Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T14:25:28.407Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Studies on the legume pod-borer, Maruca testulalis (Geyer)—VI. Cowpea resistance to oviposition and larval feeding

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2011

G. A. MacFoy ,
Z. T. Dabrowski  and
S. Okech
G. A. MacFoy
Affiliation:
The International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (ICIPE), P.O. Box 30772, Nairobi, Kenya
Z. T. Dabrowski
Affiliation:
The International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (ICIPE), P.O. Box 30772, Nairobi, Kenya
S. Okech
Affiliation:
The International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (ICIPE), P.O. Box 30772, Nairobi, Kenya
Get access

Abstract

Three cowpea cultivars, TVu 946, Ife Brown and Vita 1 were examined for resistance to the legume pod-borer, Maruca testulalis (Geyer). TVu 946 was found to be the most resistant in both the flowering and pre-flowering stages, followed by Ife Brown and Vita 1, respectively. Field and screen-house experiments show that Maruca larvae caused significantly less damage on TVu 946 than on Ife Brown and Vita 1. In addition, larval survival and development on TVu 946 was the most negatively affected. Screenhouse experiments in a choice situation clearly show non-preference of TVu 946 for oviposition by adult Maruca females, and biochemical studies show evidence of antibiosis due to nutritional and antibiotic factor(s).

Keywords

Maruca testulaliscowpea resistanceovipositionnon-preferenceantibiosisbiochemical
Type
Research Articles
Information
International Journal of Tropical Insect Science , Volume 4 , Special Issue 1-2: Crop-Borers and Emerging Strategies for their Control , June 1983 , pp. 147 - 152
Copyright
Copyright © ICIPE 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Akinfenwa, S. (1975) Bioecological study of Maruca testulalis (Geyer) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) in the Zaria area of Northern Nigeria. M.Sc. thesis. Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria, 82 pp.Google Scholar
Association of Official Analytical Chemists (1970) ‘Official Methods of Analysis’. 11th edition. Washington D.C.Google Scholar
Chapman, R. F. and Bernays, E. A. (1977) Chemical resistance of plants to insect attack. Scr. varia pont. Acad. Sci. 41, 603–643.Google Scholar
Cooper-Driver, G., Finch, S., Swain, T. and Bernays, E. (1978) Seasonal variation in secondary plant compounds in relation tothe palatability of Pteridium aquilimun. Biochemical Systemutics and Ecology 7, 177–192.Google Scholar
Dabrowski, Z. T. (1974) Bases of Plant Resistance to Pests. (In Polish). PWRL, Warszawa. 163 pp.Google Scholar
Dabrowski, Z. T., Bungu, M. and Ochieng, R. S. (1983) Studies on the legume pod-borer. Maruca testudalis (Geyer)—III. Methods used in cowpea screening for resistance. Insect Sci. Application 4, 141–145.Google Scholar
Ezueh, M. I. (1981) The biological bases of resistance in cowpea to the cowpea moth, Cydia pytchora (Lepidoptera: Olethreutidae). Ann. appl. Biol. 99, 313–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackai, L. E. N. (1981) Relationship between cowpea crop phenology and field infestation by the legume pod-borer. Maruca testulalis. Ann ent. Soc. Am. 74, 402–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackai, L. E. N. (1982) A field screening technique for resistance of cowpea (Vigna unyuiculata) to the pod-borer Maruca testulalis (Geyer) (Lepidoptera:Pyralidae) Bull, ent. Res. 72, 145–156.Google Scholar
Kogan, M. (1974) Plant resistance in pest management. In Introduction to Insect Pest Management (Edited by Metcalf, R. L. and Luckmann, W. H.), pp. 103–146. John Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Kogan, M. and Ortman, E. E. (1978) Antixenosis—a newterm proposed to replace Painter's ‘Non-preference’ modality of resistance. Ent. Sc. Amer. Bull. 24, 175–176.Google Scholar
Okeyo-Owuor, J. B. and Ochieng, R. S. (1981) Studies on the legume pod-borer, Maruca testulalis (Geyer)—I: life cycle and behaviour. Insect Sci. Application 1, 263–268.Google Scholar
Ochieng, R. S., Okeyo-Owuor, J. B. and Dabrowski, Z. T. (1981) Studies on the legume pod-borer, Maruca testulalis (Geyer)—II: mass-rearing on natural food. Insect Sci. Application 1, 269–272.Google Scholar
Perrin, R. M. (1978) Varietal differences in the susceptibility of cowpea to larvae of the seed moth, Cydia ptychora (Mecyrick) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Bull. ent. Res. 68, 47–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pridham, J. B. (1964) Methods in Polyphenol Chemistry. Pergamon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Raman, K. V., Singh, S. S. and van Embden, H. F. (1980) Mechanisms of resistance to leaf-hopper damage in cowpea. J. econ. Ent. 73, 484–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roe, J. H. (1955) The determination of sugars in blood & spinal fluid with anthronc reagent. J. biol. Chem. 212, 335–338.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosen, H. (1957) A modified Ninhydrin calorimetric analysis for amino acids. Archs biochem. Biophys. 67, 10–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, S. R. (1978) Resistance to pests of cowpea in Nigeria. In Pests of Grain Legumes: Ecology and Control (Edited by Singh, S. R., van Embden, H. F. and Taylor, T. A.), pp. 267–279. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
Singh, S. R. and Jackai, L. E. N. (1983) The legume podborer, Maruca testulalis (Geyer): past, present and future research. Insect Sci. Application. (In Press).Google Scholar
Singh, S. R. and van Embden, H. F. (1979) Insect pests of grain legumes. A. Rev. Ent. 24, 255–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, T. A. (1967) The bionomics of Maruca testulalis Gey. (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). a major pest of cowpea in Nigeria. Jl W. Afr. Sci. Ass. 12, 111–129.Google Scholar
Taylor, T. A. (1978) Maruca testulalis: an important pest of tropical grain legumes In Pests of Grain Legumes: Ecology and Control. (Edited by Singh, S. R., van Embden, H. F. and Taylor, T. A.) pp. 193–200. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
Woodhead, S. and Bernays, E. A. (1978) The chemical basis of resistance of Sorghum bicolor to attack by Locusta migratoria. Ent. exp. appl. 24, 123–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, D. W., Geering, W. A. and Dunn, J. A. (1951) Varietal differences in the susceptibility of peas to attack by the pea moth, Laspeyresia nigricana (Steph.). Bull. ent. Res. 41, 663–677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar