Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-06T10:10:18.901Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) on Leucaena leucocephala (Fabaceae): a new host record from India and a comparative study with a population from cotton

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 January 2012

Asha Thomas
Affiliation:
Division of Entomology, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi110 012, India
Rahul Chaubey
Affiliation:
Division of Entomology, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi110 012, India
N.C. Naveen
Affiliation:
Division of Entomology, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi110 012, India
Anand Kar
Affiliation:
School of Life Sciences, Devi Ahilya University, Indore, MP, 452 017, India
V.V. Ramamurthy*
Affiliation:
Division of Entomology, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi110 012, India
*
*E-mail: vvr3@vsnl.com
Get access

Abstract

Biology, morphometrics and analyses of non-specific esterases were carried out for populations of Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) collected from leucaena [Leucaena leucocephala (Lam.) de Wit] in New Delhi, India and compared with those for cotton populations. The developmental periods of the egg, and the first to fourth instars of the leucaena populations were 6.7 ± 0.18, 4.2 ± 0.18, 3.8 ± 0.14, 3.0 ± 0.0 and 5.2 ± 0.18 days, respectively, with a total life-cycle duration of 22.9 ± 0.58 days; fecundity (62.60 ± 61.53 eggs per female) and longevity (male: 13.50 ± 0.12 days, female: 16.50 ± 0.12 days) were higher than those recorded for the cotton population, with a sex ratio (male:female) of 1:3.7 in cotton and 1:4 in leucaena. Morphometrics revealed significant differences in the length of egg, second, third and fourth instars (P < 0.05). Of the 62 measurements of the puparia analysed, 70% of those of the head, 44% of those of the thorax and 51% of those of the abdomen showed significant differences between the cotton and leucaena populations. Mapping of the host association of samples onto principal component ordination showed their significant separation according to host plants, with the first three principal components accounting for 66% of the total variation. The analysis of non-specific esterases showed two bands at Rm E0.18 and E0.23 in the cotton populations but not in the leucaena populations. So far, B. tabaci is known on leucaena only from Taiwan. The present study reports it as a new host record from India in addition to documenting the biology, morphometrics and esterases of this and a cotton population.

Type
Research Paper
Copyright
Copyright © ICIPE 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Berry, S. D., Fondong, V. N., Rey, C., Rogan, F. C. M. and Brown, J. K. (2004) Molecular evidence for five distinct Bemisia tabaci (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) geographic haplotypes associated with cassava plants in sub-Saharan Africa. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 97, 852859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Barro, P. J., Liu, S. S., Boykin, L. M. and Dinsdale, A. B. (2011) Bemisia tabaci: a statement of species status. Annual Review of Entomology 56, 119.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dinsdale, A., Cook, L., Riginos, C., Buckley, Y. M. and De Barro, P. (2010) Refined global analysis of Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Sternorrhyncha: Aleyrodoidea: Aleyrodidae) mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase 1 to identify species level genetic boundaries. Annals of Entomological Society of America 103, 196208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gill, R. J. (1990) The morphology of whiteflies. Whiteflies: Their Bionomics, Pest Status and Management. Intercept, Andover. 1346 pp.Google Scholar
Hsieh, C. H., Wang, C. H. and Ko, C. C. (2006) Analysis of Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) species complex and distribution in Eastern Asia based on mitochondrial DNA markers. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 99, 768775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jayasekera, S., Thomas, A., Kar, A. and Ramamurthy, V. V. (2010) Host correlated morphometric variations in the populations of Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius). Oriental Insects 44, 193204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jesudasan, R. W. A. and David, B. V. (1991) Taxonomic studies on Indian Aleyrodidae (Insecta: Homoptera). Oriental Insects 25, 231434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, D. R. (2003) Plant viruses transmitted by whiteflies. European Journal of Plant Pathology 109, 195219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, J. H. (1987) An identification guide to common whitefly species of the world (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae). Tropical Pest Management 32, 298322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, J. H. and Mound, L. A. (2007) An annotated checklist of the world's whiteflies (Insecta: Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae). Zootaxa 1497, 184.Google Scholar
Mound, L. A. (1963) Host correlated variation in Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae). Proceedings of the Royal Entomological Society of London (A) 38, 171180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Musa, P. D. and Ren, S. X. (2005) Development and reproduction of Bemisia tabaci (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) on three bean species. Insect Science 12, 2530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nascimento, G. D., Correa, M. G. and Reginaldo, B. (2006) Aqueous extracts of Leucaena leucocephala and Sterculia foetida to the control of Bemisia tabaci biotype B. Cience Rural (online) 36, 13531359.Google Scholar
Perring, T. M. (2001) The Bemisia tabaci species complex. Crop Protection 20, 725731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SAS Institute (2009) SAS/STAT 9.22, SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA.Google Scholar
Xu, J., De Barro, P. J. and Liu, S. S. (2010) Reproductive incompatibility among genetic groups of Bemisia tabaci supports the proposition that the whitefly is a cryptic species complex. Bulletin of Entomological Research 100, 359366.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zang, L. S., Liu, Y. Q. and Liu, S. S. (2005) A new clip cage for whitefly experimental studies. Chinese Bulletin of Entomology 42, 329331.Google Scholar