No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Immunization of rabbits with Rhipicephalus appendiculatus antigen–antibody complexes
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 September 2011
Abstract
Adult ticks of Rhipicephalus appendiculatus were fed on rabbits immunized with antigen–antibody complexes derived from the immunodiffusion reaction in agarose of tick extracts with antisera from rabbits immunized previously with tick extracts. Ticks feeding on the precipitin complex immunized rabbits displayed delayed attachment, prolonged engorgement and extended periods to drop off the host. While final engorgement weight was not affected, the immunization was observed to produce an adverse effect on egg hatchability. Fewer than 10% eggs from ticks fed on immunized animals hatched live larvae compared to greater than 90% live hatchings from ticks fed on controls. The tick antigens responded to by the immunized rabbits were characterized by crossed immunoelectrophoresis. Antisera from precipitin complex immunized animals precipitated four to five separate antigens from immunizing extracts. One (or more) of these antigens may be the target for the observed deleterious effect on tick reproduction.
Résumé
Les tiques adultes Rhipicephalus appendiculatus sont nourries sur des lapins immunisés avec le complexe antigène–anticorps dérivé de la réaction d'immunodiffusion dans l'agarose des extraits des tiques avec les antisera provenant des lapins préalablement immunisés avec les extraits des tiques.
Les tiques nourries sur des lapins immunisés avec le complexe precipité montrent un attachement labile, un engorgement prolongé et des périodes extensibles pour se détacher de l'animal hôte. Alors que le poids de l'engorgement final n'est pas affecté, l'immunisation observée produit un effet adverse sur l'habileté d'attachement de l'oeuf.
A peine quelque 10% d'oeufs provenant des tiques nourries sur des animaux immunisés lâchent des larves vivantes comparées à plus de 90% des larves lâchées par des tiques nourries sur des animaux contrôlles.
Les antigènes des tiques répondant aux lapins immunisés sont carectérisés par immunoélectrophorèse croisée. Les antisera provenant des animaux immunisés avec le complexe précipitent quatre à cinq antigènes séparables à partir des extraits d'immunisation. Un ou plusieurs de ces antigènes peuvent être des cibles pour l'observation de l'effet de déletion sur la reproduction des tiques.
Keywords
Rhipicephalus appendiculatusantigensantiserumantigen–antibody complexesimmunizationimmunodiffusionimmunoelectrophoresiscrossed-immunoelectrophoresisreproductive potentialRhipicaphalus appendiculatisantigènesantiserumcomplexe antigene–anticorpsimmunizationimmunodiffusionimmunoelectrophorese croisée de s'alimenterpotentiel de reproduction
- Type
- Research Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © ICIPE 1986
References
REFERENCES
Ackerman, S., Floyd, M. and Sonenshine, D. E. (1980) Artificial immunity to Dermacentor variabilis (Acari: Ixodidae): Vaccination using tick antigens. J. med. Ent. 17, 391–397.Google Scholar
Ackerman, S., Clare, F. B., McGill, T. W. and Sonenshine, D. E. (1981) Passage of host serum components, including antibody, across the digestive tract of Dermacentor variabilis (Say). J. Parasit. 67, 737–740.Google Scholar
Allen, J. R., Doube, B. M. and Kemp, D. H. (1977) Histology of bovine skin reactions to Ixodes holocyclus Neumann. Can. J. comp. Med. 41, 26–35.Google Scholar
Allen, J. R. and Humphreys, S. J. (1979) Immunization of guinea pigs and cattle against ticks. Nature 280, 491–493.Google Scholar
Bailey, K. P. (1960) Notes on the rearing of Rhipicephalus appendiculatus and their infection with Theileria parva for experimental transmission. Bull, epizoot. Dis. Afr. 8, 33–43.Google Scholar
