Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-pwrkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-06T10:25:49.307Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Working-Class Consumer Power

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 December 2008

Marcel van der Linden
Marcel van der Linden
Affiliation:
International Review of Social History
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Research by labor historians on the acquisition of power by the working class tends to focus on labor relations (acquisition of power in businesses) or on political relations (power through elections, with the government, and so on). This approach overlooks the third source of labor's power, which is based on patterns of consumption resulting from the collective use of purchasing power. This essay examines this source of power. Because the topic is a virtual terra incognita, I will merely discuss a few observations and some very provisional hypotheses that are not always well substantiated.

Type
Articles
Information
International Labor and Working-Class History , Volume 46 , Fall 1994 , pp. 109 - 121
Copyright
Copyright © International Labor and Working-Class History, Inc. 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

NOTES

This essay is part of a broader study of household-centered labor activities. Also see my essays “Connecting Household History and Labour History,” in The End of Labour History?, ed. Marcel van der Linden (Cambridge, 1994), 163–73, and “Mutual Workers' Insurance: A Historical Outline” International Social Security Review 46 (1993): 5–18.

1. Deutsch, Hans, “Theoretisches aus der Sphare des Konsums,” Der Kampf 6 (1912–1913):306–12.Google Scholar

2. Karl Marx drew the following distinction between fixed and circulating capital: Fixed capital is the part of constant capital that “maintains the specific use-form in which it enters the production process. … It continues to perform the same functions over a shorter or longer period, in a series of repeated labour processes.” Examples are factory buildings and machines. Circulating capital consists of commodities that “are completely consumed in every labour process that they enter into.… They do not preserve their independent use-shape as they function.” Examples are coal for a steam engine, gas for lighting. Capital, vol.II., trans. Fernbach, David (Harmondsworth, 1978), 237–38.Google Scholar

3. Halbwachs, Maurice, La classe ouvrière et les niveaux de vie. Recherches sur la hiérarchie des besoins dans les sociétés industrielles contemporaines (Paris, 1913).Google Scholar

4. Spedden, Ernest R., The Trade Union Label (Baltimore, 1910), 73–74.Google Scholar

5. “The word was first used in Ireland, and was derived from the name of Captain Charles Cunningham Boycott (1832–1897), agent for the estates of the Earl of Erne in County Mayo. For refusing in 1880 to receive rents at figures fixed by the tenants, Captain Boycott had his life threatened, his servants compelled to leave him, his fences torn down, his letters intercepted and his food supplies interfered with.… The term soon came into common English use, and was speedily adopted by the French, Germans, Dutch and Russians.” “Boycott,” Encyclopaedia Britannica, vol. 4 (11th ed., 1910), 353.Google Scholar

6. For example, see Frank, Dana, “Gender, Consumer Organizing, and the Seattle Labor Movement, 1919–1929,” in Work Engendered: Toward a New History of American Labor, ed. Baron, Ava (Ithaca, 1991), 273–95;Google Scholar and Muraskin, William, “The Harlem Boycott of 1934: Black Nationalism and the Rise of Labor-Union Consciousness,” Labor History 13 (1972): 361–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

7. For example, see the cases described in von Heckel, Max, “Der Boykott,” Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik, 3rd ser., 10 (1895):481–500;Google ScholarWolman, Leo, The Boycott in American Trade Unions (Baltimore, 1916);Google ScholarWare, Norman J., The Labor Movement in the United States, 1860–1895 (New York, 1929), ch. 15;Google ScholarGordon, Michael A., “The Labor Boycott in New York City, 1880–1886,” Labor History 16 (1975):184–229;CrossRefGoogle ScholarCarvalho, Joseph III, “The Baughmann Boycott and its Effect on the Richmond, Virginia Labour Movement, 1886–1888,” Histoire Sociale 12 (1979):409–17;Google ScholarBlessing, Werner K., “Konsumentenprotest und Arbeitskampf. Vom Beirkrawall zum Bierboykott,” in Streik. Zur Geschichte des Arbeitskampfes in Deutschland während der Industrialisierung, ed. Tenfelde, Klaus and Volkmann, Heinrich (Munich, 1981), 109–23;Google ScholarRoberts, James S., “Drink and the Labour Movement: The Schnaps Boycott of 1909”, in The German Working Class 1888–1933. The Politics of Everyday Life, ed. Evans, Richard J. (London, 1982), 80–107.Google Scholar

8. Gyáni, Gábor, “Budapest”, in Housing the Workers 1850–1914. A Comparative Perspective, ed. Daunton, M.J. (London and New York, 1990), 175.Google Scholar See also Lichtblau, Albert, “Boykott-Krawall-Gewalt-Demonstration: Die Budapester Mieterbewegung 1906 bis 1912 und exkursive Vergleiche zu ähnlichen Vorgängen in Wien”, in Archiv 1992: Jahrbuch des Vereins für Geschichte der Arbeiterbewegung (Vienna, 1992), 65–82.Google Scholar

9. Kraak, Gerald, Breaking the Chains: Labour in South Africa in the 1970s and 1980s (London and Boulder, Colo., 1993), 210.Google Scholar

10. Bauer, Ingrid, “Der Boykott: Aktions- und Protestformen der Sozialdemokratie in der Provinz”, in “Daβ unsre Greise nicht mehr betteln gehn!”: Sozialdemokratie und Sozialpolitik im Deutschen Reich und in Österreich-Ungarn 1880 bis 1914, ed. Konrad, Helmut (Vienna and Zurich, 1991), 148.Google Scholar

11. Schacherl, Michael, “Ein viermonatlicher Bierboykott und seine Wirkung auf die Arbeiter”, Der Kampf 2 (1908–1909): 273.Google Scholar

12. The first four points reflect the analysis in Sartorius, August von Waltershausen, “Boycotten, ein neues Kampfmittel der amerikanischen Gewerkvereine”, Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik, new ser., 11 (1885):1–18, esp. 15–17. David Montgomery and I are preparing an anthology in English of Sartorius von Waltershausen's publications on the American labor movement, which will include a translation of this text.Google Scholar

13. Braun, Adolf, “Der Boykott”, Der Kampf 2 (1908–1909):411.Google Scholar

14. Ibid.

15. Bernstein, Irving, The Lean Years. A History of the American Worker, 1920–1933 (Boston, 1960), 422.Google Scholar

16. Collonges, Yann and Randal, Pierre Georges, Les autoréductions. Grèves d'usagers et luttes de classes en France et en Italie (1972–1976) (Paris, 1976), ch. 4.Google Scholar

17. Thompson, E.P., “The Moral Economy of the English Crowd in the Eighteenth Century,” in Customs in Common (Harmondsworth, 1992), 253.Google Scholar

18. Two exceptions that prove the rule are Scholz, Robert, “Ein unruhiges Jahrzehnt: Lebensmittelunruhen, Massenstreiks und Arbeitslosenkrawalle in Berlin, 1914–1923,”, in Pöbelexzesse und Volkstumulte in Berlin. Zur Sozialgeschichte der Straβe (1830–1980), ed. Gailus, Manfred (Berlin, 1984), 79–123;Google Scholar and Geyer, Martin, “Teuerungsprotest, Konsumentenpolitik und soziale Gerechtigkeit während der Inflation:München 1920–1923,” Archiv für Sozialgeschichte 30 (1990): 145–80.Google Scholar

19. Melling, Joseph, Rent Strikes. People's Struggle for Housing in West Scotland 1890–1916 (Edinburgh, 1983).Google Scholar Also see Moorhouse, Bert, Wilson, Mary, and Chamberlain, Chris, “Rent Strikes—Direct Action and the Working Class,” The Socialist Register 1972, 133–56.Google Scholar

20. Lawson, Ronald, “The Rent Strike in New York City, 1904–1980. The Evolution of a Social Movement Strategy,” Journal of Urban History 10 (1983–1984): 235–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

21. For example, see Hinton, James, “Self-help and Socialism. The Squatters' Movement of 1946”. History Workshop Journal 25 (1988): 100–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

22. Duriez, Bruno, “Les squatters: la ‘vraie justice’ contre la loi”, in La bataille des squatters et l'invention du droit au logement 1945–1955, ed. Duriez, Bruno and Chauvière, Michel (Villeneuve d'Ascq, 1992), 80.Google Scholar

23. Collonges and Randal, Les autoréductions, ch. 5; Ramirez, Bruno, “Self-Reduction of Prices in Italy”, in Midnight Oil. Work, Energy, War 1973–1992 (Brooklyn, 1992), 187–88.Google Scholar

24. Adamic, Louis, “The Great ‘Bootleg’ Coal Industry”, The Nation 40 (1935):46.Google Scholar

25. Ibid. describes the situation in Pennsylvania. A description of concurrent developments in Upper Silesia appears in Machtan, Lothar, “Die ‘Elendsschächte’ in Oberschlesien: Bergmännische Selbsthilfe-Initiativen zur Überwindung von Arbeitslosigkeit um 1930”, Jahrbuch Arbeiterbewegung–Geschichte und Theorie 1982 (Frankfurt/Main, 1982), 141–55.Google Scholar

26. Collonges and Randal, Les autoréductions ch. 3; Ramirez, “Self-Reduction of Prices”, 186.

27. Collonges and Randal, Les autoréductions, ch. 6.

28. Although no thorough comparative long-term study on the history of consumer cooperatives exists at this time, see Il movimento cooperativa nella storia d'Europa, ed. Innocenti, Maurizio Degl' (Milan, 1988);Google Scholar and Class, Labor, and Consumption: Consumer Cooperation in the Western World, 1840–1950, ed. Ellen Furlough and Carl Strikwerda (forthcoming).

29. von Studnitz, Arthur, Nordamerikanische Arbeiterverhältnisse (Leipzig, 1879), 206–7.Google Scholar

30. Pollard, Sidney, “Nineteenth-Century Co-operation: From Community Building to Shopkeeping”, in Essays in Labour History, ed. Briggs, Asa and Saville, John (London, 1960), 88.Google Scholar

31. Nomura, Hidekazu, “Consumer Co-operatives in Japan”, Kyoto University Economic Review 121 (10 1986):9.Google Scholar

32. Renner, Karl, “Skizze einer ökonomischen Theorie des Genossenschaftswesens,” Vierteljahrsschrift für Genossenschaftswesen 8 (1931):89–96.Google Scholar

33. On early capitalist competition, see Furlough, Ellen, Consumer Cooperation in France. The Politics of Consumption, 1834–1930 (Ithaca, 1991)Google Scholar, ch. 3. For problems that arose later, see Desroche, Henri, “Problèmes de développement des coopératives de consommateurs”, Archives de Sciences Sociales de la Coopération 75 (01–March 1986): 81–132;Google Scholar and Brazda, Johann and Schediwy, Robert, “Konsumgenossenschaften im Strukturwandel”, Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft 15 (1989): 63–84.Google Scholar

34. Based on their research on British retail cooperatives, C. N. Ostergaard and A. H. Halsey have already mentioned “the possible incompatibility of business efficiency and democratic control.” See Ostergaard, and Halsey, , “Democracy in British Retail Cooperatives”, Archives Internationales de Sociologie de la Coopération 1 (01–06 1957):72.Google Scholar

35. Pestoff, Victor A., Between Markets and Politics. Co-operatives in Sweden (Frank-furt/Main and Boulder, Colo., 1991), 103.Google Scholar

36. Sommer, Robert, “More Than Cheap Cheese: The Food Co-op Movement in the United States”, Research in Social Movements, Conflict and Change 7 (1984): 71–94.Google Scholar

37. For more information on this topic, see the analysis in Furlough, Consumer Cooperation in France, ch. 7.

38. Best known is the British Co-operative Women's Guild. See Gaffin, Jean and Thoms, David, Caring & Sharing. The Centenary History of the Co-operative Women's Guild (Manchester, 1983).Google Scholar On international developments, see Baulier, Françoise, “Femmes et organisations féminines dans l'Alliance Coopérative Internationale”, Archives de Sciences Sociales de la Coopération 74 (10–December 1985):10–40.Google Scholar

39. Compare Hagemann, Karen, Frauenalltag und Männerpolitik. Alltagsleben und gesellschaftliches Handeln von Arbeiterfrauen in der Weimarer Republik (Bonn, 1990), 140.Google Scholar

40. Totomianz, Vahan, “Le rôle des femmes dans la coopération”, Revue des études coopératives 6 (1926–1927):413.Google Scholar

41. Pestoff, Between Markets and Politics, 35, 47.

42. Spedden, Trade Union Label, 72–73.

43. Schacherl, “Ein viermonatlicher Bierboykott,” 273.

44. Fishman, William J., East End Jewish Radicals, 1875–1914, (London, 1975), 253. I owe this reference to Karin Hofmeester.Google Scholar

45. Bauer, “Boykott”, 146.

46. Tilly, Charles, As Sociology Meets History (New York, 1981), 151.Google Scholar

47. Laidler, Harry W., “Boycott,” in Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences, vol. 2 (New York, 1930), 665–66.Google Scholar

48. Ware, Labor Movement, 336–37.