sample size requirement. Hereditas 103, 119–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bezawuletaw, K. (1999) Genetic gain in grain yield potential and associated agronomic traits in Ethiopian haricot bean (Phaseolus vulgarus L) varieties. MSc thesis, Alemaya University, Ethiopia.Google Scholar
Central Statistics Agency/CSA (2009) Agricultural Sample Survey 2008/2009 (2001 E.C.), Volume I: Area and Production of Crops, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.Google Scholar
Chen, H. M., Liv, C. A., Kuo, C. G., Chien, C. M., Sun, H. C., Huang, C. C., Lin, Y. C. and Ku, H. M. (2007) Development of molecular marker for a bruchid (Callosobruchus chinensis) resistance gene in mungbean. Euphytica 157, 113–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, T. S., Ben-Huli, L. S., Stears, R. G. and Martin, T. J. (1988) Genetic improvement in agronomic traits of hard red winter wheat cultivars from 1919 to 1987. Crop Science 28, 756–760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cubero, J. I. (1987) Morphology of chickpea, pp. 35–66. In The Chickpea. C.A.B. International, Wallingford, Oxon.Google Scholar
Damte, T. and Dawd, M. (2006) Chickpea, lentil and grass pea insect pest research in Ethiopia: a review, pp. 260–273. In Food and Forage Legumes of Ethiopia: Progress and Prospects. Proceedings of a Workshop on Food and Forage Legumes, 22–26 September 2003, Addis, Ababa, Ethiopia. ICARDA, Aleppo, Syria.Google Scholar
Desroches, P., Elshazly, E., Mandon, N., Duc, G. and Huignard, J. (1995) Development of Callosobruchus chinensis (L.) and C. maculatus (F.) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) L. in seeds of Vicia faba differing in tannin, convicine and vicine contents. Journal of Stored Products Research 31, 83–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
EARO (Ethiopian Agricultural Research Organization) (2000) National Crop Research Strategy. Ethiopian Agricultural Research Organization (EARO), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. 52 pp.Google Scholar
Egli, D. B. (2008) Soybean yield trends from 1972–2003 in mid-western USA. Field Crops Research 106, 53–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falconer, D. S. (1989) Introduction to Quantitative Genetics, 3rd edn. Longman, London.Google Scholar
Fekadu, W. (2010) Assessment of genetic improvement in grain yield potential, malting quality and associated traits of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) in Ethiopia. MSc thesis, Haramaya University, Ethiopia.Google Scholar
Gomez, K. A. and Gomez, A. (1984) Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. John Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
IBPGR, ICRISAT and ICARDA (1993) Descriptor for Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). IBPGR, Rome Italy/ICRISAT, Patancheru, India/ICARDA, Aleppo, Syria.Google Scholar
Jarso, M., Keneni, G. and Wolabu, T. (2011) Enhancing the technical relevance of pulses and oilseed crops through target oriented breeding, pp. 45–65. In Oilseeds: Engine for economic development. Proceedings of the Second National Oilseeds Workshop, 24–26 March 2010, Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research (EIAR), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.Google Scholar
Kassie, M., Shiferaw, B., Asfaw, S., Abate, T., Muricho, G., Ferede, S., Eshete, M. and Assefa, K. (2009) Current situation and future outlooks of the chickpea sub-sector in Ethiopia. ICRISAT and EIARhttp://www.icrisat.org/tropicallegumesII/pdfs/Current_Situation.pdf.Google Scholar
Keneni, G. and Simane, B. (2003) Implications of geographic origin and botanical sub-species for parental selection in genetic enhancement of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Journal of Genetics and Breeding 57, 93–100.Google Scholar
Keneni, G. and Wakjira, A. (2004) Genetic uniformity of crop cultivars: challenges and opportunities, pp. 1–9. In SEBIL. Vol. 10. Proceedings of the 10th Annual Conference of the Crop Science Society of Ethiopia. 19–21 June 2001, EARO, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.Google Scholar
Keneni, G., Bekele, E., Getu, E., Imtiaz, M., Dagne, K. and Asefa, F. (2011) Characterization of Ethiopian chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) germplasm accessions for response to infestation by Adzuki bean beetle (Callosobruchus chinensis L.). I. Performance evaluation. Ethiopian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 21 (1&2), 41–65.Google Scholar
Keneni, G., Jarso, M. and Asmamaw, B. (2002) The role of drainage and genotype in improving productivity of faba bean on waterlogged Vertisols. Ethiopian Journal of Natural Resources 4, 49–60.Google Scholar