Balashov, Y. S. (1972) Bloodsucking ticks (Ixodidea)—vectors of disease of man and animals. Misc. Publ. ent. Soc. Am. 8, 161–376.Google Scholar
Bennet, G. F. (1974) Oviposition of Boophilus microplus (Canestrini) (Acarina: Ixodidae). I. Influence of tick size on egg production. Acarologia 16, 52–61.Google Scholar
Brossard, M. (1976) Relations immunologiques entre bovins et tiques, plus particulierement entre bovins et Boophilus microplus. Acta trop. 33, 15–16.Google Scholar
Brown, S. J., Shapiro, S. Z. and Askenase, P. W. (1984) Characterization of tick antigens inducing host immune resistance. I. Immunization of guinea pigs with Amblyomma americanum-derived salivary gland extracts and identification of an important salivary gland protein antigen with guinea pig anti-tick antibodies. J. Immun. 133, 3319–3325.Google Scholar
Diehl, P. A., Aeschlimann, A. and Obenchain, F. D. (1982) Tick reproduction: Oogenesis and oviposition. In Physiology of Ticks (Edited by Obenchain, F. D. and Galun, R.), pp. 277–350. Pergamon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Harrington, J. C., Fenton, J. W. and Pert, J. H. (1971) Polymer-induced precipitation of antigen-antibody complexes: “Precipiplex” reactions. Immunochemistry 8, 413–421.Google Scholar
Hornsleth, A., Mordhorst, C. H. and Pedersen, I. R. (1980) New method for production of influenza A virus specific antisera: Employment of precipitate obtained by immunoelectrophoretic techniques as antigen. J. immun. Meth. 39, 95–110.Google Scholar
Irvin, A. D. and Brocklesby, D. W. (1970) Rearing and maintaining Rhipicephalus appendiculatus in the laboratory. J. Inst. Anim. Tech. 21, 106–112.Google Scholar
Kroll, J. and Andersen, M. (1976) Specific antisera produced by immunization with precipitin lines. J. immun. Meth. 13, 125–130.Google Scholar
Lowry, O. H., Rosebrough, N. J., Farr, A. L. and Randall, R. J. (1951) Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J. biol. Chem. 1983, 265–275.Google Scholar
McGowan, M. J., Homer, J. T., O'Dell, G. V., McNew, R. W. and Barker, R. W. (1980) Performance of ticks fed on rabbits inoculated with extracts derived from homogenized ticks Amblyomma maculatum Koch (Acarina:Ixodidae). J. Parasit. 66, 42—48.Google Scholar
Ouchterlony, O. (1958). Diffusion-in-gel methods for immunological analysis. In Progress in Allergy (Edited by Kallos, P.), Vol. 5, pp. 1–78. Karger, Basel.Google Scholar
Rechav, Y., Parolis, H., Whitehead, G. B. and Knight, M. M. (1977) Evidence for an assembly pheromone(s) produced by males of the bont tick Amblyomma hebraeum (Acarina:Ixodidae). J. med. Ent. 14, 71–78.Google Scholar
Schlein, Y., Spira, D. T. and Jacobson, R. L. (1976) The passage of serum immunoglobulins through the gut of Sarcophaga falculata, Pand. Ann. trop. Med. Parasit. 70, 227–230.Google Scholar
Taussig, M. J. (1977) Antigenic competition. In The Antigens (Edited by Sela, M.), Vol. 4, pp. 333–368. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Trager, W. (1939) Further observations on acquired immunity to the tick Dermacentor variabilis Say. J. Parasit. 25, 137–139.Google Scholar
Wharton, R. H. (1976) Tick-borne livestock diseases and their vectors. 5. Acaricide resistance and alternative methods of tick control. Wld A. Rev. 20, 8–15.Google Scholar
Wharton, R. H. and Roulstone, W. J. (1970) Resistance of ticks to chemicals. A. Rev. Ent. 15, 381—404.Google Scholar
Wikel, S. K. (1981) The induction of host resistance to tick infestation with a salivary gland antigen. Am. J. trop. Med. Hyg. 30, 284–288.Google Scholar
Wikel, S. K. and Allen, J. R. (1976) Acquired resistance to ticks. II. Effects of cyclophosphamide on resistance. Immunology 30, 479–484.Google Scholar
Wikel, S. K. and Allen, J. R. (1982) Immunological basis of host resistance to ticks. In Physiology of Ticks (Edited by Obenchain, F. D. and Galun, R.), pp. 169–196. Pergamon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar