Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-fwgfc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-09T09:15:25.250Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

American Historians and Post-Revolutionary France

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 December 2008

Edgar Leon Newman
Affiliation:
New Mexico State University

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Essays
Copyright
Copyright © International Labor and Working-Class History, Inc. 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Refernces

1.Rule, James and Tilly, Charles, “Political Process in Revolutionary France, 1830–1832,” in Merriman, John M., ed., 1830 in France (Chicago: Franklin Watts Press, 1975); James Rule and Charles Tilly, “1830 and the Unnatural History of Revolution,” Journal of Social Issues, XXVIII (1972), 49–75.Google Scholar
2.Tilly, Charles, “How Protest Modernized in France, 1845–1855,” in Aydelotte, William O., Bogue, Allan G., and Fogel, Robert William, eds., The Dimensions of Quantitative Research in History (Princeton New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1972), 192255; Lynn Lees and Charles Tilly, “The People of June 1848,” Working Paper 70, Center for Research on Social Organization, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
3.Hobsbawm, E. J., Revolution (San Francisco: XIV International Congress of Historical Sciences, 1975).Google Scholar
4.Bernard H. Moss, “Parisian Workers and the Origins of Republican Socialism, 1830–1833,” in Merriman, ed., 1830 in France. See also Moss, , “Parisian Producers' Associations, 1830–1851: The Socialism of Skilled Workers,” Proceedings of the First Annual Meeting, Western Society for French History (Las Cruces, New Mexico: New Mexico State University Press, 1974), 165178; and Moss, “Producers' Association and the Origins of French Socialism: Ideology from Below,” Journal of Modern History, (forthcoming.)Google Scholar
5.Moss, , “Parisian Workers …”Google Scholar
6.Johnson, Christopher H., “Communism and the Working Class before Marx: The Icarian Experience,” American Historical Review, LXXVI (1971), 642689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7., Johnson, pp. 651–652.Google Scholar
8., Johnson, pp. 647–653.Google Scholar
9.Bezucha, Robert J., “The ‘Preindustrial’ Worker Movement: The Canuts of Lyon,” in Bezucha, Robert J., ed., Modern European Social History (Lexington, Mass.: D. C. Heath and Company, 1972), 118. See also Bezucha, “Aspects du conflit des classes à Lyon, 1831–1834,” Le mouvement social, no. 76 (1971), 5–26; Bezucha, The Lyon Uprising of 1834: Social and Political Conflict in the Early July Monarchy (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1974); and Bezucha, “The Revolution of 1830 and the City of Lyon,” in John M. Merriman, ed., 1830 in France.Google Scholar
10.Bezucha, , “The ‘Preindustrial’ Worker Movement …”Google Scholar
11.Merriman, John M., “The Demoiselles of the Ariège, 1829–1830,” in , Merriman, ed., 1830 in France.Google Scholar
12.Scott, Joan Wallach, The Glassworkers of Carmaux; French Craftsmen and Political Action in a Nineteenth-Century City (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1974).Google Scholar
13., Scott, pp. 4–6.Google Scholar
14.Edgar Leon Newman, “What the Crowd Wanted in the French Revolution of 1830,” in John M. Merriman, 1830 in France; Newman, , “The Popular Idea of Liberty in the French Revolution of 1830,” Proceedings of the Consortium on Revolutionary Europe, 1750–1850, 02 1974 (Gainesville, Fla.: University of Florida Press, forthcoming).Google Scholar
15.Pinkney, David H., “The Crowd in the French Revolution of 1830,” American Historical Review, LXX (1964), 117; Pinkney, The French Revolution of 1830 (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1972), pp. 252–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Pinkney, , “The Revolutionary Crowd in Paris in the 1830's,” Journal of Social History (Summer, 1972), pp. 512520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Sussman, George D.. “Carriers of Cholera and Poison Rumors in France in 1832,” Societas – A Review of Social History, III (1973), 233255.Google Scholar
18.Sussman, , “Wet-Nursing in the Early Nineteenth Century,” Proceedings of the First Annual Meeting, Western Society for French History, 179–194.Google Scholar
19.Smith, J. Harvey. “Work Routine and Social Structure in a French Village: Cruzy (Hérault) in the Nineteenth Century,” Journal of Interdisciplinary History, V (1975), 357 ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Newman, “What the Crowd Wanted …;” Newman, , “The Blouse and the Frock Coat: The Alliance of the Common People of Paris with the Liberal Leadership and the Middle Class During the Last Years of the Bourbon Restoration in France,” Journal of Modern History, XLVI (1974), 2659, especially p. 33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21.Rudé, George; The Crowd in the French Revolution (London: Oxford University Press, 1959).Google Scholar
22.Pinkney, , “The Crowd in the French Revolution of 1830.”Google Scholar
23.Ackerman, Evelyn, “The Social and Economic Development of Bonnières-sur-Seine,” in Gooch, Brison, ed.. Proceedings of the Second Annual Meeting, Western Society for French History (College Station, Tex.: Texas A & M University Press, 1975).Google Scholar
24.Newman, Edgar Leon, “Le cri du peuple: The French Socialist Worker Poets of the July Monarchy, 1830–1848,” in Lerner, Warren, ed., Proceedings of the National Endowment for the Humanities Summer Seminar on the History of Socialism, 1974 (Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, forthcoming).Google Scholar
25.But see Merriman, John, “Social Conflict in France and the Limoges Revolution of April 27, 1848,” Societas. IV (1974), 2132. Merriman shows how the workers of Limoges, acting on their own before the revolutionary journées of June 1848 in Paris, demanded the right to a job, the right to government aid to help them set up producers' cooperative associations, equality for the workers in the National Guard, and radical and socialist representatives in the Constituent Assembly. According to Merriman, this movement, which asked for both political power and producers' associations, was generally supported by the porcelain workers of Limoges and by the other workers as well, and only a massive effort of repression by the Imperial government after the coup d'état of December 2, 1851, could crush it.Google Scholar