Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-c654p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-30T20:53:29.274Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Diapause in the pink bollworm: preliminary genetic analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2011

A. K. Raina
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, North Dakota State University; and USDA, SEA/AR, Metabolism and Radiation Research Laboratory, Fargo, North Dakota, U.S.A.
R. A. Bell
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, North Dakota State University; and USDA, SEA/AR, Metabolism and Radiation Research Laboratory, Fargo, North Dakota, U.S.A.
W. Klassen
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, North Dakota State University; and USDA, SEA/AR, Metabolism and Radiation Research Laboratory, Fargo, North Dakota, U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

Diapause in the pink bollworm, Pectinophora gossypiella, is a quantitative genetic character that is in turn regulated by external environmental factors. A naturally occurring non-diapause strain of the insect from south India and two diapause strains from Arizona (U.S.A.) were used in crosses to study the inheritance of diapause. The F progeny expressed a diapause response intermediate between the two parents and no clear dominance was evident for the non-diapause character. It was not possible to classify the phenotypes of backcross and F2 progeny in accordance with simple Mendelian ratios. Comparisons of reciprocal crosses indicated that the progeny from male parents of the Indian strain usually had a lesser incidence of diapause. Such sex related differences were more evident in F2 progeny and backcrosses. It is therefore concluded that diapause in the pink bollworm is inherited in a complex way and that non-diapause is not completely dominant over the diapause trait. The study also indicated that incomplete dominance for non-diapause involves a sex-linked gene.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © ICIPE 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ankersmit, G. W. and Adkisson, P. L. (1967) Photoperiodic responses of certain geographical strains of Pectinophora gossypiella (Lepidoptera). J. Insect Physiol. 13, 553564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barry, D. and Adkisson, P. L. (1966) Certain aspects of genetic factors involved in the control of larval diapause of the pink bollworm. Ann. entomol. Soc. Am. 59, 122125.Google Scholar
Bell, R. A. and Joachim, F. G. (1977) Techniques for rearing laboratory colonies of tobacco hornworms and pink bollworms. Ann. entomol. Soc. Am. 69, 365373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crow, J. F. (1957) Genetics of insect resistance to chemicals A. Rev. Ent. 2, 227246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danilevskii, A. S. (1965) Photoperiodism and Seasonal Development of Insects. Oliver & Boyd, London.Google Scholar
Hoy, M. A. (1978) Variability in diapause attributes of insects and mites: some evolutionary and practical implications. In Evolution of Insect Migration and Diapause (Ed. by Dingle, H.), pp. 101126. Springer, New York.Google Scholar
Klassen, W., Knipling, E. F. and McGuire, J. U. (1970) The potential for insect-population suppression by dominant conditional lethal traits. Ann. entomol. Soc. Am. 63, 238255.Google Scholar
Kryson, J. L. and Branson, T. F. (1977) Inheritance of diapause intensity in Diabrotica virgifera. J. Heredity 68, 415417.Google Scholar
Lakovaara, S., Saura, A., Santibanez, S. K. and Ehrman, L. (1972) Aspects of diapause and its genetics in northern drosophilids. Hereditas 70, 8996.Google Scholar
Lees, A. D. (1955) The Physiology of Diapause in Arthropods. Cambridge University Press, London.Google Scholar
MacFarlane, J. R. and Drummond, F. H. (1970) Embryonic diapause in a hybrid between two Australian species of field cricket, Teleogryllus (Orthoptera: Gryllidae). Aust. J. Zool. 18, 265272.Google Scholar
Masaki, S. (1961) Geographic variation of diapause in insects. Bull. Fac. Agric. Hirosaki Univ. 7, 6698.Google Scholar
Nagatomo, T. (1953) Genetic studies on the voltinism in the silkworm. (In Japanese.) Bull. Fac. Agric. Kagoshima Univ. 2, 170.Google Scholar
Ohmachi, F. and Masaki, S. (1964) Intercrossing and development of hybrids between the Japanese species of Teleogryllus (Orthoptera: Gryllidae). Evolution 18, 405416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearson, E. O. (1958) The Insect Pests of Cotton in Tropical Africa. Empire Cotton Growing Corp. and Commonwealth Institute of Entomology, London, pp. 164200.Google Scholar
Rabb, R. L. (1969) Diapause characteristics of two geographical strains of the tobacco hornworm and their reciprocal crosses. Ann. entomol. Soc. Am. 62, 12521256.Google Scholar
Raina, A. K. and Bell, R. A. (1974a) Influence of dryness of the larval diet and parental age on diapause in the pink bollworm Pectinophora gossypiella (Saunders). Environ. Entomol. 3, 316318.Google Scholar
Raina, A. K. and Bell, R. A. (1974b) A non-diapausing strain of pink bollworm from southern India. Ann. entomol. Soc. Am. 67, 685686.Google Scholar
Sparks, A. N., Brindley, T. A. and Penny, N. D. (1966) Laboratory and field studies of Fi progeny from reciprocal matings of biotypes of the European corn borer. J. Econ. Entomol. 59, 915921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tauber, M. J. and Tauber, C. A. (1979) Inheritance of photoperiodic responses controlling diapause. Bull, entomol. Soc. Am. 25, 125128.Google Scholar