Lale, N. E. S. and Kolo, A. A. (1998) Susceptibility of eight genetically improved local cultivars of cowpea to Callosobruchus maculatus F. (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) in Nigeria. International Journal of Pest Management 44, 25–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemma, L. (1990) The biology and control of the adzuki been beetle (Callosobruchus chinensis L.) on chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). MSc thesis, Alemaya University, Ethiopia.Google Scholar
Lirie, E. (2010) Genetic gain and genotype x environment interaction in grain yield, oil content and associated traits of linseed (Linum usitatissimum L.) in Ethiopia. MSc thesis, Haramaya University, Ethiopia.Google Scholar
Little, T. M. and Hills, F. J. (1978) Agricultural Experimentation: Design and Analysis. John Wiley and Sons, New York.350 pp.Google Scholar
MoARD/Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development (2009) CROP Variety Register. Issue No. 12. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.Google Scholar
Muehlbauer, F. J. and Tullu, A. (1997) Cicer arietinum L. NewCROP FactSHEET:http://www.hort.purdue.edu/newcrop/cropfactsheets/chickpea.html#Origin.Google Scholar
Pacheco, I. A., Bolonhezi, S., Sartori, M. R., Turatti, J. M., Paula, D. C. and de Lourencao, A. L. (1994) Resistance to bruchids, fatty acid composition and grain texture in genotypes of chickpea. Bragantia 53, 61–74.Google Scholar
Rubenstein, D. K., Heisey, P., Shoemaker, R., Sullivan, J. and Frisvold, G. (2005) Crop genetic resources: An economic appraisal. United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). Economic Information Bulletin No. 2, www.ers.usda.gov.Google Scholar
SAS Institute (1996) SAS/STAT Guide for Personal Computers, version 6.12 edition. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.Google Scholar
Shaheen, F. A., Khaliq, A. and Aslam, M. (2006) Resistance of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cultivars against pulse beetle. Pakistan Journal of Botany 38, 1237–1244.Google Scholar
Singh, K. B. (1987) Chickpea breeding, pp. 127–162. In M. C. Saxena and K. B. Singh (eds),The Chickpea. C.A.B. International, Wallingford, Oxon.Google ScholarPubMed
Somta, P., Ammaranan, C., Ooi, P. A. C. and Srinives, P. (2007) Inheritance of seed resistance of bruchids in cultivated mungbean (Vigna radiate L. Wilezek). Euphytica 155, 47–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarekegn, A. (1994) Yield potential of rainfed wheat in the central highlands of Ethiopia. MSc thesis, Alemaya University of Agriculture, Alemaya, Ethiopia.Google Scholar
Teklu, Y. (1998) Genetic gain in grain yield potential and associated agronomic traits of tef (Eragrosis tef [Zucc.] Trotter). MSc thesis, Alemaya University, Ethiopia.Google Scholar
Temesgen, T. (2008) Genetic gain and morpho-agronomic basis of genetic improvement in grain yield potential achieved by faba bean (Vicia faba L.) breeding in Ethiopia. MSc thesis, Hawassa University, Ethiopia.Google Scholar
Upadhyaya, H. D., Furman, B. J., Dwivedi, S. L., Udupa, S. M., Gowda, S. L. L., Baum, M., Crouch, J. H., Buhariwalla, H. K. and Singh, S. (2006) Development of a composite collection for mining germplasm possessing allelic variation for beneficial traits in chickpea. Plant Genetic Resources 4, 13–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ustun, A., Allen, F. L. and English, B. C. (2001) Genetic progress in soybean of the U.S. Midsouth. Crop Science 41, 993–998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waddington, S. R., Ransom, S. R., Osamanzi, M. and Sounders, D. A. (1986) Improvement in the yield potential of bread wheat adapted to North West Mexico. Crop Science 26, 699–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, P. C. and Singh, U. (1987) Nutritional quality and the evaluation of quality in breeding programs, pp. 329–356. In M. C. Saxena and K. B. Singh (eds), The Chickpea. C.A.B. International, Wallingford, Oxon.Google Scholar
Winter, P., Staginnus, C., Huettel, B., Jungmann, R., Pfaff, T., Benko-Iseppon, A.-M., Rakshit, S., Pinkert, S., Baum, M. and Kahl, G. (2004) Architecture and maps of the chickpea genome: a basis for understanding plant-rhizobium interactions, pp. 201–222. In Symbiotic Nitrogen Fixation: Prospects for Enhanced Application in Tropical Agriculture. Oxford & IBH Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd, New Delhi.Google Scholar
Worku, M. and Zelleke, H. (2007) Advances in improving harvest index and grain yield of maize in Ethiopia. East African Journal of Sciences 1, 112–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yadav, S. S., Kumar, J., Yadav, S. K., Singh, S., Yadav, V. S., Turner, N. C. and Redden, R. (2006) Evaluation of Helicoverpa and drought resistance in Desi and Kabuli chickpea. Plant Genetic Resources 4, 198–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar