Last updated 10th July 2024: Online ordering is currently unavailable due to technical issues. We apologise for any delays responding to customers while we resolve this. For further updates please visit our website https://www.cambridge.org/news-and-insights/technical-incident
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 December 2008
1. Wilentz would argue that when republican rhetoric is heard later in the nineteenth century it is neither conservative nor nostalgic, but intended to present a serious alternative to capitalist domination of the political conversation and as an alternative to capitalist assertions of hegemony.
2. The alienation between masters and journeymen is suggested by their alternate understandings of the usefulness of temperance. For masters, temperance was part of a larger effort to regularize the work force and alter the traditional work rhythms of the old artisan culture. But when journeymen espoused temperance, they did so as an effort at mutual aid and self-help, and offered alternate forms of frivolity rather than “pious coercion.” (149ff, 306ff)
3. See as corrective Smith, Billy G., “The Material Lives of Laboring Philadephians, 1750–1800,” William and Mary Quarterly, 3rd ser., 38 (1981): 163–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. See, for example, 33, 247. Wilentz, however, may be less at fault in the romanticization of the early republic than some of his reviewers.
5. A Vigorous Spirit of Enterprise: Merchants and Economic Development in Revolutionary Philadelphia (Chapel Hill, 1986), 17.Google Scholar
6. Nash, Gary B., “Forging Freedom: The Emancipation Experience in the Northern Seaport Cities, 1775–1820,” in Slavery and Freedom in the Age of the American Revolution, ed., Berlin, Ira and Hoffman, Ronald (Charlottesville, 1983), 3–48.Google Scholar
7. It is the practice of the editorial page of New York's most important newspaper to award metaphorical “apples” and “worms.” I award an apple to Oxford University Press for placing the footnotes at the bottom of the page, where they belong and where they can engage the reader in the process of establishing the conclusions offered in the text. But Oxford also gets two worms. One is for a boilerplate dust jacket. The other is for placing Wilentz's well-chosen illustrations in a miscellaneous group in the middle of the book rather than at the spots where they would reinforce the argumentation, and for failing to accompany the visual evidence with full citations.
