Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-68ccn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T07:39:09.440Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Venation pattern and shape variation in wing of Antheraea assamensis (Lepidoptera: Saturniidae) of Assam, India

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

Ramesh Nath  and
Dipali Devi
Ramesh Nath*
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, Dhing College, Nagaon782123, Assam, India
Dipali Devi
Affiliation:
Seri Biotech Unit, Department of Life Sciences, Institute of Advanced Study in Science and Technology, Vigyan Path, Paschim Boragaon, Guwahati781035, Assam, India
*
*E-mail: rameshnathdhing@gmail.com
Get access

Abstract

Antheraea assamensis (Helfer, 1837) is a sericigenous insect with distinct coloration, namely green, blue, orange and yellow in their larval stages and these are multivoltine in culture. However, wild morphs with diapause are found in dense forests. In this study, the wing venation and its variation in A. assamensis were analysed using traditional as well as landmark-based morphometric methods. The venation patterns are reviewed and significant changes in veins recorded. The samples were analysed using geometric morphometric methods and other conventional statistical methods. Landmark-based data were measured among selected veins and the centroid sizes, procrustes to tangent distance of different veins were analysed. Results show significant differences in some of the veins among the intraspecies of A. assamensis. The results suggest that both visual comparison as well as a quantitative approach in A. assamensis may lead to unsound taxonomic conclusions at intraspecies level.

Keywords

genetic traitsintraspecific variationlandmarkmorphometric analysiswing venation
Type
Research Paper
Information
International Journal of Tropical Insect Science , Volume 29 , Issue 2 , June 2009 , pp. 70 - 78
Copyright
Copyright © ICIPE 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Albrecht, A. and Kalia, L. (1997) Variation of wing venation in Elachistidae (Lepidoptera: Gelechioidea): Methodology and implication to systematic. Systematic Zoology 22, 185–198.Google Scholar
Arora, G. S. and Gupta, I. J. (1979) Taxonomic studies of some of the Indian non-mulberry silkmoths (Lepidoptera: Saturniidae: Saturniinae). Memoirs of the Zoological Survey of India 16, 1–63.Google Scholar
Bier, E. (2000) Drawing lines in the Drosophila wing: initiation of wing vein development. Current Opinion in Genetics & Development 10, 393–398.Google Scholar
Bookstein, F. L. (1991) Morphometric Tools for Landmark Data: Geometry and Biology. Cambridge University Press, New York. 435 pp.Google Scholar
Bookstein, F. L. (1996) Combining the tools of geometric morphometric, In Advances in Morphometrics (edited by Marcus, L. F., Corti, M., Loy, A., Naylor, G. J. P. and Slice, D. E.). Plenum Press, New York. 587 pp.Google Scholar
De Celis, J. F. (1997) Expression and function of decapentaplegic and thick veins in the differentiation of the veins in Drosophila wing. Development 124, 1007–1018.Google Scholar
De Celis, J. F. and Fernando, J. D. B. (2003) Pattern formation of Drosophila wing: the development of the veins. Bioessays 25, 443–451.Google Scholar
Dicky, S., Erick, Y., Kokko, G., Barron, J. R., Schaalje, G. B. and Gowen, B. E. (1992) Identification of ichneumonid wasps using image analysis of wing. Systematic Entomology 17, 389–395.Google Scholar
Fibiger, M. (1990) Noctuinae I. Noctuidae Europaeae. Vol. 1. Entomological Press, Soro.Google Scholar
Hamilton, K. G. A. (1972) The insect wing. Part II. Vein homology and the archetypal wing. Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society 45, 54–58.Google Scholar
Harbach, R. E. and Kitching, I. J. (1998) Phylogeny and classification of the Culicidae (Diptera). Systematic Entomology 23, 327–370.Google Scholar
Hughes, J. and Vogler, A. P. (2004) Ecomorphological adaptation of acorn weevils to their oviposition site. Evolution 58, 1971–1983.Google Scholar
Imms, A. D. (1964) A General Textbook of Entomology. Vol. 1. Methuen and Co Ltd, London. 395 pp.Google Scholar
Jolly, M. S., Narashimhana, M. N. and Sen, S. K. (1974) Morphology of Antheraea frithi Mr (Lep Saturniidae). Indian Journal of Sericulture 13, 23–25.Google Scholar
Mutanen, M. (2005) Delimitation difficulties in species splits: a morphometric case study on the Euxoa tritici complex (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Systematic Entomology 30, 632–643.Google Scholar
Nielson, E. S. and Common, I. F. B. (1991) Lepidoptera (moths and butterflies). In The Insects of Australia (edited by Naumann, D.). Melbourne University Press, Carlton.Google Scholar
Pretorius, E. (2005) Using geometric morphometrics to investigate wing dimorphism in males and females of Hymenoptera. A case study based on the genus Tachysphex Kohl (Hymenoptera: Sphecidae: Larrinae). Australian Journal of Entomology 44, 113–121.Google Scholar
Rangaswami, G., Narashimhana, M. N., Kashibiswanathan, K., Sastry, C. R. and Jolly, M. S. (eds) (1976) Manual on Sericulture. FAO Agricultural Services Bulletin, UNO, Rome. 178 pp.Google Scholar
Rao, G. S. (1978) The new trends in ‘Eri & Muga culture’. Indian Silk 17, 43–46.Google Scholar
Richards, O. W. and Davies, R. G. (1977) Imms' General Textbook of Entomology, 10th edn. Vol. 1 (reprinted in India in 1993). Chapman & Hall, New York.Google Scholar
Rohlf, F. J. (2002) Geometric morphometrics and phylogeny, pp. 175–193. In Morphology Shape and Phylogeny (edited by MacLeod, N. and Forey, P. L.). Taylor and Francis, London.Google Scholar
Rohlf, F. J. and Slice, D. E. (1990) Extensions of the Procrustes method for the optimal superimposition of landmarks. Systematic Zoology 39, 40–59.Google Scholar
Scoble, M. J. (1992) The Lepidoptera. Form, Function and Diversity. Natural History Museum Publications, Oxford University Press, Oxford/New York. 404 pp.Google Scholar
Seth, M. K. (2000) Food plants of Muga silkworm, pp. 887–893. In Sericulture in India (edited by Agarwal, H. O. and Seth, M. K.). ISBN-211-0199-9. Bishen Singh Mahendra Pal Singh, Dehra Dun.Google Scholar
Singh, K. C. and Sen, S. K. (2001) The Natural History of Antheraea assamensis (Helfer) in India. Annotated Compendium of Muga Culture. Central Muga and Eri Research Centre, Jorhat, Government of India. 228 pp.Google Scholar
Sotavolta, O. (1964) Studies on the variation of the wing venation of certain tiger moths (Lep Arctiidae, subfam. Arctiinae). Biologica 74, 1–41.Google Scholar
Thangavelu, K., Chakraborty, A. K., Bhagawati, A. K. and Isa Md, (1988) Hand Book of Muga Culture. Central Silk Board, Bangalore. 95 pp.Google Scholar
Warren, B. C. S. (1936) Monograph of the Genus Erebia. British Museum (Natural History), London. 407 pp.Google Scholar